Vote:Is Duane" Dog" Chapmen a Racists? - Culture & Society

Vote:Is Duane" Dog" Chapmen a Racists?

Culture & Society Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: malcolm xx

1. He doesn't want his sons dating Black women

2. He has a KKKramer like tirade when he discover one does.

3. says nig*er more times I can ciunt

www.celeb-wars.com/thedog.php

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
malcolm xx said this in post #1 :
1. He doesn't want his sons dating Black women

2. He has a KKKramer like tirade when he discover one does.

3. says nig*er more times I can ciunt

www.celeb-wars.com/thedog.php


3) How he was saying the "N-word" and the amount implies this word is part of his daily vocabulary.


Why is this topic ignored on inreview?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

maybe it's ignored becuse there are so many stories about racism that some people think that inreview has reached saturation point with this. I did try and warn you that this would happen but you paid no attention to me.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #3 :
maybe it's ignored becuse there are so many stories about racism that some people think that inreview has reached saturation point with this. I did try and warn you that this would happen but you paid no attention to me.


Thats inreview's choice. All I can ( and will continue) to do is post current issues that are true. I can't controll those who want to deny reality and keep head in the sand.

I hope you haven't join those who have childishly decided to blacklist my post.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

Well I don't think that anyone has blacklisted you I just think they have heard thia arguement or a varient of this arguement from you to many times and more often than not you have normally got the wrong end of the stick. Like I said I did tell you hen you maybe had a case people would be to tired to deal with it, this seems to be that time.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #5 :
Well I don't think that anyone has blacklisted you I just think they have heard thia arguement or a varient of this arguement from you to many times and more often than not you have normally got the wrong end of the stick. Like I said I did tell you hen you maybe had a case people would be to tired to deal with it, this seems to be that time.


I'm also tired of the # of racial incidents happening in this country but thats not an excuse for anyone these issues.

Don't blame the messenger.

You can't handlr the truth
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

And how many time's have people blown holes nay craters in your "truth" with facts see that the problem you turned so many things that weren't racist in to a racial incident that most peopleare past arguing with you.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #7 :
And how many time's have people blown holes nay craters in your "truth" with facts see that the problem you turned so many things that weren't racist in to a racial incident that most peopleare past arguing with you.


Thats not true and its just your opionion. No one ( to my memory) has written anything of substance to my post, exspecially the ones invovle race.


They are the ones who make argumentt and call people names. They constantly spin posts and get angry when they are unable to gas someone with their response.

Jena6, Torture in West Virginia, Florida Boot Camp, AFRICOM, Somalia War, Reparations Demand, Katrina, Blacl decline in the military... These are issues of today. If Inreview cannot allow this then somethings wrong
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

Thats your problem right there in your first paragraph you disregard anyone elses point of view no matter hor legitimate.

You talking about spin, name calling getting angry Malcolm THATS YOU.

You also point out amazingly what I have said before about everything being racial, newsflash for you Somalia war, Africom, black decline in the military, and oh dear god the reperations arguement again these are not racially motivated you just want them to be and they are not the main issues today again you just want them to be.

Inreview is allowing this but people are sick of your one trick pony stories and it's your reaction when people have the audacity to debate with you that name calling etc starts up people don't need that.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #9 :
Thats your problem right there in your first paragraph you disregard anyone elses point of view no matter hor legitimate.

You talking about spin, name calling getting angry Malcolm THATS YOU.

You also point out amazingly what I have said before about everything being racial, newsflash for you Somalia war, Africom, black decline in the military, and oh dear god the reperations arguement again these are not racially motivated you just want them to be and they are not the main issues today again you just want them to be.

Inreview is allowing this but people are sick of your one trick pony stories and it's your reaction when people have the audacity to debate with you that name calling etc starts up people don't need that.


Are my post true?

You (and inreview) are guilty of making race the main issue of the topics I post. I guess its because you have a promblem with the facts of the topic and race is enfacized to confuse the main issue of topic.

Don't make it seem as if my post are just " trick pony stories" that are not important enough to post. Just accept reality and stop covering your eyes everytime an incident involving race happens.

