Off Topic rants against other members |
| Posted by: nikiTa | |
| quote: |
| NOTE from the Senior Mod. This thread contains off-topic rants from numerous threads on the site. |
| quote: |
| NOTE from the Senior Mod. These first few posts were split from one in the Art Forum. |
| quote: |
the_way_it_is said this in post #865 :
Baigneuse Assis au Bord de la Mer 1930
Image Linked
|
I hope **** isn't lurking the board with this one around. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: adityamahesh | | Redundancy abounds. Do we need a word and a smiley that represents the word together? 
M. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | |
| quote: |
the_way_it_is said this in post #879 :
<Edited on requst of author.>
|
I am not referring to his "artistic taste." 
And he probably won't comment, you are right.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Delta | |
| quote: |
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #884 :
I am not referring to his "artistic taste."
And he probably won't comment, you are right. |
CEASE AND DESIST this personal stuff on this thread no more Lets stick to ArT
Each of us has issues and we as friends should keep them t ourselves not splash them under the guise of helpful interest
D
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Flutterbywingz | | You're right, Delta. Perhaps what's private should remain private, which is the way I have always prefered it.  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | |
| quote: |
| NOTE from the Senior Mod. This thread was split from one in Culture and Society about black's receiving the death penalty more than other groups. |
mystic
I've read and followed the thread from its inception, in fact I was one of the original posters when it was in another forum.
And yes, Malcolm does have a tendancy to point toward Jews, but its obvious by his obvious research that he is open to looking at Israel differently because of their stance against capital punishment.
And my reference to nosiness is just pointing it back to you, because it seems that you have confused concern for others and concern for the society in which we live as nosiness. In that case, perhaps we should all live in a bubble and not be concerned about how different people are affected by others. We live in a culture and society, how people act, even though you may not know them personally affects this society as a whole...
otherwise perhaps we all should be allotted our own personal island on which to live.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #90 :
mystic
I've read and followed the thread from its inception, in fact I was one of the original posters when it was in another forum.
And yes, Malcolm does have a tendancy to point toward Jews, but its obvious by his obvious research that he is open to looking at Israel differently because of their stance against capital punishment.
And my reference to nosiness is just pointing it back to you, because it seems that you have confused concern for others and concern for the society in which we live as nosiness. In that case, perhaps we should all live in a bubble and not be concerned about how different people are affected by others. We live in a culture and society, how people act, even though you may not know them personally affects this society as a whole...
otherwise perhaps we all should be allotted our own personal island on which to live. |
When one want to press their standards on others....thats being nosy. When people ask questions and others try to expand on it because the first person never did, thats just being interested in what their underlying statement is...
Get the difference? I hope so...because it seems pretty easy to most...but I realize that for some that might be difficult to absorb.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #91 :
When one want to press their standards on others....thats being nosy.
NO! That is an impossibility. You cannot make someone live up to your standards. Get the difference?
When people ask questions and others try to expand on it because the first person never did, thats just being interested in what their underlying statement is...
And when the first person is irresponsive to your questions and/or says they do not want to answer your questions but instead wants to stick to the topic....and that requestor continues to ask and ask and ask and ask...that's being pushy and manipulative. Get the difference?
|
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
| You cannot make someone live up to your standards. |
Please try and remember that when you are so pushing your religion on others!
| quote: |
| And when the first person is irresponsive to your questions and/or says they do not want to answer your questions but instead wants to stick to the topic....and that requestor continues to ask and ask and ask and ask...that's being pushy and manipulative. Get the difference? |
If someone doesnt want people to comment and discuss something, then they shouldnt pose the question. And then when they pose ANOTHER one about something else and people comment, then why do they pose that question?
Whats the point in asking questions if you dont want people to comment....duh! Please try and put some thought into it...its really so very logical....when someone asks a question, people tend to comment and ask questions back, and then when someone comments again, then again, people will comment back..
Do you really need an interpreter to understand that? 
