Welcome aboard the Iraqi Gravy train |
| Posted by: scottc | | Another Terry Jones Classic.
---
Well the war has been a huge success, and I guess it's time for congratulations all round. And wow! It's hard to know where to begin.
First, I'd like to congratulate Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR) and the Bechtel Corporation, which are the construction companies most likely to benefit from the reconstruction of Iraq. Contracts in the region of $1 billion should soon coming your way, chaps. Well done! And what with the US dropping 15,000 precision-guided munitions, 7,500 unguided bombs and 750 cruise missiles on Iraq so far and with more to come, there's going to be a lot of reconstruction. It looks like it could be a bonanza year.
Of course, we all know that KBR is the construction side of Halliburton, and it has been doing big business with the military ever since the Second World War. Most recently, it got the plum job of constructing the prison compound for terrorists suspects at Guantanamo Bay. Could be a whole lot more deluxe chicken coops coming your way in the next few months, guys. Stick it to 'em.
I'd also like to add congratulations to Dick Cheney, who was chief executive of Halliburton from 1995 to 2000, and who currently receives a cheque for $1 million a year from his old company. I guess he may find there's a little surprise bonus in there this year. Well done, Dick.
Congratulations, too, to former Secretary of State, George Schultz. He's not only on the board of Bechtel, he's also chairman of the advisory board of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, a group with close ties to the White House committed to reconstructing the Iraqi economy through war. You're doing a grand job, George, and I'm sure material benefits will be coming your way, as sure as the Devil lives in Texas.
Oh, before I forget, a big round of appreciation for Jack Sheehan, a retired general who sits on the Defence Policy Board which advises the Pentagon. He's a senior vice president at Bechtel and one of the many members of the Defence Policy Board with links to companies that make money out of defence contracts. When I say 'make money' I'm not joking. Their companies have benefited to the tune of $76bn just in the last year. Talk about a gravy train. Well, Jack, you and your colleagues can certainly look forward to a warm and joyous Christmas this year.
It;s been estimated that rebuilding Iraq could cost anything from $25bn to $100bn and the great thing is that the Iraqis will be paying for it themselves out of their future oil revenues. What's more, President Bush will be able to say, with a straight face, that they're using the money from Iraqi oil to benefit the Iraqi people. 'We're going to use the assets of the people of Iraq, especially their oil assets, to benefit their people,' said Secretary of State Colin Powell, and he looked really sincere. Yessir.
It's so neat it makes you want to run out and buy shares in Fluor. As one of the world's biggest procurement and construction companies, it recently hired Kenneth J. Oscar, who, as acting assistant secretary of the army, took care of the Pentagon's $35bn-a-year procurement budget. So there could also be some nice extra business coming its way soon. Bully for them.
But every celebration has its serious side, and I should like to convey my condolences to all those who have suffered so grievously in this war. Particularly American Airlines, Qantas and Air Canada, and all other travel companies which have seen their customers dwindle, as fear of terrorist reprisals for what the US and Britain have done in Iraq begins to bite.
My condolences also to all those British companies which have been disappointed in their bid to share in the bonanza that all this wonderful high-tech military firepower has created. I know it must be frustrating and disheartening for many of you, especially in the medical field, knowing there are all those severed limbs, all that burnt flesh, all those smashed skulls, broken bones, punctured spleens, ripped faces and mangled children just crying out for your products.
You could be making a fortune out of the drugs, serums and surgical hardware, and yet you have to stand on the sidelines and watch as US drug companies make a killing.
Well, Hosni Mubarak, the Egyptian President, has some words of comfort for us all. As he recently pointed out, this adventure by Bush and Blair will have created such hatred throughout the Arab world, that 100 new bin Ladens will have been created.
So all of us here in Britain, as well as in America, shouldn't lose heart. Once the Arab world starts to take its revenge, there should be enough reconstruction to do at home to keep business thriving for some years to come. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Charles | | Is this article contending that these companies are not qualified to do the work they have been hired to do?
Or does he mean to say that in fact Iraq is not in need of professional reconstruction assistance? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: USA1 | | scottc,
Maybe the reason for your post is because the Netherlands didn't get the contracts.
You know, if you had lent a hand here, it may have had a different outcome. But no, the pacifists sat back and now they are left out. Booo hooo. Cry me a river....
Somebody has to put it back together and as in all wars, it's the responcability of the country who broke it. Period. Get over it and stop reading in something that's not there. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: scottc | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by USA1
scottc,
Maybe the reason for your post is because the Netherlands didn't get the contracts.
You know, if you had lent a hand here, it may have had a different outcome. But no, the pacifists sat back and now they are left out. Booo hooo. Cry me a river....
Somebody has to put it back together and as in all wars, it's the responcability of the country who broke it. Period. Get over it and stop reading in something that's not there. |
In actual fact, I am British, and contrary to the wishes of the people Tony "puppet" blair did "lend a hand". Yet, strange enough, all of the contracts have gone to American companies. Hmmm.
| quote: |
Is this article contending that these companies are not qualified to do the work they have been hired to do?
Or does he mean to say that in fact Iraq is not in need of professional reconstruction assistance? |
This article is intended to show just what sort of corrupt people decided on the invasion in the first place. The "commitee for the liberation of Iraq", chaired by mr Schultz, obviously had no intention that "liberating" Iraq would mean massive contracts for Bechtel. Hmmm.