The repaarations debate is far from over. I am going to have to give some history on this subject.


What about the subject of post? Is Dog Chapman racisist? (Read link before you respond.)

Are the issues I post true?

You (and inreview) bring up race
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

Jeez I can't belive I am reading this crap you and only you make things about race 90% of your posts are about race and you blame other people maybe you should re - read what you post.

Because the vast majority of your stries are about race then your posts do have that one trick pony side to them.

Now on to your stories some are justs nonsense you know it and I know it some are legit and some have more than one element that you ignore for example the reperations debate you blame the whites for buying but refuse to blame the Africans for selling when you do things like that people ignore you because you are dodging the hard issues same as when you talk about racial attacks but refuse to talk about black on white violence when you do that people won't want to address the issues anymore.

As for the reperations well check the court records Malcolm it is over and you ain't getting a penny.

As for Dog his comments were racial but his minister a black man say he is not a racist just a fool.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

Just to prove my point here are a few examples of threads you started where race was one of the if not the predominant issue:

Jena 6 2 therads in breaking news
Gentrification in breaking news
Isasahi Washington in Breaking news
Shirley Q Liquer and gay blcak face comics - Agree 2 Disagree
Duke issue - Agree 2 Disagrre
What to a Black man is 4th July - Agree 2 Disagree
Death Penalty used more against blacks - Agree 2 disagree
Blacks have right to ba angry after Katrina - Racism
Tokkie Williams case - Racism
Mexico is racist - Racism
Racism in sports - Racism
Black military recruits on decline - Gen Discussion
Reperations Gen discussion and Culture and society
Atlanta police shhot 82 year old black woman - Gen Discusion
Frog Princess - Gen discussion


See a trend in that Malcolm? thats just a few you and I know there are more, now show me the posts that I started that are about race.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #11 :
Jeez I can't belive I am reading this crap you and only you make things about race 90% of your posts are about race and you blame other people maybe you should re - read what you post.

Because the vast majority of your stries are about race then your posts do have that one trick pony side to them.

Now on to your stories some are justs nonsense you know it and I know it some are legit and some have more than one element that you ignore for example the reperations debate you blame the whites for buying but refuse to blame the Africans for selling when you do things like that people ignore you because you are dodging the hard issues same as when you talk about racial attacks but refuse to talk about black on white violence when you do that people won't want to address the issues anymore.



As for the reperations well check the court records Malcolm it is over and you ain't getting a penny.

As for Dog his comments were racial but his minister a black man say he is not a racist just a fool.


Are the topics I post true? (yes or no)

Admiting they are legit doesn't answer the question. Because the topics are unpopular doesn't answer the question. Inreview boycotting topics doesn't answer the question.

The reparation post exposes cooperations and countries who are guilty of explotation of a race of people and the children of those exploited want the debt that was generated.

Any other topic discuss in this post throws subjest off . [ I'm not dodging any issue but the subject of he selling of Africans is not as simple as it has been said. Its a compicated ( and different) topic that deserves its own post.]


How can the demand for reparations (debt) be over when restitution has not been given?

Dog Chapman is not racist because his priest his Black? I know you don't beleivce that.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

quote:
malcolm xx said this in post #13 :


Are the topics I post true? (yes or no)

In some cases no. Howevere we are not discussing race are we you said you don't post threads that are racial and I have give you an example of how you lied.

Admiting they are legit doesn't answer the question. Because the topics are unpopular doesn't answer the question.

Sorry that doesn't makes much sense to me. MAybe you8 misunderstood my post I am, saying you have legit posts and you also have a few that are complete nonsense. What /I mean is you go into 3 forms Malcolm Legfit campiagner i.e Jena 6, Angry Black man i.e gnetrification and foolish poster i.e Frog Princess.

Inreview boycotting topics doesn't answer the question.

Inreview does not boycot anything if the mebere are sick of your spin and blind view of the past and present that is not inreviews fault is it? A good campaigner cpatures his audience look at King and toward the end of his days Malcolm X ( both of whom would be dissapointed in blacks like you)

The reparation post exposes cooperations and countries who are guilty of explotation of a race of people and the children of those exploited want the debt that was generated.

