Va. gunman had 2 past stalking cases - General Discussion

Va. gunman had 2 past stalking cases

General Discussion Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: HECK!

Va. gunman had 2 past stalking cases

By ADAM GELLER, AP National Writer

BLACKSBURG, Va. - More than a year before the Virginia Tech massacre, Cho Seung-Hui was accused of stalking two female students and was taken to a psychiatric hospital because of fears he was suicidal, authorities said Wednesday.

The disclosure added to the rapidly growing list of warning signs that appeared well before the 23-year-old student shot 32 people to death and committed suicide Monday. Among other things, Cho's twisted, violence-filled writings and sullen, vacant-eyed demeanor had disturbed professors and students so much that he was removed from one English class and was repeatedly urged to get counseling.

In November and December 2005, two women complained to campus police that they had received calls and computer messages from Cho, but they considered the messages "annoying," not threatening, and neither pressed charges, Virginia Tech Police Chief Wendell Flinchum said.

Neither woman was among the victims in the massacre, police said.

But after the second complaint, the university obtained a temporary detention order and took Cho away for psychiatric evaluation because an acquaintance reported he might be suicidal, authorities said. Police did not identify the acquaintance.

Around the same time, one of Cho's professors informally shared some concerns about the young man's writings, but no official report was filed, Flinchum said.

The chief said he was not aware of any other contact between Cho and police after those episodes.

According to court papers, on Dec. 13, 2005, a magistrate ordered Cho to undergo an evaluation at Carilion St. Albans Hospital. The magistrate signed the order because of evidence Cho was a danger to himself or others as a result of mental illness. The next day, according to court records, a special justice approved outpatient treatment for Cho.

A medical examination conducted Dec. 14 found that Cho's "affect is flat. ... He denies suicidal ideations. He does not acknowledge symptoms of a thought disorder. His insight and judgment are normal."

It is unclear how long Cho stayed at Carilion, though court papers indicate he was free to leave as of Dec. 14. Virginia Tech spokesman Larry Hincker said Cho had been continually enrolled at Tech and never took a leave of absence.

A spokesman for Carilion St. Albans would not comment Wednesday.

After the first stalking incident, police referred Cho to the university's disciplinary system, Flinchum said.

But Ed Spencer, assistant vice president of student affairs, would not comment on any disciplinary proceedings, saying federal law protects students' medical privacy even after death. In any case, Cho remained enrolled up until his death.

"There is no blame from students," said Elizabeth Hart, a communications major and a spokeswoman for the student government. "Who would've woken up in the morning and said, 'Maybe this student who's just troubled is really going to do something this horrific?'"

She added: "There's no way to know which kids are just troubled students and who's going to develop into something greater."

Campus police on Wednesday applied for search warrants for Cho's medical records from the campus health center and an off-campus facility. "It is reasonable to believe that the medical records may provide evidence of motive, intent and designs," investigators said in court papers.

Police searched Cho's dorm room and recovered, among other items, two computers, books, notebooks, a digital camera, and a chain and combination lock, according to documents. The front doors of Norris Hall, the classroom building where most of the victims died, had been chained shut from the inside during the rampage.

Fourteen people remained hospitalized Wednesday.

Cho's roommates and professors portrayed him as a creepy, solitary figure who rarely even made eye contact with his roommates, much less speak to them.

His bizarre behavior became even less predictable in recent weeks, roommate Karan Grewal said. Grewal had pulled an all-nighter on homework the day of the shootings and saw Cho at around 5 a.m., a few hours earlier than normal.

As usual, Cho didn't look him the eye or say anything, Grewal said.

He said Cho usually worked alone on his computer and watched TV, including Friday night wrestling. He was always alone — in the dining hall, watching television, working out with weights in the gym. He rarely spoke to anyone.

"I had no idea he was capable of this," Grewal said. "We were never told his teachers had concern about him committing suicide and all these dark feelings.

"We were never told that our suitemate was depressed or suicidal."

Authorities said he left a rambling note raging against women, religion and rich kids. News reports said that Cho, a South Korean immigrant who came to the U.S. as a boy and whose parents worked at a dry cleaners, may have been taking medication for depression.

Professors and classmates were alarmed by his class writings — pages filled with twisted, violence-drenched writing.

"It was not bad poetry. It was intimidating," poet Nikki Giovanni, one of his professors, told CNN.