He brought it up, and I only asked what it is he was looking for. I dont see the problem in that..the only reason he said that I was off topic is because he didnt want to answer, or maybe he cant, I dont know. I dont care if I was being pushy or not...if someone publically states something, then why wouldnt we wonder what it is he wanted....I wouldnt call that manipulative though...maybe a dictionary would work for you because that word doesnt fit in this case.
Maybe its possible to let this go and get back on topic at this point..because this little nusiance is getting boring....anyhow, I thought you were ignoring me...please feel free to do so.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sierradaddy | |
| quote: |
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #87 :
MalcolmX
Again, OJ Simpson as an example, he was rich and Black. He wasn't convicted because he was rich, not because of His race. In fact he could afford a defense team who could play on the emotion of the injustices seen awarded to so many Black and Hispanics. This case was a huge disservice to the Blacks facing such injustices every day, who in many cases have been proven through DNA evidence to be innocent.
|
I'd agree and disagree. His wealth, AND maybe more importantly his fame and stature in the black community, allowed for him to secure lawyers who could properly and effectively reach out to the black community, drumming up massive support and causing concern among law enforcement and other areas of the government regarding another possible scene like the LA riots if a guilty verdict came back. And the riots wouldn't have only been in LA. They would've been all over, wherever there were large black communities that were openly supportive of OJ. Not to mention in Canada; Toronto and Montreal especially. Hell, Toronto rioted at the same time as LA did, albeit to a much lesser extent.
OJ's situation became POLITICAL, because of his wealth, fame, and his status as a role model in the black community. I'd say his race DID have a part to play, as well as his money. When you have politics on your side, you generally can get away with ANYTHING. When you have enough money, you can GET politics on your side...
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Sierradaddy said this in post #94 :
I'd agree and disagree. His wealth, AND maybe more importantly his fame and stature in the black community, allowed for him to secure lawyers who could properly and effectively reach out to the black community, drumming up massive support and causing concern among law enforcement and other areas of the government regarding another possible scene like the LA riots if a guilty verdict came back. And the riots wouldn't have only been in LA. They would've been all over, wherever there were large black communities that were openly supportive of OJ. Not to mention in Canada; Toronto and Montreal especially. Hell, Toronto rioted at the same time as LA did, albeit to a much lesser extent.
OJ's situation became POLITICAL, because of his wealth, fame, and his status as a role model in the black community. I'd say his race DID have a part to play, as well as his money. When you have politics on your side, you generally can get away with ANYTHING. When you have enough money, you can GET politics on your side... |
Good point Sierra.
BUT...let me ask you a question if I may..
OJ obviously played the race card in his trial...it worked for him...
Im curious though...do you think that the black community should have been so supportive of him? Maybe I dont know for sure...but I always figured that OJ used the black community when it was convenient for him, and then he stayed away from them after that...and even before that.
Am I wrong about that?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #93 :
Please try and remember that when you are so pushing your religion on others!
If someone doesnt want people to comment and discuss something, then they shouldnt pose the question. And then when they pose ANOTHER one about something else and people comment, then why do they pose that question?
Whats the point in asking questions if you dont want people to comment....duh! Please try and put some thought into it...its really so very logical....when someone asks a question, people tend to comment and ask questions back, and then when someone comments again, then again, people will comment back..
It's the constant badgering and badgering and badgering and badgering that is offensive. Asking once yes, but a constant rhetoric and dialogue with yourself because someone will not answer your question is way too much for the palate to take...and I am glad Malcolm told you to back off.
He brought it up, and I only asked what it is he was looking for. I dont see the problem in that..the only reason he said that I was off topic is because he didnt want to answer, or maybe he cant, I dont know. I dont care if I was being pushy or not...if someone publically states something, then why wouldnt we wonder what it is he wanted....I wouldnt call that manipulative though...maybe a dictionary would work for you because that word doesnt fit in this case.
Maybe its possible to let this go and get back on topic at this point..because this little nusiance is getting boring....anyhow, I thought you were ignoring me...please feel free to do so.
|
Correct the topic at hand is what's important....
Perhaps you could give additional insight from Sierradaddy's insight on my thought provoking and insightful POST #87.....