But the Africans who sold and captures the slaves are blameless in your mind how is that right, you don't think there are rrich Adfricans who made money from this what about the Annan Family in Ghana?

Any other topic discuss in this post throws subjest off . [ I'm not dodging any issue but the subject of he selling of Africans is not as simple as it has been said. Its a compicated ( and different) topic that deserves its own post.]

Yeah it's doesn't need 3 though ( found another one ).


How can the demand for reparations (debt) be over when restitution has not been given?

Becuse you don't deserve anything, how man judges is it going to take to get that across? why don't you take the case to Africa to sue the slave catchers families?


Dog Chapman is not racist because his priest his Black? I know you don't beleivce that.


Jeez have you been drinking when have made the last few posts? I never said that read it again, I said I think his osmmnets were racist but I said that his minister who is a black man does not think he is, it's part of that thing I was talking about you know seeing all the sides of the story not just the ones that suit your stance.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #14 :


Jeez have you been drinking when have made the last few posts? I never said that read it again, I said I think his osmmnets were racist but I said that his minister who is a black man does not think he is, it's part of that thing I was talking about you know seeing all the sides of the story not just the ones that suit your stance.


You say most of my topics are true. Because yoy have hard time acepting facts, I will accept your opinion on integrity of posts.

Remember your answer to my legit question is your opinion. The topics you mention are based on facts. We know you result to spin and smearing of topics you don't like. Keep it up

I've move past inreview, they have the right to avoid any topic they want. ( lodgebo :tup

Your confused on demand of reparations. You need better understanding of history of this neglect. ( www.cure.com)

I ask you is Dog Chapman racists, which is subject of post. You gave your standard political answer, that lets you be not wrong to anyone questioning your response. {Its hard to debate with someone who doesn't take a postion.}

You say his comments are racists and mention this black man following on KKKramer - like media tour. This does't give us a clear answer to question.

Is Dog Chapmen Racists?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

Well if you have moved past inreview good riddance anway I have moved to so there is little point in answering your queries is there. so good luck where ever you have gone and remember to pick fights on real issues not just issues you could do a lot of good if you stopped making everything little thing racial you should know yourself what Dog did and what Washington was fired for are little things compared to what is happening in Jena or Darfur or Zimbabwe this is where real blacks are getting hurt or killed.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

quote:
malcolm xx said this in post #10 :


Are my post true?

You (and inreview) are guilty of making race the main issue of the topics I post. I guess its because you have a promblem with the facts of the topic and race is enfacized to confuse the main issue of topic.

Don't make it seem as if my post are just " trick pony stories" that are not important enough to post. Just accept reality and stop covering your eyes everytime an incident involving race happens.

The repaarations debate is far from over. I am going to have to give some history on this subject.


What about the subject of post? Is Dog Chapman racisist? (Read link before you respond.)

Are the issues I post true?

You (and inreview) bring up race




What?

InReview brings up race? Now I don't own the site, but as a person who has been posting here for many years, I can say with 100% certainty that no post has spotaniously appeared.

People post things, that's what a message board is.

Malcom- you post these stories. You bring up race.

This is incredible... and hilarious.

-HECK!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

And I don't know if Dog is racist. I've never met him.

I find it supremely ironic that he's on a phone conversation saying he doesn't want his sons black girlfriend around because they drop the 'N' bomb. Dog is worried that his use of the 'N' bomb which he regards not as racially motivated but rather just their day-to-day vernacular, and it could used against him in the tabloids... the his conversation is leaked to the tabloids.

About Dog being a racist, who knows. I mean, if you say the 'N' word are you a racist? I don't know. It's a weird, slippery slope. And to be honest Malcom, I doubt this conversation would be worth my time in the first place.

So fine, he's a racist, everyone is a racist, down with whitey, up with reparations.

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

Okay, I'll chime in.

I have a question that I know many people have asked time and time again....

First...I should say that I never use the "N" word. I do feel that it is used as a racist remark...

