Harlemm lied about more than his age..... |
| Posted by: Jakrabit31 | | I could not believe that Harlemm had the nerve to stand there and say, "I have always wanted the chance to be a recording artist and do a record..." blah blah blah.
Harlemm Lee was on Star Search as Gerry Woo back around 1987. He was discovered on that show and signed to a record label. He had a couple of minor hits and then faded. It is unfair for him to compete in this competition having already had his shot at a recording career. And for him to change his name and pretend that this would all be new for him is such a slap in the face to the other contestants. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | | Jakrabit, I have been down this road before and people don't care about it. I understand your view more than you will ever know. I also know what happens when people lie. They have consequences to face sooner or later.
I don't believe the producers of Fame were fair to the other contestants, and I think every applicant should have been researched. But, there is something Fame didn't make clear to any of us. What were their standards of selecting and keeping participants?
Obviously, integrity was not one of those standards. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Famester | | I've said before that the issue of whether Harlemm Lee performed in the 80s using the name Gerry Woo should have been cleared up by the show producers. Surely someone at NBC reads the message boards and is aware of the rumors involving Harlemm/Gerry.
If Harlemm Lee did perform in the 80s using the name Gerry Woo, the voting public should have been given that information. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gosing | | Does it really matter?
AS far as I know the show was about finding that thriple threat. Someone undiscovered who could sing, dance and whatever...
Was intergity, and who you really are had anything to do with the selection process? As far as I know they just held auditions. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: uclapu | | I used to sing with Harlemm when he was Gerry, and can understand why there would be an issue with his recreation. That being said, the boy is hands down the best singer I have ever seen in my life. We used to just stand back and let him throw down. I could not be happier for him.
I know there is a huge issue about his age and marketability, but that just makes it more amazing to me that he kept at it. I honestly thought America would stop voting once his age came out. Thank God I was wrong. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: RaeBallet5 | | i congratulate Harlemm on winning, he was my favorite contestant on the show, with by far the best energy. however it is disappointing to hear about the apparent lies. however, is that not the show biz? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: joseph1837 | | I, as a member of the voting American public, do not care if Harlemm Lee ever performed under another name or on another show twenty years ago! (If, indeed, these rumors are true.) This man has a beautiful voice and a fresh style unlike anything I've seen. I watched FAME each week just to see what this one performer was going to do. He was clearly the most talented individual on that show. I would pay to see him performing on stage and look forward to his cd. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: SueReu | | I guess I'm confused.
We all know that he lied about his age. This was announced on the show and been beaten to death on this board.
How do we know that he lied about his experience? How do we know for a fact that the producers of Fame did not know that he had recorded under another name (although Gerry Woo is Filipino and Harlemm said last night that he is Chinese - oh my gosh! Have we caught him in yet another lie?!?)? Maybe they made the decision that since there seems to be no rule against being a "professional" on this show that it did not matter and since it was such a long time ago there was no reason to bring it up (Serena, Shannon & Tyce are all currently employed as "professionals", which could be the reason that their experience was included).
Anyway, what's past is past. Hopefully Harlemm will make a name for himself, along with all of the other contestants.
They were all WONDERFUL! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: oldbutafan | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gosing
Does it really matter?
AS far as I know the show was about finding that thriple threat. Someone undiscovered who could sing, dance and whatever...
Was intergity, and who you really are had anything to do with the selection process? As far as I know they just held auditions. |
In a way it does matter. As you say it was about finding undiscovered talent and WooLee doesn't fit that profile.
Additionally, I thought the competition was for amateurs and if WooLee is professional or even semi-professional that tilts the competition.
Also, they said the winner will be a "spokesperson". Will his platform be -- Win at all costs, Lie to get ahead, Circumvent the Process, and Make fools of those who support you ?
If this was just a regular job, what WooLee has done - misrepresented himself and lied on his application - would be grounds for termination/dismissal.
Maybe WooLee was a ringer all along ?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: SueReu | | Since Serena, Shannon and Tyce are all "professionals", I do not believe that this competition was for amateurs only.
It was not very well defined by the show and has caused some difficulties.
Again, I state, how do we know that Harlemm lied to the producers of Fame about his past experience (see my earlier post)? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: oldbutafan | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by SueReu
Since Serena, Shannon and Tyce are all "professionals", I do not believe that this competition was for amateurs only.
It was not very well defined by the show and has caused some difficulties.