Although this article does not display that Bechtel are an unreputable company, in actual fact, they are. Bechtel holds the number one spot in the "Axis of corporate evil".
http://www.corpwatch.org/issues/PID.jsp?articleid=6975
Bechtel has a terrible history of workers human rights abuses, blunders, overspending tax dollars, Nuclear leakages, and overcharging.
Just ask Bolivia if they think Bechtels privatisation of their water supplies is a good reference. They increased water prices by 400% meaning that a large number of people had to spend a third of their earnings on water charges. The choice was simple, either have water or food. Now they are being given the chance to screw the Iraqi people for the worlds most precious resource.
Yet despite the blunders, they are consistently given government jobs because of their links to government.
If Bush really did want to "help the Iraqi people", and "give the oil revenue to the Iraqi people", he would be investing in Iraqi companies, not golf buddies.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: USA1 | | Well then, maybe the Brits weren't qualified. Go figure.
"Jealousy and paranoia will destroy ya." | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: scottc | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by USA1
Well then, maybe the Brits weren't qualified. Go figure.
"Jealousy and paranoia will destroy ya." |
If you would bother to check the link, you would see that Bechtel are certainly not qualified due to their enourmous f**k ups in pretty much every venture they have handled. However, they certainly are qualified with regards to being in bed with the administration. You are a very gullible individual if you do not believe this is the reason for them being chosen.
Incidentally, I noticed you saying in another thread that you are a veteran. If so, what do you think about having a president who slashes veterans benefits, and who deserted the texas air guard?. Surely a real veteran would detest a deserter.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: USA1 | | scottc,
As a veteran, there are many rights that are deserved and there are many that aren't. I'm all for government cuts if they are for the right reason and don't jeopardise those who aren't abusing those rights. Like any government program there are abuses.
As for GWB, what ever he did in the past doesn't affect what he is doing today and it's all been in the open since he was governer of TX, so, what's the point. There are many leaders in Europe who have done and are doing worse things and the Europeans laugh at the publicity we give to this. We have had many presidents who have done worse and were greatleaders. Just look at Clinton. Geez, what a nucklehead.
As for Bechtel, if they are screw ups, better there than here. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: scottc | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by USA1
scottc,
As a veteran, there are many rights that are deserved and there are many that aren't. I'm all for government cuts if they are for the right reason and don't jeopardise those who aren't abusing those rights. Like any government program there are abuses.
As for GWB, what ever he did in the past doesn't affect what he is doing today and it's all been in the open since he was governer of TX, so, what's the point. There are many leaders in Europe who have done and are doing worse things and the Europeans laugh at the publicity we give to this. We have had many presidents who have done worse and were greatleaders. Just look at Clinton. Geez, what a nucklehead.
As for Bechtel, if they are screw ups, better there than here. |
Given your reply, I can only conclude that you are a 15 year old child. No real veteran would decide that a deserter's past does not affect the present. He deserted his cushty texas air guard job whilst Americans were dying in Vietnam. I have had many conversations with REAL vietnam vets, as opposed to school children, and they HATE the fact that a blatant deserter is president. He spent the time they were spending being shot at, snorting coke. He beat 500 better qualified recruits to the TAG, because his daddy was a congressman. As for the reason for supporting Bush, I can only conclude that you, (or rather your parents), are among the top 1% of American earners. Otherwise your support of Bush would go to show your lack of intelligence. Only the top 1% do better under Bush. As a veteran, obviously you would say America is giving too much to those evil money grabbing veterans. Idiot!!!.
As for Bechtel, it is not just abroad. They have built nuclear reactors in the USA that have been fundamentally flawed, resulting in massive environmental damage, and yes, potential cancer for YOU.
As for "done worse", name 1 person who is a deserter who became a "great leader". In the time of the world war, desertion was dealt with by a shooting squad, now it seems it is rewarded with presidancy.
GW Bush is a deserter, which equals a coward. GW Bush's dad was in charge of the CIA operation in Cuba, (bay of pigs), which made the CIA pissed off with Kennedy, when Kennedy was shot, and GW Bush's granddad was a Nazi. Hmm, what a great upbringing he had.
I can only conclude that GW Bush is not at fault, despite being thick as ****, and corrupt as hell, as he was born into this environment. If you grow up in a corrupt family, you will be a corrupt person.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by scottc
GW Bush is a deserter, which equals a coward. GW Bush's dad was in charge of the CIA operation in Cuba, (bay of pigs), which made the CIA pissed off with Kennedy, when Kennedy was shot, and GW Bush's granddad was a Nazi. Hmm, what a great upbringing he had.
|
Hmmm, you don't say, cottg'cheese.... so does any of this drivel (whether it's true or not) have any relevance at all? Give up? Well, alright then, the answer is..... NO!
______
"All in all, a great day if you believe stopping the proliferation of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons is a good thing. But, it was a very bad day indeed if world security takes a back seat to your personal hatred of George W. Bush."
We will always remember.
We will always be proud.