I noticed how you skipped that....I do believe it may give you some insight into what it possibly may be like to be a Black man living in America....
even though I am not a black man...but I am concerned enough about the struggle to want to be curious enough (you would term nosy) to delve into such issues.
I believe that the cards are stacked up against Black men in America more so than any other demographic...perhaps compassion can be a nosy thing to you, but it is important if you really want to find out why people act and speak the things they do.
And I won't be ignoring your posts because I do find them, uh, entertaining? 
By the way religion cannot be forced down anyone's throat, just like a billboard with a sexy woman and vodka cannot necessarily make me have sex with a woman while drinking vodka.
(This is an analogy brought up to make you see that behavior and beliefs cannot be forced upon anyone. And to think that people think that this is altogether possible makes me chuckle very loudly.)
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | |
| quote: |
Sierradaddy said this in post #94 :
I'd agree and disagree. His wealth, AND maybe more importantly his fame and stature in the black community, allowed for him to secure lawyers who could properly and effectively reach out to the black community, drumming up massive support and causing concern among law enforcement and other areas of the government regarding another possible scene like the LA riots if a guilty verdict came back. And the riots wouldn't have only been in LA. They would've been all over, wherever there were large black communities that were openly supportive of OJ. Not to mention in Canada; Toronto and Montreal especially. Hell, Toronto rioted at the same time as LA did, albeit to a much lesser extent.
OJ's situation became POLITICAL, because of his wealth, fame, and his status as a role model in the black community. I'd say his race DID have a part to play, as well as his money. When you have politics on your side, you generally can get away with ANYTHING. When you have enough money, you can GET politics on your side... |
That's interesting.
What do you mean by political in this instance?
Local government, state, federal....or do you mean just the basic politics of influence through power and money and status.
Because what political figures/groups do you believe were on his side...other than the race card?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Ken NJ | | People are invested emotionally to those that are within their comfort zone. OJ is no more investing with non-blacks economically as he is perceived detached to the black community. What is not generally known is that he makes his riches from no barriers and he brings home the bacon back to his neighborhood and churches giving large donations. OJ supported people of all color and causes. Therefore, he was embraced by a larger segment of the population. The same goes for MJ with his generous contributions to the world and kids. In fact the Friday night before the double murder, he donated $25,000 dollars attending a Tuxedo Fundraising affair with Barbieri. He crossed that color barrier, as opposed to many who couldn't pass own comfort zone.
Take for instance today with the announcement of Sandra Day O'conner Retirement. The women's groups and moderates are clamouring over the lost of their swing vote that decided 3/4 of the 195 of the 5-4 decisions in the U.S. Supreme Court. Many feel very uncomfortable with this critical shift which they don't embrace and fear own values being attacked, eg. abortion right, women's rights whatever. Their fears are exhibiting outside of own comfort zone. The same with Blacks who felt their role model was being taken down but many from mainstream thought Blacks shouldn't support him. I wonder how many women who feel a male should replace Justice O'conner. Will Bush nominate another female? Or will he nominate another Hispanic? Many can't embrace issues away from home. That goes on all the time. I really don't care what color OJ is, but that people should be guaranteed a fair trial under the Constitution. That goes for Michael Jackson whatever color people labeled him along with Scott Peterson, Martha Stewart, Bryant Koby or whatever trial here.
http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/ap/20050701/capt.aru10407012108.aruba_missing_teen_aru104.jpg?x=180&y=268&sig=7eg_O4CsatbLx4pQDIkeJA--Aruba's Attorney General Karin Janssen can't produce Natalee's dead body as evidence.
As to Natalee Holloway trial in Aruba, that's totally a different matter because Dutch law is different than American jurisprudence. That is another media frenzy along with Justice O'conner retiring. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #96 :
And I won't be ignoring your posts because I do find them, uh, entertaining? |
Oh..so you lied then! As if thats something new!
Oh well...you might find mine entertaining...but its better than trite, which is the way I find yours.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Ken NJ said this in post #98 :
I really don't care what color OJ is, but that people should be guaranteed a fair trial under the Constitution. That goes for Michael Jackson whatever color people labeled him along with Scott Peterson, Martha Stewart, Bryant Koby or whatever trial here. |
Hi Ken!
