Warning, thread contains War pics 'This is for the Americans That Were Murdered Here" |
| Posted by: nikiTa | | Dude, it's war, people die. Remember? It's a horrific thing. Remember? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Curley Joe | |
'Dude,' you betcha! Bring on the incendiary white-phosphorus and light-em-up good. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Curley Joe | | No Confirmation Zarqawi Was Killed in Raid
Monday, November 21, 2005
BAGHDAD, Iraq—U.S. forces sealed off a house in the northern city of Mosul where eight Al Qaeda members died in a gunfight — some by their own hand to avoid capture. The White House said Sunday that it was "highly unlikely" that the terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was among the dead. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | | Germans: Bush misused data to justify Iraq war
Informant's handlers say they repeatedly warned of unreliability.
By Bob Drogin and John Goetz
Special to The Morning Call
11/20/05 "McCall" -- -- BERLIN | The German intelligence officials responsible for one of the most important informants on Saddam Hussein's suspected weapons of mass destruction say that the Bush administration and the CIA repeatedly exaggerated his claims before the Iraq war.
Five senior officials from Germany's Federal Intelligence Service, or BND, said in interviews with the Los Angeles Times that they warned U.S. intelligence authorities that the source, an Iraqi defector code-named Curveball, never claimed to produce germ weapons and never saw anyone else do so. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | | The right to rule ourselves
Faced with US torture, killing and collective punishment of civilians, support for the Iraqi resistance is growing
By Haifa Zangana
11/19/05 "The Guardian" -- -- The photograph of an elderly Iraqi carrying the burned body of a child at Falluja, widely shown during the chemical weapons controversy of recent days, is almost a copy of an earlier one that Iraqis remember - from Halabja in March 1988. Both children were victims of chemical weapons: the first killed by a dictator who had no respect for democracy and human rights, the second by US troops, assisted by the British, carrying the colourful banner of those principles while sprinkling Iraqis with white phosphorus and depleted uranium. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | | Three Civilians Mistakenly Killed in Iraq By ANTONIO CASTANEDA, Associated
BAGHDAD, Iraq - U.S. forces mistakenly fired on a civilian vehicle outside an American base in a city north of Baghdad on Monday, killing three people, including a child, the military said. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | | Five members of Iraqi family shot dead by US soldiers 58 minutes ago
BAQUBA, Iraq (AFP) - Five members of an Iraqi family, three of them children, were shot dead when US forces opened fire on their car outside a military base northeast of Baghdad | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Inner City Blues | | Again Curley, stop pretending like you speak for the military or something. As far as I'm concerned you are nothing more than a cheerleader. Stop acting like you're supportive of the troops because you just cheerlead for the civilian leadership. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Whidden | |
Listen, we have a deal where we can post pics of WAR, and it's not to be censored.
However, I have to post a warning in the thread title, and it's not fair to the thread starter if I have to do so.
I had to erase part of Curleys thread title to make this happen.
I personally feel that posting pics of what is really happening is appropriate, but if it's going to mess with someones else thread, maybe we should think before we do it.
Some see that poor baby and can deal with it, others see it and get sick.
I'm just saying we should give it some thought before we post these images, and put a warning on the thread title.
Some do not want to see this, whether is real life and relevant or not.
I changed the thread title of this thread to contain the warning, but I had to edit out some of what was written.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: hazel_dragoneye | |
Who's child is that? Is that an American child or an Iraqi child?

| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: asantana | | from here
Military regulations
US military protocol prohibits the use of white phosphorus in civilian areas, unless approval is received from "above the division level". [8]. On the question of whether white phosphorus can be used against human targets, U.S. military training and doctrine (TRADOC) offers conflicting guidance. Although the Battle Book, published by the US Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth states that "It is against the law of land warfare to employ WP against personnel targets", [9] other training manuals do discuss the use of white phosphorus rounds against personnel. The US Marine Corps is reported to have issued guidance against using "flame weapons" (including white phosphorus) against personnel. [10]
There are at least three cases in which white phosphorus (WP) seems to have been used as an antipersonnel weapon in Iraq when significant civilian populations were present:
1. February 1991: The Iraqi military itself was accused of using WP as a chemical weapon against both combatants and non-combatants. A declassified 1995 US Department of Defense document, titled "Possible use of phosphorous chemical weapons by Iraq in Kurdish areas along the Iraqi-Turkish-Iranian borders," states that "Iraqi forces loyal to President Saddam (Hussein) may have possibly used white phosphorous chemical weapons against Kurdish rebels and the populace in Erbil and Dohuk." [11]
2. April 2004: In the first major US assault on Fallujah after the fall of Saddam Hussein's government, Darrin Mortenson of the North County Times in California reported that WP was used as a weapon. Embedded with the 2nd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment, Mortenson described one marine, a Cpl. Bogert, and his mortar team in action:
Bogert is a mortar team leader who directed his men to fire round after round of high explosives and white phosphorus charges into the city Friday and Saturday... The boom kicked dust around the pit as they ran through the drill again and again, sending a mixture of burning white phosphorus and high explosives they call "shake 'n' bake" into a cluster of buildings where insurgents have been spotted all week. [12]
London's Guardian newspaper among others, reported that the US military refused to allow many civilians to flee the city before the assault:
more here
At the checkpoint leaving Falluja towards Baghdad, women and children have been trying to leave, but in cars driven by men (women don't drive here) so they weren't allowed out. They are not letting men aged 14 to 45 - of "fighting age" - leave the city. [13]
3. November 2004: During Operation Phantom Fury (the second major assault on Fallujah), Washington Post reporters embedded with Task Force 2-2, Regimental Combat Team 7, wrote on November 9 2004 that "Some artillery guns fired white phosphorous rounds that create a screen of fire that cannot be extinguished with water." [14]
and if you want to enjoy looking at dead bodies of people killed by American troops be my guest but if you are a faint hearted then please dont try to click on the link | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Curley Joe | |
Hmmm, I dunno… Lemme see, what is the 'deferens' between charbroiling mass-murdering terrorist vermin-flesh that endeavors to blow up innocent children—Iraqi children—while American soldiers are handing out candy to them and searing a juicy all-American ground hamburger patty on the BBQ on the 4th? Not a 'vas deferens'—except the burger patty will look and taste better and it doesn't care much for celestial virgins.
Pass the mayo.
psuedo signature removed
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | asantana, please refrain from that kind of talk towards another member. No matter who it is.
CJ...... well... you know...  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: lodgebo | | WP is a nasty but legal weapon that is the harsh fact of it. It is very useful in removing enemies that are dug in but it is better used for cover.
I see that a lot of people are criticising the American for using it and that is fair enough but I must ask where is the criticism of other countries namely Russia who in attack on Grozny used only WP when they knew that women and children woul definitly be affected which is against the international laws on WP use. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Inner City Blues | |
| quote: |
Curley Joe said this in post #20 :
Hmmm, I dunno… Lemme see, what is the 'deferens' between charbroiling mass-murdering terrorist vermin-flesh that endeavors to blow up innocent children—Iraqi children—while American soldiers are handing out candy to them and searing a juicy all-American ground hamburger patty on the BBQ on the 4th? Not a 'vas deferens'—except the burger patty will look and taste better and it doesn't care much for celestial virgins.
Pass the mayo.
psuedo signature removed |
Curley Joe, don't try to make fun of people that make spelling errors, especially if English isn't their first language. It just shows that you actually have nothing of substance to say besides picking out spelling and grammatical errors. Grow up and stop being so immature.
| | Reply To this Message
|
graphic war photos Forum: Warning, thread contains War pics 'This is for the Americans That Were Murdered Here"
|