Fellow Americans, Hezbollah is Our Enemy, Too

Israel & Palestine Forum

Hezbollah is Our Enemy, Too
By Jeff Jacoby
Monday, July 31, 2006

According to a pair of Gallup polls released last week, 83 percent of Americans say Israel is justified in taking military action against Hezbollah, while 76 percent disapprove of Hezbollah's attacks on Israel. Yet when asked which side in the conflict the United States should take, 65 percent answer: neither side. Indeed, 3 in 4 Americans say they are concerned that the US military will be drawn into the fighting, or that it will increase the likelihood of terrorism against the United States.

Gallup's numbers suggest two things. First, that most Americans, sizing up the warfare in northern Israel and southern Lebanon, recognize that Hezbollah is the aggressor and that Israel is fighting in self-defense. And second, that most Americans believe this fight has nothing to do with the United States.

Welcome to Sept. 10.

For years Osama bin Laden had preached that it was "the duty of Muslims to confront, fight, and kill" Americans. His adherents had responded by blowing up the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and slamming a boat laden with explosives into the USS Cole. Yet most Americans paid no attention to Al Qaeda and its threats -- until 3,000 people lost their lives on Sept. 11, 2001.

Has nothing been learned from that experience?

Hezbollah's barbaric assault on Israel -- kidnapping and murdering soldiers who weren't engaged in hostilities, firing waves of missiles into cities and towns, packing rockets with ball bearings meant to maximize suffering by shredding human flesh -- is part and parcel of the radical Islamist jihad against the free world. Nothing to do with the United States? It has *everything* to do with the United States. Hezbollah hates Americans at least as implacably as Al Qaeda does, and rarely misses an opportunity to say so.

"We consider [America] to be an enemy because it wants to humiliate our governments, our regimes, and our peoples," railed Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, at an enormous rally in February 2005. (Video of Nasrallah's speech, which was broadcast on Hezbollah's Al-Manar TV, has been posted on the internet by MEMRI, the Middle East Media Research Institute.) "It is the greatest plunderer of our treasures, our oil, and our resources. . . . Our motto, which we are not afraid to repeat year after year, is: 'Death to America!' "

And from tens of thousands of Hezbollah supporters came the answering cry: "Death to America! Death to America! Death to America! Death to America!"

These are anything but empty threats. Prior to 9/11, Hezbollah was responsible for more American casualties than any other terrorist organization in the world. Among its victims was Army officer William F. Buckley, the CIA station chief in Beirut who was abducted by Hezbollah in March 1984 and who died after 15 months in captivity of torture and illness.

And the young Navy diver Robert Stethem, singled out during the 1985 Hezbollah hijacking of TWA Flight 847 and brutally beaten before being shot to death.

And William Higgins, a colonel in the Marine Corps and commander of the UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, who was seized by Hezbollah in February 1988, tortured, and eventually hanged. (As Michelle Malkin perceptively noted last week, the tape of Higgins, bound and gagged and swinging from a rope, was one of the first publicly disseminated jihadi snuff films.)

And the 241 US servicemen murdered by Hezbollah on Oct. 23, 1983, when a suicide bomber drove a truck rigged with 12,000 pounds of TNT into their barracks at the Beirut airport.

And the 19 US servicemen killed in the 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia.

For more than two decades, Hezbollah's Shi'ite fanatics, backed by Iran and sheltered by Syria, have made it their business to murder, maim, hijack, and kidnap Americans with the same irrational hostility they harbor for Israel. Yet when Tony Snow, the Bush administration's gifted spokesman, was asked on July 19 whether the president believes "that this is as much the United States' war as it is Israel's war," he answered, "No," and then tried to change the subject. A moment later the question returned: "I don't think you really answered the part about why is this not our war?"

Snow's incredible reply: "Why would it be our war? I mean, it's not on our territory. This is a war in which the United States -- it's not even a war. What you have are hostilities, at this point, between Israel and Hezbollah. I would not characterize it as a war."

9/11, it was said time and time again, "changed everything." No longer would Americans walk around with eyes wide shut, oblivious to the threat from the Islamofascists. Not our war? Listen again to the Hezbollah hordes: "Death to America! Death to America!"

They're serious about it -- deadly serious. Why aren't we?

Once again, the immortal George Burns is proven correct: "Too bad that all the people who really know how to run the country are busy driving taxi cabs and cutting hair."



-HECK!

Bush has worked with the majority Shia in the South, against one-time allies, the Sunni, who we need to call the "terrorsts", althought who knows anymore - just today a leaked memo stated that civil war is the most likely future for Iraq.

......

Isreal's response would be the same if Al Qaeda announced a cease fire to the U.S. We/they would try to smash the rest into the ground.

Hezbollah is waging a war similar to Al Qaeda in that sense. You can't destroy a leader, headquarters or scorch the land enough to quash the entire group. Loosely affiliated groups can take up the Hezbollah moniker at any time to continue their agenda. Hezbollah does have more to lose in Lebanon, having a stranglehold on the country. A cease fire would save them but I think it might be too late.

-HECK!

Well since my last post, Hezbollah has announced that they will cease fire if Israel will. If Israel refuses, Hez said they will hit Tel Aviv.

First, Israel never offered a cease fire, they offered to stop the airstikes for 48hrs. Secondly, Hezbollah did hit an Israeli tank during this same day. Israel also said during this acceptance that Israel reserves the right to preemptively strike any Hezbollah setting up missiles to fire at Israel during this time.

With regards to h@ts assertion that Israel wants a war with Arab countries for regime change I think may be a bit far fetched. I believe they would like a change, especially in Iran who seems to be behind these latest events.

We still fail to see any blame places on Hezbollah or Iran amongst most Arab countries. The guy now heading Iraq had the audacity to blame Israel for all the confusion there and while we have Muslims killing Muslims in Iraq by the hundreds per day, somehow they seem to be all up at arms about Israel & Lebanon civilians taking a beating.

Again, we have Iran calling for Israeli’s destruction and again it’s largely ignored amongst Muslims world wide. Imagine if you would the Israel called for the destruction of Palestine and armed militias to attack them.