Of course you know I agree with that...but there are many times when the jury members put their emotions first before the instructions given to them at the trial...
I mean how many times have we seen a person who had more than enough evidence to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt get off, while we see people with virtually no evidence against them go to jail because some jury went with their gut feeling first?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sierradaddy | |
| quote: |
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #97 :
That's interesting.
What do you mean by political in this instance?
Local government, state, federal....or do you mean just the basic politics of influence through power and money and status.
Because what political figures/groups do you believe were on his side...other than the race card? |
It was less about prominent political figures that were siding with OJ, and more about the media spin, and the ongoing discussion about the case within the black community. Not too long before the trial, there was also the riots in LA. There was a political pressure regarding racism within the police of LA that was still very present, and ready to boil up to the surface again if the trial went in a certain direction.
A lot of people who didn't have a political voice were backing OJ, and others, like Jesse Jackson if I remember correctly, who DID have a political platform from which to express themselves, also were siding with OJ, or at least making mention of the racism issue, which also had an effect on the community.
Now, those who WERE political figures were obviously aware of this, and so would the courts have known as well. For them to have stayed totally out of it doesn't sound reasonable to me. I'd think they would've wanted to avoid any uprisings that were similar to the riots.
Of course, these are just my opinions.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | | kennj said:
| quote: |
| I really don't care what color OJ is, but that people should be guaranteed a fair trial under the Constitution. |
I completely, wholeheartedly agree.
The problem is...for all the high profile trials that come around on a quarterly basis, there are hundreds perhaps thousands of similar trials that do not go under the microscope of the media blitzkrieg. And its these trials where more injustices have the opportunity to ferment and go unnoticed.
Plus you have to consider Nicole and her friend and the fact that justice was not served in their murders....even if it wasn't OJ or it was OJ, no one was convicted for their murders. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #103 :
But remember mystic, this thread is not about you and me and our little "love affair."
|
Youre like a stalker arent you? 
Very strange.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | | Yeah right. Dream on nutcase.
Love affair was meant to be sarcastic, perhaps I should have added the smilie. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | | No, now you're the liar trying to freak me out.
Give you a big clue...it ain't workin'...
Don't you have a husband and a son, or something, perhaps you should spend time with them and not me???? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #109 :
No, now you're the liar trying to freak me out.
Give you a big clue...it ain't workin'...
Don't you have a husband and a son, or something, perhaps you should spend time with them and not me???? |
At least I have a husband and a son! Who do you have? A cat or something?
We just got back from the movies and my son went to bed...is that okay? It is 10:45, and he is only 7.
Maybe you should pray for a family....it hasnt helped up until now...but keep trying....maybe someday.
Shouldnt you be staying on topic and talking about the death penalty? That IS what you told me this was all about, correct...
Or did you forget so soon?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | | It's just really wierd to me how someone with a son and a husband would be on the internet with someone they don't know, nor do they like particularly.
And keep up an incessant dialogue of back and forth "you're this you're that." Is that what makes you feel good? Makes you feel a little superior?
The thing is I am content with NOT having a family...and I am perfectly content praying intercessory prayer for yours.
(edited in case you misread that) | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #111 :
It's just really wierd to me how someone with a son and a husband would be on the internet with someone they don't know, nor do they like particularly.
And keep up an incessant dialogue of back and forth "you're this you're that." Is that what makes you feel good? Makes you feel a little superior?
The thing is I am content with NOT having a family...and I am perfectly content praying intercessory prayer for yours.
(edited in case you misread that) |
My husband is sitting here laughing at your comments! And we are watching a movie on TV as well...my son is sleeping...didnt I already say that...must be another post you forgot to read. Figures.
Well, I guess praying and nosing into others people's lives would take so much time...I can see why you have no one but me to talk too!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | | I am glad you can spend such "quality" time together, disses on the Christian who prays for your family.
That's just so very very special.
Isn't this fun????????????????????????????
