Iran's PM never said "Israel should be wiped off the map" |
| Posted by: h@ts | | Did Iranian PM, Ahmadinejad actually say Israel should be "wiped off the map"? Turns out he may not have said it. In fact he may not have said many of the things quoted in Western media outlets.
| quote: |
| Ahmadinejad never used the word "map" or the term "wiped off". According to Farsi-language experts like Juan Cole and even right-wing services like MEMRI, what he actually said was "this regime that is occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time." |
And what did he mean?
| quote: |
| In this speech to an annual anti-Zionist conference, Mr. Ahmadinejad was being prophetic, not threatening. He was citing Imam Khomeini, who said this line in the 1980s (a period when Israel was actually selling arms to Iran, so apparently it was not viewed as so ghastly then). Mr. Ahmadinejad had just reminded his audience that the Shah's regime, the Soviet Union, and Saddam Hussein had all seemed enormously powerful and immovable, yet the first two had vanished almost beyond recall and the third now languished in prison. So, too, the "occupying regime" in Jerusalem would someday be gone. His message was, in essence, "This too shall pass." |
And yet more misquotes, this time he did not say: "'main cure' for crisis in the Middle East is the elimination of Israel"
| quote: |
Radio Free Europe reported that he said "that the 'main cure' for crisis in the Middle East is the elimination of Israel." "Elimination of Israel" implies physical destruction: bombs, strafing, terror, throwing Jews into the sea. Tony Blair denounced the translated statement as ""quite shocking". But Mr. Ahmadinejad never said this. According to al-Jazeera, what he actually said was "The real cure for the conflict is the elimination of the Zionist regime, but there should be an immediate ceasefire first."
http://www.informationclearinghouse...rticle14733.htm |
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | | ?
the wording of the translations are different, but they mean the same thing... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #2 :
?
the wording of the translations are different, but they mean the same thing... |
No they do not mean the same thing. Ahmadinejad words are the equivalant of Bush saying he wanted to wipe Afghanistan and Iraq off the map, into the sea etc. He's talking about regimes and policy.
But that is not how people talk about Ahmadinejad words on this forum. And so the conflict can continue indefinitely, ignoring any chance of peace, and you guys can happily support an attack on Iran when it comes, and the conflict can go on forever, and why not? Israel continues to be by far the strongest military in the ME, supported by the most powerful military on the planet.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | | he might not be talking abot the slaughtering of every single Jew, but he sure ain't talking about peace. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #4 :
he might not be talking abot the slaughtering of every single Jew, but he sure ain't talking about peace. |
Yes, but it could well be that both sides are actually talking about the same thing, ie they both fear and want rid of each other's government policy, instead of it's people (and remember Israel is the country with the nukes and a very aggressive US support, so clearly fear is not just an Israeli thing). If the Iranian PM is saying this then it puts everything in a different perspective, and people can maybe see that their is chance to solve what seem like irreconcilable differences, as in - if you just think Iran wants to destroy Israel then no-one's even looking at peace.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Aggie1978 | | Transcript: Iran President’s speech threatening Israel
Fri. 28 Oct 2005
Iran Focus
Transcript of speech by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at “World Without Zionism” conference in Tehran
Reported by Iranian government-owned news agency ISNA on 26 October 2005 at 13:10 local time (for original Persian text see: http://www.isna.ir/Main/NewsView.aspx?ID=News-603209)
Tehran, Iran, Oct. 28 – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made a keynote speech on Wednesday at the gathering of 4,000 students organised by the Association of Islamic Students Societies. The text follows:
I am grateful to God for giving me the great pleasure of speaking at this very important gathering. I thank God for seeing the pious faces of you, the valiant, aware, God-fearing and selfless children of the revolution, who understand with vigilance and intelligence the most important issues of our times and are active with great zest and in a decisive way in the most central issues of the Islamic world. I thank God for the presence of you dear young people.
The real question is what is Zionism? No doubt there have been many discussions in this conference on this issue and you have made studies in this regard, and you may know what I want to emphasize, but it is something worth mentioning.
We must see what the real story of Palestine is. Is the conflict in Palestine a war between some Jews on the one side and Muslims and non-Jews on the other side? Is it a war between the Jews and other faiths? Is it the war of one country with other countries? Is it the war of one country with the Arab world? Is the conflict only over the limited lands of Palestine? I think the answer to all these questions is negative.
