a little help needed please - Israel & Palestine

a little help needed please

Israel & Palestine Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: littlefat

Hi all... I am studying the Israel Palestine History when I came upon this site and see many people with strong views and wondered if some would care to give their opinions on the merits of the various peace deals in the region between Camp David Agreement and the Oslo Peace Accord. These include Madrid Conference, Cairo Agreement and others.

I have to assess the attempts at peace making and I am not quite there. Would appreciate comments.

Thanks

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

It's simply littlefat. I think the Arab League sumed it up today when they said that the Middle East Peace initiative is dead. To be honest, it was just a pipe dream. There are too many Islamic militants in the region running amuck for any type of peace to ever take root in that region.

Unfortunately, it will all have to boil over and in the end and no matter what these militants do to provoke incidents such as we see today, Muslims will always blame Israel for it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: asantana

oneofpease you said Muslims will always blame Israel for it.
just give me one reason why Israel is killing people in Lebanon? Civilians are being killed by the dozens for what? Read history and try to find the answers, once you do so then you will also blame Israel for that.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: usayit

quote:
asantana said this in post #3 :
oneofpease you said Muslims will always blame Israel for it.
just give me one reason why Israel is killing people in Lebanon? Civilians are being killed by the dozens for what? Read history and try to find the answers, once you do so then you will also blame Israel for that.


Trying to bring political sense to the whole situation is the confusion. Regardless of the events of today, tomorrow, and the future, Israel will always take blame because of its very existence.

Unfortunately, I don't see any politcal resolution for a religious war.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
asantana said this in post #3 :
oneofpease you said Muslims will always blame Israel for it.
just give me one reason why Israel is killing people in Lebanon? Civilians are being killed by the dozens for what? Read history and try to find the answers, once you do so then you will also blame Israel for that.


Asantana I find it quite a double standard how Muslims in the M.E. say nothing of militants consistent targeting of civilians then blame Israel when they do the same. Is Israel right for targeting civilians? I think it’s a matter of them being indiscriminate than the intentional targeting of civilians such as Islamic extremists do.

Look, let’s lay blame where it should be. Israel wouldn’t be blowing holes in Lebanon had Hezbollah not fired rockets into Israel then invaded an Israeli military base, killing 8 soldiers and kidnapping 2 of them.

Lebanon unfortunately is paying the price for doing absolutely nothing about Hezbollah setting up on Israel’s northern borders and firing into that country consistently since Israel left in 2000.

So lets have a dosage of reality here. If Israel wanted to target civilians, the death toll would me astounding. I personally don’t think it’s right however but they consistently pick with Israel from all sides then complain when Israel retaliates.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

Some people have been blaming the Lebanese government for not dealing with Hizbollah and it's a fair point until you look and realise that the Lebanese can't take down HIzbollah they have tried in the past but they don't have the money or the troops to do it. the other factor is location, Hizbollah militants were traditionally based in the south of Lebanon and Hizbollah was more popular in the south than the government so when the Lebanese tried to deal with it they either met a wall of silence or hostility.

Speaking of the location if the south is the still the Hizbollah stronghold it has been for the pastv 20 - 30 years why doesn't Israel just attack the south?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: usayit

quote:
Speaking of the location if the south is the still the Hizbollah stronghold it has been for the pastv 20 - 30 years why doesn't Israel just attack the south?


War is war.... there's nothing just about it. The only way to wage an effective campaign is to wage war against the entire country. Disable its supply lines, its ability to mobilize, its ability to organize. Attacking the just the south wouldn't accomplish their (Israel's) military goals without a drawing out the conflict.

Now... I'm hoping the sides know when its time to stop and rebuild.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
usayit said this in post #7 :


War is war.... there's nothing just about it. The only way to wage an effective campaign is to wage war against the entire country. Disable its supply lines, its ability to mobilize, its ability to organize. Attacking the just the south wouldn't accomplish their (Israel's) military goals without a drawing out the conflict.

Now... I'm hoping the sides know when its time to stop and rebuild.


This is a religious war. It won't stop without divine intervention.

I am not a proponent of religious war by any means.
Although I believe this war is more closely related to Israel's survival.

When you say "wage" war against the entire country, who are you meaning exactly?

Don't foget that Syria and Iran are behind this as well. Hezbollah is acting as a proxy for Iran mainly, and Syria secondly. Actually you can count so many others involved as well.
For instance, Syria and Russia have created an alliance based on oil.
This alliance will flesh itself out as "Gog and Magog" vs Israel...Israel's enemies in the North.

I was surprised that Saudi Arabia condemned Hezbolla's actions. It shouldn't surprise me too much knowing that there are so many factions of radical Islam. I can only see that Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization funded by the Saudi Arabian government. Saudi Arabia is no ally of Israel, but the Wahabbis in Saudi Arabia are a different faction than the extremist backing of Saudi and Iran. The Saudis would like to see Israel pushed into the sea with as much vim and vigor as Hamas and Hezbollah and the hundreds of other terrorist groups (antiIsrael factions of Islam).

Needless to say, it is a mess. Chaos seems to ensue, but it means it's nearly the end of the world as we know it. (As the song of REM, "It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine" courses through my mind.)
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

littlefat,

In response to your original post....

The PLO has had numerous chances at Camp David and Oslo to achieve many many concessions that Israel was able to give up. However, Arafat and the cronies would stop at nothing until Israel was pushed into the sea.

Israel has had numerous conflagarations where they in turn give up more land. And Israel's enemies will NOT accept any peace agreements. During every war, '48, '67, '72 Israel gained more land, however, in turn they have given up more land for peace, more land for terror. Surrounded by enemies on all sides, it's a blatant miracle that Israel is the only real democracy in the Middle East and that irregardless of wars against her, she is still standing.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: The Writer

quote:
nikiTa said this in post #8 :


This is a religious war. It won't stop without divine intervention.

***What "War"??? No ones declared war, Israel bombs an occassional house, the muslims bomb an occassional bus. The only people getting hurt are the civilians which neither side cares about. The leaders get to keep their people in line (and in political bondage)
Divine Intervention?

