EVIDENCE OF EXPLOSIVES IN THE TWIN TOWER COLLAPSES.
The evidence that the World Trade Center towers were demolished is compelling. Photographs of explosives detonating during the collapse of both the north and south towers are presented below. They are taken from two (publicly available) videos of the collapses. Each frame has been numbered by its position in the video. Both videos were filmed at 30 frames per second, so an eight frame interval covers about one quarter of a second.
The most remarkable aspect of the World Trade Center towers demolition, is that such obvious evidence of the use of explosives, has been completely ignored by the media. This refusal to report the obvious, clearly illustrates that the "free press" is free, only in name, and anything but free in reality.
That such obvious evidence of explosives has remained "hidden in full view" approaches the unbelievable.
The South Tower.
The video evidence that the World Trade Center towers were demolished is indeed compelling. Consider the following frames which show two distinct lines of explosives detonating across the east face of the south tower.
Frame 147 shows a row of explosives detonating right across the east face at the 79th floor.
Frame 203 shows a row of explosives detonating right across the east face at the 75th floor.
The middle photos show the dust cloud from the explosions outlined in red.
The end photos show the relative positions of the two lines of dust and debris.
It has been claimed that the explosions of dust that span the east face of the tower, were caused by air being forced from the windows as the floors above collapsed. This explanation is obviously incorrect. If it was correct, such lines of dust would have been expelled from the windows of each floor in succession. That is, we would have seen such lines of dust expelled from floors 79, 78, 77, 76 and 75 in succession, but what we observe is an explosion of dust at floor 79, no new clouds of dust for a few floors, then another (larger) explosion of dust at floor 75.
The second line of explosives is much more powerful than the first, but the dust cloud from the first line of explosives, and the dust and debris from the upper floor collapse, initially obscure this.
The dust due to the visible explosions is a whitish grey. The dust from the demolition of the upper section (which is disintegrating as it falls) is dark grey. One wonders what caused this difference.
In the video, it is clear that the top 30 or so floors have snapped off and are toppling eastward. In the above frames, we follow the north-east corner of the tower as this 30 floor section descends. Using the north-east corner as a reference, I have outlined in red, the progress of this 30 floor section as it descends.
The first thing to note, is that the top section itself must be disintegrating, otherwise (as the above frames show) the top section would have extended far into parts of the building that are clearly, as yet, unaffected by the collapse.
But what could possibly cause the top section to disintegrate? And in fact, what could possibly cause the top section to almost entirely disintegrate, before the lower section begins to collapse?
You have to realize that most of the top section had not been affected by the aircraft strike or fires and was thus still the same immensely strong structure that had supported the building for some 30 years. If this section was going to fall at all, this section would fall as one piece (like a tree in the forest). Unless, of course, this section had been laced with explosives and was undergoing a controlled demolition of its own, just a few moments before the lower part of the building was demolished.
The North Tower.
In the following set of frames showing the North Tower collapse, pay close attention to the horizontal explosions of dust and debris that occur just above the red line marked on the above photograph.
Once again, note that the second layer of explosions is much more powerful than the first and that the dust cloud from the first initially obscures that of the second. Also, note the large orange areas of hot gas from the explosions. Recall, that this was about two hours after the aircraft struck the building, so there would be essentially no flammable material left on the floors from which the flash emanates (as the fire would have already consumed it all).
Note that the horizontal explosions of dust on the leftmost side of the tower are already visible and expanding in the first frame. These continue their expansion through frame nine and subsequent frames. Similarly, explosions of dust become apparent across the entire width of both (visible) faces of the tower, however, between frames 001 and 009 the television mast on top of the tower makes no downward movement at all. This shows that the horizontal explosions of dust and debris precede the collapse and thus cannot be the cause of it (in fact, it is these explosions that initiate the collapse).
That the horizontal explosions of dust precede the collapse is vividly expressed by the above animated graphic which alternates the first and ninth frames. This clearly shows that the explosions of dust were not caused by air being forced from the windows as the floors above collapsed (this was a ridiculous assertion anyway).
Since the visible evidence points to only two layers of explosives per tower, one has to conclude that the aircraft were directed to hit particular floors (possibly by homing beacons in the towers). This would also explain the total lack of solid evidence for the "Arab hijackers" hypothesis (there was however, a quantity of laughable, obviously manufactured evidence, indicating that this was an attempt to frame the Arabs).
Of course the visible explosions (or at least their dust clouds) are only part of the story, as the main weight supporting columns in the central core also had to be weakened before the towers would collapse in the way they did. But what is visible, is more than enough evidence, to conclude that the towers were deliberately demolished.
The above animated graphic alternates the first and 67th frames. It shows a classic controlled demolition of a 12 story building (the top 12 stories of the North Tower). Strange how the roofline collapses so evenly, I guess, that all the central core columns and all the perimeter wall columns collapsed simultaneously. Some coincidence eh?
The first line of explosives detonated across the 98th floor (where the collapse began). The second line of detonations occurred across the 92nd floor (just above the lower red line) with large flashes of hot gas from the explosions, clearly visible. Initially, the second line's detonation is obscured by the dust cloud of the first. However, being much more powerful detonations, the second line's dust cloud quickly bursts into view.
A close look at the video/photos shows that the collapse begins at the 98th floor, then the 99th floor collapses onto the 98th, then the 100th floor collapses onto the 98th, then the 101th floor collapses onto the 98th, then the 102th floor collapses onto the 98th, etc until the second line of detonations initiates the final collapse. So once again, we have the disintegration of the tower above the impact floors, before the collapse of the tower below the impact floors.
