I don't know how long this image will be up. All I know is that there's some speculation that the character at the end of the show, who talks to Desmond's girlfriend... is Matthew Fox.
Can anyone get another look at it? This is lost, their budget is not an issue, so if that's him, he's there for a reason.
But, is it him?
Please pardon my pseudo-intellectuaphilisophicalismysiticality.
I saved it, and tossed it up in my photobucket acct! It DOES look like him. Damn!
I still have the episode saved, so I need to watch the ending, and see what I hear, vocally. WHY would they have Jack there though? Doesn't make sense... since he's currently on the island.
:::>^..^<::: ~*~The Journey is more important than the end or the start~*~ :::>^..^<:::
The implications, if that's him, are insane. Unless they want to go the "twin brother" route, or "remarkable look alike" coinsodense (which would have to have a purpose) then we're either talking about time travel or multiple universes.
There is an actual theory that there are multiple universes and that the only fundimental thing that omni-binds us all is gravity. A magnetic anomoly may be the two universes deflecting/attracting eachother.
I'll try to find more info on this theory, you work on that episode!
Please pardon my pseudo-intellectuaphilisophicalismysiticality.
I found a little something. I'm going to go ahead and post this even though we haven't established whether or not that's Matthew Fox. Even if it's not, this show hasn't givin us any reason to rule out multiple universes.
quote:
David Whitehouse : The first question is from James Wright, from here in the UK. He says, "Why do you think there might be other Universes out there?
Sir Martin Rees : Well I should first issue a health warning, as it were. It's all speculative. I think there are two reasons. One is that if we look at the best theories we have for how our Big Bang occurred, they suggest that it wasn't the only one; there could have been an ensemble of big bangs.
The second reason is that our Universe in many ways looks rather special, and unless you want to invoke some cosmic designer who made it that way, it's attractive so suppose that there are many universes, of all different kinds. It's less surprising that there is one universe designed for life if there's a whole ensemble of them. So there's two suggestive arguments, but they're both just arguments at the moment.
David Whitehouse : We have an e-mail for Alexander in Romania, who says "If there are other universes out there, how could we detect them? And another one from Martin Arnot if France; "Could we ever prove that there are multiple universes out there?
Sir Martin Rees : Well, we may be able to detect them by gravitational effects. But I think to put the idea on a firm basis we've got to have some advances in our theories, because at the moment, we can understand our Big Bang back to the first second, but not back to the first tiny fraction of a second. Only when we have a theory which allows us to understand that, will we be able to understand the Big Bang well enough to know if it was unique or not. Theories which allow us to understand the very early Universe will be theories which combine gravity with the forces of the micro-world - unified theories. If we had such a theory which explained things we can observe, like why electrons and protons exist, then that theory would gain credibility. We'd then have reason to take seriously these other predictions, like whether there are other universes.
David Whitehouse : But in this fascinating theory, where would the other universes be? Would we ever be able to reach them? How do they exist next to ours?
Sir Martin Rees: Well in one theory we'd never reach them. There would be separate big bangs, quite independent of the one that gave rise to ours. But there is one other rather fascinating theory which is that the universes may be separated from us, maybe just by a few millimetres, but the few millimetres may be in some extra dimension in which we can't move. So just as you can imagine bugs on a three dimensional balloon thinking they're in an unbounded two-dimensional universe, and having no concept of another nearby balloon. If this idea is correct, then there may be some gravitational transference of information. But in other variants of the multiverse idea, there would be no communication between the universes.
Looking at the picture by itself I didn't think it was him, but with the photoshopped Jack pics underneath the resemblance is uncanny! It's got to be him!
"Man is a marvelous curiosity ... he thinks he is the Creator's pet ... he even believes the Creator loves him; has a passion for him; sits up nights to admire him; yes and watch over him and keep him out of trouble. He prays to him and thinks He listens. Isn't it a quaint idea." Mark Twain
Ahem. The official guest star list for the finale reads as follows:
Guest starring: Malcolm David Kelley as Walt, Henry Ian Cusick as Desmond, Sam Anderson as Bernard, M.C. Gainey as Mr. Friendly, Michael Emerson as Henry Gale, Clancy Brown as Kelvin Inman, Tania Raymonde as Alex, April Grace as Ms. Klugh, Alan Dale as Charles Widmore, Stephen Page as Master Sergeant, Michael Bowen as Pickett, Sonya Walger as Penelope, Len Cordova as man no. 1, Alex Petrovitch as man no. 2, Eyal Podell as young man and Cathy Foy as receptionist.
See the name I so happily bolded? "Man No. 1"? Let's take a look at Len's imdb page:
Hwew. Okay, mystery solved. I'm relieved. That was drving me insane. Although, he looks more like matthew fox in that picture than he looks like himself.
Please pardon my pseudo-intellectuaphilisophicalismysiticality.
I agree... and I think that they did that on purpose. They KNEW that people would start thinking about this.
Though, one of the guys at work mentioned something to me today. What if that actor is "made up" and was placed on that website, to throw people off? Just a thought.
:::>^..^<::: ~*~The Journey is more important than the end or the start~*~ :::>^..^<:::
05-30-2006 08:21 PM
but you never know....
