Ratzinger a Nazi? Don't believe it - Philosophy & Religion

Ratzinger a Nazi? Don't believe it

Philosophy & Religion Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: sordidmesh

London's Sunday Times would have us believe that one of the leading contenders for the papacy is a closet Nazi. In if-only-they-knew tones, the newspaper informs readers that German-born Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was a member of the Hitler Youth during World War II and suggests that, because of this, the "panzer cardinal" would be quite a contrast to his predecessor, John Paul II.

The article also classifies Ratzinger as a "theological anti-Semite" for believing in Jesus so strongly that – gasp! – he thinks that everyone, even Jews, should accept him as the messiah.

To all this we should say, "This is news?!"
As the Sunday Times article admits, Ratzinger's membership in the Hitler Youth was not voluntary but compulsory; also admitted are the facts that the cardinal – only a teenager during the period in question – was the son of an anti-Nazi policeman, that he was given a dispensation from Hitler Youth activities because of his religious studies, and that he deserted the German army.

Ratzinger has several times gone on record on his supposedly "problematic" past. In the 1997 book Salt of the Earth, Ratzinger is asked whether he was ever in the Hitler Youth.

"At first we weren't," he says, speaking of himself and his older brother, "but when the compulsory Hitler Youth was introduced in 1941, my brother was obliged to join. I was still too young, but later as a seminarian, I was registered in the Hitler Youth. As soon as I was out of the seminary, I never went back. And that was difficult because the tuition reduction, which I really needed, was tied to proof of attendance at the Hitler Youth.

"Thank goodness there was a very understanding mathematics professor. He himself was a Nazi, but an honest man, and said to me, 'Just go once to get the document so we have it...' When he saw that I simply didn't want to, he said, 'I understand, I'll take care of it' and so I was able to stay free of it."

Ratzinger says this again in his own memoirs, printed in 1998. In his 2002 biography of the cardinal, John Allen, Jr. of the National Catholic Reporter wrote in detail about those events.

The only significant complaint that the Times makes against Ratzinger's wartime conduct is that he resisted quietly and passively, rather than having done something drastic enough to earn him a trip to a concentration camp. Of course, whenever it is said that a German failed the exceptional-resistance-to-the-Nazis test, it would behoove us all to recognize that too many Jews failed it, as well.

If he were truly a Nazi sympathizer, then it would undoubtedly have become evident during the past 60 years. Yet throughout his service in the church, Ratzinger has distinguished himself in the field of Jewish-Catholic relations.

As prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith, Ratzinger played an instrumental role in the Vatican's revolutionary reconciliation with the Jews under John Paul II. He personally prepared Memory and Reconciliation, the 2000 document outlining the church's historical "errors" in its treatment of Jews. And as president of the Pontifical Biblical Commission, Ratzinger oversaw the preparation of The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible, a milestone theological explanation for the Jews' rejection of Jesus.

If that's theological anti-Semitism, then we should only be so lucky to "suffer" more of the same.

As for the Hitler Youth issue, not even Yad Vashem has considered it worthy of further investigation. Why should we?

http://www.jpost.com/

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Inner City Blues

Yes a child forced to be a Hitler Youth, as all children were in Germany and person that deserted the German Army (they shot deserters at the time) were definitely true Nazi sympathizers...

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Curley Joe

Not ALL children were forced into becoming 'Hitler Youths' during Hitler's reign. Many were very rabid Nazi die-hards of their own accords. But again, they were just youths—albeit, some were younger than others.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: sordidmesh

Thank you for clearing it up Joe. Some people like Inner City like to make omnipotent Godlike statements instead of logical ones.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

Remember, they had a gun to their heads. It's not like it was his decision.
I knew this would get brought up sooner or later.
I wonder what the Jewish community is thinking about this.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Sordid, CJ and others.

How can you be so gullible to believe that because a few men in scarlet vote a man in as their leader that he HAS to be a good man....just because they wear the frock?

Do a little research on some of these past "leaders" and you will see that they are not all they are cracked up to be. In fact quite the opposite.

There were 114 other men that they could have chosen and they choose a man who may very well have been a true Nazi. He has all the qualifications for Nazi, and the roman catholic press spins it to be nothing at all.

Get a clue people.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

quote:
USA1 said this in post #5 :
Remember, they had a gun to their heads. It's not like it was his decision.
I knew this would get brought up sooner or later.
I wonder what the Jewish community is thinking about this.


Makes no dang difference. He was forced in became a deserter went into the Priesthood and etc.
Give the Pope a chance.

As far as the Jewish reaction, this Pope, before he became Pope was very influential in having the Jewish populations as Kindred spirits. If you read what I posted about his background you might learn something, but thats too much to ask for of narrow minded opinionated anti Catholics.