The creation of the regime occupying Al-Qods (Jerusalem) was a heavy move by the globally dominant system and Global Arrogance against the Islamic world. There is a historic battle going on between the Oppressor World and the Islamic world and the roots of this conflict goes back hundreds of years.
In this historic conflict, the fronts have shifted many times. There were times when the Muslims had the upper hand and were active and forward-moving, while the Oppressor World was on retreat.
Unfortunately, in the past three hundred years, the Islamic world has been on retreat in the face of the Oppressor World.
I do not intend to go to the roots of the issue and I concentrate on a historical review of the events. In the past one hundred years, the last trenches of the Islamic world fell and the Oppressor World created the regime occupying Al-Qods as the bridgehead for its domination of the Islamic world. Bridgehead is a military term in warfare. When two divisions or armies are fighting each other, if one side advances and breaks through the front and captures a piece of enemy territory and builds up fortifications and strengthens its hold to make it a base for further territorial expansion, then we call this a bridgehead.
The occupying state (Israel) is the bridgehead of the Oppressor World in the heart of the Islamic world. They have built a base to expand their domination to the entire Islamic world. There is no other raison d’etre for this entity without this objective.
The battle that is going on in Palestine today, therefore, is the frontline of the conflict between the Islamic world and the Oppressor World. It is a battle of destiny that will determine the fate of hundreds of years of conflict in Palestine.
Today, the Palestinian nation is fighting the Oppressor World on behalf of the Islamic umma (nation). Thank God, from the day the Palestinian nation moved towards an Islamic struggle with Islamic objectives and an Islamic environment, and made Islam the dominating force in its behaviour and orientation, we have been witnessing the progress and successes of the Palestinian nation every day.
I must say that you have chosen a very valuable title for your gathering [World Without Zionism]. Many are sowing the seeds of defeat and despair in this all-out war between the Islamic world and the Infidel Front, hoping to dishearten the Islamic world.
Such people are using words like “it’s not possible”. They say how could we have a world without America and Zionism? But you know well that this slogan and goal can be achieved and can definitely be realised”.
If we take a look back, we had in our country a regime that was very violent, anti-popular, dependent on foreigners, and armed to its teeth. Members of SAVAK [the Shah’s secret police] controlled every move and a terrible reign of terror existed.
But when the dear Imam [Ruhollah Khomeini] said this regime must be destroyed, and we want a world without a client state, many of those who claim to be political gurus and other things said it’s not possible. The day when the Imam started his move, all the powers of the world supported that corrupt regime. Even after the massacre of Black Friday, the West and the East and regional powers all supported the regime. But our nation fought and now for 27 years we have a government that is independent of America. The Imam said the domination of the East and the West must be destroyed, but weak-minded persons, who only see the little world around them, didn’t believe him…
Our dear Imam ordered that the occupying regime in Al-Qods be wiped off the face of the earth. This was a very wise statement. The issue of Palestine is not one on which we could make a piecemeal compromise… This would mean our defeat. Anyone who would recognize this state [Israel] has put his signature under the defeat of the Islamic world.
In his struggle against the World Arrogance, our dear Imam targeted the central and command base of the enemy, namely the occupying regime in Al-Qods. I have no doubt that the new wave that has started in dear Palestine and which we witness today all over the Islamic world will soon wipe this scourge of shame from the Islamic world. This can be done.
We have to watch out for conspiracies. For more than 50 years, the World Arrogance has tried to give recognition to the existence of this fake regime [Israel] and they have make many efforts to first stabilize it and then take further steps.
Some 27 or 28 years ago, they took an important step in this regard and, unfortunately, one of the frontline countries made this mistake, and we hope that country [Egypt] will rectify its mistake.
Recently, a new conspiracy has been plotted and is underway. They have been forced to evacuate a corner of Palestine and this was imposed on them by the Palestinian nation. But they want to sell this as the final victory and use the evacuation of Gaza and the creation of a Palestinian state as an excuse to end the Palestinian cause and goal.
Today they are making an evil and deceptive effort to turn the struggle into an internal conflict of the Islamic world. They want to create conflict among Palestinian groups inside Palestine by making them greedy for political positions or high office, so that these groups abandon the decisive issue fo Palestine and turn on each other.
With the excuse of having cleared the Gaza Strip to show their good will, they want a group of Muslim nations to recognise this corrupt regime, and I am very hopeful and pray to God that the Palestinian nation and the dear Palestinian groups will be cautious of such sedition.
