From an Email to INReview:
----------------------------------
Why would you take a female whos only claim to fame is be a lewd tramp,which is disgusting to us. Just because her acts were with the President makes it no less true or disgraceful. I am sorry my family is very offended by this woman hosting your show and we will no watch as others we have talked too.
With all the beautiful people who have earned the chance to host a show, you could not bring someone else in our living room? I just don't want young girls to see this as a way to be "famous" Thank you, we might have injoyed the show if not for poor choice of hostess.
----------------------------------
From an Email to INReview:
Originally posted by Marc Flemming From an Email to INReview:
----------------------------------
Why would you take a female whos only claim to fame is be a lewd tramp,which is disgusting to us. Just because her acts were with the President makes it no less true or disgraceful. I am sorry my family is very offended by this woman hosting your show and we will no watch as others we have talked too.
With all the beautiful people who have earned the chance to host a show, you could not bring someone else in our living room? I just don't want young girls to see this as a way to be "famous" Thank you, we might have injoyed the show if not for poor choice of hostess.
----------------------------------
From an Email to INReview:
Personally, I will not watch another show that seems to be no different then Joe Millionaire. Why do people watch this $*&#? And for the record...Monica?....I agree with these people. It is one thing to get popular from something that can eventually be tolerated, but what she did was down right appauling! (Of course it doesn't help that I never was a fan of Bill and Hillary anyways).
Overall, I could care less about this show, but it really makes it worse to turn the television on and see a "menace to society" like this get recognition for something so lewd and stupid as what she did.
The network should be really ashamed of themselves for lowering their standards so that they could try and get rating from such a freak as Monica.
Oh for heavens sake people!! So Monica did a couple of sexual favours for the president? She screwed up big time. She's only human... just like the rest of us. Are you trying to tell me (and everyone else) that you don't like sex?!?! Give ME a break!! It's in our nature to be sexually active. She might have been Bill Clinton's mistress... and that's exactly what she was... BILL CLINTON'S MISTRESS!! And since he was the president, don't ya think you should be holding a grudge against him, and not Monica? As for my opinion... RIGHT ON MONICA!!! GIVE 'ER ALL YA GOT!!!
.. but as someone else mentioned, there are PLENTY of better choices for a show host out there if Fox wanted to make themselves look good. They specifically chose Monica because they LIKE that she makes people imagine her going down on Billy-boy when they see her - it's contentious and contention is exactly what a T.V. show needs to generate a reaction. ANY reaction is better than no reaction. Dumb move, IMO.
Email Sent to INReview
-----------------------------
My husband and I are devoted FOX viewers because FOX had restored much needed integrity to television. We cannot understand why FOX would want to shoot itself in the foot with Monica Lewinski as an image for FOX or set FOX up to have FOX's image eroded with her as a representative of FOX. We will continue to watch FOX; however it will be with an "extra", closer eye and ear until Monica fades from FOX. Thanks for the opportunity to let off steam and share our disappointment in Fox with their affiliation with Monica.
- Gail
-----------------------------
Email Sent to INReview
Could care less who Fox hires to host a show.
Most likely any female they would hire, would have done something in their past we could find fault with.
Who in todays world is perfect, and above all others?
No one I ever heard of, that's for sure.
Heck, she is only there for hosting purposes, and besides, we're all entitled to flip the switch to another station.
I too was very disappointed in the pick of the hostess for "Mr. Personality". I love the reality shows as they have offered something different however I don't care if it was Bill or Monica, they are both disgusting. She does not deserve any publicity because the only reason she got the job was because she is a SLUT!!! I have worked hard to get were I am at and to have some fat *** whore who slept her way through life disgusts me to have to see her on a TV show. She does not deserve it nor has she earned it. The same goes for Bill Clinton, as the former President of the US he is white trash just like she is for embarressing our country like he did!! I realize people cheat and have mistresses but we should not let someone become famous because of who they have done sexual favors for!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone that does not mind her hosting the show needs their head examined!!!!!!
FOX get rid of her for good!!! You will lose dedicated viewers to your station if you do not.
Last edited by Pamela Stepps on 04-29-2003 at 03:59 AM |
marc flemming is clearly a mysognist who has nothing better to do than write nasty posts on a website about a tv show... at least the person he seems to pick on knows how to go on with her life after having made a mistake millions of people in the world have made... he should try looking inward and maybe growing as a person... may he let the light in...
Yes she has made a mistake that millions have done however it wasn't with Jo Blo down the road. THAT IS WHAT MAKES IT AS BAD AS IT IS/WAS. She does not deserve the attention she is getting based off what she has done in the past.
Originally posted by rosebud marc flemming is clearly a mysognist who has nothing better to do than write nasty posts on a website about a tv show... at least the person he seems to pick on knows how to go on with her life after having made a mistake millions of people in the world have made... he should try looking inward and maybe growing as a person... may he let the light in...
Hey, Rosebud - I'm sorry, I had tried to avoid imbecile reactions from visually impaired forum-goers by making it abundantly clear that I was not the author of these e-mails sent to this web site. You apparently lack the sight to determine this. But, alas, you have the hindsight to realize you were wrong. So you get half-props.
Wrong? Yes - you would later send email correspondence to this web site asking that they delete your message from this thread as you had "changed" your mind. Yeah, I received your email.
And - I won't. Some folks will learn the hard way. Others will hopefully learn by example.
By the way, both of those emails were written by WOMEN.
Hey, Rosebud - I'm sorry, I had tried to avoid imbecile reactions from visually impaired forum-goers by making it abundantly clear that I was not the author of these e-mails sent to this web site. You apparently lack the sight to determine this. But, alas, you have the hindsight to realize you were wrong. So you get half-props.
Wrong? Yes - you would later send email correspondence to this web site asking that they delete your message from this thread as you had "changed" your mind. Yeah, I received your email.
And - I won't. Some folks will learn the hard way. Others will hopefully learn by example.
I'm dence perhaps but i dont get it.. Learn the 'Hard" way...
One Man, One personallity.... and only using ONE screen name for this forum
often Miss -understood and falsely accused by Many
The moral of the story: One should be clear in understanding what it is they have just read before they respond to it (particularly when choosing to use insults with no basis for doing so).
Yes your correct. However, The main problem with 'Text" is you do not get 'Hear the way its said...your just guessing at it. This will open doors for misunderstandings.
One Man, One personallity.... and only using ONE screen name for this forum
often Miss -understood and falsely accused by Many
The mistake here was that she accused me of hating women for things I did not even write. It clearly states above and below the content of my posts that the messages I posted were sent via email to INReview by people other than myself.
04-20-2003 08:16 PM
RIGHT ON MONICA!!! GIVE 'ER ALL YA GOT!!!