We will always be prepared
So that we may always be free!
http://www.ddaymuseum.org/about_us/
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: scottc | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Americaaah
[B]
Hmmm, you don't say, cottg'cheese.... so does any of this drivel (whether it's true or not) have any relevance at all? Give up? Well, alright then, the answer is..... NO!
|
Nothing has any relevance to you does it?. So what GW Bush is a deserter. So what he personally has a lot to gain through invading Iraq. So what despite being too much of a coward to serve himself, and even deserting the texas air guard, (which is the easiest possible military time), he is commanding others to go and die in another country for the sake of his golf chum corporate leaders. So what?.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Charles | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by scottc
Nothing has any relevance to you does it?. So what GW Bush is a deserter. So what he personally has a lot to gain through invading Iraq. So what despite being too much of a coward to serve himself, and even deserting the texas air guard, (which is the easiest possible military time), he is commanding others to go and die in another country for the sake of his golf chum corporate leaders. So what?. |
You certainly have the right to an opinion mr scottie.
But don't think that everyone draws the same conclusions from your emotional and not necessarily logical arguments.
In my opinion, Bush is not the brightest bulb, but he is not corrupt. I am not so cynical to think that he would squander tens of billions and potentially thousands of lives (what if they had deployed WMD?) to get contracts for some of the largest and most capable engineering firms in the world. Keep in mind that since the federal government does so much outsourcing, any government official, elected or otherwise, will know these firms well. The government depends upon their capabilities to implement huge and complex projects that our government salaried employees are not necessarily in a position to execute. A strategic decision was made long long ago to maintain a strong private sector capable of doing this type of work for government. The US government outsources billions in goods and services and much of it goes to foreign firms. How about the French company with nearly a huge$$$ contract to cater food to Marines worldwide? That's just a silly example but proves the point.
So outsourcing big projects to experienced firms does not = corruption. That's the way it is always done.
Outsourcing to firms well known by procurement officials and government employees does also not = corruption. Gov't officials of course know these people/firms.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: scottc | |
| quote: |
| In my opinion, Bush is not the brightest bulb, but he is not corrupt. I am not so cynical to think that he would squander tens of billions and potentially thousands of lives (what if they had deployed WMD?) to get contracts for some of the largest and most capable engineering firms in the world. |
Bush indeed is not the brightest bulb, but not corrupt?. Corruption is a Bush family trait, just look at the Nazi financing, and subsequent transferring of Nazi funds through a Dutch bank by his grandfather. He is also a deserter, which is something nobody seems able to justify. Do you honestly believe that Schultz had no personal interests with regards to the "commitee for the liberation of Iraq", which he chairs?. America had so many interests to satisfy by invading Iraq, from corporate interests of the people that paid for him to be in power, to the interests of the American gas guzzlers, who need the 140+ years of Iraqi oil. Just a personal question, what do you believe is the reason for the invasion?, WMD, (of which there are none), or "Iraqi liberation", (which would mean America would immediately be required to invade Saudi, China, Iran, and every other oppresive regime in the world).
Charles, you seem like an intelligent chap, unlike many of the pro war gun ho chaps on here, but the level of American propaganda can penetrate the most intelligent of people. I would just like to know how you can, whilst holding a straight face, say that Bechtel, with their ties to government, and Halliburton, with its ties to Cheney, have got the contracts on pure merit. Even if you believe that the Iraqi invasion has nothing to do with them, the awarding of the contracts to them surely must ring some alarm bells.
As for "capable engineering firms", have you checked the link?. Bechtel is totally incapable. They have screwed up on pretty much everything they have done, so why consistently award contracts to them?. Answer -- because they have had very cosy ties to every administration in the last century.
One other question, given the number of arguments to say Bush is corrupt, what argument would you use to say that he is not corrupt?.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Charles | | Alas, I wrote a long and thoughtful response but disappeared when I tried to post. Maybe there is a new "server is busy" conspiracy set up to frustrate the "pro-war" supporters????
Bottom line corruption requires deep systemic complicity and brutal oppression of the loose lipped. I lived in Russia for 6 years and saw it first hand: offshore accounts, bribes, murder, etc.
In an open system like US where people in power are there for short durations and there is plently of powerful opposition to shed light on inproprieties, corruption at the level you suppose is highly unlikely. Someone would talk. A lot of corruption is also coerced - if you don't give me this contract your daughter dies. etc. That's the real deal.
Bechtel and Haliburton are at eachothers throats. Major defence contractors, there is just a handful, can't all win all the time. People peddle influence and favors but that is different than corruption.
Politically speaking, the US had to move quick after the conflict to try to show tangible benefits and reconstruction of key infrastructure. This is a risky thing. They go to the big boys who have done it before. They couldn't start a public procurement on this 12 months before the war started now could they?
Show me a list of other firms with the same capabilities and we will start from there... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: USA1 | | scottc,
Have you ever served? Probably not.
You are pretty good at insulting everyone else though.
Not every veteran feels the way your so-called REAL veterans think. I am a Disabled Veteran a member of the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars and I feel everyone has a right to fight or not and also have a right to their opinions and not have them forced on you, I have my own opinions and I’m entitled. I also believe in forgiveness not hatred forever. When I was in Vietnam, I never heard of GWB so, it didn't matter to me then and it doesn't matter to me now. What matters to me is today and tomorrow you twit. You can’t change the past but GWB has a chance to make up for what ever he did or didn’t do. At least he didn’t claim Islam to get out of the Draft like Mohammad Ali.
You don't know me and frankly I'm glad we will never meet because I am positive I would not care for your distaste for Americans or you condescending attitude.