Why don't you Catholic Haters form your own club and you can all chime in in a cacophony of noise about a subject you know nothing about.

Oh USA You are excluded from my ranting as you asked a perfectly good question.

D
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

I have read up on this man all over the internet.
And the dates and times given in each of these regarding his "service" in the Nazi regime do not add up.

Face it, you now have as your leader a Nazi.
Believe what you want.
I am not surprised they chose this man, but I am surprised that it does not bother Roman Catholics...or maybe I shouldn't be. Blindly following a man who sets himself up as the "head of the church" is blasphemous enough.
A Nazi on top of that does not surprise me.

And he can spout all this false humility about how he is just a "humble poor man in the vineyard" hullaballoo all he wants.
He pretends to be Christ's "vicar", the "head of the Church", the "Holy Father" "Potentate" when he is merely a man pretending.
Christ needs no vicar, Jesus is the head of the Church, the name "Holy Father" is reserved for God, the Father, and Jesus is the only Potentate.

This Nazi one just confirms everyones suspicions of the Vatican.
And if you cannot see that....

Soon they'll be serving purple Kool Aid instead of wine.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

he did leave the nazi ragem though, of his own accord ... and dont beleive everything you read in the paper, esspecially arround election time in britain

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Curley Joe

sowhatsthetruth knows it all. You can't pull the wool over the eyes of this unhappy camper, so don't even try. She be judge, jury and executioner all rolled into one bad mother… package. You go girl.

Main Entry: mal·con·tent
Pronunciation: "mal-k&n-'tent
Function: noun
: a discontented person: a : one who bears a grudge from a sense of grievance or thwarted ambition b : one who is in active opposition to an established order or government: REBEL

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

Its better to hate then to love? Since when?

I am sorry I will not debate this issue with someone who knows everything and nothing.

Lets all believe the MEDIA and their tabloiditis. Thats what intelligent persons do. NOT!!!!

D

Reply To this Message

Posted by: sordidmesh

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #6 :
Sordid, CJ and others.

How can you be so gullible to believe that because a few men in scarlet vote a man in as their leader that he HAS to be a good man....just because they wear the frock?

Do a little research on some of these past "leaders" and you will see that they are not all they are cracked up to be. In fact quite the opposite.

There were 114 other men that they could have chosen and they choose a man who may very well have been a true Nazi. He has all the qualifications for Nazi, and the roman catholic press spins it to be nothing at all.

Get a clue people.


The Jerusalem Post and Yad Vashem approve of Ratzinger.

Ratzinger is the best thing that could have happened to the church and the world because of his conservative values. It is the worst thing to happen for the now shrinking radical liberal population that has poisoned the earth.

The criticism for Ratzinger is the same crap that people tried to throw at Arnold Schwarzenegger. I myself have family who worked in Germany for Mercedes-Benz, does that mean I am a Nazi lover now?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

This is all in the past, what exactly is Ratzingers crime did he gas the Jews? did he torture POWs? was he a double agent?
No he commited that most vile of crimes of being forced to join an organisation if he did not his family may have suffred the consquences.
As for the Nazi youth and it's memebers if what some people are saying is true then there must be a whole generation of Germans that are anti semetic if that is true I have never seen it, remeber what happend to the older memebers of the Nazi youth at the end of WW2 and what they saw first hand no doubt that fixed them.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Yeah.

This guy IS the perfect one for this time period remaining.

He'll conjure up more hatred for America than H@ts, scottc, Preston, or any other anti American Europist on the board. Anyone see Bill O tonight? Where a priest declared that Ratszinger will call Bush to the carpet and MAKE him decriminalize abortion? Just this very attempt will wreak havoc on America. This panzer, "god's rottweiler" will attempt to bring America to her knees. And CJ, if this is a man after your own heart, you are very confused indeed.

I don't care what the media says...Delta seems to think the media is against this Nazi. Quite the contrary. Even jpost is in on the action.

Read the book Vatican Assassins....read the Bible....I don't know it all....but God has outlined it all in the Bible for anyone to plainly see and discern who is this Mr. Scarlet panzer zinger of Rats!

God isn't exactly content with all this evil in the world and neither am I.
But He's Holy and Majestic and to His son Jesus be all the praise, honor, and glory.....!!!!!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
sordidmesh said this in post #12 :


The criticism for Ratzinger is the same crap that people tried to throw at Arnold Schwarzenegger. I myself have family who worked in Germany for Mercedes-Benz, does that mean I am a Nazi lover now?