Today the unity of the front in Palestine on its goals is a pressing necessity. The issue of Palestine is by no means finished. The issue of Palestine will only be resolved when all of Palestine comes under Palestinian rule, when all the refugees return to their homes, and when a popular government chosen by this nation takes the affairs in its hands. Of course, those who have come to this land from far away to plunder this land have no right to participate in the decision-making process for this nation.
I am hopeful that just as the Palestinian nation continued its struggle for the past ten years, it will continue to maintain its awareness and vigilance. This phase is going to be short-lived. If we put it behind us successfully, God willing, it will pave the way for the annihilation of the Zionist regime and it will be a downhill route.
I warn all the leaders in the Islamic world to beware of this conspiracy. If any of them takes a step towards the recognition of this regime [Israel], then he will burn in the fire of the Islamic umma (nation) and will have eternal shame stamped on his forehead, regardless of whether he did this under pressure by the dominant powers, or lack of understanding or naiveté or selfishness or worldly incentives.
The issue of Palestine is the issue of the Islamic world. Those who are closeted behind closed doors cannot make decisions on this issue and the Islamic nation does not allow this historical enemy to exist at the heart of the Islamic world.
http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/ne...hp?storyid=4164 | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | | very good. That is what we needed.
How can anyone read that and not understand the clear intentions to destroy Israel?
Notice how it is always referred to as "Zionist regime."
They do not recognize Israel as a legitimate country. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #8 :
very good. That is what we needed.
|
Yes, futility and war and hostility are such good straws to grasp for.
Whatever Ahmadenijad says or thinks - and as the previous post demostrates, his words can be twisted, and certainly there are those who would like nothing better than to do that and promote the idea that Iran must be destroyed - I have already posted several things saying Iran had agreed to talk to the US and recognise Israel, and would aggree to a two state solution. Obviously this is all irrelevant when war is the solution of choice to global mistrust and hostility.
I listened to Richard Pearle this morning on British radio and it's clear that the neocons want war and regime change in Iran. If they feel they have the backing for this, I'm sure they will go for it. Now it's all about the PR exercise and the demonising of Iran, it's nuclear ambitions and its WMD.
Will the necons succeed again? Going by views on this forum, they may well. "how easy is it to drag the people to war."
| quote: |
In 2003, Iran offered to negotiate all outstanding issues with the US, including nuclear issues and a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict. The offer was made by the moderate Khatami government, with the support of the hard-line "supreme leader" Ayatollah Khamenei. The Bush administration response was to censure the Swiss diplomat who brought the offer.
"In June 2006, Ayatollah Khamenei issued an official declaration stating that Iran agrees with the Arab countries on the issue of Palestine, meaning that it accepts the 2002 Arab League call for full normalization of relations with Israel in a two-state settlement in accord with the international consensus. The timing suggests that this might have been a reprimand to his subordinate Ahmadenijad, whose inflammatory statements are given wide publicity in the West, unlike the far more important declaration by his superior Khamenei.
-Noam Chomsky August 2006
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/cont...8/08chomsky.cfm |
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: EUCLID | |
| quote: |
h@ts said this in post #9 :
Whatever Ahmadenijad says or thinks - and as the previous post demostrates, his words can be twisted, and certainly there are those who would like nothing better than to do that...
|
After reading post #6, it seems pretty obvious that if there is any "twisting of words" going on, it is in post #1.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
EUCLID said this in post #10 :
it seems pretty obvious that if there is any "twisting of words" going on, it is in post #1. |
I didn't know you were a Farsi-language expert. No offence but - how is it "pretty obvious" to you? 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: EUCLID | |
| quote: |
h@ts said this in post #11 :
I didn't know you were a Farsi-language expert. No offence but - how is it "pretty obvious" to you? |
How is it obvious??
Obvious is obvious. What does being a Farsi-language expert have to do with it?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
EUCLID said this in post #12 :
How is it obvious??
Obvious is obvious. What does being a Farsi-language expert have to do with it? |
You need to pay more attention.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: EUCLID | |
| quote: |
h@ts said this in post #13 :
You need to pay more attention. |
If I missed something, why don't you tell me what I missed. It seems like that would be the quickest way to get to your point.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
EUCLID said this in post #14 :
If I missed something, why don't you tell me what I missed. It seems like that would be the quickest way to get to your point. |
I'm not going to spell it out for you. You clearly didn't read (or understand) post #1 but you then thought you were making some point by comparing it to post #6.
