Psychological Roots Of Islamic Rage | Or Why We Fight the War Against Islamo-fascists - Israel & Palestine

Psychological Roots Of Islamic Rage | Or Why We Fight the War Against Islamo-fascists

Israel & Palestine Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: P.O.T.U.S.

By: Phyllis Chesler, Ph.D., Nancy H. Kobrin, Ph.D.
Jewish Press | August 9, 2006


Islamic terrorists routinely kidnap the most vulnerable civilians and hold them hostage. Hamas and Hizbullah, like Arafat’s PLO, hold their own people hostage as well, and hide both themselves and their weapons among Muslim civilians.

For years, Hizbullah held the village of Kana hostage. When Israel finally fought back against Hizbullah’s shelling of Israeli civilians, the Jewish state reaped a whirlwind of condemnation. Israel mourned these civilian deaths even as many Islamists celebrated these deaths as a great propaganda victory.

Just as Hizbullah hid behind women and children in Kana, using them as human shields, so too does Muslim culture “honor-murder” its own women and girls.

Since we are now one world connected by cell phones, the Internet, and satellite television programs – as well as by Muslim immigration to the West, similar behavior can and has erupted against American civilians, both at home and abroad. In the recent past, Muslim Islamists have shot and killed Jewish-American males – e.g. Leon Klinghoffer (1985), Rabbi Meir Kahane (1990), Ari Halberstam (1994), Daniel Pearl (2002) and Nicholas Berg (2004).

In 1968, Sirhan Sirhan, a Palestinian, murdered Senator Robert Kennedy because Kennedy’s pro-Israel stand enraged him.

We may now have reached a turning point of sorts. On July 28, 30-year-old Naveed Afsal Haq, a supposedly lone and mentally ill Muslim-American of Pakistani origin (he had been diagnosed as bipolar and was on lithium and depacote), took a 13 year-old American girl hostage in order to gain entry to the Jewish Federation Building in Seattle.

(We must note that many mentally ill people are functioning, non-violent members of society and that many criminals, including dictators, have never been psychiatrically diagnosed or denigrated.)

Haq declared that he was “angry with Israel” and announced that it was a “hostage” situation. He began shooting women, including one who was pregnant. Five Jewish- and Christian-American women were wounded and one, 58-year-old Pam Waechter, was murdered. Haq shot several of the women in the abdomen.

Perhaps Haq’s crime is not only the product of his bipolar mental illness. It may also reflect an Islamic culture that denigrates women in general and a jihadist culture that denigrates all life, including Muslim life, and which seeks to oppress and destroy all living beings. For example, many Islamic suicide killers will purposely target pregnant women or women with small children before they blow themselves up.

Further, both in the past and in general, Jews have been seen as “female” or “feminine” because they were not allowed to bear arms and preferred a non-violent resolution of conflict for both ethical and practical reasons.

Islamic culture is a shame-and-honor-culture. What this means is that child socialization involves shaming and humiliation. Many adults reared this way are especially sensitive to slights that tend to be experienced as extremely humiliating.

Haq has been described as short (he is 5 ‘4 and wore elevator soles). He has also been described as bald, socially inept, a loner, and, despite a degree in engineering, unemployed. The ideologies of extreme hatred often attract highly dysfunctional followers, some of whom are capable of violence.

Haq’s crime took place on a Friday – a day when devout Muslims often hear sermons excoriating Israel, Jews, and America. In Israel, many Jews have been stabbed by Muslims on a Friday. In our opinion, however, this may not have been the case here. Haq had been charged with “lewd conduct” for having exposed himself in a public place. His humiliation was about to escalate. He snapped – but in a particular kind of way.

Like the 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta, who wanted no pregnant women to approach his imagined corpse, Haq apparently had no interest (or ability) to relate to women. People refuse to understand that the “occupation” that jihadists rant about is really how they themselves have been “occupied” by childhood shaming and punishing techniques. When such cruelty turns them crazy or when they are psychologically vulnerable, they may act out in the only socially approved ways allowed, namely, they first scapegoat the intimate enemy which is female and then the outsider enemy: Jews, Israelis, Zionists, and Americans.

