The Spider Man Poster Mystery by Whizzle |
| Posted by: Whidden | | I got me a Spiderman Poster awhile back from Wal-Mart and hung that sucker up on the wall. I was looking at it one day, and noticed this mystery area, that I could not identify.
I asked Sandy June, and we studied it on and off for weeks. We finally came to the conclusion that it was a mistake.
I searched the net for the poster, and found it listed, but never found any explanation as to what the mystery black area was.
Looking at the poster, look at Spidermans left arm, (our left, not his) Where his Bicep should be is a mystery Black shape I can't figure out. His foot is in front of it, his arm behind it. Yet it seems to blend into his pants and right side leg....
The shape is odd, almost like a foot, but not quite. I totally give up, and hope that someone will find this thread, someone who is a Spiderman fan, who can explain it. Perhaps it's a Spidey Fanny Pack.
http://www.inreview.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=672303
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v460/Whidden/Whidden%202/spidermanposter.jpg | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | | It looks like it's supposed to be the shadow of his foot, but it looks like they screwed it up.
one time I was doing a homework assignment, spent like 2 hours on it, then realized I had kind of done it wrong, but done some stuff right, and it looked good, even though the answer was wrong. But I didn't feel like correcting it, so I just turned it in as it was.
maybe that's what the artist did. Screwed it up, but was like "*($@&)&% I don't feel like starting over" and tried to cover it up and hoped no one would notice. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sandy June | | Well, it is driving me crazy. That is what I thought. Maybe the artist messed it up but could that really be right? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | | I think it looks like a dinger. Actually they did not draw in a definition line between the black of the arm and the crotch of his outfit, so it all blends into a strange shape. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | |
| quote: |
fuscia said this in post #4 :
I think it looks like a dinger. Actually they did not draw in a definition line between the black of the arm and the crotch of his outfit, so it all blends into a strange shape. |

*actually, that was the first thing that sprung to mind, but in a rare moment of maturity, I decided not to post it. Do not expect that to happen often.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sandy June | | I think it is suppose to be his arm. I don't like it.
Or it could be a dinger.  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | |
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #6 :

*actually, that was the first thing that sprung to mind, but in a rare moment of maturity, I decided not to post it. Do not expect that to happen often. |
Dave thinks I'm dinger obsessed, so I had to say it. I did a mural on my son's closet of spiderman. They overemphasize the crotch area in all the drawings, so there is a very noticeable bulge in the "area". I think the lack of highlighting just blends the arm into said dinger area.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Whidden | |
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #5 :
hey you know what, look at that.
That's his arm, that's just how his costume is colored. Look at his other arm.
[img]http://www.inreview.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=672335[/img] |
I could see that, if we use Fuscia's argument too, that there needs to be a line between his crotch area, and the bicep where it meets the forearm. It's giving the illusion of a bulge by the forearm, but it may need to have a line there to show the difference. I think it may be his uniform at the bicep, but I am having a hard time seeing it, it looks off...
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | | It is a definition thing. If you want to freak out, check out the Ikea catalogue.  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | | No I was warped long before I met you. BUT you did have the bananas, so that means you are at least a little warped. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | | yeah send me the link to the perverted nanner site. I miss those guys. 
See, I know art. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Whidden | | Fuscia has destroyed the Whidden marraige and driven my sweet innocent wife insane with dinger lingo.
http://bestsmileys.com/candle/1.gif But I would rather light a candle than curse your darkness. And yes, it's just a candle you dinger seeing weirdos!!! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Whidden | | FUSCIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What have you done to Sandy June?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: illuminate | |
| quote: |
fuscia said this in post #12 :
It is a definition thing. If you want to freak out, check out the Ikea catalogue. |
haha are you talking about the "dog part" in the catalog? On the inside of the first page? WHAT IS THAT?
I think this is part of spiderman's arm... atleast, i hope so.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | |
| quote: |
fuscia said this in post #12 :
It is a definition thing. If you want to freak out, check out the Ikea catalogue. |
Funny similar story with that. I went to Universal Studios when I was in high school with my folks and a few buddies. We ended up at that animal stunt show because we were tired of walking all day. Anyway, the dog from Back To The Future was there doing his thing. Afterward kids were allowed to come up with the dog and take a picture. So there's this big line of kids taking pictures with the dog when I glance over and see the dog is well, very "excited" to have all this attention. The doggie lipstick was out for sure. I started cracking up. I tell everyone around me and I can't stop laughing. I kept imagining all these kids getting home, having the film developed and getting a little surprise in their photo. It was fantastic.
-HECK!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sandy June | | DID WE DECIDE WE FIGURED OUT WHAT THE PICTURE IS IN THE POSTER? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Whidden | |
| quote: |
Sandy June said this in post #24 :
DID WE DECIDE WE FIGURED OUT WHAT THE PICTURE IS IN THE POSTER? |
It's his arm dummy. Just needs a definition line. Fuscia and Dekka solved it.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | This sounds like a Scooby Doo mystery, like from those old cartoons when they had guest starts. Remember when the Harlem Globetrotters guest starred? Then The Three Stooges were on, that was weird. My favorite was Batman & Robin.
What were we talking about again?
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: illuminate | | The spiderbulge.
If you look closely, on the right side (our right side) of his chest is a black area. I think the black bulge is part of his black pants, part of his left-chest area outline and part of his arm. It's just his costume. But everyone's right. it needs more definition lines. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | I think Whizzle bought the Spider weiner poster on purpose. Sicky.
What's even worse, it's a paint by numbers.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Whidden | | I was just lookin at posters at Wal-Mart one day, and thought it was kind of cool, so I went for it. Didn't know it had homo erotica in it.
I claim ignorance in this matter. | | Reply To this Message
|
Lounge Lizards Forum: The Spider Man Poster Mystery by Whizzle
|