|
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
Larke2000
INReview Maven
offline
Registered: May 2003
Local time: 10:37 AM
Location:
Posts: 3859
|
this post optimized for your best bill clinton internal reading voice.
"i'll admit it. i went to some of those other web sites. but i didn't enjoy them. did i look? well, maybe... it just depends on what your definition of the word look is."
"it may look... hey, did you notice that? i used the word 'look' while i'm sittin' here tryin' to describe the definition of 'look'... that's pretty funny. you know? anyhow... what was i sayin'? oh, yeah. to you, an average lay person... hot doggit i did it again. i said 'lay'. kind of reminds me of somethin' else i got in trouble for. but i don't wanna get into that right now. anyway... to the average la... uh, to the average person, 'look' may be defined as to have their eyes open and pointed in the direction of what it appears they're lookin' at. but as a highly educated former president, let me just say that i can have my eyes open and pointed right at you. like i do now. they're open and pointed right at you. but am i lookin' at you? no, of course not. i'm visifying - uh, is that a word? can somebody look that up for me right quick. well, let's just pretend that it is a word for the sake of arguement. anyway... i'm visifying out of my peripheral vision, as they call it. i'm focused on my surroundings at all times. so it may appear as though i'm looking, but actually i'm perusing all the things around me, i have no idea what's actually in front of my face. that's why that whole intern thing got me into trouble. i thought it was hilary the whole time."
"but one thing i want to be very clear about... are you listenin'? i did not have carpal relations with that keyboard" 
|
10-12-2003 03:27 AM
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
Marlene Newell
No title, Just me
offline
Registered: Jul 2003
Local time: 07:37 AM
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 1010
|
quote: |
Originally posted by Marlene Newell
Marc, I have just one question. Why is the server always "too busy" when I write my most brilliant posts? Why can't it be too busy when I write my dumbest posts? I think this cannot be random chance. This must be Marcian design.
I think Marc has single-handedly disproved the theory of naturalistic evolution.
Hooray for Marc.
Watch now, the server is going to be too busy. What do ya bet? |
Tried to edit my post, to change "Watch now, the server is going to be too busy," to "Watch now, is the server going to be too busy?" (obviously it wasn't, and since that was a dumb post, more evidence of Marcian design), and I was told I don't have access rights to my own posts. Now this has GOT to be Marcian design. No way could this be random chance.
Wow, Marc you need to publish.
P.S. I hope Marc has a good sense of humor.
If not, I'm

|
10-12-2003 08:29 AM
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |

Mike James
The One... and the Two
offline
Registered: May 2003
Local time: 09:37 AM
Location: Rice University
Posts: 1191
|
Indeed... crap.... spewed... everywhere. For jeez sake, take a look at this THREAD! We are talking about the server downtime, not Bill Clinton. This is the announcement forum, ya'll, and each one of you should get a warning for off-topic posting... but we at INReview have a good sense of humor.
With regard to the "Server Too Busy" message - when you get this message, just wait a few moments and refresh the page. All of the data you are sending will get re-transmitted, and everything should work fine. You don't have to loose your wonderful posts just because you get momentarily rejected by our server.
Yes, we are evaluating the options of replacing the INReivew server. Right now, though, the big project is setting everything up on a new system of redundant co-located servers (to aviod downtime caused by ISP uplink problems). Once that's finished, I'm sure the guy upstairs will be glad to accept your donations to the "New INReview Server/Michael and Marc's Pocket Change Foundation" 
|
10-13-2003 07:53 AM
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
Advance
In the Now Guru
offline
Registered: Feb 2004
Local time: 10:37 AM
Location:
Posts: 1459
|
quote: |
Larke2000 said this in post #9 :
this post optimized for your best bill clinton internal reading voice.
"i'll admit it. i went to some of those other web sites. but i didn't enjoy them. did i look? well, maybe... it just depends on what your definition of the word look is."
"it may look... hey, did you notice that? i used the word 'look' while i'm sittin' here tryin' to describe the definition of 'look'... that's pretty funny. you know? anyhow... what was i sayin'? oh, yeah. to you, an average lay person... hot doggit i did it again. i said 'lay'. kind of reminds me of somethin' else i got in trouble for. but i don't wanna get into that right now. anyway... to the average la... uh, to the average person, 'look' may be defined as to have their eyes open and pointed in the direction of what it appears they're lookin' at. but as a highly educated former president, let me just say that i can have my eyes open and pointed right at you. like i do now. they're open and pointed right at you. but am i lookin' at you? no, of course not. i'm visifying - uh, is that a word? can somebody look that up for me right quick. well, let's just pretend that it is a word for the sake of arguement. anyway... i'm visifying out of my peripheral vision, as they call it. i'm focused on my surroundings at all times. so it may appear as though i'm looking, but actually i'm perusing all the things around me, i have no idea what's actually in front of my face. that's why that whole intern thing got me into trouble. i thought it was hilary the whole time."
"but one thing i want to be very clear about... are you listenin'? i did not have carpal relations with that keyboard" |
hahahahahah OMG that was great. If i could nominate that post I would. Wow, I was laughing out loud on that one Thanks for making my day 
|
02-23-2004 01:43 AM
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
<
>
Copyright ?2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Page generated in 0.07781601 seconds (88.68% PHP - 11.32% MySQL) with 44 queries.
|
|
|
|