Haq’s act is chillingly reminiscent of the Montreal Massacre that took place on December 6, 1989. Marc Lepine entered the engineering school at the University of Montreal and killed fourteen women while wounding fifteen others. Lepine, who had been rejected by both the Canadian Army and the engineering school at the University of Montreal, said in his suicide note that he was after the “feminist viragos” who had ruined his life.

The Canadian police saw this as an isolated act of a madman (as American police had once viewed Ted Bundy’s bloody trail of femicide). What the Canadian police failed to understand was the importance of certain biographical and childhood factors. For example, Lepine was born Gamile Rodrigue Gharbi to an Algerian Muslim father and a French-Canadian mother who had formerly been a nun. Lepine’s father, Liess Gharbi, physically and psychologically brutalized both his son and his wife. He probably taught his son that women are chattel – property – who deserve to be beaten even when they are obedient and perhaps murdered when they are not.

What is important to note is that Gharbi/Lepine blamed women for the considerable crimes of his father, whose culture was Islamic and Algerian.

As Dr. Chesler recounts in her book, The Death of Feminism, in 2001 an angry mob of 300 Algerian men conducted a three-day pogrom against Algerian women in which they tortured, stabbed, mutilated, gang-raped, buried alive and murdered women in Hassi Messaoud.

In Dr. Chesler’s 1978 book, “About Men,” she posited that the paternal abandonment of, and cruelty toward, sons may be a crucial component in mother- and woman-hating. Dr. Nancy Kobrin, in her forthcoming book The Sheik’s New Clothes: The Naked Truth About Islamic Suicide Terrorism, suggests that the absolute degradation of Arab and Muslim women by a shame- and honor-society means that sons must perpetually rid themselves of the “contamination” that contact with women represents; and that sons must psychologically abandon their mothers even as they experience abandonment by their mothers. Many such sons are trained to mistrust, police, routinely batter, and sometimes even murder their female relatives.

Dr. Kobrin believes that such psychological dynamics may play a crucial role in contemporary Islamic terrorism.

While girl- and woman-battering and honor murders are increasingly normalized in Islamic culture, the enemy-outsider, who must also be scapegoated, has been increasingly eroticized. Israel-hatred and Jew-hatred have achieved a level of political-erotic obsession among jihadists that may even surpass that of the Nazi era. Israel is no longer “feminine” and for some, this is its great, existential crime. Israel refuses to absorb the hatred and violence or to forever turn the other cheek.

Individual Jewish women, though, may present a particularly tempting target to mentally ill and violent Muslims in a jihadic era. The “Jewess” is the most denigrated female in Islamic ideology. Zaynab bint Al-Harith, the Khaybar “Jewess,” is the woman who was falsely accused of having poisoned the prophet Muhammed after having witnessed the beheading of her entire male community in the Battle of Khaybar. Not coincidentally, Hizbullah currently calls its missiles “Khaybar.” We have also been told that a new Iranian television station is known as “Khaybar.”

Israeli civilians are at the greatest risk as they endure a slow Holocaust-like bleed of civilians. American civilians, both here and abroad, including in Europe, are also at great risk. All those who currently work for Jewish organizations in America are perhaps especially vulnerable to this eroticized Jew-hatred that permeates the very air we breathe.

We hope that Americans, both male and female, especially those who believe their politically correct and pro-jihadic views will protect them from jihadic violence, will now begin to wrestle with the tragedy in Seattle. We hope they do not blame Israel for what Haq did. His crime is a complicated mix of mental illness, woman-hatred, and Jew- and Israel-hatred. Perhaps all the propaganda against Israel and the Jews propelled Haq, a lost soul, to cling to the illusion that his criminal action could redeem his lost honor.

A Jewish woman who knew the murdered Pam Waechter told us that Waechter, who was born a Lutheran and converted to Judaism, “was a better Jew than I or most of us could ever be.” Jewish tradition believes that messianic redemption will enter the world through the good deeds of women converts to Judaism, beginning with Ruth, the ancestor of King David. Let us learn the necessary lessons about redemption from Pam Waechter’s martyrdom.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

Robert Pape, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago was on UKs channel 4 news yesterday. He's done the most comprehensive research in the world on suicide bombings since the 1980s. He's well worth doing a google search on because his findings may surprise a lot of people. Here's just a couple of things:

OVER 50% of suicide bombings have been carried out by secular groups.
95% of suicide bombings are political in nature.