"I know we're talking about a youngster, but troubled youngsters get drunk and jump off buildings," she said. "There was something mean about this boy. It was the meanness — I've taught troubled youngsters and crazy people — it was the meanness that bothered me. It was a really mean streak."

Giovanni said her students were so unnerved by Cho's behavior, including taking pictures of them with his cell phone, that some stopped coming to class and she had security check on her room. She eventually had him taken out of her class, after threatening to quit if he wasn't removed.

Lucinda Roy, a co-director of creative writing at Virginia Tech, said she tutored Cho after that. She said she tried to get him into counseling in late 2005 but he always refused.

"He was so distant and so lonely," she told ABC's "Good Morning America" Wednesday. "It was almost like talking to a hole, as though he wasn't there most of the time. He wore sunglasses and his hat very low so it was hard to see his face."

Roy also said she arranged to use a code word with her assistant to call police if she ever felt threatened by Cho, but she said she never used it.

-------

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

So many ignored signs....makes one wonder...could this have been avoided???

I guess everyone heard about the stuff he send CBS?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
mystic said this in post #2 :
So many ignored signs....makes one wonder...could this have been avoided???

I guess everyone heard about the stuff he send CBS?


Should this guy's photos and writings and videos be broadcast and published?

The killer himself was an unhappy, lonely, angry, loser who desperately wanted recognition. By publishing and broadcasting this stuff he has achieved what he wanted. Thing is the public will learn nothing from it (the excuse for publishing it) and give every other lonely unhappy loser a clear signal - carrying out a massacre is the easiest and quickest way to becoming what society calls a "somebody" (as opposed to the nobody this guy clearly felt he was).

Is it morally wrong - and dangerous - to acknowledge this guys photos and videos and aren't they just titillation for public consumption? Do they have any value?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

I agree (I think.)


It would have been best if nobody had even known this guy's name.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

Now he's immortalized and some other derranged kid is going to get dellusions of grandeur and plan the next mass shooting.

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

and each one is probably going to be worse than the last.

The big wake-up call here is similar to 9/11, that has left everyone with a feelilng of vulnerability. We don't like to think about it, but at times like these it gets thrown in our face. I don't know what security measures Virginia Tech and other colleges are going to take but the truth is...

Our lives are fragile and we are ultimately at the mercy of other people and there is nothing we can do about it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

quote:
h@ts said this in post #3 :


Should this guy's photos and writings and videos be broadcast and published?

The killer himself was an unhappy, lonely, angry, loser who desperately wanted recognition. By publishing and broadcasting this stuff he has achieved what he wanted. Thing is the public will learn nothing from it (the excuse for publishing it) and give every other lonely unhappy loser a clear signal - carrying out a massacre is the easiest and quickest way to becoming what society calls a "somebody" (as opposed to the nobody this guy clearly felt he was).

Is it morally wrong - and dangerous - to acknowledge this guys photos and videos and aren't they just titillation for public consumption? Do they have any value?


There is a legitimate need to know why this guy did what he did, although it could inspire would-be copycats. I can see both sides of the argument. But what's done is done.

But there is something else to consider besides all the hullabaloo about whether to release the information. NBC only released a small portion of Cho's manifesto. I can see them not broadcasting the whole thing, but they could have released the entire content on the Internet or other news formats. But they held back the majority of cho's production. Why? Certainly the unreleased parts cannot be more offensive than what they did release. They can bleep out the swearing.

The only reason I can see for holding back part of it is that it contains information that they don't want us to know. It could be information that embarasses others. There is lots of finger pointing in the wake of this. It could also be information that points to a whole different layer of motive than what we conclude now. And this could be a motive that either NBC, the police, or Homeland Security, or all of them don't want us to know.

I have a disinct feeling that there is a lot more to this story than a guy who felt picked on and lashed out in revenge. I am not convinced that Cho acted alone in this.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
HECK! said this in post #5 :
Now he's immortalized and some other derranged kid is going to get dellusions of grandeur and plan the next mass shooting.

-HECK!


Of course...we have had 2 threats just in Missouri. This doesn't include the other states. I was just in Kansas for a case, and I heard on their news that there was a school shut down for threats.

However, would it have made a difference whether we knew his name or not?? I mean it still would have been known that there was a shooting and there would still be idiots out there trying to outdo it.

Name or no name...there is no way that people would not have at least known that something happened. The phone calls, the bizzilion cops...it would never have not gotten to the news.

The guy is dead...he doesnt know he made a name for himself, and who really cares...it wasn't a good name.

