Sorcerer's Stone: Rate This Film

Harry Potter polls Forum

It's time for a Thumbs up - Thumbs down vote on this film! Tell everyone what you think!

I have loved every single Harry Potter book I've read yet. Both movies out definitly did a good job telling the story!! I can't wait until the book series finishes and more movies are madE!

Thumbs waaaay down down down......it was a complete disappointment. Can anyone honestly say they think that Radcliff guy was fit for the part as Harry.. ? Look at his hair...please...

The movies are no where near as good as the books... but I think that Daniel Radcliff does a great job as Harry. He really does look the part. As do Hermione and Ron, and the rest of the Weasley clan.
Anyway... the movie was pretty darn good!

It was just horrible. Thumbs down.

The movies are great, I do agree though, not as good as the books.

I really really liked the Sorcerer's Stone movie - it pretty much reflected what I felt reading the book .. I think that they do an incredibly good job on choosing the actors .. (i especially love Ron, Hermione, Snape, Dumbledore, .. well basically everybody) ..

there is just one tiny thing I don't like .. Daniel Radcliffe really looks like the Harry I imagine, he is just such a stiff actor .. I do not like his acting very much, his movements are sometimes weird and most of the times his facial expression doesn't fit the situation .. but he is trying ..

there is one particular situation in the movie when Hagrid comes to the island in the middle of the night and says something like "I'd like ter see a great Muggle like you stop him," and Harry says "a what?" .. and it is so aweful .. the German dubbing is even worse ..

but anyway, i really like the movies for they have wonderful actors, wonderful colors and settings and i love watching them over and over again ..

ineli

the books are fantastic and so the only reason I mildly enjoyed the first film was because it was an adaptation of that fantasy world that I've grown to love. However, poor performances, dodgy direction, and not the best script, all prevent this film from standing on its own.

I loved Daniel Radcliff as Harry. He really looked the part. My own little kids love the movie. Even my husband can quote it, so I think it was a good way to get new people to read the book.

Daniel Radcliff wasn't such a good actor...sure he looked like Harry....but Harry was an active boy...when u look at Dani....ewww.he doesn't move alot

Wow....... I realised there's polls I haven't touched! woo hoo

of course

Just saw it. Liked it a lot.

Of course I have not read the book. The book is always better. If I read the book first, no matter how good the movie is, I will not like it.

Just saw it too Whidden. But I voted thumbs up, not a "great" movie, but it was good..I have yet to see the second one...will soon though, I'm hoping its better than the first...And I have yet to read the book On my books to read list though

Hard to explain why a movie works. I liked it a lot. Will probably buy it on DVD.

What made it "just good" for ya Misty?

I don't know really, nothing just stood out for me...But since there are so many people here that love the movies, I'm going to give the second movie a chance

I simply loved with all the spceal effects.

Misty, I know you love Lord of The Rings. It is hard to compare the two. Very different. HP is fun and interesting.

What is it with Lord Of The Rings?????

I just saw it last night, awesome flick. I liked it a lot. The funniest part was the car.

I liked the part with the slugs.

yeah, Rons face was so purple.

Is there a thread on the second movie, I can't find it.

Just made one.