|
|
 |
| |
|
lodgebo
INReview Maven
offline
Registered: May 2003
Local time: 09:22 PM
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4383
|
| quote: |
malcolm xx said this in post #28 :
1. Scotland having nukes - I post info from FOI Act. If info is wrong blame your gov.
WRONG how many times how thick are you? it is not Scottish nukes it is British nukes. Scotland, England, Wales and Ireland 4 countries that fight under a British Army. Do you think the subs in Rosyth are Scottish or British owned, the Palnes in Lossoemouth are Royal Air Force not Scottish Air Force, 45 Commando in Arbroath part of the Royal Marines commando and the Royal regiment of Scotland fight under the British army. Like everything else military owned they are the property of Britain and can only be fired under orders from the top and that is not a Scottish descion why would we have nukes we cant use? the only reason the nukes are here is that our nukes are fired from Subs like thwe ones docked in Rosyth.
2. Lance Armstong using steroids - posted info from NY Times and his auto where he admits to using steroids. If you don't beleive read book.
WRONG well not entirely wrong yes he used striods but we have been through this as well he needed the drugs to stay alive and fight cancer are you seriously going to hold that against hiom and was he not clearwed of any wrong doing by the appropriate body?
3 World Cup racism - I'm not fan of soccer but I notice African teams, with mostly Black players all having White coaches. And no European teams with a Black coach.
Well now you are twisiting your own words you said that "African teams have no black coaches", in 3 minutes I found you were wrong. It just proves your research is piss poor if nothing else. POS John Tigan was a black coach with Fulham in England, Frank Rijkarrd is a black coach with Barcelona the best team in Europe right now.
4 Black Jesus Movie - If somthing is not accepted, that means it is banned. No one makes a movie to be shown only in limted amount of theatres of one race. Jaws wasn't made for jewish communities. Passion of Christ wasn't limited to white neighborhoods.
Ok here goes firstly it is not banned so that another lie for your list. Secondly the people that own cinemas are not racists ( despite what you want to belive) they are business people and as such they want to show the films that will get people in the cinemas be it James Bond, Borat or that tap dancing penguin thing. Of course Malcolm we all klnow your problem if it went mainstream and flopped then we the cinema going public would be racists or non doubt the viewing figures would have been distorted. See Malcolm I have no desire to see this film and from what I have seen most people here don't want to see this film do you think that would change if it was in a big cinema? if so why. You need a reality check sunshine most of these films don't make it to big cinemas I saw an indie film last month called red road it was ace but never going to make the big cinemas cos it was niche film.
My posts are not the promblem, its your inability to admit when you are wrong or accept being wrong. |
When I am wrong I admit I am wrong but the problem here is your inability to research anything properly and charge into it like a bull in a china shop. The Scottish nukes that are Britsh, the fil that is banned but is not the white coaches that were actually black. No research not one iota you just charged because you thought you saw a cause that you would attach yourself to. If you are going to make outlandish claim I suggest you do some research first.
It's YOUR problems Malcolm not OURS why can't you see that you are what you claim to stand against a little racist with an agenda the irony would be funny if it was not so pathetic.
|
11-21-2006 06:31 PM
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Sierradaddy
Days of Future Past...
offline
Registered: May 2003
Local time: 03:22 PM
Location: Somewhere in Time...
Posts: 3901
|
In my opinion it was the overwhelming media behemoth covering the OJ trial that led to him being found not guilty. Too many people rooting for him would have lost it. I'm led to believe that's why he was found guilty in the civil trial. But that's just me.
This thread is a joke. Sorry Malcolm, I know that you are trying to say something positive here, and I appreciate the effort. However, Viper seems to have ellaborated on your points for clarity's sake, which is most important when starting a thread like this. If you want to show black achievements and black intelligence, please be more diligent in the presentation and preparation. I'm telling you, it makes a world of difference.
By preparation, I'm referring to:
research - be sure that what you are posting is verified by several respectable sources, not just the first couple ones that support your viewpoint.