BUT...why is it racist when someone who is not black says it, but it isn't racist when a black person says it to or about another black person??

Hmm...

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

opinions on that vary widely from person to person but here's my view on it:

some black people use "n!gga" they way other people use "dude"
I don't see anything inherently wrong or racist about that. I've even heard black people say "I was talkin' to this white n!gga and ... [blah blah blah]"

It crosses the line into racism when a person who uses "n!gga" every other word flips his sh!t when he hears a white person say it. Even if the white person is using it in a friendly context, some people still get upset.

That's ridiculous. If black folks don't want white people saying "n!gga" then we need to stop saying it too.



That being said, it's highly doubtful Duane Dog was using the N-word in a friendly context. If you use the N-word to describe black people, it's a pretty sure bet that you're racist. There's plenty of timid bigots, who will never say the N-word, super-liberal, support equal rights or whatever, but they would cringe if their daughter brought home a black man.

So at least Duane Dog is honest about it. You can give him that. But yeah, the mother****er's racist.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

quote:
On November 26, 2006, Mooney appeared on CNN and talked about how he would stop using "the n-word", due to Michael Richards' outbursts on stage at The Laugh Factory. He referred to Richards as having become "his Dr. Phil" and "cured" him of the use of the epithet. Mooney also said, "We're gonna stop using the n-word. I'm gonna stop using it. I'm not gonna use it again and I'm not gonna use the B word. And we're gonna put an end to the n-word. Just say no to the n-word. We want all human beings throughout the world to stop using the n-word." On November 30, he elaborated upon these remarks as a guest of Farai Chideya on the National Public Radio program News & Notes. He declared that he would convene a conference on this controversial subject in the near future, as well as perform his first "n-free" comedy show in the upcoming days.

That show, which he performed at the Lincoln Theater following a set by Dick Gregory, took place at 8:00 PM on Saturday, December 2, 2006. (There was a late show at 11:00 PM.) Mooney almost made it through his entire set--about an hour of jokes--before he mistakenly used the word in a routine on O.J. Simpson. He ran off stage covering his face in his hands, and sheepishly walked back on a few moments later, saying, "I'm really going to get it now. This is probably already on the internet."

On the BET special 25 Events that Mis-Shaped Black America Mooney reiterated that he was no longer using the N-word. He was quoted as saying "I am no longer going to use the N-word. Instead of saying 'What's up my n*gga' say 'What's up my Michael Richards'!"
Reply To this Message

Posted by: WillJ

He's probably racist, who cares?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #16 :
Well if you have moved past inreview good riddance anway I have moved to so there is little point in answering your queries is there. so good luck where ever you have gone and remember to pick fights on real issues not just issues you could do a lot of good if you stopped making everything little thing racial you should know yourself what Dog did and what Washington was fired for are little things compared to what is happening in Jena or Darfur or Zimbabwe this is where real blacks are getting hurt or killed.


(Again) You misunderstood another statement.

I was saying that I am no longer going to appeal to Inreview to stop their boycott of my post and because of the "democracy" they currently have, Inreview can avoid any topic on its message board.


Its sad that your view of the world hasn't evolve over the years. People with prejudice thinking seem unable of changing their view on issues.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

quote:
malcolm xx said this in post #23 :


(Again) You misunderstood another statement.

I was saying that I am no longer going to appeal to Inreview to stop their boycott of my post and because of the "democracy" they currently have, Inreview can avoid any topic on its message board.

Ok lets get this thing straightend out, Inreview is not boycotting or avoiding anytrhing or anyone it's the posters i.e. the other people on this site that are avoiding your stories nobody is influencing them or pressurisign them they just don't wnat to deal with your stuff, ask yourself does that say more about them or you?




Its sad that your view of the world hasn't evolve over the years.

Well you need to be more specific exactly what view are you talking about give me an example I after all always attempt to give you examples.

People with prejudice thinking seem unable of changing their view on issues.


Hmmm pot, kettle and black come to mind.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
WillJ said this in post #22 :
He's probably racist, who cares?


Did you have this view with Mel Gison? Isaigh Washington? KKKramer?