You also have a real tenacity for putting words in people’s mouths and distorting every post. You seem to be pretty much a real butt hole.
Your ignorance is showing, and my impression of you is that you are a *****y little coward.
What do you care anyway? It doesn't affect you pacifists in the Netherlands. On one hand you're a pacifist and then condemn GWB for being one. So, I guess you’re a hypocrite too.
Get off your soapbox, I can see right up your dress. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by USA1
scottc,
Have you ever served? Probably not.
You are pretty good at insulting everyone else though.
Not every veteran feels the way your so-called REAL veterans think. I am a Disabled Veteran a member of the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars and I feel everyone has a right to fight or not and also have a right to their opinions and not have them forced on you, I have my own opinions and I’m entitled. I also believe in forgiveness not hatred forever. When I was in Vietnam, I never heard of GWB so, it didn't matter to me then and it doesn't matter to me now. What matters to me is today and tomorrow you twit. You can’t change the past but GWB has a chance to make up for what ever he did or didn’t do. At least he didn’t claim Islam to get out of the Draft like Mohammad Ali.
You don't know me and frankly I'm glad we will never meet because I am positive I would not care for your distaste for Americans or you condescending attitude.
You also have a real tenacity for putting words in people’s mouths and distorting every post. You seem to be pretty much a real butt hole.
Your ignorance is showing, and my impression of you is that you are a *****y little coward.
What do you care anyway? It doesn't affect you pacifists in the Netherlands. On one hand you're a pacifist and then condemn GWB for being one. So, I guess you’re a hypocrite too.
Get off your soapbox, I can see right up your dress. |
Bravo!!!
______
"All in all, a great day if you believe stopping the proliferation of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons is a good thing. But, it was a very bad day indeed if world security takes a back seat to your personal hatred of George W. Bush."
We will always remember.
We will always be proud.
We will always be prepared
So that we may always be free!
http://www.ddaymuseum.org/about_us/
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: scottc | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by USA1
scottc,
Have you ever served? Probably not.
You are pretty good at insulting everyone else though.
Not every veteran feels the way your so-called REAL veterans think. I am a Disabled Veteran a member of the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars and I feel everyone has a right to fight or not and also have a right to their opinions and not have them forced on you, I have my own opinions and I’m entitled. I also believe in forgiveness not hatred forever. When I was in Vietnam, I never heard of GWB so, it didn't matter to me then and it doesn't matter to me now. What matters to me is today and tomorrow you twit. You can’t change the past but GWB has a chance to make up for what ever he did or didn’t do. At least he didn’t claim Islam to get out of the Draft like Mohammad Ali.
You don't know me and frankly I'm glad we will never meet because I am positive I would not care for your distaste for Americans or you condescending attitude.
You also have a real tenacity for putting words in people’s mouths and distorting every post. You seem to be pretty much a real butt hole.
Your ignorance is showing, and my impression of you is that you are a *****y little coward.
What do you care anyway? It doesn't affect you pacifists in the Netherlands. On one hand you're a pacifist and then condemn GWB for being one. So, I guess you’re a hypocrite too.
Get off your soapbox, I can see right up your dress. |
OK, so you would support anybody who wants to desert?. You think they are "upstanding blokes"?. GW Bush didnt need to get out of the draft, because his dad got him a nice place in the TAG. No violence, no chance of being killed, but he still went AWOL. GW Bush is not a pacifist. No pacifist would have executed more people during his tenure as Texas governor than any other governor in the history of the USA. GW Bush is a coward. You ask as to my military past, but I am not the one who is commanding troops to go and risk their lives. I stand by my statement, you are as much a "disabled vietnam veteran" as my dog. If you were, this would make you the thickest **** alive. "I want GW Bush, the deserter, to take my benefits, because halliburton and bechtel deserve it more than I do". Or maybe all of that drug taking in vietnam has got to your head.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: USA1 | | Scottc,
You are one ignorant piece of work. You are truely a good representation of your country. Keep up the good work.
Again, you put words in the poster's mouth and make what you want out of it. I suggest that the rest of this forum not waiste anymore time with you.
I don't have to prove or disprove anything to you or anyone else, think what you want but don't tell the rest of us what to think.
You know, on second thought, I really would like to meet you. I think I could help sraighten a couple things out for you.
And you know you don't have a dog. Nice try. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: scottc | | USA1,
I am ignorant?. I realise what is going on in your country, you do not. You support a deserter, I do not, you actually believe the BS that a deeply uninteligent person is telling you, I do not. So who is the ignorant one?. Incidentally, you are right, I dont have a dog. I have 2. A spaniel called snoop, and a spitz hound called rueben. I can honestly say that they provide more intelectually stimulating debate than you. Then again, in dog years they are older than 15. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: USA1 | | You have no idea what America is like, you ingnorant twit.
You need to stay out of the coffee shops scotty, because it's starting to affect your rational judgment.
Do the dogs actually answer you when you have your intelligent conversations?