This from the NYTimes may 2005:

quote:
The data show that there is far less of a connection between suicide terrorism and religious fundamentalism than most people think.

What nearly all suicide terrorist attacks actually have in common is a specific secular and strategic goal: to compel modern democracies to withdraw military forces from territory that the terrorists consider to be their homeland. Religion is often used as a tool by terrorist organizations in recruiting and in seeking aid from abroad, but is rarely the root cause.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/18/o...serland&emc=rss


One question: this is not what Bush and Blair have been endlessly saying to the public for the last 5 years, so why have they been misleading us in both the UK and US?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

quote:
h@ts said this in post #2 :
Robert Pape, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago was on UKs channel 4 news yesterday. He's done the most comprehensive research in the world on suicide bombings since the 1980s. He's well worth doing a google search on because his findings may surprise a lot of people. Here's just a couple of things:

OVER 50% of suicide bombings have been carried out by secular groups.
95% of suicide bombings are political in nature.

One question: this is not what Bush and Blair have been endlessly saying to the public for the last 5 years, so why have they been misleading us in both the UK and US?


Yes, but it can be largely a matter of semantics to distinguish between secular goals and religious fundamentalism. Indeed, secularism can be a kind of religion, and I don't know how you can separate politics from religion in Islamic governments.

The raw material that the NY TIMES shapes to fit their worldview can be shaped in other ways by those of differing worldviews. In your worldview, you shape the raw material to fit your belief that Bush and Blair are liars. I shape it differently.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
EUCLID said this in post #3 :
Yes, but it can be largely a matter of semantics to distinguish between secular goals and religious fundamentalism. Indeed, secularism can be a kind of religion, and I don't know how you can separate politics from religion in Islamic governments.


It's far more than semantics. If there is a specific secular and strategic goal, why is it not better known? And if there is, I want to know about it. Why are we being sold the idea that we are fighting for our survival, in a clash of civilisations, the Western world against a radicalised Islamic world?

Al Qaeda certainly benefits from this view, as it will attract Muslim volunteers. But it will also benefit Bush and Blair because unlike a strategic reason for the suicide attacks, radical fundamentalism needs no explanation, and therfore Bush and Blair can and do explain what's going on as "they" simply want to "destroy us and our way of life." If they can cling to this reasoning - that they want to destroy us - then they don't have to admit that it is in fact the wars and occupation that they started that are now radicalising Muslims. The 7/7 bombers were British and those arrested yesterday were all British born.

Pape says: "What nearly all suicide terrorist attacks have in common is a specific secular and strategic goal: to compel modern democracies to withdraw military forces from territory that the terrorists consider to be their homeland."

Which means, in the case of al Qaeda and like-minded groups, getting the United States out of the Arabian Peninsula and Iraq.

http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/m...lumn/index.html
Reply To this Message

Posted by: P.O.T.U.S.

quote:
EUCLID said this in post #3 :

The raw material that the NY TIMES shapes to fit their worldview can be shaped in other ways by those of differing worldviews. In your worldview, you shape the raw material to fit your belief that Bush and Blair are liars. I shape it differently.


Precisely. The light of truth passes through the prizm of the individual's beliefs, philosophies and realities. Behold the Islamofascist who believes that murdering innocents will earn him a perpetual roll-in-the-hay with 72 maidens of purity. Or left-wing Bush-haters like most Donkey politicians and the NY and LA Times who would sell their soul to sell-out the greatest country in the world if only to put themselves and the "party" back in power. Or the typical U.S.-hating propagandist in Europe and elsewhere, breast-fed on the rhetoric of the Guardian and the BBC since early childhood. Small wonder, indeed.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: P.O.T.U.S.