The only point you made was showing the inability you have to thinking sometimes.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: EUCLID | |
| quote: |
h@ts said this in post #15 :
I'm not going to spell it out for you. |
Oh I see. Mr. Ahmadinejad does not want to use bombs, and terror to throw the Jews into the sea. He just believes that the whole problem would be solved if the Jews would vote out their Zionist regime. I wonder what Mr. Ahmadinejad would like to see replace the Zionist regime.
Mr. Amadinejad was on CBS 60 Minutes and interviewed for about a half an hour a couple weeks ago. The interviewer, Mike Wallace, confronted Mr. Ahmadinejad about his alleged “wipe Israel off the map” comment, and Mr. Ahmadinejad back-peddled.
You would think he would have taken the opportunity to set the record straight and put everyone’s mind at ease by telling the U.S. and worldwide audience that what he really said was, “This regime that is occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time.”
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | | The neocons feel regime change in Iran is now more vital than ever because of the failiure in Iraq. Everything they say is now going to be geared towards convincing a sceptical public that another war should be waged. Is none of the following stuff worth considering when thinking about the suppossed threat Iran presents?
Fact: Iran's theocracy took power after the Shah was kicked out in '79. They have not started a single war, attacked a single country, or invaded anyone in all that time. On the other hand, they have been attacked by Iraq in a war the US encouraed (and let's not forget that the democratically elected prime minister Mosaddeq was removed from power in a coup led by British and US).
Iran does support groups with weapons, training, and money, which we can argue is wrong, but hardly uncommon, and the US and UK do it to a far larger extent, US/UK - #1 and #2 suppliers of military hardware in the world.
And finally and something most people do not take into considerations: have Iran any national security worries?
- Fact: like Iraq's regime, they have been put on America's "Axis of evil" list.
- Neighbour Israel has stockpiles of secret nukes and WMDs, billions of dollars of military aid and support from the US, and have demonstrated their willingness to use massive violence and destruction on another coutry when they attacked Lebanon. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | | h@ts: read post #6 and tell me what you think Iran's intentions are. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #19 :
h@ts: read post #6 and tell me what you think Iran's intentions are. |
The intention appears to me to be questioning the legitimacy of Israel's policy in the region, and pointing out the threat Isreal poses to the surrounding nations, and America's and other nations reliance on Israel as a useful way of protecting Western interests in the region.
He mentions the 50s American and British backed coup that overthrew the democratic government of Iran as an example of how Western policy cannot be trusted, which I take to mean that although the West speaks about democracy, what's actually important is who controls the vast resourses of the Gulf, and equally as important: who will decide on how the region is governed - the people who live there or the West.
What do you think are Iran's intentions going by the speech?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: EUCLID | |
| quote: |
Aggie1978 said this in post #6 :
Transcript: Iran President’s speech threatening Israel
Fri. 28 Oct 2005
Iran Focus
Transcript of speech by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at “World Without Zionism” conference in Tehran
The real question is what is Zionism?
There is a historic battle going on between the Oppressor World and the Islamic world and the roots of this conflict goes back hundreds of years.
In this historic conflict, the fronts have shifted many times. There were times when the Muslims had the upper hand and were active and forward-moving, while the Oppressor World was on retreat.
Unfortunately, in the past three hundred years, the Islamic world has been on retreat in the face of the Oppressor World.
In the past one hundred years, the last trenches of the Islamic world fell and the Oppressor World created the regime occupying Al-Qods as the bridgehead for its domination of the Islamic world.
Bridgehead is a military term in warfare.
When two divisions or armies are fighting each other, if one side advances and breaks through the front and captures a piece of enemy territory and builds up fortifications and strengthens its hold to make it a base for further territorial expansion, then we call this a bridgehead.
The occupying state (Israel) is the bridgehead of the Oppressor World in the heart of the Islamic world. They have built a base to expand their domination to the entire Islamic world. There is no other raison d’etre for this entity without this objective.
The battle that is going on in Palestine today, therefore, is the frontline of the conflict between the Islamic world and the Oppressor World. It is a battle of destiny that will determine the fate of hundreds of years of conflict in Palestine.
Today, the Palestinian nation is fighting the Oppressor World on behalf of the Islamic umma (nation).
I must say that you have chosen a very valuable title for your gathering [World Without Zionism]. Many are sowing the seeds of defeat and despair in this all-out war between the Islamic world and the Infidel Front, hoping to dishearten the Islamic world.