Again, I state, how do we know that Harlemm lied to the producers of Fame about his past experience (see my earlier post)? |
Sorry Sue, I missed your earlier post. But, although it is circumstantial evidence, I am presuming WooLee lied on his App.
- Since we know he initially lied about his age, it's fairly safe to figure he had to exclude 10 years from his resume. Deception by ommission.
- Since Lee's background as Woo was never mentioned on the show, again, someone is guilty of lying by ommission and deception.
- He perpetuated the perception that this was his first and long-awaited opportunity.
Granted, if he would have come in as a 36 year-old former contest winner who had failed in "the business" having had several opportunities, it is questionable if he would have made the cut for the show.
Once he had made it on the show, it would have been difficult to reveal all the true facts in a way that wouldn't have affected his or other peoples chances of winning.
Depending on how the contracts were written, there might have been grounds for law suits.
I find this all very disheartening.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by oldbutafan
In a way it does matter. As you say it was about finding undiscovered talent and WooLee doesn't fit that profile.
Additionally, I thought the competition was for amateurs and if WooLee is professional or even semi-professional that tilts the competition.
Also, they said the winner will be a "spokesperson". Will his platform be -- Win at all costs, Lie to get ahead, Circumvent the Process, and Make fools of those who support you ?
If this was just a regular job, what WooLee has done - misrepresented himself and lied on his application - would be grounds for termination/dismissal.
Maybe WooLee was a ringer all along ? |
FINALLY! Thank you for your post.
I truly hope Harlemm isn't going to be a spokesperson for a product I like, because it will be hard to boycott it, especially if it's Coca-Cola... however; I could learn to like Pepsi.

| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: SueReu | | You guys crack me up!
I agree that integrity is very important and that lying is not acceptable, no matter the circumstances.
However, if you guys think that you are pure in who you like or dislike based on integrity and honesty, you are really fooling yourselves! You would listen to very little music, watch very few movies or television, and NEVER VOTE!
Lots of people tell lots of lies, some big and some small. Is it right, no. Does our society seem to accept it? For some reason, yes!
The bottom line is, this is a television show - that's it. It's not like he lied to get us into a war or something! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: tilowa | | Do you know for certain that Harlemm Lee & Gerry Woo are one in the same person? That's a strong statement to be making.
There's no reason that Harlemm should not have been a part of the Fame talent search. He auditioned just like everyone else & was one of the fortunate to be chosen. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: SueReu | | I'm not sure if anyone REALLY knows if they are the same person, although there was an article in a magazine stating that they are. Also, someone posted stating that they sang back up with Gerry Woo in the 1980's
I know I won't get a response, but I have sent an e-mail to NBC (Fame) requesting clarification.
If I get anything (and I won't hold my breath) I'll let everyone know. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Promo Mack | | So what, he raaaawks, the competition is everything with him, NOTHING without him... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by joseph1837
Kukabeara,
Too bad you don't boycott this forum! |
Freedom of speech sweatie.... why would I? You guys are too much fun.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: jalissa15 | | I couldn't figure out how to post a picture but if you go to artistdirect.com and type in Gerry Woo. There is a picture of him and it sure looks like Harlemm to me. (btw...I am a big Harlemm Lee fan, I was just curious. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: dove654 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by oldbutafan
- He perpetuated the perception that this was his first and long-awaited opportunity.
|
I don't recall Harlemm saying that this was his first opportunity. Yes, he did say that becoming a pop star has been his lifelong dream. If (I say "if" because no one here knows for sure) Harlemm Lee and Gerry Woo are one and the same how does that cancel out his right to keep his dream alive? Obviously, Gerry Woo had very limited success -- as I've said before, I listened to the radio alot in the 80's and don't recall ever having heard a song by him. So, I feel this is Harlemm's "long awaited opportunity". How is that a lie?? And I don't want to hear this "deception by omission" crap. As a general rule a resume only includes the previous 10 years experience -- let's see -- that would be 1993 -- well out of the 80's. I believe that the producers had an opportunity to check on the pasts of all the contestants. Apparently they didn't find anything that would cause them to disqualify anyone. With all the ugliness that is going on in this world today I can't believe this is an issue. The man is talented beyond belief and gives joy whenever he performs. Let him finally have his day -- please!
Harlemm -- you have the beginnings of a devoted fan base and you will be successful. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: foxydonna | | I write for one of the reality show websites and wrote a story on Harlemm/Gerry before the end of the show. I received many emails from people who knew Gerry and who verified that he was the same guy. People had nothing but nice things to say about him but were disappointed that he wasn't truthful about his past.