I am not a proponent of religious war by any means.
Although I believe this war is more closely related to Israel's survival.

***Why would anyone care about Israel's survival if they don't care about the survival of the tutsies? When Israel's had as many murdered by islamists as black christians have then let's be concerned for their survival.

Don't foget that Syria and Iran are behind this as well. Hezbollah is acting as a proxy for Iran mainly, and Syria secondly. Actually you can count so many others involved as well.
For instance, Syria and Russia have created an alliance based on oil.
This alliance will flesh itself out as "Gog and Magog" vs Israel...Israel's enemies in the North.

***A simple fact...more Americans are dying in the middle east than jews, so if all these groups are after Israel how come more of our people are being killed?

Needless to say, it is a mess. Chaos seems to ensue, but it means it's nearly the end of the world as we know it. (As the song of REM, "It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine" courses through my mind.)


Well what courses through my mind is the murder of Americans just trying to keep peace. Of the thousands who died on 911 and are yet unavenged. War needs to be waged for real by America. If you pray to God Nakita...pray He sends to us in our hour of need His terrible swift sword and removes the corrupt bush administration.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

This is a war with big objectives, way beyond something simple like acquiring territory. For the forces opposing Israel, it seems like the objective is not necessarily to overcome Israel on a one-to-one basis and drive them into the sea. It seems like their objective is to simply make the conflict as large as possible regardless of who wins per se. The larger the conflict, the more the world loses, and the more they win in some kind of non-world perspective. Even if they lose, they win in their minds. It is as if the people of Iran, collectively, are acting out the role of a single suicide bomber.

As this Iranian nuclear crisis has ramped up over the last few months, they fanned the flames by stating that they intend to destroy Israel. I know there is some kind of prophecy that a world annihilation will usher in a salvation in the Islamic faith. I don’t know the details of this, but I have heard that there is a concern that the Iranian leaders may be motivated to speed up the eventuality by starting a world conflict.

If so, they would not care whether they won or lost the battle. They would win in a larger perspective just by setting the world on fire, including themselves. If that is so, the threat to drive Israel into the sea, as intolerant as it is, would be just a pretext for something far more sinister.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

Writer, you make some valid points however I think that you aren’t exactly on target when it comes to the hatred of Israel in the region.

Jews know to stay out of countries they know are hostile to them. This is a lesson Americans have yet to learn. There is absolutely nothing and I mean nothing that those Islamic militants hate more than Israel. America is a close second and that’s because of our unwavering support for, you guessed it, Israel.

The fact that there are other ethnic groups being mistreated, although a fair assessment is a bit beyond the scope here. Israel is fighting for their existence. The Tutsis are no longer doing this.

Lodgebo, Hezbollah’s infrastructure reaches far beyond the southern borders of Lebanon. I do feel for the civilians caught in the middle but look at history for moment. Despite Bush’s incompetence and miscalculations (and lies) there are two regimes that are no longer in business as a result of Islamic extremists. Sudan had the good sense and foresight to understand that they needed to get OBL out of their country. Every day they look at Afghanistan, I’m sure they’re wiping their brows.

When I look at history, I can understand the plight of some extremists groups such as the IRA. Islamic militancy has no reasoning except their inability to bring themselves out of the stone ages and to spread their ideologies of Islam throughout the M.E. through tyranny, even of their own. Furthermore, their proclamation of Israel’s injustices to the Palestinians is a farce. It’s just that they hate the Israelis more that they care less about the Palestinians.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: usayit

quote:
nikiTa said this in post #8 :


This is a religious war. It won't stop without divine intervention.

I am not a proponent of religious war by any means.
Although I believe this war is more closely related to Israel's survival.

When you say "wage" war against the entire country, who are you meaning exactly?



I was actually talking in the general sense in response to the question about attacking just a portion of Lebanon ( south) versus the entire country. Waging war on just the stronghold of Hezbollah located in the south just would not accomplish much.

..... I'm agreeing with you... its a religious war with no political resolution.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

Well actually waging the war on the south would accomplish a lot more than bombing certain strategic and populated areas all over the country.

Firstly not all but a majority of Hizbollah fighters are in the south so if you attack the south you mqahy kill 10, 20, 30 fighetrs if you attack the cities you may kill 1, 2 or 3 fighters you attack state owned infrastructure you probably kill 0. So take out the majority and move on to the minority.

Secondly what part of Lebanon do you think these rockets are being launched from the North? the are obvioulsy coming from the south as they have a limited range I would also be willing to bet that a large amount of rockets and other weapons and ammo are in the south so Hizbollah can get to them quick, bombing the whole country will not stop Hizbollah taking pot shots at Haifa, bombing the south and taking out these positions will.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

Israel will eventually capitualate and release Lebanese and Palastinian prisoners, but first they need to show some muscle to prove they can't be pushed around by a military much weaker country.

Problem with the Israelis show of strength is that this is exactly what Hezbollah expected and they have obviously been planning for just such a strategy, which could explain why Israel have been bombing cities all over the place and hardly touching Hezbollah. Hezbollah also have better technology than the Israelis expected, and have been firing further into Israel than the Israelis expected.

Ultimately it stops when Bush calls a halt but so far he's happy to see Lebanon destroyed, which is pretty stupid really, seeing as it's hardly good news for the democratic government there, although great news for the more radical elements.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

It seems that all roads lead to Bush.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Subject: MEMRITV: Egyptian MPs Discuss Call
For Obtaining Nuclear Weapons

The following are excerpts from an Egyptian parliamentary debate on the
recent Israeli-Palestinian clashes, which aired on Egyptian Channel 1 on
July 4, 2006.

TO VIEW THIS CLIP: www.memritv.org/search.asp?ACT=S9&P1=1192

*Clip #1192 Egyptian MPs Discuss Israeli-Palestinian Clashes and Demand
Egypt Obtain Nuclear Weapons

MP Ibrahim Al-Gogari: It is not enough to demand the recall of the Egyptian
ambassador from Israel. We must also demand that the Israeli ambassador to
Egypt be expelled, because what is happening now is a violation of all
international boundaries, and of all the agreements. Moreover, it is a
breach of international human law.

