Horcruxes-if you haven't read the book, don't look in here! - Book 6: HP & the Half-Blood Prince

Horcruxes-if you haven't read the book, don't look in here!

Book 6: HP & the Half-Blood Prince Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: fuscia

Thread open to horcruxes. There are six. Two have been destroyed-TMR's Diary, and the Ring of Slytherin. What do you think are the others?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: peregr!n

Possibly the locked has been destroyed too, but we cant be sure of that.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Heatherhobbit

Does anyone have a strange feeling that Harry's scar is a Horcrux?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: peregr!n

I had that feeling, yeah. Seems right. It could be the "Gryffindor's something"

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

quote:
Heatherhobbit said this in post #3 :
Does anyone have a strange feeling that Harry's scar is a Horcrux?


Nope. Voldemort did not intend to give him the scar. He intended for Harry to die, so they is no way that the scar could be a horcrux.

I do wonder if the mirror's from Sirius were/ are horcruxes. They could have once belonged to Ravenclaw and Gryffindor. Think silver locket, silver cup, sliver mirrors?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: White Tiger

I expect that Nagini is one.

And the key to finding the Horcruxes is to find out who R.A.B is.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: uragit

i think RAB is sirius brother and i think that the gryffindor horcuxe is the sword that harry pulled out of the hat and maybe the hat it's self?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: V. S. Black

quote:
uragit said this in post #7 :
i think RAB is sirius brother


Regulus Black! Brilliant!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

No, Dumbledore categorically refuted the idea that the sword is a horcrux, and neither is Harry's scar.

Harry said that he has a feeling he needs to go to Godric's hollow. There may or may not be a horcrux there, but it seems to me that it is a place of immense importance to the story and the conclusion.

As for Regulus Black, one problem I find with this idea is that Sirius neither anyone else never seemed to have placed any importance on his intelligence. I don't know if Regulus was smart enough not only to have to have found out Voldemort's secret of horcruxes but also find where one of them was and also get a hold of it and destroy it.

M.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: peregr!n

Maybe Harry himself is an involuntary horcrux...just a thought.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: uragit

remember sirius said that regulus was killed on voldemorts command... maybe it was because he got freeked out by what he had found out and what he had... he left he note in the locket because he knew his master was going to find out and kill him

Reply To this Message

Posted by: V. S. Black

My instincts are telling me that Harry is carrying a part of Voldie's soul. If he is indeed a Horcrux, perhaps he recieved the better parts of Tom's soul along with his special tallents, such as his Parselmouth abilities. It makes their mind connection so much clearer to me, anyway. Sharing part of a soul does seem like it would give each of them access to either of their minds. We know that Voldemort is now occluding all the time. I think Voldemort has a healthy fear of their connection now.

There is also the fact that the Death Eaters were commanded not to bother with Harry, as was revealed in the end by Snape, and that he was only Voldemort's to deal with. Hmmm... Lucius already brought about the destruction of one Horcrux, maybe Voldie knows now not to let his D.E. deal with the other ones anymore.

As for Harry's sudden urge to visit Godric's Hallow, well, that's where it all began for Harry, really. I don't remember him ever seeing his parents graves, why shouldn't he go?

As for Regulus being the mysterious RAB, Harry owns the Black's ancesteral home and money vault now, perhaps he will find the Horcrux inside one of them... dunno.

This was the message in the fake locket:

To the Dark Lord
I know I will be dead long before you read this
but I want you to know that it was I who discovered your secret.
I have stolen the real Horcrux and intend to destroy it as soon as I can.
I face death in the hope that when you meet your match,
you will be mortal once more.
R.A.B.


First of all, I think only another Death Eater would address Voldemort as "The Dark Lord".

And besides, I think the person would have to be close to Voldemort, or at least somewhat trusted, to be able to discover a secret as well kept as this one. Unfortunately we don't know what it is exactly the person thought they knew. Did they find out everything? Or just about the locket and what it held?