The ironic thing is that his past could have been dealt with in a way that would play into the whole Fame thing. The perfect time for him to acknowledge this would have been in the film clip they showed before he performed. He could have said something like "I had a shot at fame once and blew it..." whatever. By not saying anything, he perpetuated the lie. One person I heard from told me his mother and Harlemm's mother were friends. I mean did he think that everyone who knew him would vanish.
I personally feel that the show insulted the viewers by totally overlooking all of this. How could they not have known? Those of us who write about these shows knew? You knew? All you have to do is "Google" and you can find all these articles. Do they think we are all total morons? That is what got me with the Tyce thing too. He was so easy to uncover.
I hope they never do this show again. If they do, I won't watch it. It was sham from the get-go and although I think Harlemm is talented and hope that he does well, the whole show left me feeling totally cheated.
Strictly my opinion! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Newport | | Harlemm has been presented to the America public as just a regular guy with a dream. A data entry clerk who has waited all his life for stardom.
The film clips of who he is said nothing about a previous career as Gerry Woo. If Harlemm is Gerry Woo, he is guilty of deception.
If he won a talent contest, recorded a CD, had videos and a couple of minor hits, that is something that is part of who he is.
Serena's history of singing backup for Gladys Knight was known. Shannon's history of singing with a rock band and being an NBA dancer was known. Tyce's history as a professional dancer was known. Why was Harlemm Lee allowed to erase his history as Gerry Woo? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: foushou | | Oh guys get over the moral issue...If it had been so important you would have never seen Harlemm perform in the first place!!
All I know is that he captivated me more than I have been in years. Let's not forget the pleasure we felt by becoming too intellectual about it. It's only entertainment! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Newport
Harlemm has been presented to the America public as just a regular guy with a dream. A data entry clerk who has waited all his life for stardom.
The film clips of who he is said nothing about a previous career as Gerry Woo. If Harlemm is Gerry Woo, he is guilty of deception.
If he won a talent contest, recorded a CD, had videos and a couple of minor hits, that is something that is part of who he is.
Serena's history of singing backup for Gladys Knight was known. Shannon's history of singing with a rock band and being an NBA dancer was known. Tyce's history as a professional dancer was known. Why was Harlemm Lee allowed to erase his history as Gerry Woo? |
Those are very good points Newport. Sooner, or later, the media will catch up to all the controversy and start asking Harlemm to explain. He must have a reason for wanting his history to stay in the past. If he didn't want it to come out, getting up there on national TV is not a good way of keeping the past hidden!
I listened to a music clip of his old CD. Someone put it on a site and it's not bad sounding.
As for us getting over the moral issues.... Harlemm put himself up on the stage and wanted our votes and supports. By doing so, he's asking us to invest in his career. I don't know of any SMART investors that fail to check out the integrity of an investment opportunity before supporting it.
People will, once again, have to decide whether or not its an issue worth standing for. Some for what he did, some against. To ask us to get over the issue is like asking you to consider the issue. And perhaps America DOES care about moral values and would like to take a stand. If you don't want to take a stand, then it's your choice, but don't expect the rest of us to not pursue the truth. I'm looking forward to the media asking the truth, because....
If you look in the sports arena, there are athletes who wrongfully won an award, and when the truth is later found out, they have to give up the award, and the rightful person who would have won, is awarded the title and award.
If Harlemm is found out to be hiding something that should have been made available to the voters, and the voting would have been given to an honest contestant, then it DOES matter on the moral issues. If he's deserving of the win, let him keep it. If not, let the real winner be crowned.
I like it when cheaters are found out in sports, and they take the title away and give it to the real winner. It's fair, and just.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: foushou | | Yes TORQUEVADA, you"...like it when cheaters are found...", you are a true inquisitor, we know that, poor lost soul. If you had the power you would burn them alive wouldn't you!!??
If stoning others makes your day, rest assured that you will harvest what you sowed...Be prepared for a rain of rocks one of these days!!!! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by foushou
Yes TORQUEVADA, you"...like it when cheaters are found...", you are a true inquisitor, we know that, poor lost soul. If you had the power you would burn them alive wouldn't you!!??
If stoning others makes your day, rest assured that you will harvest what you sowed...Be prepared for a rain of rocks one of these days!!!! |
This has absolutely NOTHING to do with casting stones. It has to do with what is fair. What did you want everyone to do, over look it, not care, not challenge anything, accept whatever comes our way and not even bother to see if it's the truth, go with the flow and not take a stand in anything?