[...]

MP Mustafa Bakri: The Zionist entity must realize that the Egyptian
people... Forget about all the others - just Egypt... If Egypt takes a stand
everything in the region changes. We know that President Mubarak is exerting
efforts and maintaining contacts, which is all fine, but we say to the
president: If you take an actual measure, which is supported by the entire
Egyptian people, Israel will back down.

[...]

MP Ahmad Dawidar: Mr. Speaker, Israel is a Nazi state. It does not honor any
international charter or treaty, and it completely ignores the UN charter.
Israel is doing to the Palestinians what Hitler did to them in the
Holocaust.

[...]

MP Ali Nasr: We are the strong ones. We are the men of honor. We are a
graveyard for the enemies. We do not fear Israel or those behind it. We do
not fear Israel or those supporting it.

[...]

MP Sabri 'Amr: There should be campaigns for a boycott, an official boycott,
a boycott of the normalization, and a boycott of all the dealings with
Israel. We do not want anyone, whoever he may be, to be able to say that
[Egyptian] gas is exported to Israel, and that cement and iron are exported
to Israel.

[...]

MP Ragab Hmeda: Israel is trying to bring the entire world to its knees. The
United States has already knelt before it, and so have all the countries of
the European Union. Therefore, any appeal to these countries is bound to
fail. The only thing that will deter Israel is nuclear power.

[...]

MP Sa'd 'Abud: We must pursue the nuclear path and arm ourselves with
nuclear weapons.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

How quickly do Arab and Persian nations put the blame on Israel.
Especially when these nations like Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia have displaced the so called "Palestinians" to be used as an excuse for the destruction of Israel.

The surrounding Arab countries have done greater damage to these displaced Arabs by using them as a buffer between Israel and the surrounding nations. These nations do greater harm to their own Arab brothers than Israel would ever dream to do.

The situation is worsening when Egypt calls for nukes.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
EUCLID said this in post #16 :
It seems that all roads lead to Bush.


In regard to Israel, this is indeed the case. Just as in the case of Hezbollah it is Iran and Syria.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

Comparing Israel to Hezbollah is a bit far fetched but I can see your point. However the US, not Bush has been the support for Israel. Bush is just following suit.

That nut job in Iran is going to bring the M.E. to look like Lebanon before it's over and in the end, Arabs will once again methodically blame Israel for it all.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: usayit

quote:
lodgebo said this in post #14 :
Well actually waging the war on the south would accomplish a lot more than bombing certain strategic and populated areas all over the country.


It would fail their biggest goal... a show of non-compromising strength to all those around them that preach for the destruction of Israel. Nothing short of divine intervention will convince Israel's enemies otherwise. Israel's only choice is to survive by intimidation and presense of power.

You are basically asking for "restraint" and I believe that only Israel can decide what an appropriate response should be. War is war.... If everyone would accept and realize that ugly fact perhaps we would not be so eager to start another.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
EUCLID said this in post #16 :
It seems that all roads lead to Bush.


What tha?

All roads lead to the battle at Megiddo!!!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

quote:
nikiTa said this in post #22 :


What tha?

All roads lead to the battle at Megiddo!!!


Well that may be, but Bush will be blamed for it.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Whidden

quote:
This will be the plague with which Dubya will strike all the peoples who have warred against Jerusalem: their flesh will consume away while they stand on their feet, and their eyes will consume away in their sockets, and their tongue will consume away in their mouth.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

I just hope the economy does not consume away.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
EUCLID said this in post #25 :
I just hope the economy does not consume away.


This is what will happen to "the economy."

quote:
And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
Rev 18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.
Rev 18:6 Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.
Rev 18:7 How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.
Rev 18:8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.
Rev 18:9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning,
Rev 18:10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
Rev 18:11 And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:

Rev 18:12 The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass, and iron, and marble,
Rev 18:13 And cinnamon, and odors, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.
Rev 18:14 And the fruits that thy soul lusted after are departed from thee, and all things which were dainty and goodly are departed from thee, and thou shalt find them no more at all.
Rev 18:15 The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing,
Rev 18:16 And saying, Alas, alas that great city, that was clothed in fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and decked with gold, and precious stones, and pearls!
Rev 18:17 For in one hour so great riches is come to naught. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
Rev 18:18 And cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like unto this great city!
Rev 18:19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas, that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

Rev 18:20 Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her.
Rev 18:21 And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.
Rev 18:22 And the voice of harpers, and musicians, and of pipers, and trumpeters, shall be heard no more at all in thee; and no craftsman, of whatsoever craft he be, shall be found any more in thee; and the sound of a millstone shall be heard no more at all in thee;
Rev 18:23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.
Rev 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #20 :
Comparing Israel to Hezbollah is a bit far fetched


You're absolutely right, the damage that Hezbollah is inflicting on Israel is tiny by comparison to the damage Israel is doing to the whole of Lebanon, which is pretty much destroying the whole country.

What surprises me is despite the fact that Americans, Britains and other foreign nationals (Canadians and Brazilians have been killed) are fleeing for their lives in Lebanon, neither UK nor US government will say squat to the Israeli government. As one paper put it today, it is the biggest civillian rescue since WWII.

quote:
That nut job in Iran is going to bring the M.E. to look like Lebanon before it's over and in the end, Arabs will once again methodically blame Israel for it all.


It takes two to tango. Everyone finds it easy to condemn Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah, but apart from Russia, everyone is finding it near impossible to condemn Israel's destruction of a country.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
Despite dire warnings by certain US politicians, such as Senator John Warner, the Bush administration has failed to call on Israel to halt its offensive, opting instead to focus on Syria and Iran - reminding one of the Vietnam War when Moscow or Peking (Beijing) were often blamed for the efforts of the North Vietnamese.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HG18Ak02.html
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

quote:
usayit said this in post #21 :


It would fail their biggest goal... a show of non-compromising strength to all those around them that preach for the destruction of Israel. Nothing short of divine intervention will convince Israel's enemies otherwise. Israel's only choice is to survive by intimidation and presense of power.