Wow.. you are a piece of work. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: hanuman | | Now what? When one seems to be out of points to argue, it is natural to get tensed a bit and sprout out words which may match the outpourings of a man like bush, but not the great men like Abe Lincoln or Roosevelt. Calm down, USA1, we admire your country for all its good. But what they did in Iraq, that was unpardonable. It will surely hang over Bush's neck for a long period. Sure! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by hanuman
Now what? When one seems to be out of points to argue, it is natural to get tensed a bit and sprout out words which may match the outpourings of a man like bush, but not the great men like Abe Lincoln or Roosevelt. Calm down, USA1, we admire your country for all its good. But what they did in Iraq, that was unpardonable. It will surely hang over Bush's neck for a long period. Sure! |
Wrong, hangman. What the U.S. did in Iraq was the absolute right thing. But of course not everyone will agree to that. There will always be those who criticize it just like there are those who will always criticize U.S. policy regardless of what it might entail. Nevertheless history will commend Bush as the American President who brought down a dictator and his evil regime. And that is a good thing by any standards.
______
"All in all, a great day if you believe stopping the proliferation of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons is a good thing. But, it was a very bad day indeed if world security takes a back seat to your personal hatred of George W. Bush."
We will always remember.
We will always be proud.
We will always be prepared
So that we may always be free!
http://www.ddaymuseum.org/about_us/
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ickle | | This whole premise that George Bush is a deserter is complete malarkey. I'll skip the whole long FACTUAL dissertation on why he is not a deserter since you'll paint things the way you want to see them anyhow.
I'll just ask you one question: If GWB really were truly a "deserter", do you think he'd have the respect of the military that he does? Compare this to Clinton who was despised by the military.
The fact that you resort to name-calling and denigration based on falacy in order to attempt to make your case either shows your inability to debate or the weakness of your argument.
End of thread. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: scottc | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by ickle
This whole premise that George Bush is a deserter is complete malarkey. I'll skip the whole long FACTUAL dissertation on why he is not a deserter since you'll paint things the way you want to see them anyhow.
I'll just ask you one question: If GWB really were truly a "deserter", do you think he'd have the respect of the military that he does? Compare this to Clinton who was despised by the military.
The fact that you resort to name-calling and denigration based on falacy in order to attempt to make your case either shows your inability to debate or the weakness of your argument.
End of thread. |
No, please do not skip the whole FACTUAL dissertation. Please provide evidence to rebut the official documents in the public domain that prove that Bush did not show up for duty for A WHOLE YEAR. This is technically called "DESERTION". Please present evidence to disprove this.
Please show the "weakness in my argument". GW Bush was given the easiest job in the military, (ie, he had no chance of being hurt), but even he has described his coke snorting time as "the wilderness years". (the time he was being arrested for drunk driving and coke possesion, he was supposed to be serving in the TAG.). What an upstanding president.
Not "end of thread", unless you clearly demonstrate an "inability to debate".
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by ickle
This whole premise that George Bush is a deserter is complete malarkey. I'll skip the whole long FACTUAL dissertation on why he is not a deserter since you'll paint things the way you want to see them anyhow.
I'll just ask you one question: If GWB really were truly a "deserter", do you think he'd have the respect of the military that he does? Compare this to Clinton who was despised by the military.
The fact that you resort to name-calling and denigration based on falacy in order to attempt to make your case either shows your inability to debate or the weakness of your argument.
End of thread. |
Absolutely, ickle. I agree.
______
"All in all, a great day if you believe stopping the proliferation of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons is a good thing. But, it was a very bad day indeed if world security takes a back seat to your personal hatred of George W. Bush."
We will always remember.
We will always be proud.
We will always be prepared
So that we may always be free!
http://www.ddaymuseum.org/about_us/
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ickle | | He signed up for a six year stint in the guard. He served very well as a pilot during his first four years. In fact, putting in more time than required. Admittedly, he then blew off a year of his guard obligations to go to Alabama to work on political campaigns. In fact, many people at the time would serve for several years and then blow off their Guard oblgations. So his behavior was not out of the ordinary or an act of cowardice as you would like others to beleive when you throw the term deserter around. (Note that most of the people in the US military have a great deal of respect for him. If he could truly be classified as a deserter, do you think that would be the case? Also, I sincerely doubt that he would have been elected by the American people if he truly deserved the title deserter.)
Now, I suppose technically it APPEARS as though he was a deserter but given the fact that it was common practice and that National Guard units stayed stateside during the Vietnam War, I think it's rather rash to run around calling him a deserter. Especailly given that he was never charged or prosecuted and that, at least colloquially, the term deserter is generally reserved for those who flee from battle out of cowardice.
FACT: He was never accused of desertion by the military or tried for desertion, much less convicted of it. He was given an honorary discharge. Obviously, the military justice system did not see this as serious enough or substantiated well enough to prosecute him. Is he innocent until proven guilty or have you deemed yourself the sole arbiter of US military justice in this case?
Oh yeah, and, by the way, how does this have any relevance to world politics in the 21st century? Answer: It doesn't.
But, I suppose those, like you, who are looking for any reason to discredit him would grasp at any straw so you'll keep bringing up this old, tired, irrelevant argument. For me, his excellent service during the first part of his guard service and his public service since that time greatly outweigh blowing off Guard meetings for a year.
One final question: Do you know anyone who may have been drinking and driven home a few times when they shouldn't have? Probably. Do you run around calling them a repeat DUI offender every chance you get? No, of course not. It's not a perfect world and no one in it is, even you.
Get real and try to base your arguments on something that is substantive. If you disagree on foreign policy issues, military strategy or geo-polical approaches, that's one thing but it really does cheapen your position when you have to grasp at unnecessary and unsubstantiated denigration in order to try to make your case.
