 |
 |
The Weasley PetsBook 6: HP & the Half-Blood Prince Forum |
| Pages: 1 | Original Forum Popular Forums Search |
| Posted by: Heatherhobbit | ||
Hogwarts rules specifically say that the only pets allowed are owls, toads, and cats. So why are the Weasley children allowed to have rats and pygmy puffs? Why were Scabbers and Arnold exceptions to this rule? | ||
| Reply To this Message | ||
| Posted by: flying panda | ||
I think they can bend the rules lightly, i think its more of a guide line than a rule, to stop people bringing dangerous creatures such as snakes or dragons | ||
| Reply To this Message | ||
| Posted by: Heatherhobbit | ||||
| ||||
| Reply To this Message | ||||
| Posted by: Lawless | ||
But no one knew that Scabbers wasn't really a rat.... | ||
| Reply To this Message | ||
| Posted by: fuscia | ||
Did anyone ever think that maybe they got away with it because they are poor? The Weasley's could not afford an owl or a cat, so they most likely got permission for the rat. Ginny more than likely snuck in Arnold. | ||
| Reply To this Message | ||
| Posted by: Heatherhobbit | ||
I agree with fuscia. They more than likely got away with alternate pets because of their financial status. | ||
| Reply To this Message | ||
| Posted by: flying panda | ||
im pritty sure Mrs weasley spoke to Dumbledore about it, or dumbledoe unsderstood there plight about there finantials | ||
| Reply To this Message | ||
| Pages: 1 | Free Forums Chat Forum |
Book 6: HP & the Half-Blood Prince Forum: The Weasley Pets
|
|