I disagree I seriously doubt that it would fail. It is not about intimidation, compromise etc etc it is about using your brains, the missiles are still coming they are being launched by the south, a large number of Hizbollah figters are in the south which probably menas we are talking about a large number of weapons dumps, so you take care of the south remove the immediate threat i.e Haifia being flattend and then move in to the rest of the country. Another advantage is that ig you need yto send troops in the border area will be realtivly safe to cross into.

You are basically asking for "restraint" and I believe that only Israel can decide what an appropriate response should be. War is war.... If everyone would accept and realize that ugly fact perhaps we would not be so eager to start another.


is in my view a narrow viewed way of looking at the situation. Who is the war against Lebanbon and her people or Hizbollah and thier fighters?. What you call restraint I call doing the right thing because right now Hizbollah does not look threatend or weakend for that matter, 2 soldiers are still missing probably dead it's no longer a rescue more a recovery mission and the majority of people killed are innocent Lebanese and Israellis so it,s not so much restraint as re - evaluating the situtaion to see if you have really gained anything from this.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

Suppose the whole world spoke with one voice and told Israel they must practice restraint and cease fire immediately, and Israel did not comply. What would happen then?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

well the idea that the US would join that one voice is frankly laughable as the US has never condemmed Israel look at the number of UN resolutions condemming Israeli actions in the 90's and look at which country vetoed every single one of those resolutions.

However the fact is that the current course of action is failing and they need to step back and go to plan B.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
h@ts wrote
You're absolutely right, the damage that Hezbollah is inflicting on Israel is tiny by comparison to the damage Israel is doing to the whole of Lebanon, which is pretty much destroying the whole country.


How do you respond to an enemy who listens to no reason? What do you do when that enemy’s agenda is the destruction of your country and to wipe them off the map? This isn’t an isolated incident. Hezbollah has been firing rockets into Israel since Israel withdrew in 2000, when is enough enough?

Ok, I read your article h@ts and I find it to be totally unbalanced. What I find so ridiculous is its assertions that Israel is being “perpetrated” as the victim. I just don’t understand this when you have Islamic militants and States throughout the M.E. publicly declaring they are going to destroy Israel.

Since Israel’s declaration of statehood they fought with Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Iran, Syria & Lebanon. Or how about Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hezbollah. Brigade and Fatah just to name a few? So why is it that Israel wants to be fighting with all these countries all the time?

Your article accuses them of some agenda to start a war and is conspicuously absent of the public declarations of Hezbollah, Hamas & the nut job in Iran for starters. So what are their motives, that the “Zionists” want to take over the entire M.E. and they have to be stopped or is it more that they refuse to accept them in the slither of land they now hold as statehood? Please don’t say it’s about the Palestinians because you know that’s a crock.

So I ask myself, why does Israel want to dismantle Hezbollah? Is this not reasonable considering they (Hezbollah) do the things they do? Israel left Lebanon 6yrs ago why do they keep shooting rockets, planning bombings and helping Hamas do the same? You can’t honestly believe it’s all about prewar borders of 1967? What was it about the declarations of Nasser that he would annihilate Israel off the face of the earth?

For this article to say that Israel is planning a war and that they are wrong is perplexing on how they could arrive to such a conclusion, especially when Arabs make no secret that they will continue until Israel is no more.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

quote:
lodgebo said this in post #31 :
well the idea that the US would join that one voice is frankly laughable...


Yes, but that wasn't my question.

I am not asking how likely it would be for the U.S. to contradict Israel.

This is my question:

Many suggest that the U.S. is partly to blame because they won't tell Israel to stop. This criticism seems to presume that Israel would stop if the U.S. told them to. So if the whole world, including the U.S. did speak with one voice, and told Israel to stop, and Israel did not stop, then what?

If two people are fighting, they don't need some genius to tell them to stop. If somebody wants it stopped, they have to break it up and subdue the combatants. So if we tell Israel to stop, and they don't stop, do we use force to stop them?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #32
How do you respond to an enemy who listens to no reason?


Says who? I'm getting tired of this perpetual idea that Arabs are brainless lunatics.

quote:
What do you do when that enemy’s agenda is the destruction of your country and to wipe them off the map?


Leaders of Hamas discussed two years ago and stated that this was not their intention. The Israelis have no doubt murdered them since. Fact is Israel has prevented the Palastinians getting a state of their own for decades.

quote:
This isn’t an isolated incident. Hezbollah has been firing rockets into Israel since Israel withdrew in 2000, when is enough enough?


It seems it's never enough for either side but you think it's a good idea supporting the Israelis with F-16s etc.

quote:
Ok, I read your article h@ts and I find it to be totally unbalanced. What I find so ridiculous is its assertions that Israel is being “perpetrated” as the victim.


How about the present Israeli/Lebanon war, you tell me who's the victim? Is there one. Should I support the destruction of Lebanon?

I’ve got one question for you, OOP, is there any action Isreal could take that you would object to? Or are they always in the right?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
h@ts wrote
Says who? I'm getting tired of this perpetual idea that Arabs are brainless lunatics.


Says who? Have you heard them rant on video tape? It all sounds alike. You can literally pull out Zarqawi’s face and put in Nasrallah’s face in and you couldn’t tell the difference. It all sounds the same. They curse Israel, they curse the US and then make promises under the guise of Allah that they will slaughter all of them.

Brainless, maybe not but lunacy surely fits the bill.

quote:

Leaders of Hamas discussed two years ago and stated that this was not their intention. The Israelis have no doubt murdered them since. Fact is Israel has prevented the Palastinians getting a state of their own for decades.


Again, this is inaccurate. Hamas won’t even recognize Israel and they won’t lay down arms nor stop laving rockets into Israeli communities. We won’t even talk of the suicide bombers they sent into Tel Aviv during this two year period you speak of.

