U.N. troops should stay out of Iraq - Post-9/11 Era

U.N. troops should stay out of Iraq

Post-9/11 Era Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: Americaaah

THE WORD OUT of the State Department is that Colin Powell and his troops are feverishly working to get a new U.N. resolution to get the U.N. involved in postwar Iraq. All I can say is, good luck! Why? Because the U.N. is filled with countries who simply hate America. And I got to tell you something else. Not only do they hate America. They would love to see nothing more than America fail in Iraq.

France, they’ve got their reasons. They had lucrative financial deals with Saddam Hussein and the United States‘ victory cost them billions and billions of dollars. And, of course, then there was Syria, a fellow Baathist regime who sat in judgment of America on the United Nations Security Council. Do you think they want us to succeed? And what about Libya, why, that famous arbiter of human rights who sits as a chairman of the U.N. Human Rights Council? Oh, but by the way, they just admitted to blowing up hundreds of civilians on a commercial airplane.

And let’s ask a bigger question. Why do we really want the United Nations to get involved, when they have such a lousy track record? Did they stop a million deaths in Rwanda in the ‘90s? Did they stop two million deaths in the Sudan in the ‘90s? Did they stop the bloodshed in Bosnia? The answer is no, no and no.

How did they do this past fall? I’m telling you, it was a three-ring circus in the United Nations. They have proven themselves to be obsolete and out of date. And the only question is, why should the United Nations drag itself down even more by associating itself with an international body that no longer represents democratic values and no longer can succeed on the world stage?

—Joe Scarborough


______

"All in all, a great day if you believe stopping the proliferation of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons is a good thing. But, it was a very bad day indeed if world security takes a back seat to your personal hatred of George W. Bush."


We will always remember.
We will always be proud.
We will always be prepared
So that we may always be free!

http://www.ddaymuseum.org

Reply To this Message

Posted by: legend73

quote:
Originally posted by Americaaah
Because the U.N. is filled with countries who simply hate America. And I got to tell you something else. Not only do they hate America. They would love to see nothing more than America fail in Iraq.

Sometimes it seems that you like to be hated, or to have a lot of enemies. Mussolini once said "Molti nemici, molto onore" (sthg like "The many enemies we have, the more honour we'll get from that").
Then the Greeks kicked him in the ass.


quote:
Originally posted by Americaaah
And let?s ask a bigger question. Why do we really want the United Nations to get involved, when they have such a lousy track record? Did they stop a million deaths in Rwanda in the ?90s? Did they stop two million deaths in the Sudan in the ?90s? Did they stop the bloodshed in Bosnia? The answer is no, no and no.


These were all CIVIL wars. UN were founded and organized to keep INTERNATIONAL peace, to improve relationship between nations. You may read the Charter of UN in order to better understand that. However, this means that the role of UN has to been redefined, since they could not act effectively in these circumstances (because they never have been organized in order to do that) and not that they are useless.

quote:
Originally posted by Americaaah
They have proven themselves to be obsolete and out of date.

I agree with you that they are obsolete. But the question is: shall we dismantle them or shall we work to improve them?
Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Post-9/11 Era Forum: U.N. troops should stay out of Iraq

Forum Forum Forum