America is no longer a superpower - Post-9/11 Era

America is no longer a superpower

Post-9/11 Era Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: h@ts

Below are some of the reasons why Paul Roberts (Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration) thinks America is not a superpower (Full article below that).

I put this because the UK tends to follow America by just a few years, so what the US does is pretty much what we in the UK tend to do too.

quote:
Our biggest bankers are China and Japan, both of whom could cause the US serious financial problems if they wished. A country whose financial affairs are in the hands of foreigners is not a superpower.

A country dependent on foreigners for manufactures and advanced technology products is not a superpower.

A country that cannot create jobs for its native born population is not a superpower.

A country whose business class has no sense of the nation is not a superpower.

http://www.informationclearinghouse...rticle12843.htm


quote:
Wars, Debt and Outsourcing

The World is Uniting Against the Bush Imperium

By Paul Craig Roberts

04/25/06 -- -- Is the United States a superpower? I think not. Consider these facts:

The financial position of the US has declined dramatically. The US is heavily indebted, both government and consumers. The US trade deficit both in absolute size and as a percentage of GDP is unprecedented, reaching more than $800 billion in 2005 and accumulating to $4.5 trillion since 1990. With US job growth falling behind population growth and with no growth in consumer real incomes, the US economy is driven by expanding consumer debt. Saving rates are low or negative.

The federal budget is deep in the red, adding to America's dependency on debt. The US cannot even go to war unless foreigners are willing to finance it.

Our biggest bankers are China and Japan, both of whom could cause the US serious financial problems if they wished. A country whose financial affairs are in the hands of foreigners is not a superpower.

The US is heavily dependent on imports for manufactured goods, including advanced technology products. In 2005 US dependency (in dollar amounts) on imported manufactured goods was twice as large as US dependency on imported oil. In the 21st century the US has experienced a rapid increase in dependency on imports of advanced technology products. A country dependent on foreigners for manufactures and advanced technology products is not a superpower.

Because of jobs offshoring and illegal immigration, US consumers create jobs for foreigners, not for Americans. Bureau of Labor Statistics jobs reports document the loss of manufacturing jobs and the inability of the US economy to create jobs in categories other than domestic "hands on" services. According to a March 2006 report from the Center for Immigration Studies, most of these jobs are going to immigrants: "Between March 2000 and March 2005 only 9 percent of the net increase in jobs for adults (18 to 64) went to natives. This is striking because natives accounted for 61 percent of the net increase in the overall size of the 18 to 64 year old population."

A country that cannot create jobs for its native born population is not a superpower.

In an interview in the April 17 Manufacturing & Technology News, former TCI and Global Crossing CEO Leo Hindery said that the incentives of globalization have disconnected US corporations from US interests. "No economy," Hindery said, "can survive the offshoring of both manufacturing and services concurrently. In fact, no society can even take excessive offshoring of manufacturing alone." According to Hindery, offshoring serves the short-term interests of shareholders and executive pay at the long-term expense of US economic strength.

Hindery notes that in 1981 the Business Roundtable defined its constituency as employees, shareholders, community, customers, and the nation." Today the constituency is quarterly earnings. A country whose business class has no sense of the nation is not a superpower.

By launching a war of aggression on the basis of lies and fabricated "intelligence," the Bush regime violated the Nuremberg standard established by the US and international law. Extensive civilian casualties and infrastructure destruction in Iraq, along with the torture of detainees in concentration camps and an ever-changing excuse for the war have destroyed the soft power and moral leadership that provided the diplomatic foundation for America's superpower status. A country that is no longer respected or trusted and which promises yet more war isolates itself from cooperation from the rest of the world. An isolated country is not a superpower.

A country that fears small, distant countries to such an extent that it utilizes military in place of diplomatic means is not a superpower. The entire world knows that the US is not a superpower when its entire available military force is tied down by a small lightly armed insurgency drawn from a Sunni population of a mere 5 million people.

Neoconservatives think the US is a superpower because of its military weapons and nuclear missiles. However, as the Iraqi resistance has demonstrated, America's superior military firepower is not enough to prevail in fourth generation warfare. The Bush regime has reached this conclusion itself, which is why it increasing speaks of attacking Iran with nuclear weapons.

The US is the only country to have used nuclear weapons against an opponent. If six decades after nuking Japan the US again resorts to the use of nuclear weapons, it will establish itself as a pariah, war criminal state under the control of insane people. Any sympathy that might still exist for the US would immediately disappear, and the world would unite against America.

A country against which the world is united is not a superpower.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.He can be reached at: paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

Does no-one want to defend America's status as superpower? Is the status important?

I personally can't see the big deal for ordinary people - see how well countries like Norway and Sweden are doing - in being top dog but some people think it's important.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: hazel_dragoneye

The countries that you listed H@ts are neutral countries that do not find the need to start wars to crank up their economies. They are doing well financially, but I suspect that the United States will some day wake up and lead the world once more.

This scare is not new. In the 1950s, the United States feared that it was falling behind as a superpower after the Soviet Union launched its famous Sputnik and launched its own space program. We eventually outpaced that Soviet Union. Now, however, China is becoming an export hothouse.

I may be too optimistic but I think we could catch up with the rest of the world if we stop spending money as if it grew on trees and stopped relying on debt.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
hazel_dragoneye said this in post #3 :
The countries that you listed H@ts are neutral countries that do not find the need to start wars to crank up their economies. They are doing well financially, but I suspect that the United States will some day wake up and lead the world once more.


The US is in massive debt to China and Japan, who are keeping you afloat. Iraq was America's failed attempt to grab a slice of control in one of the most strategically important parts of the world. Control = power and influence = America's attempt to prevent their slide down the superpower pole.

I fear what America will do next if the US decline and debt continues to grow, especially if there is another terrorist attack on US soil. Could Bush get public backing for another attack and war on a strategically important country? Iran has BIG reserves of oil and China can't get enough.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: brochu13

America does not think as collectively as you think. We aren't one large entity bent on dominating the world. I don't agree with Bush, but you make him out to be Cobra Commander or something.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
brochu13 said this in post #5 :
America does not think as collectively as you think. We aren't one large entity bent on dominating the world. I don't agree with Bush, but you make him out to be Cobra Commander or something.


I'm talking about the vested interests that run and rule America. The instituitions that keep these vested interests in power. Bush and his family are just one small part.
Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Post-9/11 Era Forum: America is no longer a superpower

Forum Forum Forum