Interestingly, this observation disproves the so called pancake theory, where one floor collapses onto the next lower floor, causing that floor to also collapse (not that the pancake theory made any sense anyway). Here, what we see is 5 or 6 floors in a row, all falling onto the 98th floor, which does not collapse (until the second line of explosives are detonated, taking out its support). The pancake theory would have the 98th floor collapsing onto the 97th, causing that to collapse onto the 96th, causing that to collapse onto the 95th, etc.
These very strange circumstances, mentioned above, have a very simple explanation: The twin towers were deliberately demolished. Occam's razor, suggests that the simplest explanation, a deliberate demolition, is probably also the correct explanation.
To play the videos you need to download 3ivx. 3ivx is a plug-in for Windows Media Player and QuickTime. It enables the playing of DivX 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, OpenDivX, XviD, FFMpeg, AngelPotion, SMR, Philips MPEG-4, Apple MPEG-4, MS-MPEG-4v3, 3ivx D3, D3.5 and 4, RealMagic MPEG-4, Sorenson MPEG-4, Blizzard MPEG-4 and other MPEG-4 variants and the encoding of high quality MPEG-4 video. So, it is a must for your system. It can be downloaded from http://www.3ivx.com/download
O.K. That did it for me!! Just how stupid are you?? Plains crashed into the buildings.. The gas was not turned off.. I watched them fall along with 50 millions of Americans.. From what I can piece together by your threads you are some kind of nut trying to stir up trouble.. Alot of people lost there lives in this Blatant Attack against America.. Yes there was a explosion.... I'll tell you what... Fill a container with gas, Put a rag into it,Throw it into your front window,, Does it explode??? Did you get a second explosion when your kitchen went up??
I cant finish this right now.... I'm too mad and I don't want to say anything to get me thrown off this forum..
TheAwfulTruth said this in post #5 : Interesting eh?
No replies about facts or figures at all.
Just garbage.
Those who have replied so far should get an education.
Wow! You are either extremely gullible or just plain extremely stupid.
You should put your energy into something more constructive. The only person who believes this crap is you. Brilliant work though but, just not logical.
I could explain every one of your images fopr you and prove there were no explosives other than jet fuel but, I'm affraid it would take too much time and it would be waisted.
"Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those who say this are witless." ~Ayatollah Khomeini
This story was covered by British media, there is also a record of each of the smaller explosions on a couple of earthquake monitors. We are also told here that these stories are 'no go' areas in the US.
The twin towers coincidence may turn out to be just that, but still you have to question why the US gets a very different view of it all to the rest of the world.
Everyone has a conspiracy theory. Elvis is still alive. The Pope killed JFK. The Mafia murdered Marylyn Monroe. The Jews are taking over the world. The Washington sniper shootings were staged by the US government. And right now, if the conspiracy theory is anti United States, it will be plastered all over the world.
Hey, I thought Israel was responsible for 9/11? What happened to that theory? Remember all those thousands of Jews who suddenly didn't report to work that day? Or is this part of the same theory? The Zionist conspirators placed explosives there. But wait, what about those planes shown in the video that hit the buildings? Ah, that was part of the conspiracy as well. The planes WERE actually hijacked by Al Queada, because OBL is actually a secret US operative. But the US government, controlled by the worldwide Zionist/Jewish conspiracy, realized that the planes hitting might not be enough to bring the buildings down, so they planted these bombs there, see. But no one believes it, because the media controls our minds. It's all true.
Trust me.
- woolfe
The best lack all conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity.
kula said this in post #10 : This story was covered by British media, there is also a record of each of the smaller explosions on a couple of earthquake monitors. We are also told here that these stories are 'no go' areas in the US.
The twin towers coincidence may turn out to be just that, but still you have to question why the US gets a very different view of it all to the rest of the world.
Funny thing media.
kula
Yes, holocaust deniers don't get much coverage either around here. They publish books and write pamphlets. The books have hundreds of footnotes. There's all kinds of facts and figures. For the most part, these people are ignored because no one wants to dignify it with a response. "Debating" someone regarding such theories is giving it quasi-legitimacy as being "the other side of a debate." In reality, there is no debate. Those people are off in their own worlds. But they CLAIM that they our ignored in the press because are press is biased in favor of the Jews.
Since we don't censor our press here [contrary to what appears to be your belief], this issue would have been covered if there was anything even remotely credible to it. If an investigative reporter could expose the "real truth" about this, that reporter would gain huge wealth and fame. Since we don't kill or jail journalists here for printing stories critical of the US goverment, which happens about every 5 minutes here, the logical explanation is that these accusations are so lacking in merit as to be beneath discussion.
The reason this idiotic drivel gets some limited coverage in other countries is because there are more people there who are apt to believe anti-US conspiracy theories. Media is all about selling itself. If there's a legitimate demographic that will eat up something like this, it will be published. Without demand, there is no supply.
I didnt say it was covered as a conspiracy story, what you know as 9-11, some of us know as the twin towers coincidence, i think the conspiracy stories, or at least most of the ones ive read, have originated in the US.
Until someone comes up with evidence to the contary, it will remain a coincidence, or several. How all the planes slipped through US defence, .....i dont think there is any need to go on and on and on and on and on, again !
04-19-2004 12:14 AM
)
