rowdyrjp
Mastermind
offline
Registered: Apr 2003
Local time: 08:43 AM
Location: canada
Posts: 787
|
Listen... I have tried and tried to understand this case...
I just don't get it.... are people such sheep of the tabloids??
HOW ON EARTH DO WE SET A PRECEDENT OF CONVICTION AND DEATH PENALTY.... WITHOUT EVIDENCE??????
Is he a likely suspect... sure.
BUT WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?
Should we routinely kill to avenge infedelity now??
Have we become as theocratic as the extremist muslim tribes in how we run a justice system??
CAN SOMEONE ANYONE EXPLAIN THIS CONVICTION TO ME?
And please do not sully the word "evidence" by placing 'circumstantial' in front of it!!!!!!!!
Circumstances should only be relevant post conviction in a sentencing phase... NOT ... NOT be the meat of the prosecution!!!
No one { no matter how unlikeable } should be convicted of a death penalty offence without physical evidence and/or eye witness testimony!! What kind of puritanical society are we developing where the suspicion of guilt and questionable morality can substitute EVIDENCE?
|
Decide if the path to a better future lies in building a better war machine or in building the relationships that will make the war machine obsolete! |
Last edited by Heavens11 on 03-17-2005 at 03:03 AM | Reason For Edit: Closed: Duplicate post
|
03-17-2005 12:58 AM