Yeah and I worked for Siemens for many years.
But, I never was a member of a Nazi/NeoNazi group. Nor was I in the Nazi army.
And I don't proclaim myself to be "head of the church" either, the post that only Jesus Christ holds.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

I think the Catholic church have made a huge mistake giving the top job to anyone who even vaguely had anything to do with the Nazi party. How's this guy going to keep a straight face and condemn homosexuals - that was one of Hitlers policies.

Saying that, going by church attendances and the difficulty in employing priests, does anyone but a small minority in the West take any notice of the Catholic church anymore? Doesn't appear that way to me. Explains why the Church had followed the tobacco giants strategy and sents it's storm troopers out into the developing world, where the heathens could do with a good dose of guilt, no doubt.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

pope benidict and his family were FORCED to join the nazi's ... and they left the first oppertunity they had, everyone at the time was forced to join, and diserters were shot

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Curley Joe said this in post #3 :
Not ALL children were forced into becoming 'Hitler Youths' during Hitler's reign. Many were very rabid Nazi die-hards of their own accords. But again, they were just youths—albeit, some were younger than others.


quote:
flying panda said this in post #17 :
pope benidict and his family were FORCED to join the nazi's ... and they left the first oppertunity they had, everyone at the time was forced to join, and diserters were shot


Panda you keep reinforcing that stance.
But if you see the post above yours that I have quoted from a very reliable source who knows everything about this....
"Not ALL children were forced..."

And Panda if deserters were shot, and Ratzinger (AKA god's rottweiler AKA the enforcer AKA the panzer cardinal) deserted, why was he NOT shot.
Seems the Jesuits who colluded with the Nazi's may have cut a deal for him? "He'll be your Nazi in the RCC, please do him no harm."
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

quote:
Not ALL children were forced into becoming 'Hitler Youths' during Hitler's reign. Many were very rabid Nazi die-hards of their own accords. But again, they were just youths—albeit, some were younger than others.


Many isnt all, so both are statments could be right.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

EGADS<GADZOOKS......POPPY ****(ROOSTER)

d

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Tvee

quote:
h@ts said this in post #16 :
I think the Catholic church have made a huge mistake giving the top job to anyone who even vaguely had anything to do with the Nazi party. How's this guy going to keep a straight face and condemn homosexuals - that was one of Hitlers policies.


Actually, Hitler had tolerated homosexuals who were among his closest aides. The intense passion of his homosexual supporters had been strategic in closing down the parliament in favor of martial rule.

It was only after the public pressure/scandal for reforms that Hitler had to purge his closest supporters found to rape young recruits that demoralized the German troops.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Hitler also gassed many homosexuals (pink triangle) and gypsies and disabled.

Hitler used the homosexuals at the beginning for his purposes and then fried them. This had little to do with public opinion. The man had no care for anyone else's "opinion." He wasn't a pleasant fellow. And I can't imagine his "youth" were any different.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
flying panda said this in post #19 :


Many isnt all, so both are statments could be right.


The fact remains that if CJ is correct....this blows the whole..."I was forced into it," way out of the water."
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Tvee

I've wanted to state my views against homosexuality but the previous thread was closed.


In the Catholic religion, the faithful follow Christ. It could be a steep and uphill climb or serious struggle for many to change into the image of holiness. Nonetheless, the faithful must persevere in faith rather than give up so easily, citing excuses from being a victim of the environment to genetics.

What is wrong is to lower the standards Christ set for men to follow simply because many view false sexuality as a common desire or weakness. I think that would be a “guilty” attitude. If in your heart, a wrong is justified as right or correct, then that is the state of being guilty. Those who confess to wrong doing is in the right with God but those who refuse to be corrected or those who refuse to admit to mistakes is guilty.


So if you’re a defiant homosexual and wants to change the whole CHURCH to accept your weakness, then that is being guilt for me. However, anyone who accuses himself and is repentant that he is a sinner is on the right with God. In the Gospels, a similar question was asked by Jesus to the crowd, who was initially made to choose between the Pharisee who thought himself blameless for temple ritual, and the tax collector who confessed he was a sinner and unworthy, but repentant. Jesus concluded that the tax collector or sinner went home justified.

All of us are sinners, is there anyone here claiming otherwise?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Tvee

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #22 :
Hitler also gassed many homosexuals (pink triangle) and gypsies and disabled.

Hitler used the homosexuals at the beginning for his purposes and then fried them. This had little to do with public opinion. The man had no care for anyone else's "opinion." He wasn't a pleasant fellow. And I can't imagine his "youth" were any different.


I doubt if Hitler wanted to kill his close allies just because they had tendencies. The problem was his homo friends were strong willed and physically stronger than the young recruits they raped. Criminal behavior and abuse of authority were reasons for the purge.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Re Tvee post #24


Well, there are estimates that there are between 25% to 50% of the RCC priests who are homosexual.

