|
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |

mystic
Evil Queen
offline
Registered: Apr 2003
Local time: 01:42 AM
Location: In my castle
Posts: 13357
|
quote: |
KJ said this in post #27 :
Mystic, when you nominate a post, it will be a staff decision, I believe. Right now, that's what we're doing for nominations!!! |
Im going to pose a thought here...and I dont know why I do this, but I cant help my opinionated ways....it always seems to get me in trouble...but I have to at least wonder....
I know you say staff decision, and thats fine with me, of course....my thought, or question really, is, since there are some staff members that do not necessarily agree or like what a person says based on thier "different" beliefs....how does this effect a nomination? Or could I could shorten the thought and say what are the odds of be bias being factored in the decision process? (against the nominee or nominator...is that a word?)
And how about my other question on the difference between funny and drama posts (I dont know another way to describe it..but I think you understand).....will there be a consideration based on that or will they be looked at equally?
Anyways...just thoughts in my head....I have a couple that I may want to nominate, but I dont want to until I know how the judging will be based...
|
01-07-2004 06:09 AM
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
Kookaburra
In the Now Guru
offline
Registered: Jun 2003
Local time: 02:42 AM
Location:
Posts: 2411
|
quote: |
Delta said this in post #39 :
Mystic .. Marlene and myself have all contributed to and been the butt opf hypocrisy over and over, so I doubt someone will come forward and give us any points. Its a shame because we are the best on the site ( just kidding, I think)
D |
I would like to say something concerning this post. The names you mentioned are names I frequently run into on the P&T forum. And I am well aware of they controversial subjects we discuss there. Although I do not have much interaction with you Delta, I do with the others you mentioned.
I will have to disagree with your view on this, as I would reward them for the sheer sake of keeping the P&T alive and kicking. If everyone got in there and were in agreement with each other, we wouldn't learn other views.
We don't have to like or agree with posts in order to give rewards. In fact, I would reward the names you mentioned based on their contribution to a forum, and for being objective, and for listening to all the different views, and for coming back in spite of the frustration they must experience.
I wonder if endurance is a reward option Do you know how many topics they have started and kept going in the P&T forum alone?
As many times as feathers have been ruffled over there, they contribute. As many times as some say they will never be back, they come back and keep going.
I would absolutely miss them if they left, and I would not hesitate to reward them.
|
01-07-2004 10:24 PM
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
Marlene Newell
No title, Just me
offline
Registered: Jul 2003
Local time: 11:42 PM
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 1010
|
Re: Kooka's post #48
I agree Kook, the P&T forum is the greatest. No two of us agree on much of anything, and yet the conversations remain pretty civil. You don't see dozens of expletives in posts or posters being sent to the flamers ward or being warned. We certainly don't have any pink posters.
Marc, how about rewarding a forum -- I'm sure there are others that are good, too, but I think the "community" makes a big difference in the way posters behave and how well they handle disagreements on controversial issues.
And, Kooka, here's pointing the compliment back to you -- you are a major influence for good in that forum.
If we get points, will we be told how many or for what? Sorry if this has already been explained, but I browsed quickly and didn't find anything.
|
01-08-2004 05:59 PM
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
<
>
Copyright ?2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Page generated in 0.09110188 seconds (87.33% PHP - 12.67% MySQL) with 52 queries.
|
|
|
|