You make it sound as if Hamas disbanded or decided on peaceful means and Israel just kept killing them. This is what I speak of when I say unsound reasoning.

As for statehood, countless times the Palestinians rejected any deals from the early 20’s straight through to Camp David. Besides, you honestly think that Hezbollah and Hamas would stop simply because of Palestinian?

quote:

It seems it's never enough for either side but you think it's a good idea supporting the Israelis with F-16s


H@ts, since when have Israel even gone into Lebanon or Palestine and started bombing without it being responsive to something? How can you complain when you’re laving rockets and blowing up their market places then say Israel is unfair?

You think for one moment that Hezbollah isn’t using every weapon at their disposal?

quote:

How about the present Israeli/Lebanon war, you tell me who's the victim? Is there one. Should I support the destruction of Lebanon?


I servers certain interests to keep each incident isolated instead of looking at the entire problem. You can’t heal a condition by treating the symptoms. Israel left Lebanon 6yrs ago so why is Hezbollah still shooting missiles into Israel, the Palestinians? I honestly think you know better h@ts.

quote:

I’ve got one question for you, OOP, is there any action Isreal could take that you would object to? Or are they always in the right?


Sure, I disagree with their indiscriminate bombing in which civilians are dying. I think it’s wrong to send a missile into crowded market places or buildings housing civilians.

Now let me ask you a question h@ts. Do you think these militants bear any responsibility for some of those civilian deaths? You know they hide weapons and set their bases amongst the general population so if or when Israel strikes, they can point to these same casualties.

Lastly, you never answered my response about Syria & Iran. What’s their beef with Israel, the unfair treatment of Palestinians?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

Obviously not all Arabs are 'brainless lunatics'. The Islamic extremists are portrayed in a negative light however, mostly through their actions. It's easy for the western world to lift their collective noses at them but I'd say walk a mile in their shoes before anyone tries to judge them as a people.

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Yeah Heck! Loving your enemies, trying to understand their madness and hatred...ok.

But once they come at you with missiles, knives, guns...what do you do?

I would like to know from all the Israeli haters from Europe and the USA...

What would happen if Al Qaeda moved offices to Canada, France, Ireland, or Mexico...nearby neighbours? What if these extremists started bombing the USA or England day in and day out.
Would you fight back or would you just take it in the shorts? Seriously, what would you expect your government to do?

I mean come on! Residents of the USA want National Reserves and a fence at the Mexico border to hold back folks from employment! I said, employment!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

Heck not without respect for your position, heck (no pun intended) I agree with your points in other forums but this is something I disagree with entirely. Islamic militants are scourges of their communities. They are quick to resort to violence then complain of the results when they reap what they’ve sown.

This is about non acceptance more than any of these pretenses. Arabs make it absolutely clear that they want to obliterate Israel. This isn’t a result of the West Bank or Gaza, it’s not a result of Lebanon 82 or their miserable failings in 67. Pay attention to the guy in the black suit (Iran). Given this attitude, I could walk a light year in their shoes and if reason prevail, I wouldn’t understand none of it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

My basic point was that not all Arabs are 'brainless lunatics'.

I'm not saying we hold hands with the Islamic extremeists/terrorists/etc. and try to sing songs of happiness... but in a place where you learn how to fire a gun before you ride a bike, lumping not only all the extremists but the Arab world as a whole in some over-generalization only begets more ingnorance in the long run.

It's a different world over there.

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

oneofpeace,

Just to clarify...

"The men in the black suit" (Iran) are not Arabs, they are mostly Persian. They speak the language of Farsi, not Arabic. They are mainly Shi'ite Muslim.
Also, not all "Arabs" fit the mold of the Muslim extremists...there are Christian Arabs, there are also Persian Christians.

The President of Lebanon, for example, is Christian.

So, I wouldn't tend to lump all Arabs into the same mold.
These extremists come in many forms, but mainly those of the extreme Muslim religion.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

I can just imagine what a juicy target a ship or plane full of evacuating Americans would be to Hezbollah.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

Arab/Middle East culture is generally racist. Period. They don't like Israel because they are Jewish.

Is it that hard to imagine? America, until just a couple decades ago, was a very racist country.

The Arabic/Muslim world has not overcome their prejudices, and that is the problem.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: usayit

So the US should ask Israel to for a cease fire. Israel should use some restraint. After years of failed diplomacy and attacks.

Meanwhile, you have Hezbollah leader, Nasrallah, yelling "We are ready for it -- war, war on every level" and thousands supporting him.

I don't see how Israel could have responded any differently then they already have. I don't see how their response isn't appropriate. I bet most of us would have a total different mindset if our neighboring countries.

>> I can just imagine what a juicy target a ship or plane full of evacuating Americans would be to Hezbollah.

I was just thinking of the same thing.... especially with how slow and the number of people that need evac.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

Yes I think there could be some real surprises in store as this unfolds. Maybe Hezbollah will surprise the world with some of those non-existent WMDs.

Maybe Israel will retaliate with nuclear force, and Europe will be so outraged by the disproportionality that they will use nuclear force on Israel.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

Dekka hit it on the head, it’s racism pure and simple. When I speak of the Arab/Muslim community I understand that they all aren’t in the same boat. However there is overwhelming support for them in that region, clearly among the same group that we speak of that aren’t extremists. In fact, you can find Muslim support for their actions against Israel here in the states.

If you allow them to take up and thrive in your country and allow them to act with impunity then you have to accept the consequences of their actions.

Nikita, when I speak of Arabs/Muslims in that region it’s all synonymous. I know there are differences in DNA but Muslim support worldwide for Islamic militancy is overwhelming. After 9/11 Muslims worldwide were celebrating in the streets. It shows the extreme indifference Dekka mentions above.


lol@non existent WMD's

E, I see you'll die believing the rhetoric of GW...

Reply To this Message

Posted by: usayit

Lets not forget.....