People HAVE to know this stuff anyways....to hide it, would be to act like it didn't happen...and what a slap in the face to those who were killed, injured, or to the families of those victims. People HAVE to know the signs so that this might never happen again.

Personally, I blame the idiot judge who just let this psycho walk!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
h@ts said this in post #3 :


Should this guy's photos and writings and videos be broadcast and published?

The killer himself was an unhappy, lonely, angry, loser who desperately wanted recognition. By publishing and broadcasting this stuff he has achieved what he wanted. Thing is the public will learn nothing from it (the excuse for publishing it) and give every other lonely unhappy loser a clear signal - carrying out a massacre is the easiest and quickest way to becoming what society calls a "somebody" (as opposed to the nobody this guy clearly felt he was).

Is it morally wrong - and dangerous - to acknowledge this guys photos and videos and aren't they just titillation for public consumption? Do they have any value?


Of course they have value....

If this stuff is not shown, how would one know what to look for next time? Years and years ago, there was crime, yet it was never newsworthy because they did not want to freak out the public. We cannot go back to the days when the news didnt display anything about crime.

Would you rather not know about anything, or would you rather be educated?

There was more to this guy than feeling he was a nobody. That is maybe what you see on the surface, but there is more than that. This guy had some major issues...and feeling alone is just a part of the top layer. Many times, people feel like nobodys but they don't go on a killing rampage. There are signs and this guy had so many that were totally ignored.

Wearing blinders, won't make these kind of people go away. All that does is make one a potential victim.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
mystic said this in post #9 :
[B]

Of course they have value....

If this stuff is not shown, how would one know what to look for next time?


You really think his media "manifesto", was published and broadcast to educate the public. It was a car crash and the media shoved it in the public's face for pornographic base voyeuristic appeal.

quote:
Years and years ago, there was crime, yet it was never newsworthy because they did not want to freak out the public. We cannot go back to the days when the news didnt display anything about crime.


I'm not saying the story didn't need to be told. I'm talking about broadcasting his stuff, and giving him what he wanted, notoriety, fame, and a platform to spout his juvenile ramblings to the world. It was an advert to every angry kid in the US on how to become a "somebody". Don't be surprised next time if the death toll is even higher, and the production value of the killers stuff is even better.

quote:
Would you rather not know about anything, or would you rather be educated?


The only people getting any education are disillusioned angry teenagers showing them exactly how to get on TV and get people to notice them. For everyone else it's the worst kind of titillating entertainment.

quote:
Many times, people feel like nobodys but they don't go on a killing rampage.


But some do and those that do have just learnt what it takes to get back at the world and be remembered. Make some videos and photos rambo style and Kill your classmates and you too will get your 15 minutes of fame.

quote:
Wearing blinders, won't make these kind of people go away. All that does is make one a potential victim.


How am I blind? There was a choice made, publish or not publish his videos and photos.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: envelopefilter

quote:
EUCLID said this in post #7 :


The only reason I can see for holding back part of it is that it contains information that they don't want us to know. It could be information that embarasses others. There is lots of finger pointing in the wake of this. It could also be information that points to a whole different layer of motive than what we conclude now. And this could be a motive that either NBC, the police, or Homeland Security, or all of them don't want us to know.

I have a disinct feeling that there is a lot more to this story than a guy who felt picked on and lashed out in revenge. I am not convinced that Cho acted alone in this.


EUCLID, you are exactly correct!

Cho, like Timothy McVeigh, Eric Harris , the Unibomber, and other mass murderers are under mind control perpetrated by the CIA.

I will name a few CIA mind control projects and you can google them:

Project Paperclip
Project MKultra
Project Artichoke
Project Bluebird

The others involved in this are the perpetrators who programmed this pitiful man. Of course, there is no way to prove this because all the press has to say is that he is mentally ill! Cho was crying out for help on many occasions and why did they ignore him!!! The press says that there is no way they can force medications of people! That is bullcrap, many mentally ill folks are forced to get shots every week by court order. And who does Cho really mean when he says "You did this to me. You blah blah" Who is "you" and why are they not mentioning his parents in the news. Eric Harris' and Dylan Klebold's parents were never a part of the process of the investigation. And they were making weopons in Eric's garage AND there was a sawed out shot gun on his dresser!!! Eric Harris' father is a military intelligence officer!

