Pat Tillman investigation - Afghanistan

Pat Tillman investigation

Afghanistan Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: Whidden

quote:
Criminal negligence at issue in Army's probe into Tillman's death
BY DREW BROWN
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - The Army's criminal investigation into former NFL star Pat Tillman's death, announced on Saturday, will focus on whether his death may have been the result of criminal negligence and whether his superiors tried to cover up the facts.
Tillman, 27, was serving with the Army's 2nd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment when he was shot and killed during a patrol in southeastern Afghanistan in April 2004. The military initially reported that enemy fighters had killed Tillman during an ambush. An investigation later revealed that he was accidentally killed by fellow Rangers.
The issues that Army investigators will probe will likely include:
_Why did Tillman's company commander, who wasn't on the scene, order his 34-man platoon to split in half just before the Rangers were ambushed, a decision that led directly to the friendly fire incident? Basic military doctrine says that commanders shouldn't split their forces when they're in hostile territory and may be facing a superior enemy force.
_Did other Rangers know what they were firing at before they shot Tillman and an Afghan militiaman with him? Rangers, who are among Army's most elite troops, are taught never to fire unless they can positively identify their targets.
_Why did Tillman's superiors initially cover up the circumstances of his death? When Tillman was awarded a posthumous Silver Star on April 30, 2004, eight days after his death, the Army's account was full of stirring but phony details about how he'd been killed, even though officers in his chain of command already knew that he'd been killed by American troops.
_When did senior military officials learn that Tillman had been killed by fellow soldiers?
_Why did Army leaders wait for more than a month, until after a nationally televised memorial service three weeks after Tillman's death, to tell his family the truth?
The Army has conducted three investigations into Tillman's death and concluded that there was no apparent wrongdoing. According to the Pentagon, seven soldiers in Tillman's unit have been punished in the case. Three received reprimands for failing to "provide adequate command and control" during the incident, and four received non-judicial punishments for "failure to exercise sound judgment and fire discipline."
Tillman's parents have repeatedly expressed anger that the military lied to them about the circumstances of their son's death. The Pentagon directed the Army to conduct a criminal investigation of the incident after Brig. Gen. Gary Jones, who conducted an investigation last year, asked the Pentagon to review his findings.
Jones reported that the initial inquiry by an officer in the 2nd Ranger Battalion had found that Tillman had been killed as a result of "gross negligence" by his fellow soldiers, who said they'd fired on his position without knowing what they were firing at. Jones also found that top Army officials, including Gen. John P. Abizaid, the head of the U.S. Central Command, had been told several days before Tillman's memorial service that he'd been killed by friendly fire.
Jones, however, found that there was no official intent by the Army to conceal the truth.
Although the scope of the new criminal investigation hasn't been determined, Marine Gen. Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, speaking Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," said the investigation would focus on whether there was criminal activity involved in Tillman's death.
"Although there is no evidence that there was criminal activity, the investigators did not specifically look at whether or not there was criminal activity," Pace said. "Criminal activity being when Corporal Tillman was killed by friendly fire, was that fire by the friendly forces fire that should have been going on or was someone potentially firing a weapon when they should not have been?"
Pace said the Tillman family "has gone through enormous anguish, and the fact that that has happened to them is really regrettable."
Reply To this Message

Posted by: gaboman

Terrible tragedy

I've always hated the saying "friendly fire" - there's really nothing friendly about it

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Inner City Blues

Something tells me this is going to be one of those "investigations" that only get people low on the totem pole. Here's a better question: who was responsible for the false Pat Tillman story placed in the media? Who sought to make Tillman a poster boy? I think if you answer those questions, the other ones will easily be answered.

I hope this doesn't end like the investigation of Abu Ghraib where the real culprits weren't punished.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: gaboman

quote:
Inner City Blues said this in post #3 :
I hope this doesn't end like the investigation of Abu Ghraib where the real culprits weren't punished.
That still ticks me off whenever I think about it.

I think in this case, according to Whidden's article at least, they're looking for real answers, and they don't mind asking real questions...

