|
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
h@ts
INReview Maven
offline
Registered: Oct 2003
Local time: 09:05 AM
Location: england
Posts: 3938
|
quote: |
Lawless said this in post #76 :
[B]If the father signed papers for an adoption, then Madonna does have rights to the child. |
Legally she can run rings round this guy and stomp all over him while she's at it. But morally she's onto a loser, and economically she has her reputation to worry about. This could effect her record sales.
quote: |
I don't think that mystic is painting the father in a bad light... |
You don't think comparing this guy to people who screw other people out of insurance money by pretending they're hurt is painting the guy in a bad light?
quote: |
but, if he wanted to keep David, then he shouldn't have agreed, for any period of time, to allow another to his child. |
He changed his mind or didn't know what he was signing. He's poor, iliterate, and uneducated. Give the guy a break.
quote: |
Now, he's guaranteed a better life, and future... and everyone wants to shoot at Madonna for doing something good. |
Why? Because Madonna's rich it must mean he's going to have a better life. Forget that she could be the biggest screw up of all time when it comes to being a mother, there are more important things in life than the fact you can afford a palace in Scotland and never have to work. This kid is being removed totally from his own culture and father.
|
10-25-2006 06:09 PM
|
|
|
|  |
<
>
Copyright ?2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Page generated in 0.11593390 seconds (73.15% PHP - 26.85% MySQL) with 48 queries.
|
|
|
|