I truly believe that this matter needs to be handled from within before they start condemning the parishners.

And the freaky pedophiles within the RCC? Cmon!
Bill O'Relly a supposed devout Catholic has a big beef with Ratzinger.
When the pedophile problem became known to the mass public via the media...Ratzinger blamed the problem on the American media instead of addressing the pedophile issue head on.
De frock them. Turn them into the authorities.

Another RCC coverup exposed and Ratzinger blames the American media.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Tvee said this in post #25 :


I doubt if Hitler wanted to kill his close allies just because they had tendencies. The problem was his homo friends were strong willed and physically stronger than the young recruits they raped. Criminal behavior and abuse of authority were reasons for the purge.


Are you actually saying Hitler had friends and he was loyal to such friends?
Do you understand this man at all?

Criminal behaviour? He was actually concerned about criminal behavior and abuse of authority?

Rape? He was concerned about rape?
Ever heard of the "joy division?"
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

we will just have to wait and see what the new pope does, wont we. I think we just have to cope till he dies (is that how it works? can he be voted out of being pope by the cardinals, or is he pope for life?)

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Tvee

I agree Flying Panda... the end of something is better than the start... let us refrain from judging in the meantime. I'm hoping for the best for the new pope.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Tvee

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #27 :


Are you actually saying Hitler had friends and he was loyal to such friends?
Do you understand this man at all?

Criminal behaviour? He was actually concerned about criminal behavior and abuse of authority?

Rape? He was concerned about rape?
Ever heard of the "joy division?"


No one would ever know the exact answers to your questions. The English author of the Rise and Fall of the Third Reich based his theories on first hand accounts from records of the NAZI party made available in Nuremberg after the defeat of Germany. It is possible that the source records were edited or scripted to appear great or historically significant.

I am sorry but I can only recall from memory what I had read. Please feel free to correct me if these ideas are imprecise. The book about the war is older than me...
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

New pope hailed for strong Jewish ties

quote:
"This continuity will be reflected in Catholic-Jewish relations. He has a deep commitment to this issue. And his own national background makes him sensitive to the dangers of anti-Semitism and the importance of Jewish-Catholic reconciliation," said Rosen, the international director of interreligious affairs for the American Jewish Committee.

"He was also supportive of the establishment of full relations between the Holy See and Israel, and he cares deeply about the welfare of the State of Israel," added Rosen.

Rabbi Israel Singer, chairman of the World Jewish Congress, called Ratzinger the architect of the policy that John Paul II fulfilled with regard to relations with the Jews.

"He is the architect of the ideological policy to recognize, to have full relations with Israel," Singer said
.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satell...7273080&apage=1

More "befriending"...

and then:

the ending...


Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
On November 25, 1981 Pope John Paul II named Ratzinger prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, formerly known as the Holy Office of the Inquisition, which was renamed in 1908 by Pope Pius X.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Cardinal_Ratzinger

Eek a mouse.
Better mind my P's Q's and assortment of "O my's"
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
As was John Paul II's custom, Benedict XVI addressed his last words to the Blessed Virgin Mary, in whose hands he placed "the present and future of my person and of the Church."


http://www.zenit.org/english/

WHATTTT?????????????!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

No, T I won't bite!!! Even if steam is pouring out my ears at your duplicity of Christian Behavior. It saddens me and I will pray for you.

D

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

E

I am not a Roman Catholic and never will be. This man is NOT my leader and never will be. The Vatican and all their winebibbery, power and whore mongering does not appeal to me.
Just because I do not buy into man's tradition and scoff at man's tradition does not mean I am in duplicity with the teachings of Christ.
It means I am not a follower of man's pagan version of Christendom.

I pray for you.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Tvee

It is a Christian concept..., "Judge not, lest be judged." Our friend SWTT here had confessed of unfaithfulness in the past but how come this hard stance against someone who may just "appear" to be a NAZI? Pope Benedict XVI was ordained a priest after the war. He changed as many Germans had. Our new pope advocates faithfulness rather than liberal cooperation with the desires and dictates of the modern times.

Furthermore, he is credited for going against liberation theology, the current temptation of priests for independence and militant political role playing. The Pope is the vicar of Christ; as Peter's successor, the pope cannot be independent in matters of the faith but must protect its integrity in its original intentions, as it is found in the Gospels.

Like the different socialist fervor that swept Europe, leading to WW2, liberation theology is a potential problem similar to Marxism during the last century. Instead of invoking the holy spirit to renew the face of the Earth, liberation theology skips God and puts all control and responsibility to humans to effect CHANGES. Ask a theological supporter where his cross is and prepare to realize that he wields a tight fist, ready to violently strike his perceived opponents down.

