maybe it's ignored becuse there are so many stories about racism that some people think that inreview has reached saturation point with this. I did try and warn you that this would happen but you paid no attention to me.
lodgebo01 said this in post #3 : maybe it's ignored becuse there are so many stories about racism that some people think that inreview has reached saturation point with this. I did try and warn you that this would happen but you paid no attention to me.
Thats inreview's choice. All I can ( and will continue) to do is post current issues that are true. I can't controll those who want to deny reality and keep head in the sand.
I hope you haven't join those who have childishly decided to blacklist my post.
Well I don't think that anyone has blacklisted you I just think they have heard thia arguement or a varient of this arguement from you to many times and more often than not you have normally got the wrong end of the stick. Like I said I did tell you hen you maybe had a case people would be to tired to deal with it, this seems to be that time.
lodgebo01 said this in post #5 : Well I don't think that anyone has blacklisted you I just think they have heard thia arguement or a varient of this arguement from you to many times and more often than not you have normally got the wrong end of the stick. Like I said I did tell you hen you maybe had a case people would be to tired to deal with it, this seems to be that time.
I'm also tired of the # of racial incidents happening in this country but thats not an excuse for anyone these issues.
And how many time's have people blown holes nay craters in your "truth" with facts see that the problem you turned so many things that weren't racist in to a racial incident that most peopleare past arguing with you.
lodgebo01 said this in post #7 : And how many time's have people blown holes nay craters in your "truth" with facts see that the problem you turned so many things that weren't racist in to a racial incident that most peopleare past arguing with you.
Thats not true and its just your opionion. No one ( to my memory) has written anything of substance to my post, exspecially the ones invovle race.
They are the ones who make argumentt and call people names. They constantly spin posts and get angry when they are unable to gas someone with their response.
Jena6, Torture in West Virginia, Florida Boot Camp, AFRICOM, Somalia War, Reparations Demand, Katrina, Blacl decline in the military... These are issues of today. If Inreview cannot allow this then somethings wrong
Thats your problem right there in your first paragraph you disregard anyone elses point of view no matter hor legitimate.
You talking about spin, name calling getting angry Malcolm THATS YOU.
You also point out amazingly what I have said before about everything being racial, newsflash for you Somalia war, Africom, black decline in the military, and oh dear god the reperations arguement again these are not racially motivated you just want them to be and they are not the main issues today again you just want them to be.
Inreview is allowing this but people are sick of your one trick pony stories and it's your reaction when people have the audacity to debate with you that name calling etc starts up people don't need that.
lodgebo01 said this in post #9 : Thats your problem right there in your first paragraph you disregard anyone elses point of view no matter hor legitimate.
You talking about spin, name calling getting angry Malcolm THATS YOU.
You also point out amazingly what I have said before about everything being racial, newsflash for you Somalia war, Africom, black decline in the military, and oh dear god the reperations arguement again these are not racially motivated you just want them to be and they are not the main issues today again you just want them to be.
Inreview is allowing this but people are sick of your one trick pony stories and it's your reaction when people have the audacity to debate with you that name calling etc starts up people don't need that.
Are my post true?
You (and inreview) are guilty of making race the main issue of the topics I post. I guess its because you have a promblem with the facts of the topic and race is enfacized to confuse the main issue of topic.
Don't make it seem as if my post are just " trick pony stories" that are not important enough to post. Just accept reality and stop covering your eyes everytime an incident involving race happens.
The repaarations debate is far from over. I am going to have to give some history on this subject.
What about the subject of post? Is Dog Chapman racisist? (Read link before you respond.)
Jeez I can't belive I am reading this crap you and only you make things about race 90% of your posts are about race and you blame other people maybe you should re - read what you post.
Because the vast majority of your stries are about race then your posts do have that one trick pony side to them.
Now on to your stories some are justs nonsense you know it and I know it some are legit and some have more than one element that you ignore for example the reperations debate you blame the whites for buying but refuse to blame the Africans for selling when you do things like that people ignore you because you are dodging the hard issues same as when you talk about racial attacks but refuse to talk about black on white violence when you do that people won't want to address the issues anymore.
As for the reperations well check the court records Malcolm it is over and you ain't getting a penny.
As for Dog his comments were racial but his minister a black man say he is not a racist just a fool.