Hint: Re-read the bolded part above before responding. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: scottc | |
| quote: |
| He signed up for a six year stint in the guard. He served very well as a pilot during his first four years. In fact, putting in more time than required. Admittedly, he then blew off a year of his guard obligations to go to Alabama to work on political campaigns. In fact, many people at the time would serve for several years and then blow off their Guard oblgations. So his behavior was not out of the ordinary or an act of cowardice as you would like others to beleive when you throw the term deserter around. (Note that most of the people in the US military have a great deal of respect for him. If he could truly be classified as a deserter, do you think that would be the case? Also, I sincerely doubt that he would have been elected by the American people if he truly deserved the title deserter.) |
So, basically your argument is that because he spent 4 years serving, this means it does not matter that he deserted. Sort of like the argument that a 26 year old who only spent the last year abusing children is ok, as he spent 25 sterling years. Nonsensical attempt at justifying the unjustifiable. The American people did not elect him, he lost both the popular and the electoral vote, so that sort of blows that argument out. His brother Jeb elected him by blocking votes from black voters in Florida.
| quote: |
| Now, I suppose technically it APPEARS as though he was a deserter but given the fact that it was common practice and that National Guard units stayed stateside during the Vietnam War, I think it's rather rash to run around calling him a deserter. Especailly given that he was never charged or prosecuted and that, at least colloquially, the term deserter is generally reserved for those who flee from battle out of cowardice. |
Again, refer to the scenario above, would someone who only spent one year abusing children be a pedophile?. You say common practice, but does this make it right?. It is also common practice in Texas to give TAG duty to sons of connected people. So, is this right?. Should the vast majority of Americans be sent to die, whilst the son of a Texas congressman is given an easy life with the certainty of never seeing action?. He beat 500 more qualified recruits because of his dad. Those 500 people had to go to Vietnam and risk their lives, whilst GW snorted coke. Is that right?. Never charged or prosecuted?, once again, he was never prosecuted for either D&D, or drug possesion, but he did it. Why?, once again the famous Bush family protection racket comes into place. Do you believe that Joe Smith, son of a plumber, would be able to just "decide" that he will take a year off military duty?. Would he be tried and prosecuted?. There is no such thing as "technical deserter", just "deserter". Plain and simple. The word "technical" only comes into play when the subject in question is the son of a congressman.
| quote: |
Oh yeah, and, by the way, how does this have any relevance to world politics in the 21st century? Answer: It doesn't.
But, I suppose those, like you, who are looking for any reason to discredit him would grasp at any straw so you'll keep bringing up this old, tired, irrelevant argument. For me, his excellent service during the first part of his guard service and his public service since that time greatly outweigh blowing off Guard meetings for a year. |
Politicians are subject to previous exploits, plain and simple. Relevance?. Well, if he previously murdered 12 children and ate their bodies, given the same argument, what relevance would that have to 21st century politics?. Your argument holds no ground whatsoever. You are saying the past does not matter. In politics, the past does matter, since he is now COMMANDING the people who he was TOO COWARDLY to join. That is entirely relevant.
| quote: |
| One final question: Do you know anyone who may have been drinking and driven home a few times when they shouldn't have? Probably. Do you run around calling them a repeat DUI offender every chance you get? No, of course not. It's not a perfect world and no one in it is, even you. |
Not a perfect world?. Hmm, well what about abortion?. Whilst commiting his "little mistake" there is every chance that he could have run over innocent people. Yet, his brother has condemned anyone commiting abortion as evil. He recently barred a physically and mentally disabled patient who was raped from having an abortion because of this. But apparently, some piss head driving home shitfaced is OK. As a leader, you need to lead by example. If the president of America is allowed to get away with drink driving, why cant I?.
| quote: |
| Get real and try to base your arguments on something that is substantive. If you disagree on foreign policy issues, military strategy or geo-polical approaches, that's one thing but it really does cheapen your position when you have to grasp at unnecessary and unsubstantiated denigration in order to try to make your case. |
I do not need to grasp at anything. GW Bush is so ****ing stupid, he gives all the amunition needed to blast him. Maybe if you get out of the propaganda haven you are living in you may be able to make sensible debates based on more than a blatant eyes closed approach to the president always being right about everything. Sorry, did I say president, I meant governor. The current president of the USA is Al Gore.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by ickle
He signed up for a six year stint in the guard. He served very well as a pilot during his first four years. In fact, putting in more time than required. Admittedly, he then blew off a year of his guard obligations to go to Alabama to work on political campaigns. In fact, many people at the time would serve for several years and then blow off their Guard oblgations. So his behavior was not out of the ordinary or an act of cowardice as you would like others to beleive when you throw the term deserter around. (Note that most of the people in the US military have a great deal of respect for him. If he could truly be classified as a deserter, do you think that would be the case? Also, I sincerely doubt that he would have been elected by the American people if he truly deserved the title deserter.)
Now, I suppose technically it APPEARS as though he was a deserter but given the fact that it was common practice and that National Guard units stayed stateside during the Vietnam War, I think it's rather rash to run around calling him a deserter. Especailly given that he was never charged or prosecuted and that, at least colloquially, the term deserter is generally reserved for those who flee from battle out of cowardice.