The problem isn't just the covert way to attain justice but the poor perception of who are the real opponents. The world would suffer much if this theology is pursued because in the guise of following the WIll of God, many would prepare to abandon their crosses and take arms instead. Probably SWTT, our friend is a believer of the new theology?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Tvee said this in post #36 :
It is a Christian concept..., "Judge not, lest be judged." Our friend SWTT here had confessed of unfaithfulness in the past



but how come this hard stance against someone who may just "appear" to be a NAZI? Pope Benedict XVI was ordained a priest after the war. He changed as many Germans had. Our new pope advocates faithfulness rather than liberal cooperation with the desires and dictates of the modern times.

Furthermore, he is credited for going against liberation theology, the current temptation of priests for independence and militant political role playing. The Pope is the vicar of Christ; as Peter's successor, the pope cannot be independent in matters of the faith but must protect its integrity in its original intentions, as it is found in the Gospels.

Like the different socialist fervor that swept Europe, leading to WW2, liberation theology is a potential problem similar to Marxism during the last century. Instead of invoking the holy spirit to renew the face of the Earth, liberation theology skips God and puts all control and responsibility to humans to effect CHANGES. Ask a theological supporter where his cross is and prepare to realize that he wields a tight fist, ready to violently strike his perceived opponents down.

The problem isn't just the covert way to attain justice but the poor perception of who are the real opponents. The world would suffer much if this theology is pursued because in the guise of following the WIll of God, many would prepare to abandon their crosses and take arms instead. Probably SWTT, our friend is a believer of the new theology?


I have no idea about some "liberation theology" except that Ratzinger will brand you a heretic for following it and his Inquisition will ensue.

I have no part with the harlot church and never will so I don't follow any "theology," merely the Bible as written and not conjured up into pagan tradition and the worship of the dead....

I follow a living God and Jesus Christ is His name.

I am not so concerned about his past so much as it indicates his future and his dealings with Israel.

I am not a militant person. I will not raise up arms against another person because of their beliefs or any other reason. Leave that handiwork to the Inquisitors. The pen is mightier than the sword. Perhaps you find the double-edged sword which is the Word of God dangerous? I am sure you do. That is why for centuries the RCC killed anyone who owned a Bible. The Word of God IS dangerous to the Vatican...because if the people read it, they will see how very false the RCC doctrine is.

Ratzinger, in the tradition of his fellows is a militant man. He would have the Jesuits carry out his dirty work as they all have in the past. Lets not forget Opus Dei as well.
He was prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, formerly known as the Holy Office of the Inquisition.

You can white wash the name of his previous title, you can white wash his record....he will prove in time to be a "black pope" and live up to his sobriquets "the enforcer, god's rottweiler, and the panzer (tank) cardinal."
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Tvee

What do you care SWTT, does the RCC or its Pope have power over you? Are you haunted by the thought you'd pay for your sins on Earth?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Tvee said this in post #38 :
What do you care SWTT, does the RCC or its Pope have power over you? Are you haunted by the thought you'd pay for your sins on Earth?


No, Ratzinger has NO power over me. Even in the name of ecumenism I will not bow to anyone who wants me to hold hands with satanists, hindus, moslems and apostate Christian groups merely to say I am united with the harlot church.

The penalty for my sin (past present future) has been paid by Jesus' work on the cross. My salvation is sure. I have sure hope of eternal life. Perhaps you would like to have this certain hope...and not wait until the RCC Judgment Day to find out whether or not you are saved? You can know now, this very minute, that your salvation by grace through faith is eternally secure.

I merely admonish from Revelation 18: 4-5 re: Mystery Babylon, harlot church
"Come out of her, my people, lest you share in her sins, and lest you receive of her plagues. For her sins have reached to heaven, and God has remembered her iniquities."
Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

but didnt you, just a few posts ago say you are not roman catholic, and benerdict the XVI is not your pope ... rejection your your faith if ever there was one.

Has the new pope accually stated that he wants everyone in the RCC to become nazi's ... or hold hands with al the other faiths, and imbrace them?

quote:
hold hands with satanists, hindus, moslems and apostate Christian groups merely to say I am united with the harlot church.


is how you put it, your faith is your own, but the RCC is a hierarchy, and choosing it means you must respect the disitions of the higher powers in the church (eg THE POPE)
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
flying panda said this in post #40 :
but didnt you, just a few posts ago say you are not roman catholic, and benerdict the XVI is not your pope ... rejection your your faith if ever there was one.