And now you both feel so very superior....a match made in...well, | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: nikiTa | | I give you the last word, I won't tell you what I've done with my day, or what I plan to do for the remainder.... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Whidden said this in post #117 :
I think this thread is going to the Flamers Ward soon. |
Sorry Whid! Ill stop.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Whidden | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #118 :
Sorry Whid! Ill stop. |
Oh, I'm not a mod in here, just thinking out loud.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Whidden said this in post #119 :
Oh, I'm not a mod in here, just thinking out loud. |
Its good though that you said that though...things get out of hand sometimes, and they need to be put back in place.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Ken NJ | | Without offending either Mystic or SWTT, there is an irony from this. Each are comfortable holding own positions and arguments. Aren't we all saying the same thing to a large extent, despite minor differences? Wanna drill down and not hurt feelings?
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/2004-IR-Cover-S.jpg Check out The Innocence Project, spawned by OJ's DreamTeam Lawyer Barry Scheck over the years now spreading all over the country. Those overzealous DAs should be ashamed of themselves for lacking the ability to separate wrongful convictions.
| quote: |
sowhatsthetruth said this in post
But remember mystic, this thread is not about you and me ...
Nor is it about OJ Simpson specifically....it's about the death penalty used against blacks and on a larger scale it is about justice and the law and how neither rarely applies to the everyday Black person. |
Funny how if we all take away the vocabulary, the underlying issue we fairly much agree upon, the same that society doesn't treat certain segments of the down and trodden with any degree of fairness. Now we each can inject small inconsistencies where we can all disagree whether a few exceptions might have gotten their judicial protection and with their wallet were able to afford the best legal and medical niceties. I have no problems with that for subscribing to the American capitalistic tenet: "You get what you paid for."
http://www.cnn.com/US/9609/25/simpson/simpson.generic.jpg http://www.channel955.com/timages/page/michael-jackson-mugshot.jpg The successful blacks crossed over their comfort zone and able to enjoy the fruits of their labor, while an unusually larger demographics cannot gain a foothold outside of their economically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Therefore, I have no problem accepting jury verdicts of OJ and MJ. If faced with a crime, more of the poorer blacks get the slammer. Many unjustifiably get the death sentence because of incompetent defenses. The other poor person's tenet: "They ain't got a pot to pizz in." Since 1973, 119 people in 25 states have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence. Half of those exonerated were blacks. RACE - No. OF EXONERATIONS
Black - 60
White - 46
Latino - 12
Other - 1 EXONERATIONS BY YEAR - In the 25 years from 1973 to 1998, there were an average of 2.96 Exonerations per year. In the five years since 1998, thru 2003, that average has risen to 7.60 Exonerations. There were 6 exonerations in 2004.
| quote: |
Supreme Court Agrees to Consider Standards for Claims of Innocence - June 2005.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/php/uploads/thumb_phpvcVRBL_supreme.jpeg The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a capital case challenging the standard of proof needed for claims of innocence based on new evidence. The Justices will consider an appeal filed by Paul House, a Tennessee death row inmate who says new DNA evidence proves he was wrongfully convicted. In 1993 in Herrera v. Collins, a 5-member majority of the Court said a claim of innocence based on new evidence alone is generally not enough to merit a new hearing in federal court. However, in 1995 in Schlup v. Delo, the Court ruled that a convicted murderer who had other constitutional claims in addition to an innocence claim could get a new hearing if he could show that his new evidence makes it probable that "no reasonable juror would have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt."
* source: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/art...id=1495&scid=64 |
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | |
| quote: |
Whidden said this in post #26 :
I think this thread is going to the Flamers Ward soon. |
no one gives a flaming crap WHAT you think. Who do you think you are? Mister High-and-Mighty, always chipping in his two cents.
)*&$ you, Whidden, nobody likes you.
***gives Whidden an atomic wedgie***
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: adityamahesh | | Whidden with an atomic wedgie... Oh man, that is brutal Dekka.
Ahem... Dekka, go suck on eggs you punk. Take your ass and put it on the stove.
M. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sierradaddy | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #6 :
Good point Sierra.
BUT...let me ask you a question if I may..
OJ obviously played the race card in his trial...it worked for him...
