The Difference Between Europe And Us - Post-9/11 Era

The Difference Between Europe And Us

Post-9/11 Era Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: Desert Hawk

AP/Ipsos Poll: Americans Want Execution For Saddam If Convicted, While "Allies" Prefer Life Sentence.

A new Ipsos-AP poll provides another example of just how different we are from Europe on issues of crime and punishment. A strong majority of Americans think Saddam should be executed after being convicted. Most Europeans think he should sit in jail for life.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

I thought it was widespread knowledge that a majority of Europeans do not favor the death penalty.

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Desert Hawk

quote:
HECK said this in post #2 :
I thought it was widespread knowledge that a majority of Europeans do not favor the death penalty.

-HECK!


Apparently that sentiment applies to Saddam Hussein. I wonder if it would apply to Adolf Hitler.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

I have no idea what would be done with Hitler, historical hypothetical capital punishment scenarios are not my speciality.

Back in the 40's I would wager that he would have been swinging with the rest of his comrades that were captured.

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

Not to mention some 9/11 families want Moussaoui to be spared execution, go figure.

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Desert Hawk

quote:
HECK said this in post #4 :
I have no idea what would be done with Hitler, historical hypothetical capital punishment scenarios are not my speciality.

Back in the 40's I would wager that he would have been swinging with the rest of his comrades that were captured.

-HECK!


I'm talking hypothetically, today. The fact that it's even up to question within European society in itself is the point.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

The point being you don't like Europeans?

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Desert Hawk

When in 'HECK's World' act accordingly. And while one is at it, one might read the thread-starter describing the point in question.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

quote:
Desert Hawk said this in post #8 :
When in 'HECK's World' act accordingly. And while one is at it, one might read the thread-starter describing the point in question.


Dude, I don't know why I try with you. Can't even have a civil discussion.

If you take into account all the negative threads about Europe you create it's painfully obvious what your stance on Europeans is, am I mistaken in that rationale?

What is your point if the majority of Europeans don't want Saddam executed? You said "The fact that it's even up to question within European society in itself is the point." Again, no answer. What's the freakin' point chief?

-HECK!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Desert Hawk

Fair enough, 'Chief-dude.' Now then, let's take into account all the negative threads about America that h@ts—and you create. (Granted, your threads are not directly anti-U.S.—they're clearly designed to instigate anti-Bush, anti-American govent. hysteria.) And of course h@ts… well, that much transperancy requires no further comment. When was the last time you expressed to him that you felt he was being anti-American?

You can label me as disliking Europeans, and you'd be correct—partly. I hold a fair amount of contempt for those who stand on a soap-box to blame America first—particularly when most of their ills are self-wrought. To those Europeans who do not hate America I apologize all over the place for my generalization, it excludes them—but all polls that I have ever seen bear witness to this reality—not to mention my personal experiences over there. Shoot, call be politically incorrect, and a "continentist."

So try not to get all preachy-like and bent outta shape when the shoe's on the other foot. Let's have a civil discussion. Or not. I'm good. But 'if I'm lyin' I'm dyin.'

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

quote:
Desert Hawk said this in post #10 :
Fair enough, 'Chief-dude.' Now then, let's take into account all the negative threads about America that h@ts—and you create. (Granted, your threads are not directly anti-U.S.—they're clearly designed to instigate anti-Bush, anti-American govent. hysteria.) And of course h@ts… well, no further 'splanation necessary there. When was the last time you expressed to him that you felt he was being anti-American?


I can only speak to my own actions and intent. h@ts can chime in with his/her stance on things.

At times I post articles that are critical of Bush and/or his administration and their actions both domestically and internationally. I often try to crack jokes and get inside a right wingers mind and dance around. That does not make the posts or me anti-American. I love my country and despite the fact I disagree with the CIC, I still support our troops and honor their sacrifices. Instigating hysteria? Come on now. Let's not get overdramatic. It's our right as Americans to question our leaders when we believe they are failing us.

quote:
You can label me as disliking Europeans, and you'd be correct—partly. I hold a fair amount of contempt for those who stand on a soap-box to blame America first—particularly when most of their ills are self-wrought. To those Europeans who do not hate America I apologize all over the place for my generalization, it excludes them—but all polls that I have ever seen bear witness to this reality—not to mention my personal experiences over there. Shoot, call be politically incorrect, and a "continentist."


I was stating that you did not like Europeans based on the articles or editorial pieces you post here. By your own admission, I was right- partly. There is nothing wrong with your stance, that's the way you feel, then rock on.

quote:

So don't get bent outta shape when the shoe's on the other foot. Let's have a civil discussion. Or not. I'm good. But 'if I'm lyin' I'm dyin.'


If you can see a parallel between my criticism of Bush and your stance on Europeans, then I think we both need to reevaluate how we might come across on this board. In your previous incarnation here, I recall you talking about 'Europissts' (sp?) going extinct? Not exactly fostering a welcoming attitude toward those over the pond and definitely not a recipe for intriguing, stimulating debate.

Back to the topic at hand- I'm not sure that the European stance on Saddam's fate effects me one way or the other. We're not going to decide his fate, neither are they. I am not surprised because of Europe's general disdain for the death penalty to begin with.

I don't think it shows weakness on the Europeans part. Just a different mentality, for better or worse.

-HECK!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Ireland

quote:
Desert Hawk said this in post #1 :
AP/Ipsos Poll: Americans Want Execution For Saddam If Convicted, While "Allies" Prefer Life Sentence.