Israelis have been waiting since the 7th century (Romans) to establish a homeland. They've survived centuries of "racism" and persecution from all sorts of groups... including Catholic church.

They are just as dedicated to protecting their new found homeland as those dedicated to destroy it. Exactly why Israel sees their response as approriate... those that don't live this history can only try to comprehend.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

The original ideologies of Zionism were wrong and it’s also dead. The land they have now is nothing compared to what they wanted and how they wanted to achieve it.

For Christians their return to the homeland was prophetic. For the Arabs that lived there it was problematic. There were indigenous Arabs in that land after thousands of years that wasn’t originally considered however it was Jordan that got most of the land, in fact ¾ of it. Israel got the ¼ that was left and Arabs rejected it right up until present days.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: The Writer

quote:
usayit said this in post #46 :
Lets not forget.....

Israelis have been waiting since the 7th century (Romans) to establish a homeland. They've survived centuries of "racism" and persecution from all sorts of groups... including Catholic church.

Who has ever been more racist than the jews? If you are not a jew you are referred to by them as a cow (goy) your entire people no matter how just, compassionate, and tolerant of jews are considered by them to be Goyem (cattle) Does that mean we should stop being tolerant of them? NO! But lets never forget they are a racist culture. possibly the most racist in the world.

They are just as dedicated to protecting their new found homeland as those dedicated to destroy it. Exactly why Israel sees their response as approriate... those that don't live this history can only try to comprehend.


Israel's the biggest scam ever perpetrated on the American taxpayers. It would be humorous if it was just our money they take but now we're giving the blood of our first born.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

<Post erased as nikiTa attempts to engage reasoning capabilities before posting.>

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

WHOEVER those who oppose Israel with meager attempts at war have to be plumb out of their minds and foolish enough to believe that they can succeed against Israel. I mean Israel saw this coming in Nov. 2005.

Israel is not at all blindsided...

I for one would not want to piss off the Israelis...don't know how anyone would even make an attempt....oh yeah, forgot...the anyone would mean those seized with hatred, those seized with lunacy.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: usayit

quote:
The Writer said this in post #48 :


Israel's the biggest scam ever perpetrated on the American taxpayers. It would be humorous if it was just our money they take but now we're giving the blood of our first born.


So what part is a scam? That all of history is completely lying about the persecutions of the Jews?

That Israelis are just as willing to die for their country?

At some point US leaders decided that Israel would be a great strategic ally in the Middle East... as we have with other countries in the past. It provides leverage to further the US agenda.. Agree or Disagree.. thats fine.. but I would stop short of calling it a scam.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #35 :
[B]Says who? Have you heard them rant on video tape? It all sounds alike. You can literally pull out Zarqawi’s face and put in Nasrallah’s face in and you couldn’t tell the difference. It all sounds the same. They curse Israel, they curse the US and then make promises under the guise of Allah that they will slaughter all of them.

Brainless, maybe not but lunacy surely fits the bill.


Peace -
You hear what you want to hear. Like I said, I heard one Hamas leader just two years say that Hamas would recognise Israel.

Thing is both leaderships curse each other. You think the Israels haven't got ulterior motives for actions they take? You don't think they are doing all they can to prevent a Palastinian state. You surely must have read about how the expansions in the West Bank will eventually make a Palastinian state unviable. Israel is already close to wiping the Palastinians off the map. They just don't need to talk about it because the have the muscle to do it, and of course with full US backing.

quote:
Hamas won’t even recognize Israel and they won’t lay down arms nor stop laving rockets into Israeli communities. We won’t even talk of the suicide bombers they sent into Tel Aviv during this two year period you speak of.


Hamas has had many cease fires, and while the last one was going on Israel was murdering Hamas leaders from helicopters.

quote:
You make it sound as if Hamas disbanded or decided on peaceful means and Israel just kept killing them. This is what I speak of when I say unsound reasoning.


Unfortunately it seems for many Western governments Hamas have just won a democratic election. But rather than give even the slightest support to Hamas, we have punished them economically.

quote:
H@ts, since when have Israel even gone into Lebanon or Palestine and started bombing without it being responsive to something? How can you complain when you’re laving rockets and blowing up their market places then say Israel is unfair?


Both sides are to blame for being unable to realise what they are doing is futile. But you support the Israelis and claim they are always the victim, "responding". Didn't you see that Palastinian family killed on that beach a few weeks ago. Or haven't you heard that Israeli jets fly low over Palastinian areas creating sonic shock waves to humiliate and terrorise.

quote:
You think for one moment that Hezbollah isn’t using every weapon at their disposal?


Luckily for the Israelis Hezbollah are weak militarily and are not armed to the teeth by the USA.

quote:
why is Hezbollah still shooting missiles into Israel, the Palestinians? I honestly think you know better h@ts.


Because according to you they are mindless lunatics who don't understand reason.

quote:
Now let me ask you a question h@ts. Do you think these militants bear any responsibility for some of those civilian deaths?


They are absolutely responsible.

quote:
You know they hide weapons and set their bases amongst the general population so if or when Israel strikes, they can point to these same casualties.


Because militarily they are much weaker.

quote:
Lastly, you never answered my response about Syria & Iran. What’s their beef with Israel, the unfair treatment of Palestinians?


Politically the Palastinians may well be being used by stronger nations for alterior motives, but that includes Israel as well as Iran and Syria. There are no heroes in this enless conflict.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

quote:
EUCLID said this in post #33 :


This is my question:

Many suggest that the U.S. is partly to blame because they won't tell Israel to stop. This criticism seems to presume that Israel would stop if the U.S. told them to. So if the whole world, including the U.S. did speak with one voice, and told Israel to stop, and Israel did not stop, then what?

Well firstly I don't blame the US for the whole Israel thing, I think it was foolish to give such overwhelming public support to a country that is disliked in a volatile region but what can you do you pick your friends and make your enemies. To answer the main part of your question ( and I think I know where you are trying to go) if Israel did not stop you would probably see an uprising of other nations that dislike Israel. In diplomatic terms you can ask but if a country does not stop there is nothing you can do. So Israel might be sanctioned or disengaged from the world but that is all. Thats the diffrence between countries and terror groups you can't sacntion terror groups.