Im curious though...do you think that the black community should have been so supportive of him? Maybe I dont know for sure...but I always figured that OJ used the black community when it was convenient for him, and then he stayed away from them after that...and even before that.
Am I wrong about that? |
Whoops, forgot to respond to this...
I'm not sure that the community should ever be so openly supportive of one of it's members just because they are black and successful. But that's me. Following a trial and seeing how it's going is one thing, but deciding on whether or not the person is guilty is up to those who have been appointed to perform such a task.
I didn't know if he did it, and still am not convinced either way, but I did find it both good AND bad that the community was behind him. Good because the community supported one of their own, and bad because he might have been guilty, but many in the community were blindly supporting him anyways.
I'm the type of person who will say, "I hope that if they didn't do it, that they will be aquitted of all charges, and the true culprit(s) will be brought to justice." I wouldn't be the one to say, "OJ didn't do it. This is just another attempt to bring a successful black man down. Racism pure and unadulterated."
So, do I feel that OJ used the support of the black community to his advantage? Yes. Do I feel that he was wrong in doing so? Only if he was actually guilty, which I can't judge one way or the other.
Perhaps that's why I didn't respond to your post earlier... I can't really provide any kind of definitive answer... 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Sierradaddy said this in post #34 :
So, do I feel that OJ used the support of the black community to his advantage? Yes. Do I feel that he was wrong in doing so? Only if he was actually guilty, which I can't judge one way or the other.
Perhaps that's why I didn't respond to your post earlier... I can't really provide any kind of definitive answer... |
Okay...I understand...but even if he is truly innocent...do you think its right for someone to use people just to get what they want regardless? I feel as if OJ did this and then again walked away from that community....I also feel that regardless of his innocence or guilt, the black community should have viewed this as more of a slap in the face since he wasnt really all that supportive of them to begin with...or maybe he was and Im just uneducated about that particular instance.
Even if someone gives money to a particular cause once in a while and they arent active in that particular community, it still could be said that they arent a part...but then again, I guess people give to causes all the time and arent 100 percent involved in that particular cause.
But is it the same? I dont know.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
fuscia said this in post #31 :
Shame on you both for taking it to this level. I NEVER thought I would have to split a thread. You both are intelligent women, and I just am agast at the level that this went to in the thread.  |
Sorry...
*bows head in shame*
Wont happen again.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Whidden | |
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #32 :
no one gives a flaming crap WHAT you think. Who do you think you are? Mister High-and-Mighty, always chipping in his two cents.
)*&$ you, Whidden, nobody likes you.
***gives Whidden an atomic wedgie*** |
My butt hurts. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Spaliznad | | Personally, I'm kind of sick of this Spaliznad kid, I mean, come one people!!!! He is so stupid:
I'll explain in detail here. rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble RELIGION rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble RACE rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble http://www.ascendancy.net/tribalwar/forumrangers.jpg rabble rabble RABBLE RABBLE!!!
See, I told you. I am a friggin retard.
el oh el. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sierradaddy | | Spal, you're that freakin' blue ranger, aren't you? Yeah, you are. What a FREAK. I mean, CARTWHEELS?
You're either that one, or the red guy.
That pic is funny. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fuscia | |
| quote: |
adityamahesh said this in post #36 :
Yeah, aghastness is really chumpy.
M. |
I can be agahst if I want to be. 
Dang college kids getting all stuck up. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | I'd like to complain about HECK for a moment. There's nothing really about him personally that rubs me the wrong way, but there are a few incidents that have led me to question where his loyalties lie. Basically, I think he's a communist.
Evidence: his current avatar.
Now let's examine this for a moment.
Greatest American Hero? Yeah right.
http://www.the11thhour.com/archives/042000/features/images/superhero_tgah.jpg
If you look carefully, the symbol subtly placed on Mr. Katt's chest just happens to be the Chinese symbol for "middle" [zhong], which is also the name of the Country itself, China [zhong guo]. If this weren't enough, his suit is also red, just like all those red commie bastards.
Furthermore, John Hinkley, no doubt a relative of Ralph's, attempted to murder one of the greatest American Cowboys of all time: Ronald Regan.
