Ex-Army boss: Pentagon won't admit reality in Iraq - Post-9/11 Era

Ex-Army boss: Pentagon won't admit reality in Iraq

Post-9/11 Era Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: Marc Flemming

The former civilian head of the Army said Monday it is time for the Pentagon to admit that the military is in for a long occupation of Iraq that will require a major commitment of American troops.
Former Army secretary Thomas White said in an interview that senior Defense officials "are unwilling to come to grips" with the scale of the postwar U.S. obligation in Iraq. The Pentagon has about 150,000 troops in Iraq and recently announced that the Army's 3rd Infantry Division's stay there has been extended indefinitely.

"This is not what they were selling (before the war)," White said, describing how senior Defense officials downplayed the need for a large occupation force. "It's almost a question of people not wanting to 'fess up to the notion that we will be there a long time and they might have to set up a rotation and sustain it for the long term."

The interview was White's first since leaving the Pentagon in May after a series of public feuds with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld led to his firing.

Rumsfeld and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz criticized the Army's chief of staff, Gen. Eric Shinseki, after Shinseki told Congress in February that the occupation could require "several hundred thousand troops." Wolfowitz called Shinseki's estimate "wildly off the mark."

Rumsfeld was furious with White when the Army secretary agreed with Shinseki.

Last month, Rumsfeld said the United States would remain in Iraq as "long as it takes." But the Defense chief was not specific about the size of the force.

The Pentagon declined to respond to White's comments, but a senior official said it was too early to draw conclusions about the size or length of the U.S. troops' commitment in Iraq.

White said it is reasonable to assume the Pentagon will need more than 100,000 U.S. troops in Iraq to provide stability for at least the next year. Pentagon officials envisioned having about 100,000 troops there immediately after the war, but they hoped that number would be quickly drawn down.

Source: USA Today

Reply To this Message

Posted by: rowdyrjp

Ya well we all suspected they were going to occupy after conquering.

Oh, wait sorry, it was liberation {sic} wasn't it?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Belis

Another proof of Rums and Wolfy's lies. The goal of the war was obviously to maintain a strong military presence in an oil producer middle east country, with Saudi arabia becomming unsafe for US citizens... Iraq was an obvious target.
They will stay until the Iraqis kick their fat ass, unfortunately only by means generally refered to as terrorism".

Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Post-9/11 Era Forum: Ex-Army boss: Pentagon won't admit reality in Iraq

Forum Forum Forum