And this incident came the same day Congress was discussing war funds as a smoke screen for what our government is perpetrating now on Americans and foreign countries alike. If you ask me, politicans in our government are the most culpable creeps for war and and poverty throught the world.

If you want to read more about this, I suggest you read the homepage of this site:

www.trance-formation.com

nikiTa
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
h@ts said this in post #10 :
You really think his media "manifesto", was published and broadcast to educate the public. It was a car crash and the media shoved it in the public's face for pornographic base voyeuristic appeal.


I guess that is your interpretation of what you see it to be. I obviously don't see it that way.

I'm not saying the story didn't need to be told. I'm talking about broadcasting his stuff, and giving him what he wanted, notoriety, fame, and a platform to spout his juvenile ramblings to the world. It was an advert to every angry kid in the US on how to become a "somebody". Don't be surprised next time if the death toll is even higher, and the production value of the killers stuff is even better.


Okay, and where did he get his version of this before he did this? What you are saying is that others will get this same idea from him...but where did he get it from? (and so on, etc). Where does any psycho get their ideas? You think all mass killers got their ideas from the news? I disagree. I think a psycho has a mind of their own...they see what they see already.


The only people getting any education are disillusioned angry teenagers showing them exactly how to get on TV and get people to notice them. For everyone else it's the worst kind of titillating entertainment.

Again, you think that these killings never existed before they were newsworthy? Killings like this have been going on for a long long time. And as I said, whether or not the video was shown, the name still would have been known, the killing would have still been known...these disillusioned teenagers, as you call them, would have known either way. And you say that as if you think all teenagers are ready to kill, and I believe they are still the minority of teens.


But some do and those that do have just learnt what it takes to get back at the world and be remembered. Make some videos and photos rambo style and Kill your classmates and you too will get your 15 minutes of fame.


Like I said, this is nothing new...this crap has been going on for a lot longer than you think.

How am I blind? There was a choice made, publish or not publish his videos and photos.

I didn's say you, per se...I said it in a general sense. But, yes if base your rational on that, then you are not seeing the issue as a whole. Its really easy to look at only one aspect, but when you put it in a entire whole, your reasoning doesn't work, at least to me it doesn't. Anyhow, all your focus is on the bad seed. You have yet to say that this kind of stuff could educate the good kids to be more aware of their surroundings.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
mystic said this in post #12 :
What you are saying is that others will get this same idea from him...but where did he get it from? (and so on, etc). Where does any psycho get their ideas? You think all mass killers got their ideas from the news? I disagree. I think a psycho has a mind of their own...they see what they see already.


There's all kind of reasons why people become psychotic, but this particular kind of killing is very specific in purpose, and one of the main reasons is to get on TV and get some kind of celebrity. This time he killed a couple of people, then posted videos and photos to a TV station he'd already produced before killing 30 other students and teachers. Why did he kill so many? Would 2 deaths have been enough to get his videos shown? Probably not.

quote:
Again, you think that these killings never existed before they were newsworthy? Killings like this have been going on for a long long time.


Of course they have, there has been 19 school and college killings in the last 10 years in the US. I expect them make the news but how the story is presented is important. If you want to make celebrities out of killers then killing becomes another way of becoming a celebrity.

quote:
Anyhow, all your focus is on the bad seed. You have yet to say that this kind of stuff could educate the good kids to be more aware of their surroundings.


I've only seen a few seconds of the videos so if you have seen all of them then how do you think showing them will educate anyone?

Every time the videos and photos are shown he has achieved a little bit of his ambition. I guarantee when this happens again the killer will try to kill more than 32 and will produce a slicker video.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

Counter-Punch is making a connection between some recent high-school killings and Prozac. Aparently Cho was on the drug.

quote:
A Killer Cocktail
Prozac Madness

By FRED GARDNER

The lard-assed cops at Virginia Tech spent two hours interrogating the wrong suspect and failed to prevent the massacre. Now they're "investigating." What is there to investigate - which brand or brands of anti-depressant Seung Hui Cho was taking?

A lonely, picked-on boy was given Prozac (or one of its chemical analogs) like Kip Kinkel in Oregon, like Eric Harris in Colorado This is not a scoop, America: Prozac causes horrible, bizarre flip-outs. It is a fact that has been known for 20 years and that Eli Lilly and the other manufacturers of "selective" serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have relentlessly denied and are still trying to suppress.

http://counterpunch.com/gardner04212007.html
Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

General Discussion Forum: Va. gunman had 2 past stalking cases

Forum Forum Forum