Do you accept everything that comes your way? Do you take a stand on anything?
I'm not someone who just sits back and lets anything in the world happen to me. One voice makes a difference some times, and I am not ashamed to test the waters, ask questions, find out whats true and what isn't.
Do you vote? Do you just vote for anyone that puts their name on the ballet, or do you find out what they stand for first? Then do you try to verify what they say they stand for? Do you even care what a person stands for before you vote?
Foushou, you have made it quite clear that you don't like me one bit, and that's your freedom to do so, but I will not step down on questioning things. I made it a choice to take an interest in the people on Fame, because I support one of the contestants. If you can't accept me taking a stand on an issue because that's my nature, then consider it taking a stand for the person I support. I would like to know what the truth is, because one of those kids is not even out of high school yet, and you don't take kids and exploit them for publicity. Either Fame was for real, or it wasn't. We have a right to know, if nothing more than for the honest kid who didn't get a fair contest.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Mr. Cargo | | Ahoy Foushou,
Thank you for your kind words.
I do hope you do not refrain from contributing to the site: you added some very interesting points.
I shall read your further contributions with curiosity
For now.
Mr Cargo
PS Thank you INVAR for keeping me entertained. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuzzyfred | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Kukabeara
This has absolutely NOTHING to do with casting stones. It has to do with what is fair |
What do you mean "fair"? Was the show ever properly defined? I never saw anything in the rules about "lack of professional experience" being a requirement. Did you? Probably not. I don't recall the rules ever being explicit....
You've allowed your own PERSONAL ASPIRATIONS for what the show SHOULD BE guide your assessment of "fair." That's clear.
Unless you've seen the resume Harlemm submitted to the show, you shouldn't go spouting off "He hid his past." You have no proof, yet speak with tremendous conviction.
[EDIT] Please share your insults with your friends and family, but keep them out of public discussion. [/EDIT]
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | | In case you haven't noticed, a lot of this forum is about what Fame is, isn't, should be, shouldn't be, and what we would like it to be. I'm one in a crowd of members on this forum who are asking questions, posting views, and hopefully, Fame 2 will be better because of our posts. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: shimster | | this issue was cleared up in a website i came across, apparently it is not against the show rules if or not the contestants had previously had a contract, the only rule is that they should not be signed up now, during the show.
for example, on the show last comic standing, half of the contestants have been well established over the past 10+ years, (one of them even made history as being the first and only white stand up to have appeared on Def Comedy Jam), and he has repeatedly made appearances on the Rosie O'Donnell Show, but this does not qualify any of them, because where are they there for? a comedy central special in their name and countless other projects on tv and on tour.
the same goes for other contests, only present recording deals are considered not past ones.
also, about the age thing, harlemm cannot be disqualified because it does not say in show rules that age is an issue. AI on the other hand has an age range within which contestants have to be in to qualify for the show.
whether it is or isn't an issue of morality/integrity, that's a whole different issue. i think we can more than agree that tv, least of all reality tv, is far from being founded on morals... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: donof | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Kukabeara
In case you haven't noticed, a lot of this forum is about what Fame is, isn't, should be, shouldn't be, and what we would like it to be. I'm one in a crowd of members on this forum who are asking questions, posting views, and hopefully, Fame 2 will be better because of our posts. |
I hope there is a Fame 2 but the ratings were SO poor. Only 8 million watched the finale and it came in third for the hour. Although I liked the show, I'm betting against Fame 2 ever happening.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: foushou | | What I dislike KUKA, is not YOU, ( no need to get paranoiac on me now!).
It is your constant reference to moral laws to cast out people that you do not know, that bothers me.....Moral is a personal thing, and it has to stay that way. Otherwise it becomes an instrument of oppression. It is very clear to me that a great majority of the problems arising in this world stem from the fact that individuals take it on themselves to decide how others should behave...Of course they will say that they do it acccording to whatever "scripture" they are attached to by virtue of their individual faith. But in fact all they are doing is interpreting in a total subjectivity, a text, that was never intented but for the sole purpose to inspire each individual to better themselves (and solely themselves!).
It was never meant to be an instrument for the judgment of others. Justice serves that purpose. It has its institutions to make sure that the societal peace is maintained. Let them do their job.
To abstain from morally based judment is a sign of moral health; it shows that you understand that you are not above the problems that might affect others. To say that somebody is a liar, implicates that you are not, and that it is simply impossible!!
Do you get that??????????????