Are you consistent with your " who cares" attitude? [ WE want to know]
Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
mystic said this in post #19 :
Okay, I'll chime in.

I have a question that I know many people have asked time and time again....

First...I should say that I never use the "N" word. I do feel that it is used as a racist remark...

BUT...why is it racist when someone who is not black says it, but it isn't racist when a black person says it to or about another black person??

Hmm...


Someone saying the "N" word is not the definition of someone being racists.

And not using the "N" word doesn't mean he/she or not racists?

Based on your statements, someone can (easily) say you don't know the meaning of racism.

How can anyone take your threads seriously when you begin with the wrong information (and will have to end with a wrong conclusion)?

I challenge you to define these words: racism, prejudice, racist
,
Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #24 :


Hmmm pot, kettle and black come to mind.


So how would you want those who are guilty defined?

Would Inreview exists without "posters"?


Lets use this topic. Instead of just answering the question. Is Dog Chapmen racists?

You say his comments were racists [but his (so called) black minister doestn't think so. ]

Why did you add the minister line? What does it have to do with your personal view? You can't admit the obvious.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

Well obviouly you are to chicken to answer the rest of my post so we will just say I am right about everything else that I posted ( that would make you wrong again BTW).

So now I am guilty wow without a trail or access to a lawyer I mean I know we ( (that would be the British not the white community Malcolm) are trying to speed up trials but I always thought they would at least tell you that you were being tried.

Would inreview exsist without posters well look at it everyone posts on other sites ( ourselves included) and this place has gone down the toilet so you already know the answer.

Firstly yes I said I thought what he said was racist but why the black minister well I was going to do a joke about a dog a black minister and a Jewish pope but I forget the punch line thats why.

Come on you know why. The reason is this we have angry little boys like you screaming racist and want to destroy him wheras on the other hand we have another black man who is saying that he thinks he is foolish but not a racist, the point is that when you say WE you mean YOU because not all black men want to be WE. This was a black man who had a right to be offended but instead of wanting to destroy the guy he wanted to listen and draw his own conslusion and that was the point Malcolm not all blacks were offended.

Now as for not admitting the obvious again pot kettle and black.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

Malcom I used ti be good at drawing up a person charcter without meeting them and I think I have a good idea what you are like anyway tell me if I am right because I am a little out of practice:

I would say you are male and black ( obviously)

I would say that you are in the age range of 15 - 21

Maybe in school or further education

I would say you live in the city possibly a poor - lower middle class area

I would say racism is not a usual event for you personally

I would say you don't have a job and / or least 1 member of your immediate family does not either

Your parents live together or you have contact with both your parents

you are closer to your mother

You are not very knowledgebale to the wider world

You prefer stories to substance

You are stubborn and possibly bad tempred

I reckon you are tall

I would say you have friends but you would not say they were close friends

You are passionate

you don't like a truth that goes against your beliefs

You are not relgious but at the same time I would say you maybe don't like at least one relgion possibly Judaism or Catholicism

I reckon you are not keen on homosexuals

I reckon you are a closet gay ( only kidding)

I think you look for role models closer to home maybe community leader, relgious leader or a teacher

I would say the above are black

right handed

not in love

I would say you are dissapointed in some blacks because you think they have sold out possibly people in politics or entertainment.

Anyway I am honestly not having a go at you but I used to do this and I thought you were a good case to try not tying to cause offence and I would love to know if I was close in any of my observations on you. If you want you can do me I will show you how.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: WillJ

quote:
malcolm xx said this in post #25 :


Did you have this view with Mel Gison? Isaigh Washington? KKKramer?

Are you consistent with your " who cares" attitude? [ WE want to know]


You don't represent all black people. Jesus Christ man.

Mel Gibson = Douche
Washington = Douche
KKKramer = Less of a douche than Gibson but moreso than Washington
Dog = A douche but people knew that before. He should just get the Imas treatment and be kicked off his show.