Panda,
You are a sweet young man, so please do not take what I have to say as that I am upset with you in any way...I am merely disgusted with the RCC hierarchy.

when you say "rejection your faith if there was one" I take it you mean that I have rejected the RCC and Ratzinger as my leader and that somehow means I have no faith?
My faith is in Jesus Christ alone and His saving work on the cross.
I have no faith in man and his religion in its various forms. Particularly a bunch of white haired old men (I like white haired old men, don't get me wrong) who are for the most part, alcoholics and power hungry whore mongers. And yet they tell the rest of the world how to act. And the chief one pretends he is the "head of the church" when the Bible clearly states that Jesus is the Head of the Church. Ephesians 5:23
I reject the Roman Catholic Hierarchy and its teachings, more importantly, I love Jesus Christ with all my heart, soul, and mind.


Has the new pope accually stated that he wants everyone in the RCC to become nazi's

No, that would be too obvious. But John Paul in his final address asked God to "forgive Israel for its sins." Several people heard this plainly, and then when looking up a transcript on the internet of this speech following the announcement of his death, this little phrase was deleted from the written version. Why would that be Panda? Ratzinger was called the architect of RCC/Israeli policy...and yet somehow the hierarchy believes Israel is in sin? Why?

... or hold hands with al the other faiths, and imbrace them?

John Paul II did. And Ratzinger vows to do the same. Its called ecumenism. It will continue to be heavy on the RCC agenda.

is how you put it, your faith is your own, but the RCC is a hierarchy, and choosing it means you must respect the disitions of the higher powers in the church (eg THE POPE)

I understand the hierarchy all too well. This is the doctrine of the Nicolaitans that Jesus warns about in Revelation 2:6.
Where the clergy lords it over the laity.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Tvee

Your apprehensions about the RCC is unfounded since you're not even baptized Catholic. I am. For a while, this idea of control over the laity seems valid but care to look more deeply, that normally does not happen unless you subject yourself voluntarily to church organizations. In any kind of organization, there is the risk of mismanagement and political affiliations that divides and weakens order.

My suggestion is help yourself with Catholic teachings and inspirations but keep yourself wise and clear headed about the church organization itself. The pope is there precisely to prevent collapse of order in the church due to differences in opinion, styles and languages. In a market economy, it is caveat emptor - so make sure you keep away from intermediaries who have other agendas in mind.

Blame yourself not others if you got fooled. Eventually only the Holy Spirit would make a person right and justified, not the opinions of men, however collectively uniform or unanimous they are.

Keep yourself holy. Be self-absorbed in prayers and in your duties in Christian life. In the end, you'd be judged in what you do or say, not in what others think of you. Seek always the approval of God and not of men.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

My grandmother is Roman Catholic.
I have seen how the RCC has tried to keep her in the dark regarding the truth found in the scriptures. She was raised in a RC orphanage and knows the harsh brutality of the nuns firsthand.
She did not even own a Bible until she was in her 70's and that was because I bought them for her.
She did not learn the truth of Jesus and His saving work on the cross from the RCC. She learned the truth from her Protestant friends who continually witnessed to her.

And come to find out, my parents checked into her lineage for a legal reason....and she is a Russian Jew!
Her parents emigrated from Russia via Poland. They changed their name to Wagner and pretended to convert to RC. They did this to forego persecution by the RC faction of Jew haters.
And then when her father put her and 8 other siblings in an orphanage when her Mom died, the children grew up completely unaware of the Jewish heritage!

As for your suggestions, though touching they are, I will stick to Bible admonishments. Because I cannot "keep myself holy." That is the work of the Holy Spirit. All I can do is yield to the Holy Spirit and he will do the work. Conviction of any sins will come through Him and He alone will deal with me. Judge myself first and I will not need public humiliation:
For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. 1 Co 11:31

And Tvee, I made an attempt of learning the RCC doctrine when I was searching for the truth.
I called the parish, spoke with a nun and she set up a private tutoring instruction with a priest.
I really could not concentrate on what he was saying because during every session he had these dogs that continually humped on his leg...I am telling the truth. He kept saying good dog good dog while these dogs proceeded in their disgusting actions.

So, you see tvee, I did make an attempt early on in my adulthood to discover the RCC teachings, and my experience digusted me to the max...

The approval of God and not man?.....obviously by discussing with you RC diehards, that doesn't seem to be an issue.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

I agree that the Jesus ios the "head of the church" ... the pope is ment to represent "Paul" ... who jesus said he would be the rock on which his church will be founded, or something like that. and that all the popes were ment to be related to paul hoimself (i heard, but dont know if the first load were accually decendates of paul ... im not a bible basher, so i wouldnt know (no offence to anyone))

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

Tnt. it was Peter that Jesus said that too.
Stay away from persons who portend to be Christians yet spew out all kinds of anti Christian behavior.