If two people are fighting, they don't need some genius to tell them to stop. If somebody wants it stopped, they have to break it up and subdue the combatants. So if we tell Israel to stop, and they don't stop, do we use force to stop them?


Well that is a difficult option I certainly don't think that going to war to stop a war is a clever scenario and lest be honest it's not just Israel that would have to be dealt with it would be Hizbollah.
Maybe Tony Blair's option is the best one international troops to make and maintain peace. That could be a NATO operation but tahat leads to yet another problem because if they are to make peace that could mean engaging with Israelli troops who refuse to toe the line and like I said Bush would not allow US troops to do that.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

quote:
lodgebo said this in post #53 :


Well that is a difficult option I certainly don't think that going to war to stop a war is a clever scenario and lest be honest it's not just Israel that would have to be dealt with it would be Hizbollah.
Maybe Tony Blair's option is the best one international troops to make and maintain peace. That could be a NATO operation but tahat leads to yet another problem because if they are to make peace that could mean engaging with Israelli troops who refuse to toe the line and like I said Bush would not allow US troops to do that.


That is basically the point I was trying to make. Calling for a cease fire does no good unless you are willing to enforce it. And if either of the combatants do not want a cease fire, they will fight whomever tries to force one on them. I have no respect for people who break up fights and declare that both parties are to blame without looking at the evidence.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: EUCLID

I heard that Hezbollah is preventing civillians from fleeing south Lebanon. Why would they do that?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
EUCLID said this in post #54 :


That is basically the point I was trying to make. Calling for a cease fire does no good unless you are willing to enforce it.


Bush could enforce it with the click of his fingers. You may have noticed that Bush is not asking Israel to stop. Why? Because Israel would stop if he told them to. Israel would not disobey US government pressure.

Israel is a powerful US ally in the Middle East, and let's face it they don't have many.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

Well I think we now have to accept that we are beyond the point of these two groups finishing this on thier own so maybe we shouold send in NATO forces wether Israel and Hizbollah like it or not, obviously the forces will have to make peace and if that means that Israeli and Hizbollah forces are killed trying to prevent peace then too bad.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

Why I don't get is why Hezbollah got into this mix in the first place. Just when Israel is mixing it up with Palestine, yet again, Hezbollah swoops up a few Israeli troops. Sure, they say it's because Israel has some Arab prisoners, but it can't be that easy. I know Syria and Iran back these dudes, but still, something is just not sitting right with me about this whole thing.

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

writer,
Your comments in post #48 are straight out of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Clue: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are a hoax...repeat: a hoax.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
h@ts wrote
You hear what you want to hear. Like I said, I heard one Hamas leader just two years say that Hamas would recognise Israel.


And you say I hear what I want to hear? Did Hamas change their charter? Because if so, then that one slipped past me.

Facts are these. Hamas got elected and single handedly turned back years of negotiations and progress. Remember Israel pulled out of Gaza and part of the West Bank because of these earlier negotiations.

quote:

You think the Israels haven't got ulterior motives for actions they take? You don't think they are doing all they can to prevent a Palastinian state. You surely must have read about how the expansions in the West Bank will eventually make a Palastinian state unviable.


So the song use to be Gaza and West Bank now it’s just the WB. That’s progress. So where’s the progress on the other side of the equation? Quite frankly if someone kept sending bombs into my cities I wouldn’t give them anything either.

quote:

Hamas has had many cease fires, and while the last one was going on Israel was murdering Hamas leaders from helicopters.


This statement lacks accuracy. When Israel was taking out Hamas leaders they were actively plotting and sending bombers into Israel. Hamas has been blasting and shelling longer than any cease fire they observed. And even when they do observe them, Israel still has to deal with the other dozens of factions that keep up the bombing campaigns.

quote:

Unfortunately it seems for many Western governments Hamas have just won a democratic election. But rather than give even the slightest support to Hamas, we have punished them economically.


How do you negotiate with a government that doesn’t recognize their neighbor? How do you take over a government that made such head way and totally through it in the garbage? Now you want these Western governments of which whom spent so much effort trying to broker these agreements to help Hamas turn the clock back years?

To expect that is absurd.

quote:

Both sides are to blame for being unable to realise what they are doing is futile. But you support the Israelis and claim they are always the victim, "responding". Didn't you see that Palastinian family killed on that beach a few weeks ago.


I ask you again, what is Israel suppose to do when they keep bombing their cities? The entire beach fiasco didn’t have to happen had their not been rockets fired into Israel in the first place. And the situation with the jets happened “after” Hamas militants tunneled into Israel and kidnapped 2 soldiers.

Plainly and simply put, had Islamic Jihad not been firing rockets into Israel almost daily, the beach incident wouldn’t have happened. Similarly had Hamas not tunneled into Israel and kidnapped soldiers, those planes wouldn’t have been buzzing Palestinians and had Hezbollah not attacked Israel’s military post and started firing rockets into Israel then Lebanon wouldn’t be undergoing these unfortunate circumstances.

quote:

Luckily for the Israelis Hezbollah are weak militarily and are not armed to the teeth by the USA.


So what you are saying is that if you’re militarily weaker than your enemy, this justifies their bombings of Tel Aviv? So they should just send in bombers and Israel do nothing about it and when they do, they’re wrong or disproportionate?

quote:

Because according to you they are mindless lunatics who don't understand reason.


Yes that’s correct, so again what is your thoughts as to why they’re doing it?

quote:

Politically the Palastinians may well be being used by stronger nations for alterior motives, but that includes Israel as well as Iran and Syria. There are no heroes in this enless conflict.


So who’s gain is it that this conflict keeps going? It seems Israel was giving back land and still Hamas and Hezbollah came in and jumpstarted this entire process again. So why should Israel believe any of them when they say it’s all about the WB and Gaza?