By presentation, I'm referring to:
Expression - express your viewpoint in a manner that shows you are looking for change, but are being REASONABLE in how you are going about it. Be strong, be clear, be ACCURATE, and expect to have some potential detractors and critics or disagreements with people who don't see what you see. Be prepared for the critics and disagreements by doing your best to see them coming FIRST, before they get there, and preparing reasonable arguments that support your view, while not just shrugging off the criticism. You've got to embrace the debate just as much as you embrace the starting of new threads covering topics that are of apparent interest to you.
You can be controversial, but be PREPARED, not only with your topics and research, but also with what comes back from the controversy you incite. It comes with the territory, if you haven't yet taken notice.
That's my advice to you. Take it or leave it, but I think it's good advice, and I think you'll get more positive results by following it.
|
11-24-2006 05:43 AM
|
|
|
| |
|
malcolm xx
In the Now Guru
offline
Registered: Jun 2004
Local time: 09:22 PM
Location:
Posts: 1746
|
| quote: |
Sierradaddy said this in post #45 :
In my opinion it was the overwhelming media behemoth covering the OJ trial that led to him being found not guilty. Too many people rooting for him would have lost it. I'm led to believe that's why he was found guilty in the civil trial. But that's just me.
This thread is a joke. Sorry Malcolm, I know that you are trying to say something positive here, and I appreciate the effort. However, Viper seems to have ellaborated on your points for clarity's sake, which is most important when starting a thread like this. If you want to show black achievements and black intelligence, please be more diligent in the presentation and preparation. I'm telling you, it makes a world of difference.
By preparation, I'm referring to:
research - be sure that what you are posting is verified by several respectable sources, not just the first couple ones that support your viewpoint.
By presentation, I'm referring to:
Expression - express your viewpoint in a manner that shows you are looking for change, but are being REASONABLE in how you are going about it. Be strong, be clear, be ACCURATE, and expect to have some potential detractors and critics or disagreements with people who don't see what you see. Be prepared for the critics and disagreements by doing your best to see them coming FIRST, before they get there, and preparing reasonable arguments that support your view, while not just shrugging off the criticism. You've got to embrace the debate just as much as you embrace the starting of new threads covering topics that are of apparent interest to you.
You can be controversial, but be PREPARED, not only with your topics and research, but also with what comes back from the controversy you incite. It comes with the territory, if you haven't yet taken notice.
That's my advice to you. Take it or leave it, but I think it's good advice, and I think you'll get more positive results by following it. |
I accept contructive critcism.I admit I'm inexperience in debating facts and defending the truth but that doesn't make my threads a joke and why am I inciting controversy for posting the truth?
I do research. This info had to come from somewhere.
|
11-26-2006 11:03 PM
|
|
|
| |
|
Sierradaddy
Days of Future Past...
offline
Registered: May 2003
Local time: 03:22 PM
Location: Somewhere in Time...
Posts: 3901
|
To clarify, I was referring to the direction the thread went in. Your initial goal probably wasn't to have everybody in here basically bash on you, but that's kinda what happened again. I would suggest that it might be because of how clear Viper was in ellaborating on your original post, which showed everyone that your research was either incomplete, or you were intentionally being vague about the true measure of the contributions from the people you presented. After having been through several of your other threads, it just reinforced some people's belief that you are trying to express not THE truth, but YOUR truth. The reason I called this thread a joke, is because you should have been more thorough either in your research, or in your presentation. I wasn't trying to be mean, just constructively critical.
Also, when I spoke of controversy, I'm referring to FUTURE posts, if you choose to take heed of my advice in those posts you prepare in the future. You can be controversal if you choose to be in those posts, but be mindful that if you are, you most likely will get a backlash from your controversial position, if you present one, by those who vehemently disagree with you. I'm just ellaborating on what it would take to be prepared for an intelligent debate, again meaning to be constructively critical.
|
11-28-2006 06:24 AM
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
<
>
Copyright ?2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Page generated in 0.06666207 seconds (86.96% PHP - 13.04% MySQL) with 44 queries.
|
|
|
|
contributers to development of america. were they in your history books?
