Chat or Talk in the INReview Discussion Forum Chat or Talk in the INReview Discussion Forum
Support INReview. Please visit our sponsors and shop.
 
register chat shopping members links refer search home
INReview INReview > The Scuttlebutt Lounge > Politics & Government > Law > Trial of Scott Peterson > Evidence wasnt there!
Search this Thread:
  Print Version | Email Page | Bookmark | Subscribe to Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread   
scott_peterson
Crackerjack

offline
Registered: Nov 2004
Local time: 01:42 PM
Location: Modesto/Prison
Posts: 120

Evidence wasnt there! post #1  quote:



- i dont believe a few phone calls and a fishing trip is enough evidence. all they had was circumstantual (spell check) evidence. nothing really pinnin g him to it. then they dismiss two jurors at the end, two jurors that suppossably were for peterson? i smell a re-trial. INNOCENT!

Old Post 11-26-2004 11:25 PM
Click here to Send scott_peterson a Private Message Find more posts by scott_peterson Add scott_peterson to your buddy list Click Here to Ignore scott_peterson REPORT this Post to a ModeratorNOMINATE this Post for Reward Points Reply w/Quote
Time: 01:42 PM Post New Thread   
  Print Version | Email Page | Bookmark | Subscribe to Thread
INReview INReview > The Scuttlebutt Lounge > Politics & Government > Law > Trial of Scott Peterson > Evidence wasnt there!
Search this Thread:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts 		HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Forum Policies Explained
 
Rate This Thread:

< - INReview.com >

Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Page generated in 0.15911198 seconds (95.19% PHP - 4.81% MySQL) with 36 queries.

ADVERTISEMENTS
Support This Site! Shop @ INReview!
© 2007, INReview.com.   Popular Forums  My Favorites All Forums   Web Hosting and Web Design by Psyphire.
INReview.com: Back to Home