Such people are using words like “it’s not possible”. They say how could we have a world without America and Zionism? But you know well that this slogan and goal can be achieved and can definitely be realised”.
Our dear Imam ordered that the occupying regime in Al-Qods be wiped off the face of the earth. This was a very wise statement. The issue of Palestine is not one on which we could make a piecemeal compromise… This would mean our defeat. Anyone who would recognize this state [Israel] has put his signature under the defeat of the Islamic world.
In his struggle against the World Arrogance, our dear Imam targeted the central and command base of the enemy, namely the occupying regime in Al-Qods. I have no doubt that the new wave that has started in dear Palestine and which we witness today all over the Islamic world will soon wipe this scourge of shame from the Islamic world. This can be done.
For more than 50 years, the World Arrogance has tried to give recognition to the existence of this fake regime [Israel] and they have make many efforts to first stabilize it and then take further steps.
The issue of Palestine will only be resolved when all of Palestine comes under Palestinian rule, ... and when a popular government chosen by this nation takes the affairs in its hands.
Of course, those who have come to this land from far away to plunder this land have no right to participate in the decision-making process for this nation.
...God willing, it will pave the way for the annihilation of the Zionist regime and it will be a downhill route.
... and the Islamic nation does not allow this historical enemy to exist at the heart of the Islamic world.
http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/ne...hp?storyid=4164 |
I have extracted the above comments from Ahmadinejad's speech given in post #6. By clearing away a lot of unecessary words, it easier to get his point. Once you have his point, you can consider the suggestion of this thread, which is that this leader of Iran is only talking about changing policies of Israel, and not suggesting actual armed conflict where people get hurt.
In making your decision about whether Iran's president is referring to a battle where blood is spilled or merely talking about a battle of ideas, it helps to note that he does include the battle in Palestine against Israel that is going on today as the frontline component of the larger battle that he is discussing throughout his speech.
Also, if you buy into the proposition that Ahmadinejad is only talking about changing the course of events through people changing their policies, note that he is explicilty banning the people of Israel from having a vote in the matter.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | | So the translators are wrong? Those guys who actually know the language? I suppose now you are going to say that it wasn't Ahmadinajad who participated in taking the American hostages in 1979?
This is the guy who said that the holocaust never happened. Or was the translaters wrong about that too? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
Edward Teach said this in post #23 :
So the translators are wrong? |
No, "according to Farsi-language experts like Juan Cole and even right-wing services like MEMRI" they are wrong.
| quote: |
| Those guys who actually know the language? |
Which guys?
| quote: |
| I suppose now you are going to say that it wasn't Ahmadinajad who participated in taking the American hostages in 1979? |
Here's something you might want to find out about - why did the students storm the embassy and what were their demands?
| quote: |
| This is the guy who said that the holocaust never happened. Or was the translaters wrong about that too? [/B] |
Did he really say, "the holocaust never happened"? Maybe you should check.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | |
| quote: |
h@ts said this in post #24 :
No, "according to Farsi-language experts like Juan Cole and even right-wing services like MEMRI" they are wrong.
|
You mention one person Juan Cole whom ever the heck that is. I've never heard of him.
I would expect that it came from the official tranlaters from Iran TV but don't you find it odd that all of them have come up with the same thing?
| quote: |
Here's something you might want to find out about - why did the students storm the embassy and what were their demands?
|
Tell us your version!
| quote: |
Did he really say, "the holocaust never happened"? Maybe you should check. |
Not those exact words.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | | Addressing about 4000 students gathered in an Interior Ministry conference hall, Ahmadinejad also called for Palestinian unity, resistance and a point "where the annihilation of the Zionist regime will come".
It's hard to exactly translate one language from another.
In English we don't literally mean "Wipe a country off of a map" That would be impossible. It would be more like killing every man woman and child of a country. So it's obvious that the translator put it in terms that American's understand. We knew what was meant. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
Edward Teach said this in post #25 :
I would expect that it came from |
So you've no idea?
| quote: |
| don't you find it odd that all of them have come up with the same thing? |
Well seeing as you don't know who "they" are I don't know how to answer your statement.