You yourself have been caught lying on this forum. You justified it with some convoluted ridiculous logic, but in the end fooled no one. If you recognized that, it would make you a much nicer person. As long as you will cling to your rigid self-righteous self, people will not want to be around you. Why ? Because, they'll know that at anytime you can condemn them. I am surprised that you haven't discovered yet the mirror effect law : if we start looking for lies in others, then they start doing the same thing with us, and once everybody has been proven a liar, what's next? A freeking dead-end!
FREE YOUR MIND AND YOUR A.... WILL FOLLOW!!  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by foushou
You yourself have been caught lying on this forum. You justified it with some convoluted ridiculous logic, but in the end fooled no one. If you recognized that, it would make you a much nicer person. As long as you will cling to your rigid self-righteous self, people will not want to be around you. Why ? Because, they'll know that at anytime you can condemn them. I am surprised that you haven't discovered yet the mirror effect law : if we start looking for lies in others, then they start doing the same thing with us, and once everybody has been proven a liar, what's next? A freeking dead-end!
FREE YOUR MIND AND YOUR A.... WILL FOLLOW!! |
I have not lied on this forum at all. What you are assuming is a lie is based on whether or not wanting what is fair, is considered mean spirited. This comes from Johnny offering Shannon a contract at the end of the show. I say it was fair and a good ending. Some say I lied and it's mean spirited. Again, that's different views for a subject several people disagree on.
As for condemning people for lying and they won't want to be around me... do you keep friends that lie to you? If you do, then you really don't have a deep friendship at all now do you? I have friends that have lied to me, and I forgive them, but when they continually lie, I don't consider them loyal friend, and they are not trusted like the ones that don't lie. I'm a loyal friend that values honesty. My friends know I'm not going to lie to them and that's what makes our friendship so trusting. A person who lies to you is not your friend. A person who takes a risk and lies in spite of what is right, but they do everything to correct the mistake, and don't continually repeat the mistake, is probably worth keeping if they learned from the mistake. To make a mistake and learn from it is growth and success. To live in the mistake is failure.
Again, I'll take a stand. Harlemm lied on his application and should have been fired. If he's willing to lie on an application and laugh it off, it means he may not have learned from his mistake. I don't think it's funny at all. Do a lot of people lie on their applications, about their age, etc? Yes, but it doesn't make it right. Since the producers are not concerned about integrity as a spokesperson, then they aren't concerned about what else he might lie to them about. That's their choice.
If someone asks me for a job, but they lied on their application, they don't get hired. If the lie was missed during the hiring process, and found out later, they are confronted with their lie. The person is then fired or put on probation, depending on the nature of the lie.
It isn't a question that people make mistakes. We all make mistakes. It how we handle the mistakes and what we do afterwards that seems to be the issue here. Our arguments come from those who oppose lying, and those who think it's ok, especially white lies.
As for being happy for an ending that seemed fitting for Fame, if you want to consider that a lie, then you label it whatever you want. I am happy when dishonesty doesn't get the glory. Who was that marathon runner than cheated? She was found out to have cheated and the real winner, who didn't cheat, was given the title some time later. Would I be mean to be happy about that? I suppose some of you will say that's mean, and some will say that's justice.
Harlemm didn't get the full spotlight. Some will say that's mean, some will say that's justice.
Label it what you want.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: dove654 | | First, let me say, Foushou -- excellent, excellent post
Kuk: Alas, I grow weary but feel the need to reiterate something.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Kukabeara
Again, I'll take a stand. Harlemm lied on his application and should have been fired. If he's willing to lie on an application and laugh it off, it means he may not have learned from his mistake. I don't think it's funny at all. Do a lot of people lie on their applications, about their age, etc? Yes, but it doesn't make it right. Since the producers are not concerned about integrity as a spokesperson, then they aren't concerned about what else he might lie to them about. That's their choice.
|
Harlemm did not "laugh it off". He came clean with the producers of the show and they let him stay in the competition. Then American voted and decided they wanted to see and hear more of him. On the Today program with Matt Lauer on Thursday Harlemm indicated that he was the one who brought up the issue. He admitted that he lied about his age. He was not fired but, instead, forgiven -- forgiveness is an option.
"It's all about love... yeah, yeah..." come on everybody, sing with me "It's all about love, love, love..." -- from the song "I Love You Love Me". I think it's time for that group hug now  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ddkay | | Thank you dove654 for making my 1st point.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Kukabeara
If someone asks me for a job, but they lied on their application, they don't get hired. If the lie was missed during the hiring process, and found out later, they are confronted with their lie. The person is then fired or put on probation, depending on the nature of the lie.
|
According to how you have been jumping on Harlemm, this is inconsistent.