The person obviously knew they would die for stealing the locket, and so we must assume they are now dead (but by what means is unknown). We know that Voldemort killed Regulus, but not why. Why would JK not explain why, unless there was a greater story behind his death, which we must to discover untill all has begun to be revealed?

Whoever this person is, they believed that destroying the locket would bring Voldemort closer to being mortal again, but we don't know if they actually got around to doing it, or even if they found a way to do it. What if it couldn't be destroyed? Dun-dun-DUN!

We don't even know any details on how Dumbledore destroyed the ring Horcrux, only that he was wearing it at some point (correct me if I'm wrong). Did he absorb the ring into his hand or something? If so, what of the soul inside it then? I find it very suspicious that Dumbledore would not tell Harry anything about it and what it did, or what curse was upon it, considering everything else he was telling Harry about Voldemort and his Horcruxes.

I have this sneaking feeling that Dumbledore knew he was going to die anyway, and was setting it up that in the end when it happened, Harry would be able to carry on his task of destroying Voldemort without him, and because of Snapes vow, that Draco would be spared and given a chance to redeem himself.

And GEEEZE don't even get me going on Snape! Arrrrrgh. Maybe I'm just reading too much into things. *bangs head on keyboard*

Oh well... as you can see I could go on and on about this. lol I think I'll stop here and let everyone have a chance to digest my theories and observations. Sorry for the long post and any spelling mistakes I might have made, I was up late reading. :P

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

quote:
What if it couldn't be destroyed? Dun-dun-DUN!


I dont think that any of the Horcruxes "cant be destroyed", I suspect that that R A B knew he would die soon after he either touched it, or wore it. possible destroying it ... after all Dumbledore said he would have died had it not been for snape, when he put on the ring, sacrafising his hand
Reply To this Message

Posted by: agent mike

Great post V.S. Black. Sirius actually mentioned having an uncle called Alphard and there seems to be a tradition in wizarding familes in which people's first names become the middle names of their offspring. Therefore, R.A.B. could be Regulus Alphard Black.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

quote:

We don't even know any details on how Dumbledore destroyed the ring Horcrux, only that he was wearing it at some point (correct me if I'm wrong). Did he absorb the ring into his hand or something? If so, what of the soul inside it then? I find it very suspicious that Dumbledore would not tell Harry anything about it and what it did, or what curse was upon it, considering everything else he was telling Harry about Voldemort and his Horcruxes.


Thats a good theory about him absorbing the ring, that might be how you have to distroy it, have it absorbed into your body, and die. He knew how to get to the necklece, about what the potion would do prity correctly, so maybe he had been there before and swopped the real necklace for a fake, putting the note inside (possibly he knows that you can only absorb (if thats what he did with the ring) one of the Horcruxes, so he sent the necklace to someone else (The RAB maybe, who is looking after it. maybe RAB is the initials of an old nickname that dumbledore used to have (just a wild thought) i have alkways thought that that bar tender in hogs head is a relitive of Dumbledore i think when they first introduced him he remineded him of someone (dumbledore) and maybe he has the necklace.) I also think he was ( ) better at divination than he lets on, he seemed to get alot right (although that might be through his vast experience and connetions)

Another theory i have about the disapearing ring is that the Horcruxes was distroyed when he wore it, and just left the ring. (we saw it on the table once) and then Dumbledore sent it off for safe keeping.

quote:
I have this sneaking feeling that Dumbledore knew he was going to die anyway, and was setting it up that in the end when it happened, Harry would be able to carry on his task of destroying Voldemort without him, and because of Snapes vow, that Draco would be spared and given a chance to redeem himself.


Im not too sure if Dumbledore did know about the unbreakable vow. He only knew that stuff about what malfoy was up to because of what Harry told him (very trusting). From what Treawney said teachers know about the Room of Requirement, so dumbledore may have seen the cuboard but thought it brocken, and that Malfoy may be mending it, but knowing he must die, he left it.

quote:
And GEEEZE don't even get me going on Snape! Arrrrrgh. Maybe I'm just reading too much into things. *bangs head on keyboard*

Oh well... as you can see I could go on and on about this. lol I think I'll stop here and let everyone have a chance to digest my theories and observations. Sorry for the long post and any spelling mistakes I might have made, I was up late reading. :P


Wasn't that long, but besides i liked your opinions about it.

