| Posted by: Lawless | | What, in your opinion, was the best movie put out in 2005?
(and don't "whine" if your movie isn't in there) | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | I know its nuts, but I went for Sin City in this poll. Mainly because it was an underdog, and it really was one of the best movies I've seen in the past 5 years.
Harry Potter and Hitchhiker's I liked just as much though  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | No surprise, I don't think... I went with Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. It was just an amazing movie... the special effects were so dead-on real looking, and they did a wonderful job adapting the book to the screen.
Star Wars III would be next for special effects
and
Mr. & Mrs. Smith would be next for EYE CANDY!!! (on BOTH parts) | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: schmiggens | | I have only seen Sin City, War of the Worlds, Star Wars III, The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy and Fantastic Four out of that list. Star Wars, the acting was so bad, War of the World, the ending was so bad, Hitchhikers was good but not GREAT and I missed the ending of Fantastic Four, so my vote goes to Sin City, which WAS great. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | KJ- great poll
But I would have added... 
Serious, I picked Star Wars. Let me say it was semi-tough because I was a big fan of Wedding Crashers and 40-Year-Old Virgin. Those were great. But this was the last Star Wars movie ever, and it was great. I needed it to be great or else I would have challenged Lucas to a duel. That's the vote and I'm stickin' to it.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: illuminate | | eh, none of those tickle my pickle except wedding crashers or 40-year old virgin. I vote virgin, but i'd RATHER vote for CRASH. that's THE BEST movie of 2005 | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | | I picked Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. It was awesome! The pacing was great. The special effects were out of this world.  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Shadow Stalker | | Man, all most all of those were awesome movies. Had to go with Narnia though. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: illuminate | |
| quote: |
HECK said this in post #8 :
Crash was dope. But there's no crying about the poll!
-HECK! |
WHO'S CRYING PUNKO? I said i'd rather vote CRASh but i voted Virgin since it was on the POLL. jeezzo peezooo.

(i still say crash)

| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | Virgin was damn funny though. You can't really compare a raunch comedy with a gripping drama though.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: illuminate | | i'm not comparing them. that was just my pick out of the ones listed. being as how the one i liked wasn't. i'm just working with what i have... that's all. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | I'm happy with the choices. As good as Crash was, I'd take 40-Year-Old Virgin over it, not only because I like comedies better, I think it was a great vehicle for a funny guy. Crash was great, but an ensemble cast that went through familiar plots.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: illuminate | | I can tell you what the WORST movie of the year was:
family stone.
great ensemble cast but a mess of a movie. i give it two pukes and a poop. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | My best friend just saw that yesterday. She said that it was "okay"
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: illuminate | | i think that's the highest compliment one could give this movie....
but perhaps this is off topic being that this is the BEST movie thread...
still... it sucked | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | Family Stone was 'ok', teetering on crap-o-la.
King Kong was slightly better.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | Don't say that, I'm checking King Kong out tomorrow after my New Years count down.... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | |
| quote: |
Pippin said this in post #22 :
...it had Adrian Brody in it ... |
Oh, come on now, everbody! Stop making me not want to watch it 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | King Kong licked ape.
3 hours waiting for that damn thing to die. Ugh. You would think after Jackson went on Jenny Craig he would also trim down the bloated run time on his movies. Just because he likes to make 3 trips to the snack bar during a movie doesn't mean he has to compensate with longer than necessary movies. Put down the milk duds and week old hot dog and go to the editing bay you neckless, overgrown Peck.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | Having just seen Narnia today... it's in my top three for this year!!!!
Harry Potter, Star Wars, and Narnia.... all three were AWESOME!!!
And then, there was Rent!!! It was beyond amazing, in a different way! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | After seeing King Kong, its on my bottom 3... that did suck the big one.
But the Kong/T-Rex action was almost redeaming. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: brochu13 | | Narnia Batman Begins and Sin City really come down to the top choices here. Unfortunately, I haven't seen Narnia yet, so I'll withhold my judgement. Damn you, Ondemand, hurry up! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: illuminate | | i'd like to change my answer to Narnia. Just saw it and i loved watching that book come to life. The battle scene was cooooo.
and what OTHER character did Andy Serkis play in Kong? besides that guy that squinted one eye? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | |
| quote: |
gaboman said this in post #27 :
After seeing King Kong, its on my bottom 3... that did suck the big one.
But the Kong/T-Rex action was almost redeaming. |
Thank you, someone else sees the truth.
I just saw Narnia and it was damn good. I haven't seen Harry Potter yet, but I'm sure that would be on the top 5.
Now its:
1- Star Wars
2- 40-Year-Old Virgin
3- Wedding Crashers
4- Narnia
5- Not King Kong
-HECK!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Shadow Stalker | |
| quote: |
illuminate said this in post #29 :
i'd like to change my answer to Narnia. Just saw it and i loved watching that book come to life. The battle scene was cooooo.
and what OTHER character did Andy Serkis play in Kong? besides that guy that squinted one eye? |
he played Kong, in the same manner in which he portrayed gollum in Lord of the Rings
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Pippin | | He said in an interview that he'd have never thought his first romantic lead would be a huge monkey | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: brochu13 | |
| quote: |
Pippin said this in post #32 :
He said in an interview that he'd have never thought his first romantic lead would be a huge monkey |
Hey, his first romantic lead was Aragorn!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | Whoa, I didn't know he did the monkey stuff.
Movie was still lame.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: illuminate | | I didn't know Serkis played kong either. i saw it last night on the critics awards. that's cool. yeah the movie was aiiigghhhtttt | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | Yeah, so, what was he in some big robotic monkey suit? That must have been hard to control.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Pippin | | No, there were little motion-capture things stuck to his body and he acted the part, then they just edited the motions to be done by Kong. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | |
| quote: |
Pippin said this in post #39 :
No, there were little motion-capture things stuck to his body and he acted the part, then they just edited the motions to be done by Kong. |
I know, I kid, failed attempts at humor 
-HECK!
| | Reply To this Message
|
older polls Forum: Best Movie of 2005
|