Though that seems to be just the article's opinion, not necessarily what the army investigators will really probe into. The problem is, any investigation that ends with the military looking flakey is never gonna see the light of day.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Whidden

Well, he was a pro football player and quasi famous, so they may do the investigation right. I think that the site owner, Marc knew him as well.

I remember a thread on it a long long time ago.


Anyhow, something there is bogus, because this is an old story, and it's getting re-investigated.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Inner City Blues

Well I think some evidence was destroyed, so I think that may be what they're trying to uncover.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

What pisses me off about all of this, is the fact that if it were just a regular soldier, who wasn't semi-famous, would this even be something that was investigated?

It's about time that we make the gov't pay for the mistakes that they make.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

We could always get rid of the military altogether. That way we wouldn't have any mistakes.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

It's not the mistakes that worry me it's the amount that seem to be made.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

Have you ever looked to see how many troops die annually from non-combat related incidents?
I am interested to see how they can call this homicide?
To kill one of your own on purpose jeopardises the whole mission. I seriously doubt this was the case.
I can see how Tilman could have been mistaken for a rebel. Especially if they were dressed in local garb which, in many cases happens with Special Forces and getting in front of the squad would deffinatly expose him.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Accidental death by gunfire...hmmmm

Wonder where Cheney was...thought Tillman was a quail.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

quote:
nikiTa said this in post #11 :
Accidental death by gunfire...hmmmm

Wonder where Cheney was...thought Tillman was a quail.


Sorry, as much laughter about somebody getting shot may be funny to the liberals, it is not funny to me in the slightest.
I will ignore that remark.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

quote:
nikiTa said this in post #11 :
Accidental death by gunfire...hmmmm

Wonder where Cheney was...thought Tillman was a quail.


BTW- Who said accidental death by gunfire? It sure wasn't me.
You must work for the Times.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Accidental death by gunfire sounds a hell of a lot better than "friendly fire."

You are right, USA1, this isn't funny...that's why it should have been investigated a long time ago instead of been swept under a rug.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

I am not sure it any of our busness except the family of Tilman. To publicize or politicize this seems wrong.
We are all human and in that fold there are those who commit murder and being in the military doesn't change that. However, I don't think this is the case.
I thin kit is a mistake in identity during a fire fight. What they told his parents is between them. It's not a relfection of our military general practice.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

[QUOTE]USA1 said this in post #10 :
[B]Have you ever looked to see how many troops die annually from non-combat related incidents?

Have you looked at the number of friendly fire incident involving US forces compared to other forces? off the top of my head I can think of the unexplicable reason for US forces to shot down two RAF tornadoes, the bombing of 8 Canadians in Afghanistan, the shooting of 9 Iraqi police and 1 Jordanian, the bombing of a a british troop carrier in the Perisan gulf war that resulted in 12 deaths, the bombing of a Kurdish convoy carrying US speacial forces near Mosul, there were the 10 soldiers killed in some sort of confusion during the fianl push to Baghdad, then there was the 1 British soldier who died when an A - 10 dropped a bomb on a UK convoy, 3 americans killed and 20 injured when a B 52 missed it's target, then there was the Hornet that US troops shot down. Thats probably only the tip of iceberg. Friendly fire does indeed happen all I am saying is that it happens more often to the US than other countries take Afghanistan US friendly fire deaths = 48 UK friendly fire deaths = 3

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

USA1 said this in post #15 :
I am not sure it any of our busness except the family of Tilman. To publicize or politicize this seems wrong.

Wrongful death of Anyone in the military should be publicized. That is what is "wrong."

We are all human and in that fold there are those who commit murder and being in the military doesn't change that. However, I don't think this is the case.

How the frick do you know? Is everyone in the military an angel in your eyes? Just because they have the patch?

I thin kit is a mistake in identity during a fire fight. What they told his parents is between them. It's not a relfection of our military general practice.

You are damn right it is a reflection of "our military general practice!!!"

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

quote:
nikiTa said this in post #17 :
USA1 said this in post #15 :
I am not sure it any of our busness except the family of Tilman. To publicize or politicize this seems wrong.