My spelling is atrosious as well
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Yes, i think it might have been Sirous' cusin (spl) you never know he might have been a double agent like snape, and helped dumbledore find them ... or not

Reply To this Message

Posted by: V. S. Black

quote:
agent mike said this in post #14 :
Sirius actually mentioned having an uncle called Alphard and there seems to be a tradition in wizarding familes in which people's first names become the middle names of their offspring.


Brilliant! Thanks for that bit of info.

As for not being able to destroy any of the Horcruxes, it's possible that Voldemort put protections or curses on them, such as he had on the cave the locket was retrieved from. Maybe in order to destroy the ring, one must die along with it. Perhaps Snape could only buy Dumbledore a bit of time, time enough to explain all he knew about Voldemort to Harry and then retrieve the locket. Yes, he didn't seem rushed in letting Harry in on everything, but perhaps that was because he was waiting for Harry to retrieve the altered memory from Slughorn and then figure out the rest. I feel that this objective was the main reason Dumbledore wanted Slughorn at Hogwarts in the first place. To figure out how many Horcruxes there might actually be.

I wonder... Does anyone else think that Dumbledore wouldn't have drank that potion in the cave unless he already knew what it was? He had a perfectly good Potions Master to confer with.

And tell me THIS. Why would Dumbledore put Snape in the DADA possition when he KNEW that Voldemort had cursed the possition. WHY knowing that Snape would eventually be booted out by the curse? UNLESS that was what was planned all along. OOoooooooo.... there's one to think on.

Really there are too many possibilities to know for sure, but perhaps in the end I am only too hopeful that Snape turns out good in the end in spite of his betrayal.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

quote:
Maybe in order to destroy the ring, one must die along with it.


Thats kind of what i tried to say.

quote:
I wonder... Does anyone else think that Dumbledore wouldn't have drank that potion in the cave unless he already knew what it was? He had a perfectly good Potions Master to confer with.


He did know what it did, he described what would happen to a tee, and he said he taught Tom, and new his style
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

This book makes things very complicated, lots of different possibilitys. And interpritations, the 6th and 7th book is one story split into two, and thats what makes it confuing, because we were left in the middle of a story, and unlike the other books, where harry went back to the dursley's for a summer, this one is left open ended, what will happen to harry? ... he seems to have taken up what Dumbledore was doing, he went around to the important places (the cave, Toms parents house, and possibly mopre places, he had been gone days at a time)

Reply To this Message

Posted by: uragit

i love this part after a book... its so exciting

Reply To this Message

Posted by: V. S. Black

*rubs hands together* It's time for the second reading apparently. lol... I'm already forgetting things. :P

Reply To this Message

Posted by: uragit

i still ahvent digestied the first reading but i think that i am going to look back into my socail like for a day or two and then go back and read it

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

quote:
agent mike said this in post #14 :
Great post V.S. Black. Sirius actually mentioned having an uncle called Alphard and there seems to be a tradition in wizarding familes in which people's first names become the middle names of their offspring. Therefore, R.A.B. could be Regulus Alphard Black.


Yes, that would make sense. That uncle could be the one. I think it was either him or Regalus.

As for the ring, notice that it was cracked. So, Dumbldore had broken the ring, breaking the horcrux.

Harry could not be the Horcrux. You do not create one by accident. Voldiepoo set out to kill Harry, and he had no clue that the spell would backfire on him, so Harry's scar could not be a horcrux.