That all said, who the hell cares if his black minister thinks he's racist? "Well he's black so she should know!"...Screw that. Being black doesn't make you a perfect judge of who is racist. If anything all this proves is Dog is a racist and good at deception.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

[QUOTE]WillJ said this in post #30 :


You don't represent all black people. Jesus Christ man.

Mel Gibson = Douche
Washington = Douche
KKKramer = Less of a douche than Gibson but moreso than Washington
Dog = A douche but people knew that before. He should just get the Imas treatment and be kicked off his show.

WE isn't " all Black people". It says I'm in agreement with the opinion that MOST have on that issue. [ I've define it before. Why is definition hard to understand?]

That all said, who the hell cares if his black minister thinks he's racist? "Well he's black so she should know!"...Screw that. Being black doesn't make you a perfect judge of who is racist. If anything all this proves is Dog is a racist and good at deception.
[

"WE" doesn't mean " all Black people". It says I'm in agreement with the MAJORITY on a certain issue , (which means I'm speaking for myself) Ive dfine this before. Why is it so hard to understand?

Your right. Why is his (so called) minster has been allowed go with him on his apology tour? Who cannot see through this scam? This is an insult to our intelligence and it makes him look even more guilty.

Getting the Imus treatment is just a $20 mil vacation . The Mel Gibson / Washinton treatment is better.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: WillJ

Hm...yeah, I'm ok with the Gibson/Washington treatment. I agree with malcolm on this...whatever he gets he deserves.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
WillJ said this in post #32 :
Hm...yeah, I'm ok with the Gibson/Washington treatment. I agree with malcolm on this...whatever he gets he deserves.



What do you mean " whatever he gets he deservees"? What if he gets the usual treatment given to the KKKramer types.

You confuse US because you beginf your post saying he should get same treatment as Gibson and Isaigh Washington.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

So Malcolm are you saying it's ok to verbally abuse gays but not blacks? If you ask me if Dog is a racist them Washington is a homophobe and if you want to destroy one for being intolerant then you jabe to destroy the other.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: WillJ

quote:
malcolm xx said this in post #33 :



What do you mean " whatever he gets he deservees"? What if he gets the usual treatment given to the KKKramer types.

You confuse US because you beginf your post saying he should get same treatment as Gibson and Isaigh Washington.


It's an English expression, similar to "whatever he gets is too good for him". Calm down, WE're on the same side for once.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #34 :
So Malcolm are you saying it's ok to verbally abuse gays but not blacks? If you ask me if Dog is a racist them Washington is a homophobe and if you want to destroy one for being intolerant then you jabe to destroy the other.



I did not ask you if Dog is racist. I do not know him.

The post ask you to participate in a survey based on KKKramer-type remarks he used as pronoun for Blacks.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
WillJ said this in post #35 :


It's an English expression, similar to "whatever he gets is too good for him". Calm down, WE're on the same side for once.


This doesn't clear up anything.Your quote still leaves loophole for people who pretend to be against his type.

Nothiong could be done and your " to good for him quote" could be used.

Just tell us what should happen to him?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

[QUOTE]malcolm xx said this in post #36 :
[B]


I did not ask you if Dog is racist.

Yet you called the thread " Is Duane Dog Chapmen a racist?"

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #38 :
[QUOTE]malcolm xx said this in post #36 :
[B]


I did not ask you if Dog is racist.

Yet you called the thread " Is Duane Dog Chapmen a racist?"


I did not call the thread anything. Someone is asking us to vote based on that question. I am just giving site so we can participate.

What was your vote? yes or no
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

I think you are beggining to lose it Malcolm. YOU started this thread so YOU had to give it a name so YOU must have called it "is duane dog chapman a racist" so unless you are on the take for a magazine or work for a company ( which is against the rules BTW) then YOU must have come up with this title.

UIn response to your qauetion I have an answer I will give it when you answer some of my qauestions which you have ignored in the past those questions being:

Explain to us how the African slave catchers were victims of slavery?
and
Is Washington a homophobe?

When you answer those queations I will gladly answer yours.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #40 :
I think you are beggining to lose it Malcolm. YOU started this thread so YOU had to give it a name so YOU must have called it "is duane dog chapman a racist" so unless you are on the take for a magazine or work for a company ( which is against the rules BTW) then YOU must have come up with this title.