Like I said, this didn’t start with the WB and Gaza. To pretend it’s about that now is being quite disingenuous.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #60 :
[B]Facts are these. Hamas got elected and single handedly turned back years of negotiations and progress. Remember Israel pulled out of Gaza and part of the West Bank because of these earlier negotiations.


Israel got out of Gaza to expand the settlements which happen to be on the best land in the West bank. Don't pretend that Israel is not continuing to expand. Have you heard that the continued exansion will eventually make a Palastinian state unviable. Is that not wiping the Palastinians off the map?

quote:
This statement lacks accuracy. When Israel was taking out Hamas leaders they were actively plotting and sending bombers into Israel. Hamas has been blasting and shelling longer than any cease fire they observed.


Actively plotting? Have Israel got bugs in every room in every house? Hamas' leaders were being murdered from Apache helicopters when there was a ceasfire. To use your logic - how can Hamas not respond?

quote:
How do you negotiate with a government that doesn’t recognize their neighbor?


I'm sure there are several ways if there is any will. Israel could have tried to negotiate - remember Hamas were democratically elected, an amazing opportunity you'd think, something we are all apparently suppossed to welcome. Israel could have got a third party to negotiate for them. They could have asked the UN for help. But Israel did niether, instead they immediately blocked funding in an attempt to destroy Hamas economically and with it the Palastinian people. Using your logic - how can Hamas not respond?

quote:
The entire beach fiasco didn’t have to happen had their not been rockets fired into Israel in the first place. And the situation with the jets happened “after” Hamas militants tunneled into Israel and kidnapped 2 soldiers.


It's this "first place" logic that is wrong, and always seeing Israel as the victim. Fact is the Israeli military killed the family on the beach.

And what is this thing about kidnapping? Israel has with impunity been kidnapping Palastinians for years and jailing them without trial.

quote:
So they should just send in bombers and Israel do nothing about it and when they do, they’re wrong or disproportionate?


It's up to you whether you think the destruction of Lebanon is disproportionate. I think the destruction of a country for the capture of two soldiers is disproportianate.

quote:
Like I said, this didn’t start with the WB and Gaza. To pretend it’s about that now is being quite disingenuous.


50 years this conflict has been going on. Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah obviously do not know how to bring it to a resolution. America AND Iran must take blame for supporting their respective sides. It's a proxy war which in many ways must be beneficial to the powerful states that back it. Maybe we are building up to bigger war, who knows?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: usayit

quote:
EUCLID said this in post #55 :
I heard that Hezbollah is preventing civillians from fleeing south Lebanon. Why would they do that?


Human shields perhaps.... a way to place blame for shooting at civilians... at least thats my first thought.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
h@ts wrote
Israel got out of Gaza to expand the settlements which happen to be on the best land in the West bank. Don't pretend that Israel is not continuing to expand.


I can’t tell you how many times I heard this line of argument. In 1948 Arabs refused on the grounds that Israel got the “best land” even though Israel’s land was mostly desert.

You have to remember how Israel acquired the WB & Gaza in the first place. Imagine if Arabs had succeeded, you think for one moment they would give Israel back anything? Israel could have run them all out of the West Bank and Gaza after that war but chose not to do it. This doesn’t sound much like a conspiracy to take the land.

For the record, I wish Israel would have given back the WB too but I don’t believe for one moment it would stop them from being attacked.

quote:

Actively plotting? Have Israel got bugs in every room in every house? Hamas' leaders were being murdered from Apache helicopters when there was a ceasfire. To use your logic - how can Hamas not respond?


A history lesson is in order.

Fact, Hamas enacted a ceasefire in March 2005. During this time Israel did NOT attack any Hamas militants. The last talks of ceasefire between Hamas and Israel was in 2003. Hamas called them off because Abbas promised to end the violence against Israel while brokering a peace agreement with them.

Prior to this Israel killed the guy in the wheelchair in 2002, during which time Hamas was sending bombers into Israel. Prior to this, 2yrs of violence culminated after Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount.

quote:

Israel could have tried to negotiate - remember Hamas were democratically elected, an amazing opportunity you'd think, something we are all apparently suppossed to welcome.


h@t’s not without respect to your position but this statement shows and incredible lack of perspective in my opinion. So Hamas was elected. This automatically means that years of ealier negotiations should have been tossed and “Israel” should have bent over backwards to appease a group with a charter for their destruction?

They won’t even recognize Israel’s right to exist. This is light years away from the headway that was forged under Abbas, Israel & the US. Now everyone “else” should change.

quote:

It's this "first place" logic that is wrong, and always seeing Israel as the victim. Fact is the Israeli military killed the family on the beach.


Again you’ve dodged the question. Do you think Israel did that on purpose? You asked why I think Israel’s violence is responsive. I said that Islamic Jihad was firing rockets into Israel close to that location (an obvious tactic).

Fact, Israel targets militants, militants target civilians. Does this excuse Israel’s indiscriminant bombings? No, but what do you do when the cowards are firing into your cities while they hide behind Palestinians?

quote:

And what is this thing about kidnapping? Israel has with impunity been kidnapping Palastinians for years and jailing them without trial.


And the two dozen militant factions in Palestine hasn’t been kidnapping and “killing” Israelis for years? At least Israel has a list of who they want to “kidnap”, Hamas and they others kidnap because of opportunity. They don’t care who they are or if they agree that Israel shouldn’t build in Gaza or the WB. They just take them simply because they are Israeli.

quote:

It's up to you whether you think the destruction of Lebanon is disproportionate. I think the destruction of a country for the capture of two soldiers is disproportianate.


I would too if I didn’t know the history of that region which is something that seems to conveniently be left out of the equation time and time again.

quote:

50 years this conflict has been going on. Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah obviously do not know how to bring it to a resolution.


Funny, I do. There are examples all around us on how those who see themselves as oppressed have won their freedoms. It’s been longer than 50yrs but lets speak of it. In the last 50yrs Arabs attack Israel several times even before 67. I ask you what will change if Palestinians acquired the entire WB?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote: