Chat or Talk in the INReview Discussion Forum Chat or Talk in the INReview Discussion Forum
Support INReview. Please visit our sponsors and shop.
 
register chat shopping members links refer search home
INReview INReview > Archives > Politics and Law > 2004 U.S. Presidential Election > Candidate Issues > John Kerry: traitor then; traitor now - Red China
Search this Thread:
  Print Version | Email Page | Bookmark | Subscribe to Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread   
Dirk Hudson
Enthusiast

offline
Registered: Aug 2004
Local time: 09:16 PM
Location:
Posts: 52

John Kerry: traitor then; traitor now - Red China post #1  quote:



John Kerry: traitor then; traitor now

Part D: Bargain With Red China: Campaign Contributions for Market Fraud and Espionage (1996)

In 1996, Kerry's re-election campaign received a $10,000 contribution from Red Chinese agent Johnny Chung, who laundered contributions for both the Clinton/Gore '96 election campaign and for Kerry. This was at least in part for Kerry's assistance in arranging a high level meeting between aerospace companies fronting for Red Chinese military intelligence (including Lt. Col. Liu Chaoying, a high ranking PRC military intelligence operative) and the S.E.C. (D-1) One apparent objective of the Red Chinese was access to American capital markets, including loopholes and lax application of U.S. disclosure rules, allowing the PRC to fraudulently manipulate the market to swindle unsuspecting investors. (D-2) Another could be access to aerospace technology with military potential through partial control of relevant companies. (D-3)

"The legal watchdog group Judicial Watch announced the release of recently declassified documents that indicate Sen. John Kerry accepted laundered contributions from the communist Chinese government for his 1996 re-election campaign. [P] "In exchange, Judicial Watch suspects, the presidential candidate might have arranged meetings between Chinese aerospace executives and U.S. government officials. [P] "'These disturbing FBI documents raise further questions about Sen. Kerry's involvement in what looks like a quid pro quo [cash for meetings] with the communist Chinese,' said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton [P] An Insight magazine report published by WND earlier this month revealed a new photograph has emerged showing the Massachusetts senator in Beijing working with a company associated with the Chinese military." (D-4)


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Endnotes to Part D:

D-1: See Timperlake and Triplett, Year of the Rat, Washington, Regnery, 1998, p. 206.

D-2: See Year of the Rat, supra, at pp. 205-206, 222-223.

D-3: See "FBI docs say China funded Kerry: Suggest exchange with Beijing for aerospace technology," World Net Daily, August 28, 2004.

D-4: See "FBI docs say China funded Kerry:Suggest exchange with Beijing for aerospace technology," World Net Daily, August 28, 2004.


Old Post 10-12-2004 03:29 AM
Click here to Send Dirk Hudson a Private Message Find more posts by Dirk Hudson Add Dirk Hudson to your buddy list Click Here to Ignore Dirk Hudson REPORT this Post to a ModeratorNOMINATE this Post for Reward Points Reply w/Quote
Time: 05:16 AM Post New Thread   
  Print Version | Email Page | Bookmark | Subscribe to Thread
INReview INReview > Archives > Politics and Law > 2004 U.S. Presidential Election > Candidate Issues > John Kerry: traitor then; traitor now - Red China
Search this Thread:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Forum Policies Explained
 
Rate This Thread:

< - INReview.com >

Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Page generated in 0.15858889 seconds (91.08% PHP - 8.92% MySQL) with 44 queries.

ADVERTISEMENTS
Support This Site! Shop @ INReview!


© 2007, INReview.com.   Popular Forums  My Favorites All Forums   Web Hosting and Web Design by Psyphire.
INReview.com: Back to Home