Wrongful death of Anyone in the military should be publicized. That is what is "wrong."

We are all human and in that fold there are those who commit murder and being in the military doesn't change that. However, I don't think this is the case.

How the frick do you know? Is everyone in the military an angel in your eyes? Just because they have the patch?

I thin kit is a mistake in identity during a fire fight. What they told his parents is between them. It's not a relfection of our military general practice.

You are damn right it is a reflection of "our military general practice!!!"


Boy, are you missinformed!

This is typical liberal spin.
I never said they were angels, you did.

You are POLITICIZING this not me.

You are wrong about the general practice of how they handle the dead. You have no respect in my eyes.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

quote:
lodgebo said this in post #16 :
[QUOTE]USA1 said this in post #10 :
[B]Have you ever looked to see how many troops die annually from non-combat related incidents?

Have you looked at the number of friendly fire incident involving US forces compared to other forces? off the top of my head I can think of the unexplicable reason for US forces to shot down two RAF tornadoes, the bombing of 8 Canadians in Afghanistan, the shooting of 9 Iraqi police and 1 Jordanian, the bombing of a a british troop carrier in the Perisan gulf war that resulted in 12 deaths, the bombing of a Kurdish convoy carrying US speacial forces near Mosul, there were the 10 soldiers killed in some sort of confusion during the fianl push to Baghdad, then there was the 1 British soldier who died when an A - 10 dropped a bomb on a UK convoy, 3 americans killed and 20 injured when a B 52 missed it's target, then there was the Hornet that US troops shot down. Thats probably only the tip of iceberg. Friendly fire does indeed happen all I am saying is that it happens more often to the US than other countries take Afghanistan US friendly fire deaths = 48 UK friendly fire deaths = 3



Over what period of time are you talking about an in what conflict?

How many Americans have served in Iraq and Afganistan compared to any other country. The shear odds of the numbers serving increase the risk.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

USA1

So, if this were your son...what would you want?
Would you want the truth from the get go?
Would you want an investigation?

What?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

quote:
USA1 said this in post #19 :



Over what period of time are you talking about an in what conflict?

This is from the Persin gulf war, the current conflict and the Afghan conflict. the timescale is from the start of the battle to present day.

How many Americans have served in Iraq and Afganistan compared to any other country. The shear odds of the numbers serving increase the risk.


Like I said the number are only the tip of the iceberg, now yes there are more troops but the US friendly fire losses are more than the rest of the coalition losses put together now that is a worrying statistic. It's not just friendly fire either, was it not the US that dropped a bomb on a known aircraft shelter during the Perisn Gulf war and was it not Powell who had to try and clear up a major PR disaster? and what country bobmbed a red cross building in Afghanistan.

look lets take the first case I mentioned about the two tornadoes that you blew out of the sky in March 2003. Here you had the two planes coming back to the aircraft carrier they had flown from. Now we knes that Iraq had no air force and we all know that fighters don't look, sound or fly like planes so why did the US launch SAM's at the planes what possible reason could there be?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Inner City Blues

I'm still looking for where this death has been politicized? USA1, you're the only one on here talking about the death being politicized, saying it is doesn't make it so. Aside from the flippant remark about Cheney, this is not being politicized, so take your trash somewhere else unless you're willing to have intelligent discussion.

What's probably bothering you is the fact that Tillman was used as a poster boy for those who have fallen in combat only to find out it's a lie and there is a probable cover up. If you want to whine and complain about politicization, point the finger at the people that tried to make this man a poster boy.

Nothing more, nothing less, let's hope this investigation is fruitful. It's not just another friendly fire incident and you know it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

I really wasn't trying to make a "flippant remark." Nor was I trying to joke in any way form or fashion.

The thing about war is: Politicians order it. The President is the Commander in Chief. Congresspeople (politicians) are supposed to declare it...in times of dire national insecurity.... However.

And my comment was merely pointing to the fact...that these political leaders are just as culpable in this war...even more so than anyone else in the deaths of our boys.

Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Afghanistan Forum: Pat Tillman investigation

Forum Forum Forum