But as the run up to the US attack on Iraq showed, when people like Bush are determined to attack a country, they will pretty much say anything to convince the public that war is necessary, and usually the best policy is to scare the public and say they are in danger. Worked in Iraq (mushroom clouds over US cities) and it might work in Iran.
| quote: |
| Not those exact words. |
No he didn't say those exact words.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
Edward Teach said this in post #26 :
So it's obvious that the translator put it in terms that American's understand. We knew what was meant. |
Obvious? Why wouldn't it be put in such a way? There are people who wish to convince you that Iran is the biggest threat to peace in the ME, and they are doing a good job, despite the actual reality, which should be clear to anyone with eyes that it is in fact the US who are doing all the attacking and invading and war starting?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Edward Teach | | Al Jezeera reports it the same way so where are YOU getting YOUR information? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | |
| quote: |
h@ts said this in post #20 :
The intention appears to me to be questioning the legitimacy of Israel's policy in the region, and pointing out the threat Isreal poses to the surrounding nations, and America's and other nations reliance on Israel as a useful way of protecting Western interests in the region.
He mentions the 50s American and British backed coup that overthrew the democratic government of Iran as an example of how Western policy cannot be trusted, which I take to mean that although the West speaks about democracy, what's actually important is who controls the vast resourses of the Gulf, and equally as important: who will decide on how the region is governed - the people who live there or the West.
What do you think are Iran's intentions going by the speech? |
It seems to me that Ahmadinejad believes there is ongoing conflict of the Western World versus the Islamic world.
He sees the creation of Israel (which he refers to as 'the Zionist Regime') as an encroachment of the Western World into the Islamic world. He believes that the Western World's long-term goal is to subjugate the Islamic World, and that the only way to stop this is by destroying Israel.
Now, he may or may not intend genocide with theses statements, but it seem pretty obvious that he intends to remove Israel's sovereignity as an independent nation.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: P.O.T.U.S. | |
| quote: |
Edward Teach said this in post #30 :
Al Jezeera reports it the same way so where are YOU getting YOUR information? |
He gets it from the BBC and The Guardian. Worse than Al Jazeera.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #31 :
[B]
It seems to me that Ahmadinejad believes there is ongoing conflict of the Western World versus the Islamic world. |
There is plenty of recent evidence to back up this belief, not least - the attack and invasion of Iraq on the pretext that Iraq was a threat to the world because of its (non-existant) WMDs, and there's the PNAC docs, and the military bases the US is building in Iraq - to name just a few examples.
| quote: |
| He sees the creation of Israel (which he refers to as 'the Zionist Regime') as an encroachment of the Western World into the Islamic world. |
Is it an encroachment? Aren't Jews as much a part of the Middle East as Arabs and Persians?
| quote: |
| He believes that the Western World's long-term goal is to subjugate the Islamic World, and that the only way to stop this is by destroying Israel. |
The West has subjugated countries in the Middle East since early last century. This interferance in ME politics and careless support for brutal regimes has not doubt played a large part in the hostility and mistrust felt towards the West, which we seem incapable of appreciating (until recently).
| quote: |
| Now, he may or may not intend genocide with theses statements, but it seem pretty obvious that he intends to remove Israel's sovereignity as an independent nation. |
If he doesn't control the military then how is he going to do this? And these statements contradict the offers made by Iran to recognise Isreal and the two state solution, which Bush rejects. Truth is Iran can't "remove Israel's sovereignity". Israel is by far the strongest military might in the ME. They could have obliterated and killed every single person in Lebanon, with minimum loss of life to themselves and no-one could stop them.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | |
| quote: |
h@ts said this in post #34 :
There is plenty of recent evidence to back up this belief, not least - the attack and invasion of Iraq on the pretext that Iraq was a threat to the world because of its (non-existant) WMDs, and there's the PNAC docs, and the military bases the US is building in Iraq - to name just a few examples.
Is it an encroachment? Aren't Jews as much a part of the Middle East as Arabs and Persians? |
you and I may think so, but Mr. Ahmadinejad doesn't.
| quote: |
| The West has subjugated countries in the Middle East since early last century. This interferance in ME politics and careless support for brutal regimes has not doubt played a large part in the hostility and mistrust felt towards the West, which we seem incapable of appreciating (until recently). |
So are you agreeing with Ahmadinejad?
| quote: |
| If he doesn't control the military then how is he going to do this? And these statements contradict the offers made by Iran to recognise Isreal and the two state solution, which Bush rejects. Truth is Iran can't "remove Israel's sovereignity". Israel is by far the strongest military might in the ME. They could have obliterated and killed every single person in Lebanon, with minimum loss of life to themselves and no-one could stop them. |
I do not think Iran is capable of wiping Israel off the map, but, it seems obvious that Ahmadinejad wishes to do so. He wishes to create nuclear weapons, and he wishes to use them on Israel. He does not believe in the Holocaust ( link ), he does not think that Jews should have a homeland in the Middle East, and he wants Israel to be destroyed.