A new Ipsos-AP poll provides another example of just how different we are from Europe on issues of crime and punishment. A strong majority of Americans think Saddam should be executed after being convicted. Most Europeans think he should sit in jail for life.


What punishment for those who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and nagasaki? What punishment for the american administration that supported Saddam Hussein at the time when he carried out his worst and most documented crimes?
Open your eyes your as guilty as anyone one you choose to punish. You are absolute hypocrites.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
Desert Hawk said this in post #6 :


I'm talking hypothetically, today. The fact that it's even up to question within European society in itself is the point.


What is your point? Are you implying that European countries are weak because they chose not to kill their own citizens and America is strong because it does kill its own citizens? Is the death penalty a sign of a strong nation? Iraq has always executed it's own prisoners. So what? America likewise kills it's own prisoners. Europe doesn't. I think legalised state killing is barbaric and I wouldn't want to see it in Britain (I doubt this is a majority view). How do you feel about it?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

Well first off we can take Hawk as at least one European who is for the death penalty. However in the case of Sadamm killing him is to me the easy and quick way out of the situation at best the guy might reach 80 years old so i say let him sit and rot in jail for the rest of his natural life. If he is executed then we all know exactly how he will go down telling every one that he is the rightfull ruler of Iraq and thewre will be no remorse when he faces the gallows. at leasdt if he is in a cell for the rest of his life he may not be remorsefull but he will have at least 30 years to think about what he did,

Look at the death of that **** Milosevic he is dead do you think his victims have closure? the only diffrence between Sadamm and Miolsevic is that we kill Sadamm with the word justice in forn of it.

However the is not up to Europe or the US it's in the hands of the Iraqis and I will respect thier descion but I don't think killing him will bring closure.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: JY_French

Am I surprised to hear "Desert Hawk" support of death penalty ? Of course, no. It is a logical choice for someone who has everytime clearly resorted to simplistic (not to say caricatural) ideas / opinions / schemes about the issues at hand.
Yes, lots of europeans are against this legalised barbary that is death penalty. Trying to explain why to people like D . H. is just a waste of time.

Do you want to kill Saddam Hussein, or Zacharias Moussaoui ? Just do it and make "martyrs" of them. At least for Moussaoui, that's just what he is waiting for.

Desert Hawk you constantly bring accusations of anti-americanism, as a generalisation, levered at those who dare to challenge / question the way the Bush admin is leading the US and more generally meddling into other countries business. In the same time, you openly and continuously bash and insult the very same Europeans (at least used to do it) with ignominous articles. Talk about hypocrisy. Most of these europeans, yet very critical regarding the administration, do not express generalized disdain and contempt towards the people like you do. You are the one who have a problem here. You still need to get that.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Desert Hawk

quote:
Desert Hawk said this in post #1 :


A new Ipsos-AP poll provides another example of just how different we are from Europe on issues of crime and punishment. A strong majority of Americans think Saddam should be executed after being convicted. Most Europeans think he should sit in jail for life.


As Euro-posts #12, #13, #14 and #15 can attest, the conviction is reaffirmed. Viv la difference!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

You see I am not quite sure where you are attempting to go with this debate joe. I mean is this the end of it do we close the thread because I can't see it going much further, we all agree US wants an eye for an eye and Europe wants people to rot in jail for thier crimes.

If you are attempting to say that European people are bad and wrong because they don't want Sadamm executed well that to me is rather pathetic and flies in the face of allowing us to have diffrence of opinion.

The thing about the poll is that there are some major things left out that I would like to know for example when it was taken, how it was taken and in what countries it was taken, I would like to knoe the margin of error and most importantly how many were asked you see there are more people in europe than in the US so the amount of people asked is important to the poll. If you only asked young people in the Germany and France then you get a no to the death penalty but if you asked older people in Britain and the eastern european states you might get a yes for execution. Was this poll carried out in every European country becasue if it was not then how can it reflect the whole of the European population?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
Desert Hawk said this in post #16 :


As Euro-posts #12, #13, #14 and #15 can attest, the conviction is reaffirmed. Viv la difference!


It's well know that the British public is in favour of the death penalty, but British politicians are not. It would not surprise me if America were split on the issue.

So it's hardly an interesting point that there are different opinions on execution. You brought the subject up and I'm interested to know if you think that state killing is a sign of strength?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: B3TTY

If Saddam had given the U.S. the same kind of money laundering deal that the House of Saud did in double crossing their populous , Saddam would be called a great man of peace,a great friend of democracy etc ,and no one would be talking about a death penalty .

Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

quote:
B3TTY said this in post #19 :
If Saddam had given the U.S. the same kind of money laundering deal that the House of Saud did in double crossing their populous , Saddam would be called a great man of peace,a great friend of democracy etc ,and no one would be talking about a death penalty .


It's clear that if Hussein had not stepped over the US foreign policy line by invading Kuwait (and he'd been "good" for the previous 25 years of his dictatorship) he could have continued to oppress and torture his own people to his heart's content. But he threatened Western oil interests and that's a step too far.

It's not that we like dictators, it's just we REALLY LIKE our business and strategic interests, and the "good" dictators are the one's that protect our interests. As long as they continue to do that we'll arm them, we'll support them, we'll turn a blind eye to their attrocities, and we'll continue to reap the rewards. It's gangsterism but on a massive scale.
Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Post-9/11 Era Forum: The Difference Between Europe And Us

Forum Forum Forum