"It is Incumbent on Every Muslim to Aid the Hizbullah Jihad Fighters."
— Fatwa, published in Syria's state-sponsored newspaper

Reply To this Message

Posted by: asantana

quote:
P.O.T.U.S. said this in post #6 :
"It is Incumbent on Every Muslim to Aid the Hizbullah Jihad Fighters."
— Fatwa, published in Syria's state-sponsored newspaper

rubbish
it looks like any one can do his own fatwa to serve his own agenda. this is pure politics and have nothing to do with the faith
Reply To this Message

Posted by: P.O.T.U.S.

quote:
P.O.T.U.S. said this in post #6 :
"It is Incumbent on Every Muslim to Aid the Hizbullah Jihad Fighters."
— Fatwa, published in Syria's state-sponsored newspaper


Muslims are the ones who declare Fatwa—it's a Muslim word.

Muslims are responsible for jihad—another Muslim word.

Muslims can rise up and decry Muslim terrorism. Muslims do not.

It's not rocket science.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dreamzwalker

quote:
P.O.T.U.S. said this in post #8 :


Muslims are the ones who declare Fatwa—it's a Muslim word.

Muslims are responsible for jihad—another Muslim word.

Muslims can rise up and decry Muslim terrorism. Muslims do not.

It's not rocket science.


man i saw the most fatwa women i've ever seen. must have been around 800 pounds.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dreamzwalker

quote:
h@ts said this in post #4 :


It's far more than semantics. If there is a specific secular and strategic goal, why is it not better known? And if there is, I want to know about it.


its a long history of why arabs fight the Israelis so hard.

I'm going to be brief about this because there's far too much to post here.

Go back through the geneology of both peoples and you'll find that they were once the same tride basically. they seperated at one point. neither admit this particular part.

Israel has existed longer then the Muslim by the definition of Muslim. Muslims didn't really come about with this title until about 580 when Mahammad transcribe the book, slaughtered all the arabs in mecca, and took over mecca. He used jihad to recruit his army, and they were easy to recruit with the promise of virgins upon death while fighting for the faith.
The muslim text, is a complete copy of the jewish book. Its been changed around a bit. i've read the entire bible and most of the muslim book.

Jews were led to the land of israel about 1500 years before the arabs decide to try and claim it for their own.
After battle after battle with the jews they won the land - took over whatever the jews had build and then the jews took it back. Now the arabs want it back.
Until Israel doesn't exist, or the anti-christ emerges, there will be no peace.
The early books of the bible even states that Israel WILL ALWAYS be a hated nation. this was stated like 3000 years ago and it hasn't changed one bit.

By the way, the history aspect of the bible has NEVER been proven wrong - so if you want the history of the jews, including wars that were faught against the arabs while they were traveling to what became israel and after they became israel its a good start.
Just an FYI They even found hieroglyphics depicting moses as son of pharoh and the plagues. was sometime in the 90s. saw it on nova (educational television) and in some written works. Egypt claims this was a hoax. And also claims that the jews were never slaves, although it was proven that they were slaves.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
Dreamzwalker said this in post #10 :
Until Israel doesn't exist, or the anti-christ emerges, there will be no peace.

By the way, the history aspect of the bible has NEVER been proven wrong


If you're going to use the bible as blueprint for the future then who cares who does what to who and how many people die or get killed or whatever. Everything is Gods fault/plan - he designed the whole show.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dreamzwalker

quote:
h@ts said this in post #11 :


If you're going to use the bible as blueprint for the future then who cares who does what to who and how many people die or get killed or whatever. Everything is Gods fault/plan - he designed the whole show.


umm i never said that.

I never said it was gods fault. i never said it was his plan. i said what they believe.

and i didn't say to use it as a blueprint for the future -
where the hell do you get this stuff man?
i mean, do you just read something and sit there for 30 minutes and think stuff up?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
Dreamzwalker said this in post #12 :
[B]

umm i never said that.

I never said it was gods fault. i never said it was his plan. i said what they believe.


Who's "they"? Is that previous post what "they" believe? Or do you believe it too?

quote:
and i didn't say to use it as a blueprint for the future -


So what is the bible to you? And was the comment about no peace until the emergence of the "anti-christ" just a flippant remark?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: P.O.T.U.S.

quote:
Dreamzwalker said this in post #9 :


man i saw the most fatwa women i've ever seen. must have been around 800 pounds.


That is a fatwa(n).
Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Israel & Palestine Forum: Psychological Roots Of Islamic Rage | Or Why We Fight the War Against Islamo-fascists

Forum Forum Forum