If Harlemm lied about his age, and owned up to it, took responsibility for that, then he has learned from this. That responsibility could (IMO) be one of the reasons that he won. Talented and admitting his fear that he was too old to be in this contest. People respect when you own your mistakes. If he had tried to weasel out of it, no one would have respected him, regardless of his talent.
You wanted him gone, now, no excuses. But an employee... or put on probation, depending on the nature of the lie.
I would have expected that anyone who had lied to you would be fired on the spot, no questions asked. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: foushou | | thanks DOVE and DDKAY, for proving the point again.
KUKA, once again you show your total lack of logic.
You compare a "cheat", (i.e: the marathonian that is doped), and a "lie". Both are 2 different things. The cheater erase the competition by enhancing his performance with artificial means.
Harlemm's lie did not enhance anything which was not there in the first place!! The competitors were not deprived of a fair competition !!!!!!!!! It would have been a determining factor to eliminate him only if the show had been entitled FAME JUNIOR, where obviously the age of the competitors would have been a determining factor of their participation.
Ok if you can't understand that now, just don't bother replying and go back to college. Take a unit on philosophy and logic!!! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: foushou | | Oh a little advice KUKA. Please, do not go into your 3 miles long, verbosity striken, under-hypnosis answers, before actually REALLY reading our posts...It defeats the purpose of writting to you! thanks. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by foushou
thanks DOVE and DDKAY, for proving the point again.
KUKA, once again you show your total lack of logic.
You compare a "cheat", (i.e: the marathonian that is doped), and a "lie". Both are 2 different things. The cheater erase the competition by enhancing his performance with artificial means.
Harlemm's lie did not enhance anything which was not there in the first place!! The competitors were not deprived of a fair competition !!!!!!!!! It would have been a determining factor to eliminate him only if the show had been entitled FAME JUNIOR, where obviously the age of the competitors would have been a determining factor of their participation.
Ok if you can't understand that now, just don't bother replying and go back to college. Take a unit on philosophy and logic!!! |
Who said anything about artificial means? She lied about how she got to the finish line.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by foushou
Oh a little advice KUKA. Please, do not go into your 3 miles long, verbosity striken, under-hypnosis answers, before actually REALLY reading our posts...It defeats the purpose of writting to you! thanks. |
Then stop writing to me, or put me on ignore.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nektub | | Harlemm didn't cheated to be the winner of Fame but it was the American public that voted him to be. If the american public thought he shouldn't be in the competition then they should had not voted for him.
So stop blaming Harlemm!
If some people are saying that they didn't vote for Harlemm because of high morals then are they thinking that the american majority have low morals?
So direct your anger towards the correct source. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Kookaburra | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by foushou
I can't let you spread your delirious points of view.... |
Well, since you haven't been successful in stopping me yet, you are spinning your wheels. I give this thread a very short future before the admins close it, because it's gone way off topic. I told you guys before that if you can't accept the fact that other people are going to have a different opinion than you, then the administrators of the forum will close the threads. Look what happened! The thread "a slap in the face for Harlemm from Johnny" got closed. Imagine that.
I would also like to point out something to you before the admins close this thread too. Go back and look at all of my posts I've given in response to those who oppose my views. I give you responses that do not cast insults on any of you, but instead, explain my views the best I can. Now, go look at all those posts given by those who oppose me. One was so bad the admins had to edit it out. Most are out sheer anger because I have a different view. That won't change, so why waste your time trying to lash out at me? Until the administrators tell us we are only allowed to have one view, and one view only, then I will continue to have whatever opinion I want.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: foushou | | Complex of persecution, paranoid, hallucinations....you name it you've got it KUKA. Nobody is trying to stop you. We are exercising our right to be outraged. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: calliope6 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by foxydonna
The ironic thing is that his past could have been dealt with in a way that would play into the whole Fame thing. The perfect time for him to acknowledge this would have been in the film clip they showed before he performed. He could have said something like "I had a shot at fame once and blew it..." |
Who is to say that he didn't say something like that? The editing is not controlled by the contestants.
Bottom line, the one who showed the most star power/true triple threat came out on top. Not just my opinion, but the overall opinion of the voters.
| | Reply To this Message
|
Fame Forum: Harlemm lied about more than his age.....
|