Welcome back everyone!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

I dont think the crack in the ring was Dumbledore, it was cracked when Voldemorts grandfather had it as well

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Why didnt this RAB get the ring as well? if he knew about the Horcruxes he would know what sort of items to look for. or did he only think he had done it once?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

I think the first mention of the crack is when Dumbledore has it. When Marvolo is wearing it, there is not a description of the crack.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

The phoenix at the end. Did anyone else think when the tomb went over the body, and Harry thought he saw a bird, that maybe just maybe that Dumbledore had his own Horcrux? COS-
he said that as long as help was needed it would be give to those that were loyal to him. Well, what if Fawkes is Dumbledore's Horcrux?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

quote:
V. S. Black said this in post #17 :
Really there are too many possibilities to know for sure, but perhaps in the end I am only too hopeful that Snape turns out good in the end in spite of his betrayal.


Yeah, I agree that you are being too hopeful. Rowling described him to have a look of revulsion and hatred on his face before he killed Dumbledore, and I really doubt it was revulsion and hatred for Voldemort. Snape knew all along what he would have to do.

M.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

quote:
fuscia said this in post #27 :
The phoenix at the end. Did anyone else think when the tomb went over the body, and Harry thought he saw a bird, that maybe just maybe that Dumbledore had his own Horcrux? COS-
he said that as long as help was needed it would be give to those that were loyal to him. Well, what if Fawkes is Dumbledore's Horcrux?


Fuscilli, you are forgetting that you have to kill to make a horcrux. It is one of the most advanced forms of dark magic and very malicious. Plus if Dumbledore had made a horcrux, he wouldn't have died after Snape hit him with the curse. And lastly, Dumbledore was never afraid of death and neither did he wish immortality.

M.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

quote:
fuscia said this in post #27 :
The phoenix at the end. Did anyone else think when the tomb went over the body, and Harry thought he saw a bird, that maybe just maybe that Dumbledore had his own Horcrux? COS-
he said that as long as help was needed it would be give to those that were loyal to him. Well, what if Fawkes is Dumbledore's Horcrux?


I supose he would have killed a few Dark wizards, but i think hes too trusting to kill
Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

Ah that is right, he had to have killed, BUT he did defeat the Dark Wizard Grindewald. SO he could have killed him way back then. Dumbledore did not fear death, but he might have created one to have part of himself around to help Harry.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

I don't know if Dumbledore would stoop so low as to create a horcrux. And he defeated that wizard a long time ago, even before Voldemort was born.

As for a part of him, he already has his portrait in his office, and who knows where Fawkes went? There might be more to that phoenix too.

M.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

There are many that think it/ Fawkes is Godrick Gryffindor.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: V. S. Black

What do you think would happen if you threw a Horcrux into "the veil" that Sirius fell through?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

quote:
V. S. Black said this in post #34 :
What do you think would happen if you threw a Horcrux into "the veil" that Sirius fell through?



OOOOO. What a wicked idea. I love it! I think the Horcrux would "die".


So we know that Voldiepoo likes his trophies. He has to find places to keep his horcruxes, and obviously, the Malfoy's manor isn't going to be one of them. Where are they likely to be?

I think there will be one buried in the rubble of the Potter Place. I think he may have had it with him, and it got dropped when he had to flee his body.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Do you think when Harry's parents died people sifted though the rubble? If not, Voldemorts dead body might be there, because his body must of died but his soul surevived.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

We know that Hagrid sifted through the rubble to get Harry out of there. I would assume that they only went in to recover the bodies for burial.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Well, hopfully we will se in Book 7

Reply To this Message

Posted by: daemon17

Considering it will have been 16 years since voldmorts death, I highly doubt that voldmorts corpse would still be there, even if it had been left there, which I also highly doubt.

I also really doubt any speculation that there is a horcrux at harrys old house, or that voldmort had it with him. Voldmort made a big deal out of hiding his horcruxes, i doubt that he would carry one in his back pocket.