UIn response to your qauetion I have an answer I will give it when you answer some of my qauestions which you have ignored in the past those questions being:

Explain to us how the African slave catchers were victims of slavery?
and
Is Washington a homophobe?

When you answer those queations I will gladly answer yours.


1st paragraph: wrong,wrong,wrong and wrong

2nd: ( chicken?)

3rd: I will answer your questions on that particular site. The topic of this post ask us " Is Dog Chapmen a Racists". How many times have do I have to answere question.

last sentence: You won't participate in thread ,But you continue to give us opinions defending guilty person. We now know your position on topic. Why can't you participate like us and just VOTE your opinion.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

[QUOTE]malcolm xx said this in post #41 :
[B]

1st paragraph: wrong,wrong,wrong and wrong

Ok so who started the thread then?

2nd: ( chicken?)

Just like you then

3rd: I will answer your questions on that particular site. The topic of this post ask us " Is Dog Chapmen a Racists". How many times have do I have to answere question.

When you answer my questions on the other threads which you have not done yet, see now you know how ir feels annoying eh.

last sentence: You won't participate in thread ,But you continue to give us opinions defending guilty person.

I am participating in the thread I have given you my opinion a number of times.

We now know your position on topic. Why can't you participate like us and just VOTE your opinion.

Ok so what is my posiotn on the topic why don't you enlighten us and also if you know my oppinion why do you need me to vote?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: crankasaur

Honestly, I could care less about him.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
crankasaur said this in post #43 :
Honestly, I could care less about him.




You have right to a opinion.


But site ask for us to vote ( regardless of personal opinion) " Is Dog Chapmen a Racists"? yes or no
Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #42 :
[QUOTE]malcolm xx said this in post #41 :
[B]

1st paragraph: wrong,wrong,wrong and wrong

Ok so who started the thread then?

2nd: ( chicken?)

Just like you then

3rd: I will answer your questions on that particular site. The topic of this post ask us " Is Dog Chapmen a Racists". How many times have do I have to answere question.

When you answer my questions on the other threads which you have not done yet, see now you know how ir feels annoying eh.

last sentence: You won't participate in thread ,But you continue to give us opinions defending guilty person.

I am participating in the thread I have given you my opinion a number of times.

We now know your position on topic. Why can't you participate like us and just VOTE your opinion.

Ok so what is my posiotn on the topic why don't you enlighten us and also if you know my oppinion why do you need me to vote?


Based on your previous statements, we know you would (or have) voted YES.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

What previous statement would these be show me them. BTW who started the thread anyway?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #46 :
What previous statement would these be show me them. BTW who started the thread anyway?



I don't know who created thread. It was discovered while I was finding information on this KKKramer type incident. Black community was (is) outraged at the lack of coverage from conservative media.

Why am I the only one who should be responsible for this question? Do you know every site you visit? Why is it so hard for you to vote your opinion? Are you aware of what he said?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

Malcolm the first poster is the one that created the thread, who is the first poster? go back and see you have obviously forgotten.

Anyway about these staments I have been making what are they?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #48 :
Malcolm the first poster is the one that created the thread, who is the first poster? go back and see you have obviously forgotten.

Anyway about these staments I have been making what are they?



Why? And do you hold everyone to same standard?

This is a legit thread. Stop trying to taint this post and just VOTE your transparent opinion.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

Just tell me who started the thread and show me these statements I have been making.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #50 :
Just tell me who started the thread and show me these statements I have been making.


Happy Kwanzaa



read post #49
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

Read post 48 stop being a coward and answer the question.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: malcolm xx

quote:
lodgebo01 said this in post #52 :
Read post 48 stop being a coward and answer the question.


post #47 gave answer your question


Lodgebo if you have nothing to say on thread JUST STOP POSTING and move on.

We know where you stand on issue.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo01

No these previous statements that you claim I have made what are they?

Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Culture & Society Forum: Vote:Is Duane" Dog" Chapmen a Racists?

Forum Forum Forum