Stay out of this , You are well meaning but SWTT knocks you off like a gnat.

Say what you want but be prepared for her.

D

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Delta said this in post #45 :
Tnt. it was Peter that Jesus said that too.
Stay away from persons who portend to be Christians yet spew out all kinds of anti Christian behavior.

Stay out of this , You are well meaning but SWTT knocks you off like a gnat.

Say what you want but be prepared for her.

D




I would in no way "knock Panda off as a gnat."

He is the kindest person I have encountered in this particular forum.
And he is among the sweetest natured persons on this board.

It's extremely easy to discuss with Panda.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

I went to Chapel to day in front of the Holy God and I spent my time praying for you T
Everything in yourloife has been so f'd up its a shame.

We are supposed to extend our hands to one another in Peace not in violence.


Jesus whom you believe in ,always said treat your neighbor as your self didn't he?
You are on this board yelling and screaming your faith. Jesus was humble ,and whom offered us the path to Redemption. Kindness Kindness not swearing about others Mode of getting to him.

You need to go back to the Scriptures and re read his words. Sad. T.

I love you Friend
D

D

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Violence?

Have you read how Jesus spoke to the Pharisees? Why exactly do you think they crucified Him? He didn't lift a hand or sword against the religious hierarchy of His day. His words of truth cut them to the core. Read Matthew 23.
"I came not of peace but of the sword." Jesus said he would separate family member against family member to insure that we would love Him above anyone else.
All of my discussion has been pointed at the Vatican and the hierarchy.
It's not pointed at any of you.

Thanks for your prayers.
I love you too, very sincerely and deeply.
We have prayer tonight. You are always in them. Corporate prayer, all of us pray for you.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

Inside Information on The New Popes softer side

In German town, Benedict XVI known for love of cats, conversation By Matthew Schofield, Knight Ridder Newspapers
Thu Apr 21, 6:20 PM ET



REGENSBURG, Germany - When he was a cardinal, Pope Benedict XVI often delivered sermons at the German-language church in Campasanto Teutonico near St. Peter's Basilica, but his most heartfelt talks may have been the ones he gave after celebrating Mass.



"I went with him once," said Konrad Baumgartner, the head of the theology department at Regensburg University. "Afterwards, he went into the old cemetery behind the church.

"It was full of cats, and when he went out, they all ran to him. They knew him and loved him. He stood there, petting some and talking to them, for quite a long time. He visited the cats whenever he visited the church. His love for cats is quite famous."

Although his public image is that of a stern enforcer of church doctrine, in Regensburg, where the 78-year-old pope came into his own as a theologian, those who know the man known as "God's Rottweiler" say his soft, human side has been ignored.

The pope loves cats, can't resist Christmas cookies and, three months ago, waxed on about how he dreamed of retiring from the hectic life at the Vatican to enjoy his last years reading, writing and talking with friends.

His brother Georg still lives in Regensburg and is Benedict's strongest connection to the town he left for Munich when he became archbishop. Georg Ratzinger, also ordained in the church, spent decades as the musical director of the famous Regensburger Domspatzen boys' choir. He lives down a twisting cobbled street from the towering Gothic Regensburg Cathedral.

"The totally wrong picture is painted of my brother," he said Thursday in a dining room decorated with iconic art and photos and letters from Pope John Paul II. "He's a cheerful man, friendly. But he does have principles that he will stand for."

In fact, Ratzinger believes that instead of being divisive, Benedict will build bridges - "though there are limits."

He bridled at how some members of the English press have treated his brother. One paper ran a headline saying "From Hitler Youth to Papa Ratzi," but Ratzinger said all boys were forced to join the Hitler Youth and that his brother was never a Nazi.

"In our family, we were taught they were evil," he said.

His brother's interests included music, Ratzinger said. "He played the organ quite well, but he hasn't played for years now."

When he was younger, Benedict XVI hiked in the Tyrol mountains to relax. As he grew older and had less time and energy, he tended the magnolia tree outside his house, cleaned the fountain under the statue of Mary and thinned out the ivy.

Agnes Heindl has been Georg Ratzinger's housekeeper for 10 years, and she's come to know the new pope well.

She said she often drove then-Cardinal Ratzinger to his house after the brothers had shared Sunday dinner. His favorite foods were Weisswurst - the traditional white Bavarian sausage - and anything sweet. She said he's known for trying every type of Christmas cookie at a party.

"Oh, he could just talk about anything, really," she said. "He liked to talk about friends and how people he knew were doing. He's a very pleasant man to have a conversation with."