As for Harry being a horcrux, I agree with fuscia that it is not possible, not only because Voldmort did not expect that the avada kedavra spell would backfire, but because the prophecy says " neither can live while the other survives". If Harry tried to kill voldmort, and part of voldmorts soul was still in harry.. well then Harry would have to kill himself, in order to kill voldmort. And if voldmorts soul is in Harry, then Harry living, would make sure that voldmort did survive.. so it would contradict the prophecy. That sounds more like a two for one sale, than an either/ or kind of thing. I highly doubt it would work, and Voldmort said in the 4th book that he put a lot of effort into making the horcurxes. Voldmort didn't even know about Harry until the prophecy, he'd never even seen the boy, nor would the boy have had any historical significance like the locket and the founders items.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: V. S. Black

Book 5, chapter six, bottom of pg.116

Wish I would have found it first, but I can't take credit for it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: daemon17

ahhhh, yes I see it now.

Hm, that is interesting.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

They never did say if Sirius smashed the locket or what became of it. Kreacher being Harry's new elf could retrieve it for him.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Kreacher might have kept it, like he did so many other tings in his cubourd

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

and all Harry has to do is Order him to destroy it. MWHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

He could order both dobby and Kretchler to distroy them all and not tell anybody about what they are up to, and not been seen, caught or detected ...

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

I loved it when Dobby was beating up Kreacher. That was cool. Dobby could just observe.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: daemon17

Hm, I'm also suspicious of Borgin and Burkes. We know that Mr. Burkes was the one that originally bought the locket off of Voldmorts mother, and was the one who sent Tom to Hepzibah, where he first recognized it as the heirloom of Slytherin.

We know that tom stole the locket and the golden hufflepuff cup, and then left the shop. However in the second and sixth book only Mr. Borgin was in the shop. Both men have surnames that begin with B. I wonder if Tom made the mistake of telling Burkes where he was going with the locket, and if it was Burkes who took the locket later on, after all working with him could have shown him just who Tom really was. It could explain the reason why Mr. Burke has not been seen in the present store yet. Also, the store Borgin and Burkes does seem to work very closely with death eaters. Especially after the vanishing cabinet inccident. I think it would be highly likely that at least one of Boring and Burkes is or was a death eater.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

quote:
Hepzibah,


???
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

quote:
golden hufflepuff cup,


Silver, i think
Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

Brilliant. That really would explain a lot. I think that will be my favorite theory.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

i like that theory too

Reply To this Message

Posted by: daemon17

quote:
flying panda said this in post #49 :


Silver, i think



nope it was definetly gold

" She opened the lid. Harry edged foward a little to get a better view and saw what looked like a small golden cup with two finely wrought handles."

I thought it was silver too. When Mundungus dropped the silver cup in front of Harry, when he was caught stealing, I thought for sure that there had to have been more cups or goblets of the sort, and that even if the one Harry picked up had the Black crest on it, that other cups Mundungus was carrying could have been hufflepuff. Then I looked back and saw that it was gold, and different from what Mundungus was carrying. Although Mundungus could have stolen it, I find it highly doubtful that the Blacks would have held two horcruxes, if the locket Harry found was one. The fact that it was gold and not silver also put doubt in my mind.

I still think Sirius's brother took the locket.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

That would be a reason for Regalus to be killed.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

If Voldemort knew what Regulus did, he would make another horcrux, but as far as we know he hasn't. I really doubt Voldemort knows that one of his horcruxes has been destroyed (apart from his diary).

M.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

but he wouldn't make another. He wanted his soul split only into 7 parts because that is the most magical number.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

Yeah, but then why would the locket and the note still be there? Voldemort wouldn't want someone to know that a horcrux has been destroyed.

M.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Voldemort never got the note, therefore never knew it was taken. Remember Dumbeldore said that Voldemort made the Horcuxes so long ago he no longer fells them, or has a connection with them

Reply To this Message

Posted by: daemon17

ahhh, but maybe Voldmort knew that it wasn't destroyed.

I think it's highly possible that Regulus tried to take the locket, and tried to destroy it, but couldn't. To quote pg 112 in the 5th book. " From what I found out after he died, he got so far, then panicked about what he was being asked to do and tried to back out."

