Iraqi Republican Guard Defector: Saddam to use chemical weapons if invaded - Post-9/11 Era

Iraqi Republican Guard Defector: Saddam to use chemical weapons if invaded

Post-9/11 Era Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: Marc Flemming

An Iraqi defector has told Sky News that Saddam Hussein will use chemical weapons if the country is invaded.

See a video of his interview.

His warning comes amid revelations Saddam Hussein may be planning to use pilotless drone planes to spray British and US troops with anthrax and sarin gas if they attack.

In an exclusive interview, the officer with Saddam's elite Republican Guard, said the use of chemical weapons by Iraq was "100% guaranteed".

The 26-year-old soldier defected 10 days ago near the city of Sulaymaniyah in Northern Iraq.

Weapons

He is being guarded in a safe house and is said to have provided valuable intelligence to authorities.

"A chemical attack is guaranteed," he warned.

"We have been fully provided with complete protection gear, gas masks, first aid kit, injections."

In the 1991 war, Saddam Hussein deployed his chemical weapons but they were not used.

"We are sure about the chemical bombardment," said the defector, whose identity is being protected.

"In the last stage, he will use it as a last resort."

Fierce

He said Republican Guard soldiers will put up a fierce fight.

"When it is time for war we are fully prepared to fight into the ground. If we don't fight hard, they will execute us," he said.

The defector said Baghdad was full of loyal troops and special forces and the city would see heavy fighting.

"In Baghdad there will be a lot of killing," he added.

Warheads

The suspected plot by Saddam to drop chemical weapons on attacking troops emerged following chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix's 173-page report to the UN Security Council.

The report listed details of missing weapons which Iraq had not accounted for.

They include 50 Scud B warheads and 6,500 bombs laced with chemical weapons, VX nerve agents and anthrax.

http://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1131248.jpg

Source: Sky News

Reply To this Message

Posted by: NothingSacred

And why wouldn't he? He has nothing to lose? He's painted into a corner. In his place, I wouldn't even bother destroying the Al Sammouds...Bush is out to kill him no matter what he does. He could produce 10,000 WMDs latter today, and Bush would say, "OK, where's the rest of it." and still attack no matter what. Anyone that believes that Iraq could "come clean" and be spared is really fooling themselves.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Marc Flemming

Hey - wait - um, I thought he didn't have chemical weapons?

Furthermore, wouldn't he be justifying a US-led invasion by using these supposedly non-existent chemical weapons?

Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Post-9/11 Era Forum: Iraqi Republican Guard Defector: Saddam to use chemical weapons if invaded

Forum Forum Forum