This is frustrating that there is no confirmation on what these people have been recording for OVER a year now in the same areas of the sky. See for yourself skeptics:
the ones filmed in the day are obviously unidentified objects. the ones at night are clearly some kind of phenomenon that is emitting light. that's about all that can be concluded given the parameters of the observations. and there is certainly no way to make a conclusion at this time as to the origin of the anomalies.
And of course as per the author of that website, Mark Olson, no Government sources have been willing to give ANY explanations.
So, I guess we all just have to sit here with sweaty palms and wait to be told.
If the Russians and U.S. were able to reach the planet Venus since 1961 can you imagine the types of technology there is now that we are not being told about from finger nail thin microchips implanted in casino chips to silent flying black triangles in the sky.
oh, no doubt. just look at how long the stealth bomber was in use before it was made public. and with that kind of technology being as old as it was when it was made public, there's no telling what exists or what is being planned. but there's no way to get anyone in the government to admit anything before they are ready to tell us poor serfs out here in the real world.
But amagin being in their shoes ... You tell the public (ie your telling the world) abiut the technology, and then a contry that isnt that friendly with you gets wind of the information, and builds something to counter act that ... the cycle would build and build, technology would advance soooo much quicker
sordidmesh said this in post #3 : And of course as per the author of that website, Mark Olson, no Government sources have been willing to give ANY explanations.
Explanations for what? The site isn't convincing enough for me to read through it all so could you tell me what exactly they feel the government should explain.
If you're robbing a bank and your pants fall down, I think it's okay to laugh and to let the hostages laugh too, because, come on, life is funny.
Explanations for what? The site isn't convincing enough for me to read through it all so could you tell me what exactly they feel the government should explain.
So what is it that you find unconvincing about my website? I record, document and post the sightings. What more do you expect? I'm doing all that I can do. The goverment, the so-called UFO organizations and the mainstream media have been disseminating disinformation for so long that any attempt at true investigation is thwarted easily. Then there's people like you who, no matter what evidence is collected and presented, it is not enough. Well that's your problem. Especially since you decided to make judgements without even reading the evidence collected. Your mind is made up, so don't confuse you with FACTS. Whatever.
As for those who took the time and read the website as well as watching the video clips, THANK YOU! I've spent hours and hours watching the skies for every few minutes of video I have collected. It is worth the time I've spent doing so when there are those like you out there that actually appreciate the work that I have done. Thank you very much, and thank you for posting my website and spreading the word about these sightings.
To the critics and skeptics, all I can say is this. These sightings are occurring, not only in Sonora, CA, but all over the world. All you have to do is get off your lazy butts, go outside for a few hours and watch. All I ask if for people to look up and see what is going on right over their heads while they are SO busy watching the boob tube!
Thanks for allowing me to vent.
Respectfully,
Mark A. Olson, D.M.
Sonora Sightings www.sonorasightings.com
So what is it that you find unconvincing about my website? I record, document and post the sightings. What more do you expect? I'm doing all that I can do.
Thanks for your reply, Mark. When I say it wasn't convincing enough I didn't mean any disrespect for the site or the work that you do with it. It's just that the videos of the sightings aren't enough for me to think that there's something extraordinary going on. I've seen videos of lights in the sky before and have read explanations of them. They could be any number of things, there's no reason for me to assume that it's anything out of the ordinary. It may well be, I'm not denying the possibility, but with only this evidence I'm not going to go "Oooh, aliens!" or whatever.
quote:
Then there's people like you who, no matter what evidence is collected and presented, it is not enough. Well that's your problem. Especially since you decided to make judgements without even reading the evidence collected. Your mind is made up, so don't confuse you with FACTS. Whatever.
This is simply not true. This is often said of skeptical people, that no amount of evidence could convince them. In some cases it may be true, but generally, I think not. Certainly not in my case. Just because those lights in the sky did not convince me, it doesn't mean that nothing can. What I saw on the site can have quite natural explanations, so I see no reason to assume anything extraordinary.
And my mind certainly isn't made up. If it was, I wouldn't be here asking about this thing. So what is it that the government should be explaining?
If you're robbing a bank and your pants fall down, I think it's okay to laugh and to let the hostages laugh too, because, come on, life is funny.
This is simply not true. This is often said of skeptical people, that no amount of evidence could convince them. In some cases it may be true, but generally, I think not. Certainly not in my case. Just because those lights in the sky did not convince me, it doesn't mean that nothing can. What I saw on the site can have quite natural explanations, so I see no reason to assume anything extraordinary.
And my mind certainly isn't made up. If it was, I wouldn't be here asking about this thing. So what is it that the government should be explaining? [/B][/QUOTE]
Unfortunately, it IS true. You stated that it wasn't convincing enough to look through the whole website. Natural explanations? For a triangle or cylinder in BROAD DAYLIGHT? Objects that change SHAPE? Before you make statements like that, you should look at EVERYTHING. How can it convince you when you didn't look at it all? Not that I'm saying that these objects are alien in origin. All I'm saying is that they are unidentified. They are over Sonora and NO ONE has an explanation as to what they are. But they are certainly NOT natural. I've lived here long enough to know what is and is not natural in this area.
Now as for what the government should be explaining is the sightings themselves. Instead of investigating any of the sightings by many people around the country, they give false and rather idiotic rationalizations and expect everyone to swallow them. "You saw a light that pulsated in the North, you say? Why that was Venus!" "Oh, you saw a weather balloon. There were none in the area, but that is what you saw for sure!" "Lights in formation over the forest? Oh, that was marsh gas reflecting the light of Venus!" Ridiculous!
I've called our local airport when sightings have occurred and asked if they have anything on radar. The answer is always no. I found out recently that our local airport doesn't even HAVE radar as it is too small an airport for "all that fancy stuff."
Look, my friend, I don't mean to be critical of you, but your statement that you didn't look at everything, because you found the site unconvincing is typical of skeptics and critics. The message I'm attempting to spread is that this is not just occurring over Sonora, but everywhere. Just take the time to go outside and watch. That's all.
you realise that this thread is advertising the product from that link? and i just looked through the site, and it said nothing about changing shapes ... just advertiseing the dvd of the sitings ...
You didn't look through all the clips pages. The DVD is for people who wish to see the sightings in full, not just little video clips. What's wrong with selling the DVD to maintain the website?
Well, I don't see how I'm advertising, since I'm not the one who posted my website. And the gentleman who DID post my website was posting the video clips, not the DVD. I don't see how that applies.