Tried to back out of what? Is it possible that he stole the locket, but then chickened out when it came to destrying it? The book never says that Voldmort asked him to do anything.. simply that someone asked him to do something. Is it possible that after he died, the family which was dedicated to Voldmort offered to keep the locket safe in return for what their son did when he betrayed the dark lord? And if so then it wouldnt have been nessecary for voldmort to go and find the note. In fact it probably would have been safer to leave it there, so as to trick anyone that was trying to find it... like Dumbledore and Harry.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

(remember that UK and US copies have different pages)

Good point

Reply To this Message

Posted by: V. S. Black

quote:
flying panda said this in post #59 :
(remember that UK and US copies have different pages)


Opps. :P I guess my page numbers are worthless then. This is the paragraph in book 5, chapter 6 I was talking about.

"...There was a musical box that emitted a faintly sinister, tinkling tune when wound, and they all found themselves becoming curiously weak and sleepy, until Ginny had the sense to slam the lid shut; a heavy locket that none of them could open; a number of ancient seals; and, in a dusty box, an Order of Merlin, First Class, that had been awarded to Sirius's grandfather for 'services to the Ministry'..."

The locket no one could open, found in number 12, Grimmauld Place, is what I wanted people to take notice of.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: daemon17

I also think that number 12 Grimmauld place, is very important.. more important than just being headquarters of the order.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

Something no one has brought up, at least I don't think anyone has yet, to get to the locket and successfully get it, you need TWO people. R.A.B. had to have had a helper-or perhaps a servant

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Its been mentioned beofre, i think the person who mentioned it thought Krechler ... but possibly someone else. Harry can now make Krechler tell him stuff about the deatheaters as well.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: daemon17

quote:
fuscia said this in post #62 :
Something no one has brought up, at least I don't think anyone has yet, to get to the locket and successfully get it, you need TWO people. R.A.B. had to have had a helper-or perhaps a servant



Again, this is also where I see borgin and burkes coming in. There were two of them, and they were already business partners...
Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

I think you may be right about B & B. Notice that she has NEVER metioned either of their first names. Perhaps it was also a grude for Voldie stealing Hepizbahs stuff. You just never know with JKR.

IF you were Voldie, where would you hide the other horcruxes?

AND an odd though. Dementors can suck out a soul, so it would have to be someplace that a dementor could not get it. I will go on record as saying that at least one part of Voldies soul will be devoured by a dementor.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

That would be awesome. How about Harry feeds the last part of Voldemort's soul that is inside him to a dementor? I can just see a dementor and Voldemort engaged in a liplock.

M.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Thats an interesting thought, but arn't Dementors drawn to happiness, not the soul itself?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

quote:
flying panda said this in post #67 :
Thats an interesting thought, but arn't Dementors drawn to happiness, not the soul itself?


You show your ignorance once again. And you dare to call yourself a Harry Potter fan. Shameful.

I am kidding about that, but remember, a dementor's 'kiss' sucks the soul out of the body.

M.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Yes but they also suck all happiness out of you, without kissing.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

Voldemort knows happiness in a twisted way. He derives happiness at the expense of others. Finding a soul just away from the body would be an easy snack.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

quote:
flying panda said this in post #69 :
Yes but they also suck all happiness out of you, without kissing.


Yes they do, we all know that, but we are talking about the soul dude.

M.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

You are also talking about Dementors, they dont look for souls, they look for happiness, and the soul segmants have been away from volde that he doesnt feel them, and they arnt apart from him

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Maja88

quote:
fuscia said this in post #65 :
I think you may be right about B & B. Notice that she has NEVER metioned either of their first names. Perhaps it was also a grude for Voldie stealing Hepizbahs stuff. You just never know with JKR.