She clutched 16 Benedict roses, white, as she talked.

"Maybe if I can't get the flowers to him, someone will take a picture of them, and he'll see that we're thinking of him," she said.

She spoke with him again this week. He called on Wednesday morning, after getting busy signals at his brother's house Tuesday night. When she answered, a well-known voice said: "Can I please speak to my brother."

"The Holy Father called, and all I could do was stammer, `So how do I address you now?' He laughed," she said.

She said she's glad she heard him laugh. His new job isn't easy, and he'll need to laugh. She said that when he was relaxing, there was never a mystery about what would make him laugh.

"Oh, cats," she said. " He loves them."

She pointed up a staircase to a wall full of painted plates, each depicting a different cat. The brothers collected the plates together, she said.

"When we were on vacation, a cat, a little kitten, would come by, and he'd be giddy, almost giggling with joy," she said." Cats love him; they always go to him straight away. And he loves them back."

He doesn't have a cat, however. Heindl doesn't think he can have one living in the Vatican.

"He was always content to play with the street cats," she said. "I don't know much about Rome, but I know there's no shortage of cats there."

Benedict still owns the house he bought on the edge of Regensburg in 1970, but he visits only a couple times a year. The city adjusted his deed this week: It now lists the owner as "Holy Father."

On Thursday afternoon, Chico the cat - perhaps the closest thing there is to The Pope's Cat, strolled from the shaded arch between the pope's front door and his garage. Chico belongs to Rupert Hofbauer, who looks after Benedict's garden and home.

"Chico is his friend, though he scratched him over Christmas because he didn't want to go outside, all day or night, and the cardinal tried to put him out," Hofbauer said. "They usually get along well, though."

Hofbauer and many others in Regensburg, where the new pope remains on the faculty rolls, shared mixed emotions, pride and sorrow, when they heard the news. Georg Ratzinger said he almost feels as if he's lost his brother, knowing that it won't be easy to see him now.

"I thought he'd retire soon, and we would finally have a lot of time to finish all the talks we've started through the years. We talked about that, just this Christmas when he was home," Hofbauer said.

"He thought it sounded nice, to retire, to take it easy. That's not how it worked out though, is it?"

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

How in the world can I not like the man after this post?
Shame on me.

I have been posting all over the internet on different boards about this man...getting hit over the head by Jesuits...and now this comes out.
It's simple. They profiled me and found out my weakness....CATS!!!!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

ROTFLMAO Too much T.

D

Reply To this Message

Posted by: lodgebo

Cats why cats? surely a man called the rottweiler would prefer big dogs.

Though it is nice to see the private side of the pope. what I would like is to find comments from somebody who was with him the Hitler youth and find out how serioulsy he took being in that organisation.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: flying panda

apparently lots of jernalists have moved into his home town in germany hoping for an interview with or about the new pope

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Interesting...


quote:
Actually <name removed>, the Pope and Reagan did cause the downfall of Communism. It is rather an interesting story (and sordid tale). JPII was a Nazi sympathizing Pole who had major connections with the still extant Nazi "ratlines" throughought eastern Europe. These ratlines (basically an underground railroad made up of Catholic monestaries, seminaries, and such) running from Germany throughout Eastern and Western Europe to Italy, etc. It is essentially these ratlines through which many Nazi's were smuggled out of Europe to America (Operation Paperclip) and to South America. After WWII the ratlines were major fascist spy routes throughout Europe. As you know, by design the fascists hate the communists and vice versa.

These ratlines, including those that smuggled Nazis, were controlled and operated by the Jesuits through the Vatican in Rome. The current Pope, Benedict the 16th was a major player in this.

This is a major, large, extensive story... most of it has been uncovered and exists in several books (including one called "Blowback" by Christopher Simpson). Reagan and the Pope recruited Lech Walesa (Solidarity) and promised him power and prestige for his movement if he would allow the U.S. spy intelligentsia join up with the fascist/nazi spy apparatus to "squeeze" the Soviets when our intelligence was telling us that they were the most financially vulnerable. This included the decision to ban all technology transfers to the USSR, the successful attempt to thwart the USSR plan to build Oil pipelines to bolster its economy, and many other plans. The Jesuits had long planned (even through the KGB) a controlled collapse of the Soviet Union (read Golitsyn's book, New Lies For Old). Reagan and the Pope were the Jesuit tools used to accomplish this. What JVI isn't telling you, is that this was all planned and the culmination of that plan includes the destruction of Amerika.


Ze truth iz out der!
Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Philosophy & Religion Forum: Ratzinger a Nazi? Don't believe it

Forum Forum Forum