And to top it all off, HECK does not support the Bush administration. I repeat, he does not support the Bush administration. Now, I don't want to go pointing any fingers here, but, well, HECK's working to bring America down and should be executed as soon as possible.
Preferably before he gets a chance to state his opposing case. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | That just tears it.
I was going to keep this to myself.
It's become fairly obvious gaboman is… a witch.
Now, he’s trying to cast a spell on all of you to follow his web of lies.
Look, under his name, his participates in an online game where he moonlights as a 'Professor of Divination'. What is divination, you might ask? Well, it's the discovery of unknown information through occult means. Like using magical tools/symbols to gather information on people, places, things and events in the past, present and future.
Beware: he knows that I hold the key to stopping his ultimate goal- seducing this entire website and tricking them into doing his biding.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | You all know this isn't true. Everybody here is smart enough (and might I say attractive enough!) to realize when the wool is being pulled over their eyes. I am not so powerful as to dupe all these very, very intelligent people here into following my cause (if I had one, that is)... but we all know the tricks of these terrorists. Deceit!
I have irrefutable evidence that our good friend HECK is sitting a-top a stockpile of, you guessed it, WMDs. We, as the moral supperiors of all others in the World Wide Web, have the task... no no no, the responsibility to overthrow him and his terrorist regime.
That's right. Scary words. You know you want to get him now. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | More and more of his witch talk. I see the voodoo that he do, and it's not going to work.
Don't let him walk over you swinging his wand and spouting misinformation about HECK.
He'll try to butter you up with his sweet talk, but the venom of his occult life will spew forth and trap your very soul in the depth of his twisted pointy hat wearing lifestyle.
Oh, and he agrees with Tom Cruise and thinks L. Ron Hubbard is on to something. He told me.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | Gaboman came up with the ideas for 'Gigli', Chicken Fried Chicken, and New Coke.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: HECK! | | Gabo spills coffee on himself at fast food restaurants on purpose so he can sue them. Then, the fast food places are forced to raise their prices. He's to blame. Boo that man.
-HECK! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: flying panda | | One of you incorage jahovas witnesses to do house calles, its all your fault | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: flying panda | | HECK sends in complaints to the governement asking to scrap tax rebats (i have no idea if this is good or bad ) | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | I've heard flying panda can't fly. But not only that, he's not even a panda.
HECK dated Carmen Elektra and didn't sleep with her. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: adityamahesh | |
| quote: |
HECK said this in post #52 :
Gaboman came up with the ideas for 'Gigli', Chicken Fried Chicken, and New Coke.
-HECK! |
Chicken Fried Chicken? WTF? 
I blame Heck for the new 'Coke Zero'.
M.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: flying panda | |
| quote: |
gaboman said this in post #59 :
I've heard flying panda can't fly. But not only that, he's not even a panda.
HECK dated Carmen Elektra and didn't sleep with her. |
I can too fly, you can expect some Panda doo doo in a paper bag, and it will be on fire, outside your door. ... then ill poop on you head ...
| quote: |
adityamahesh said this in post #60 :
Chicken Fried Chicken? WTF?
I blame Heck for the new 'Coke Zero'.
M. |
M farts in chicken burgers then eats them ... its a fetish of his
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: adityamahesh | |
| quote: |
gaboman said this in post #55 :
HECK wrote the music and lyrics to "It's A Small World After All" |
Now I have that song stuck in my head.
Gabo is responsible for the tragedy that was Jurassic Park III. And he plans to kill everyone with Jurassic Park IV.
No really, Jurassic Park IV is in the making.
M.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: adityamahesh | |
| quote: |
flying panda said this in post #61 :
M farts in chicken burgers then eats them ... its a fetish of his |
That was below the belt. 
M.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: adityamahesh | |
| quote: |
flying panda said this in post #64 :
have i hit a nerve? |
Not a nerve, but some disgusting things are not funny. And this is one of them.
M.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | Oh come on, people eating farts is funny. Ask Dekka while he's on his SoCo trip, he'll tell you. | | Reply To this Message
|
|