FACT: He was never accused of desertion by the military or tried for desertion, much less convicted of it. He was given an honorary discharge. Obviously, the military justice system did not see this as serious enough or substantiated well enough to prosecute him. Is he innocent until proven guilty or have you deemed yourself the sole arbiter of US military justice in this case?
Oh yeah, and, by the way, how does this have any relevance to world politics in the 21st century? Answer: It doesn't.
But, I suppose those, like you, who are looking for any reason to discredit him would grasp at any straw so you'll keep bringing up this old, tired, irrelevant argument. For me, his excellent service during the first part of his guard service and his public service since that time greatly outweigh blowing off Guard meetings for a year.
One final question: Do you know anyone who may have been drinking and driven home a few times when they shouldn't have? Probably. Do you run around calling them a repeat DUI offender every chance you get? No, of course not. It's not a perfect world and no one in it is, even you.
Get real and try to base your arguments on something that is substantive. If you disagree on foreign policy issues, military strategy or geo-polical approaches, that's one thing but it really does cheapen your position when you have to grasp at unnecessary and unsubstantiated denigration in order to try to make your case.
Hint: Re-read the bolded part above before responding. |
Read the above again, scottc, without putting your leftist spin on it this time.
______
"All in all, a great day if you believe stopping the proliferation of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons is a good thing. But, it was a very bad day indeed if world security takes a back seat to your personal hatred of George W. Bush."
We will always remember.
We will always be proud.
We will always be prepared
So that we may always be free!
http://www.ddaymuseum.org/about_us/
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ickle | | scottc: I'll hit your points briefly:
What does a pedophile have to do with GWB skipping Guard meetings? A little out in left field, don't you think?
He WAS elected. Even Al Gore knows that. Not to mention Congress, the Supreme Court and the vast majority of the American populus - those approval ratings must really make your blood boil.
BTW: Did you check out of all those independent post-election recounts? He won Florida in all of them. Denial is not a healthy emotional state - seek counseling.
I'll skip the discussion on the hows and why of the electoral vote vs. the popular vote - you'll just get more frustrated and confused.
Someone murdering and eating 12 babies??? Where did this come from? Is this the sort of thing that haunts your nightmares? Some counseling might be in order here as well.
How is Jeb Bush's position on the issue of abortion related to GWB's Guard service?
I never even implied that I thought the president (oops, sorry, governor - I forgot about he denial thing) was always right. I was adressing the issue of GWB's supposed "desertion."
Thank you for your insightful point by point analysis of my post. I've never had a delusional episode on crack but your post helps me understand what it might be like. Now we see the true end result of those liberal drug policies in the Netherlands.
Your vitriolic nonsensical tirade demonstrates a complete lack of rational thought - which is probably why you're a liberal and a Bush-hater.
PS: You seem as though you're far gone enough to qualify for some free counseling from the government - could save you a few bucks on the road back to reality. I guess government-sponsored mental health programs DO have their place. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: safeRus | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by ickle
scottc: I'll hit your points briefly:
What does a pedophile have to do with GWB skipping Guard meetings? A little out in left field, don't you think?
He WAS elected. Even Al Gore knows that. Not to mention Congress, the Supreme Court and the vast majority of the American populus - those approval ratings must really make your blood boil.
BTW: Did you check out of all those independent post-election recounts? He won Florida in all of them. Denial is not a healthy emotional state - seek counseling.
I'll skip the discussion on the hows and why of the electoral vote vs. the popular vote - you'll just get more frustrated and confused.
Someone murdering and eating 12 babies??? Where did this come from? Is this the sort of thing that haunts your nightmares? Some counseling might be in order here as well.
How is Jeb Bush's position on the issue of abortion related to GWB's Guard service?
I never even implied that I thought the president (oops, sorry, governor - I forgot about he denial thing) was always right. I was adressing the issue of GWB's supposed "desertion."
Thank you for your insightful point by point analysis of my post. I've never had a delusional episode on crack but your post helps me understand what it might be like. Now we see the true end result of those liberal drug policies in the Netherlands.
Your vitriolic nonsensical tirade demonstrates a complete lack of rational thought - which is probably why you're a liberal and a Bush-hater.
PS: You seem as though you're far gone enough to qualify for some free counseling from the government - could save you a few bucks on the road back to reality. I guess government-sponsored mental health programs DO have their place. |
I will not bother answering each individual point as above, as there are none. As you quite clearly do not understand the concept of an analogy, I will explain each.
The first analogy is pointing to the fact that you state that the fact GW Bush did 4 years sterling service before deserting, means the desertion is irrelevant. The analogy is that if someone spent 25 years as a non pedophile, then abused a child for a year, does that make him a pedophile, or just "technically" a pedophile?.
The second analogy is that if GW Bush murdered 12 children, then ate them, would that affect your oppinion on his ability to be the president of the USA?. You obviously think not. Apparently the past does not matter. Anything you do in the past has no bearing on today?. Try telling that to the mourning families of the 155 people executed whilst GW Bush was governor of Texas.
The third analogy involves dubbya's brother, Jeb. If drink driving is simply an "indescretion", then surely so is having sex without a condom. In particular, surely having sex when you are physically and mentally disabled and completely incapable of consent without a condom is an "indescretion". Yet Jeb Bush pulled her through the courts forcing her to have the baby of a rapist. But obviously an "indescretion" by a president is acceptable, but not by anybody else. Maybe a new constitution is needed that includes the proviso that the son of a congressman/senator is excempt from any law?.