Actually, she did mention Burke's first name in HBP, I just noticed it today, it's Caractacus (pg. 245, british edition). Still, it leaves the discussion open about Borgin...
I love the idea about RAB being Regulus-Something-Black. Even though everybody thinks he was weak and stupid and whatever, remember that his brother was also misunderstood for a long time... . About this whole souls/happiness discussion: could it be that the soul is, like, the main nutrition and happiness is some kind of spice or topping on it, in dementor's perspective? So now, adityamahesh and FP, ur both right!
BTW, do you think dementors would like to suck Voldemort's soul? I bet it tastes something like rotten tomatoes and stinky socks but anyway - if the dementors are under Voldie's command, do you think they're allowed to do things like sucking parts of his soul? Are they reasonable enough to restrain themselves from doing it? I just can't realise exactly what Dementors are - sophisticated demons or monsters that irationally destroy whatever's on their way.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Whats the point in sucking Voles soul? he has no happines, it would just be left with sadness anyway ... i wonder what would happen if volde gets kissed by a dementor (apart from it being his first kiss and its not killing him is it ...

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

If you are soulless, then you are just a shell. That would be a horrible existence. I seriously doubt that Voldie has marked his horcruxes as "property of Lord Voldemort". So how would a dementor know whos soul it is.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

I can just imagine the horcruxes being marked as "Property of Lord Voldemort, chairman of Death Eaters, Ltd."

(For the ignorant, England has companies register as Ltd. instead of Inc.)

M.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

Now M, it would also have to say
"Property of Lord Voldemort, heir of Salazar Slytherin, most powerful wizard in the world* too.


note- Lord Voldemort has yet to defeat Harry Potter, but he is confident that he will sometime in the future.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

I received a pm from a very nice person who has not posted yet in the forum. This person thinks that the last horcrux is Harry. Well, I respectfully disagree. Harry can not be the last horcrux. A horcrux is made with deliberation. Harry must destroy the last horcrux before he can kill Voldemort, so unless he can kill himself then kill Voldie from the grave, he can not be it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: gaboman

You know, I think... perhaps Voldemort DID deliberate turning Harry into a Horcrux.

The prophecy... if you think about it... if Voldy heard that... perhaps he thought his best bet was to turn his arch nemesessi... messi... nemesis... into a Horcrux. That way, he'd know that the only way for them to destroy Voldemort would be to kill Harry... and ta-da, you have Voldemort's motive for doing so.

Just an idea, though.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

Well, remember that "Scar" is supposed to be the very last word. Maybe the scar is finally gone, because it's destroyed.

I just don't see Harry dying at the end of this series.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

How would he destroy the scar and not himself? I just don't think that Voldie could have done it. He went there intending to kill Harry, not make him into a horcrux. If Harry had died, then the horcrux/Harry would have been no good.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

That's what I'm talking about... I just don't see how it could be him, or the scar, because it would have to destroy him... unless she's really got something sneaky up her sleeve.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

I think that the scar will go away once Voldie dies because the link between the two will be broken.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

That's what I think too... I've said that for a very long time.

But, there is the possibility that it will always be there, as a reminder of what he went through.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: gaboman

I just think the idea of Harry being a Horcrux shouldn't be discounted. I mean, it just makes sense that Voldemort could make a Horcrux of Harry, knowing that he's the only one with the power to vanquish him.

Though I'd dearly hope that if it ends up true, they can find a way to destroy the horcrux without, like, killing Harry and that.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

But if Harry is one of those Horsenuts things, then if Voldie killed Harry, wouldn't Voldie get jacked up too?

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

No .. .all the Horcux's have to be destroyed ... if harry distroyed them all but then got killed ... someone else would be able to kill Voldie, but he wouldnt die because of it ... he still holds a part of his soul

Reply To this Message

Posted by: gaboman

The problem with that is that Harry is the one (the only one? Hmmm) with the power to vanquish the dark lord, like the prophecy says.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

thats only if they follow the prophecy ... if they both turn away and ignore the prophcy then it wont come true

Reply To this Message

Posted by: gaboman

They wouldn't ignore the prophecy, though. Harry WANTS to kill Voldemort.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

Does he? Does he really want to kill? OK he hates him because he kille everyone harry's ever loved, but he is full of love.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: gaboman

Hehehe well, I think he does... Really, really, really does

Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Book 6: HP & the Half-Blood Prince Forum: Horcruxes-if you haven't read the book, don't look in here!

Forum Forum Forum