Just to prove my point here are a few examples of threads you started where race was one of the if not the predominant issue:
Jena 6 2 therads in breaking news
Gentrification in breaking news
Isasahi Washington in Breaking news
Shirley Q Liquer and gay blcak face comics - Agree 2 Disagree
Duke issue - Agree 2 Disagrre
What to a Black man is 4th July - Agree 2 Disagree
Death Penalty used more against blacks - Agree 2 disagree
Blacks have right to ba angry after Katrina - Racism
Tokkie Williams case - Racism
Mexico is racist - Racism
Racism in sports - Racism
Black military recruits on decline - Gen Discussion
Reperations Gen discussion and Culture and society
Atlanta police shhot 82 year old black woman - Gen Discusion
Frog Princess - Gen discussion
See a trend in that Malcolm? thats just a few you and I know there are more, now show me the posts that I started that are about race.
lodgebo01 said this in post #11 : Jeez I can't belive I am reading this crap you and only you make things about race 90% of your posts are about race and you blame other people maybe you should re - read what you post.
Because the vast majority of your stries are about race then your posts do have that one trick pony side to them.
Now on to your stories some are justs nonsense you know it and I know it some are legit and some have more than one element that you ignore for example the reperations debate you blame the whites for buying but refuse to blame the Africans for selling when you do things like that people ignore you because you are dodging the hard issues same as when you talk about racial attacks but refuse to talk about black on white violence when you do that people won't want to address the issues anymore.
As for the reperations well check the court records Malcolm it is over and you ain't getting a penny.
As for Dog his comments were racial but his minister a black man say he is not a racist just a fool.
Are the topics I post true? (yes or no)
Admiting they are legit doesn't answer the question. Because the topics are unpopular doesn't answer the question. Inreview boycotting topics doesn't answer the question.
The reparation post exposes cooperations and countries who are guilty of explotation of a race of people and the children of those exploited want the debt that was generated.
Any other topic discuss in this post throws subjest off . [ I'm not dodging any issue but the subject of he selling of Africans is not as simple as it has been said. Its a compicated ( and different) topic that deserves its own post.]
How can the demand for reparations (debt) be over when restitution has not been given?
Dog Chapman is not racist because his priest his Black? I know you don't beleivce that.
In some cases no. Howevere we are not discussing race are we you said you don't post threads that are racial and I have give you an example of how you lied.
Admiting they are legit doesn't answer the question. Because the topics are unpopular doesn't answer the question.
Sorry that doesn't makes much sense to me. MAybe you8 misunderstood my post I am, saying you have legit posts and you also have a few that are complete nonsense. What /I mean is you go into 3 forms Malcolm Legfit campiagner i.e Jena 6, Angry Black man i.e gnetrification and foolish poster i.e Frog Princess.
Inreview boycotting topics doesn't answer the question.
Inreview does not boycot anything if the mebere are sick of your spin and blind view of the past and present that is not inreviews fault is it? A good campaigner cpatures his audience look at King and toward the end of his days Malcolm X ( both of whom would be dissapointed in blacks like you)
The reparation post exposes cooperations and countries who are guilty of explotation of a race of people and the children of those exploited want the debt that was generated.
But the Africans who sold and captures the slaves are blameless in your mind how is that right, you don't think there are rrich Adfricans who made money from this what about the Annan Family in Ghana?
Any other topic discuss in this post throws subjest off . [ I'm not dodging any issue but the subject of he selling of Africans is not as simple as it has been said. Its a compicated ( and different) topic that deserves its own post.]
Yeah it's doesn't need 3 though ( found another one ).
How can the demand for reparations (debt) be over when restitution has not been given?
Becuse you don't deserve anything, how man judges is it going to take to get that across? why don't you take the case to Africa to sue the slave catchers families?
Dog Chapman is not racist because his priest his Black? I know you don't beleivce that.
Jeez have you been drinking when have made the last few posts? I never said that read it again, I said I think his osmmnets were racist but I said that his minister who is a black man does not think he is, it's part of that thing I was talking about you know seeing all the sides of the story not just the ones that suit your stance.
Jeez have you been drinking when have made the last few posts? I never said that read it again, I said I think his osmmnets were racist but I said that his minister who is a black man does not think he is, it's part of that thing I was talking about you know seeing all the sides of the story not just the ones that suit your stance.
You say most of my topics are true. Because yoy have hard time acepting facts, I will accept your opinion on integrity of posts.
Remember your answer to my legit question is your opinion. The topics you mention are based on facts. We know you result to spin and smearing of topics you don't like. Keep it up
I've move past inreview, they have the right to avoid any topic they want. ( lodgebo :tup
Your confused on demand of reparations. You need better understanding of history of this neglect. ( www.cure.com)
I ask you is Dog Chapman racists, which is subject of post. You gave your standard political answer, that lets you be not wrong to anyone questioning your response. {Its hard to debate with someone who doesn't take a postion.}
You say his comments are racists and mention this black man following on KKKramer - like media tour. This does't give us a clear answer to question.
11-13-2007 09:33 PM
I know you don't beleivce that.