With regards to your rant about drugs, many points. Firstly, I no longer live in the Netherlands, as I relocated to Germany, (do you have a passport?, have you ever gone outside of the USA?, probabaly not, since 93% of American people have no passport). American people think "going abroad" means driving to Georgia. You are quite clearly a redneck hick. Secondly, obviously you do not know **** about the so called "liberal drug laws". Crack is just as illegal in Holland as America, but the difference is that even politicians can be prosecuted for it here. I suggest you go back to screwing your sister rather than wasting peoples time on the internet with your redneck hick Bush loving ill informed opinions. I have never tried crack, however GW Bush has tried coke. He was arrested for it, but never prosecuted as the American way is "if you are related to politicians, you are exempt".
As a final message, I am currently laughing at you, as I have a son. He is FREE to grow up without being shot in school. Any unfortunate child spawned by you will be in fear, just as all Americans are, as to how safe he is just going to school, from being shot dead in school. LAND OF THE FREE indeed!!!.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: safeRus | |
| quote: |
| Read the above again, scottc, without putting your leftist spin on it this time. |
Incidentally, I find it really funny when Hick Yanks say stuff like "leftist". I am a capitalist. I believe in personal gain. I drive a Porsche, I live in a half million pound house, I work for an Investment bank as a BA, but I do not believe in killing people for the personal gain. This is only considered "leftist" in America. The stupid thing is that if I lived in the USA, I would be better off under Bush than most, as I would be in the top 1% scale. As it happens though, I do not, which means I have to put up with the stupid wankers economic disasters plunging the rest of the worlds economy downwards.
Americaaaah, what do you do for a living, go on it will be really funny. What do you drive?, where do you live?.
scottc
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by safeRus
Incidentally, I find it really funny when Hick Yanks say stuff like "leftist". I am a capitalist. I believe in personal gain. I drive a Porsche, I live in a half million pound house, I work for an Investment bank as a BA, but I do not believe in killing people for the personal gain. This is only considered "leftist" in America. The stupid thing is that if I lived in the USA, I would be better off under Bush than most, as I would be in the top 1% scale. As it happens though, I do not, which means I have to put up with the stupid wankers economic disasters plunging the rest of the worlds economy downwards.
Americaaaah, what do you do for a living, go on it will be really funny. What do you drive?, where do you live?.
scottc |
You can present yourself as you want—but as far as I'm concerned you are clearly a propagandist who denies reality when it does not suit your anti-American pursuits. You only seek out that "factoid" that will support your rhetoric—after having stripped it of its context, and spun it such that it will fit inside your narrow field of vision. This phenomenon is by now all-too-familiar along these threads.
______
"All in all, a great day if you believe stopping the proliferation of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons is a good thing. But, it was a very bad day indeed if world security takes a back seat to your personal hatred of George W. Bush."
We will always remember.
We will always be proud.
We will always be prepared
So that we may always be free!
http://www.ddaymuseum.org/about_us/
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: USA1 | | Americaah,
scottc is full of crap. Since when does Germany use pounds as a monetary measure? Old Marks maybe or even Euros but not pounds. Hick Yanks is an English term isn't it?
scottc. you are a complete and utter idiot.
Let's see, um, today I drive a porche, or maybe it's a Benz. I'd say a maybe a Vauxhal. Oh ya, isn't that owned by GM?
You even have tha gaul to post Germany as your home when in fact you live in England or Scottland. What's a BA anyway? Bad Attitude or British Ass? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: safeRus | | USA1,
I use pounds because I am British, in exactly the same way that all Americans over here judge prices and income in dollar terms. It is what you grew up with, so it is the measure used.
I live in Koenigstein, which is 20K from Frankfurt. I have the misfortune of being close to the Wiesbaden US Army base, which means I have to listen to the rediculous whine of the yank voice a few times too many.
Americaaah, you still have not answered my question. It is interesting because if you, as I suspect, work in a gas station, your support of Bush is the biggest indicator as to how stupid you are. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ickle | | scottc:
You need to go back to school to learn what an analogy is. You obviously don't understand the whole concept of analogies.
The purpose of an analogy is to find a situation that is as similar as possible to the situation at hand, not to come up with something that is as inflammatory as possible.
To compare neglecting National Guard duty, in essense a contractual obligation to a government body, to an act of violence/perversion committed by an adult against an unconsenting minor is just plain ridiculous. Your other "analogies" are equally inappropraite and do more to prove that you're most likely irrantional than to prove your case.
Later, you, in what I suppose you'd consider a fit of cleverness, try to bring in the issue of GWB's brother's stand on abortion, something totally irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
If these are the best "analogies" that you can come up with, then your side of this issue is much better off if you just read posts and refrain from "contributing." If you want have a serious debate, then you need to debate, not rant. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ickle | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by safeRus
USA1,
I live in Koenigstein, which is 20K from Frankfurt. I have the misfortune of being close to the Wiesbaden US Army base, which means I have to listen to the rediculous whine of the yank voice a few times too many.
|
No need to worry about hearing much more whining from that base. We'll soon be removing all or a signficant portion of the forces there and, in the process, making the local economy there even worse than the rest of Germany. Enjoy!
| | Reply To this Message
|
Post-9/11 Era Forum: Welcome aboard the Iraqi Gravy train
|