That is the impression I got from post #6, anyway.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | |
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #35 :
So are you agreeing with Ahmadinejad? |
About what? We overthrew the Iranian government. Intreferance doesn't get any more discraceful. We talk about democracy but in the end it's just propoganda, and we lap it up, because we're spoon-fed the idea that we're the good guys. Welll guess what, all governments say that.
| quote: |
| I do not think Iran is capable of wiping Israel off the map, but, it seems obvious that Ahmadinejad wishes to do so. He wishes to create nuclear weapons, and he wishes to use them on Israel. He does not believe in the Holocaust ( link ), he does not think that Jews should have a homeland in the Middle East, and he wants Israel to be destroyed. |
This is all wrong. For one thing nuking Israel would kill the Palastinians. He does not disbelieve in the holocaust - read the opening post link. And the last point has been dealt with and it's just very convenient of us to believe he wants to destroy Israel because that gives us the excuse we're after to justify destroying Iran.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: P.O.T.U.S. | |
| quote: |
h@ts said this in post #36 :
We talk about democracy but in the end it's just propoganda, and we lap it up, because we're spoon-fed the idea that we're the good guys. |
The above post aptly showcases the self-loathing mania which is at the core of the pathology that pervades the unhappy mind of the extreme liberal.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Viper1 | | Iran: Israel links may hurt Europe
POSTED: 7:03 a.m. EDT, October 20, 2006
TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has warned Europe that it may pay a heavy price for its support of Israel.
"You should believe that this regime (Israel) cannot last and has no more benefit to you. What benefit have you got in supporting this regime, except the hatred of the nations?" he said in nationally broadcast speech Friday.
"We have advised the Europeans that the Americans are far away, but you are the neighbors of the nations in this region," he said.
"We inform you that the nations are like an ocean that is welling up, and if a storm begins, the dimensions will not stay limited to Palestine, and you may get hurt."
Ahmadinejad's comments came on Jerusalem Day -- when Iranians are officially encouraged to show their support for the Palestinians.
These remarks were made a day after Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said Iran would "have a price to pay" if it continued down the path of its nuclear ambitions.
Olmert was speaking to reporters Thursday on his way home from a three-day trip to Moscow. Israel, along with the United States and other Western powers, rejects Tehran's claim that its nuclear program is peaceful, designed solely to produce energy.
The Iranian leader has long spoken out against Israel, saying the Jewish nation should be "wiped off the map."
He has not since repeated that phrase but often launches verbal attacks on Israel, whose right to exist Iran has not recognized since the 1979 Islamic revolution.
On Friday, Ahmadinejad said there was no justification for the "Zionist regime" -- a term he often uses when referring to Israel -- arguing that it is on the verge of disintegration.
"Efforts to stabilize this fake regime, by the grace of God, have completely failed," he said.
He also called Israel's leaders a "group of terrorists."
Ahmadinejad has also sparked outrage in the West by describing the Holocaust, in which 6 million Jews were killed by the Nazis, as a "myth." | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: EUCLID | | I don't have much of a problem getting Ahmadinejad's drift when he talks about the "zionist regime," but some can find other meaning in his words. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: malcolm xx | |
| quote: |
h@ts said this in post #1 :
Did Iranian PM, Ahmadinejad actually say Israel should be "wiped off the map"? Turns out he may not have said it. In fact he may not have said many of the things quoted in Western media outlets.
And what did he mean?
And yet more misquotes, this time he did not say: "'main cure' for crisis in the Middle East is the elimination of Israel"
I'm glad you cleared up this propaganda the [conservative] media created for an Zionistic agenda.
|

| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: WillJ | | Hm...how about that part when he said homosexuality didn't exist in Iran? I nearly fell out of my chair laughing. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: malcolm xx | |
| quote: |
WillJ said this in post #41 :
Hm...how about that part when he said homosexuality didn't exist in Iran? I nearly fell out of my chair laughing. |
Then you must sit on the floor when your president speaks.
| | Reply To this Message
|
Iran Forum: Iran's PM never said "Israel should be wiped off the map"
|