Terri Shiavo Passes Away - Euthanasia/Right to Die

Terri Shiavo Passes Away

Euthanasia/Right to Die Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: chelktty

Just in - Terri Shiavo Passed away this morning. May she finally find peace.

Regardless of how you personally feel about this case, it's obvious there are no "winners" in this situation. Let's all unite now in the hope that the families effected by this woman's passing can begin the healing process and find some peace in their lives. Let's all unite in the hope Terri herself is now in a better place with no pain or suffering.

Here's to hoping also, that the hundreds of protesters, fame seekers and attention grabbing opportunists who have disrupted the peaceful dying process for the 70 other patients in the hospice will now LEAVE and go about their own lives.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

Ijust caught the news Chel..Yes may she now Rest In Peace and a healing come over the family.

D

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

Well said Chel!

I agree.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

And the winner is! ABC, NBC, CNN, CBS, FOX, MSMBC.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Edward Teach

Let the lawsuits begin.

I'm sorry that this girl was murdered by the state on hearsay on her wishes and if her death means anything it will be in the bringing of this out as a major issue. I know I will be making a living will and make sure it spells out everything I believe and want.

My sympathy go out to the Schindler family.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

As I have already said on another thread Louisiana is now in the process of reviewing to pass a Bill on Death with Dignity. That should prove interesting.

Until and at such time my living will gives my instructions.

D

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

My sympathies go out to Michael and the Schindler family. Chel is right, there are no winners in this. Terri is at long last at peace and in a better place. I hope the familiy can find some peace.

I find it shameful that at this time the politicians are still trying to use this for their own agenda .

So much of the nation has focused on Terri who had no chance to recover. During this time there have been several children abudcted, raped, and murdered by child molesters. Why can't the politicans embrace this "culture of life" and fight to keep these predators off the street? The Schiavo case was a family matter, and it should have stayed as such. What in the world could be more precious than protecting the children?

I have my advanced directive filled out. Hopefully, everyone will go get one or a living will so that politicains do not try to make the choice for us if we should fall into these unhappy circumstances.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Edward Teach

So if I understand this, one is not allowed to commit suicide unless they put it in writing, then it's ok. IE LIVING WILL!!!

However in this case she didn't have a Living Will so someone else gets to dictate whether she lives or dies.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

It's not suicide.

A Missouri state case gave national precedent for this ruling that patients have the right to refuse medicine, food, and water.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

Ron, we each should have that right to leave a living will saying what measures we want to have taken or not taken on our behalf. Perhaps the answer is to have a law passed that says that they will provide hydration and food services unless you direct otherwise. I would not be opposed to a law like that. It would make people go out and have their wishes know. However, I do not want some fanatical group telling me that I can not refuse food and hydration if I chose to go home to my maker.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

I don’t believe I ever saw more misuse of a word in my life during the last couple weeks. Let’s look at Merriam Webster’s definition of “murder” shall we?

“The crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought”

Now I know that this is an emotionally charged issue, however letting yourself get led by your emotions is definitely a recipe for disaster.

If we were to accept that this was “murder” then there would have to be evidence of malice. Although Mike Schiavo has been accused of everything from killing Terri to killing JFK, there is no credibility in any of the accusations levied at him.

It is the right-to-lifers, living will or not, whom want to impose their ideologies on others. Nothing in this entire case has signified bad intentions except for the Schindlers in their endless attempt to slander Mike Schiavo character.

May Terri now RIP. I’m sure she is was weary and tired in her body and never knew it. I don’t understand the religious right since they proclaim how glorious the afterlife is. Why is it that they’re always trying to stop so many from getting there?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

Well guys its not over yet as the experts gather to do the Autopsy.

Indeed some are calling it a Homicide so fasten your seatbealts its gonna be a bumpy ride ...Yet.

D

I agree with you Heavens.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: chelktty

quote:
Heavens11 said this in post #12 :
I find it a very cold and heartless thing to do -- Michael forcing Terri's parents away from the room when she is so near death (within 10 minutes according to news sources); then letting them in the room only after she died.

Actually Hospice staff asked them to leave so they could assess Terri's condition. After that, Michael Shiavo would visit her. The family asked to stay and Michael declined. I'm sure after almost a decade of being called a murderer, abuser and every other name the Shindler's have called him to his face and in the media, he was not willing to subject Terri to that in her final moments, nor was he willing to subject himself to that. Remember that in these last few days the kinds of things her family has been saying about him, while he has said and done nothing to lash out at them.

Feelings that Michael Schiavo and the Schindler's experienced in their disagreements with each other should have been pushed aside where Michael's wife and the Schindler's daughter was concerned in her dying moments. I can tell you this, it would take an army to move me away from a family member's bedside at the end.

I totally agree that it's a shame that both sides couldn't make peace with one another and come together for Terri's final moments. Let's hope they can all begin the healing process.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Delta said this in post #13 :
Well guys its not over yet as the experts gather to do the Autopsy.

Indeed some are calling it a Homicide so fasten your seatbealts its gonna be a bumpy ride ...Yet.

D

I agree with you Heavens.


Homicide?
It went through the courts.
No one is culpable.

NO MEA CULPA
NO MEA CULPA
NO MEA CULPA
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

This is why I am not married.
With marriage comes family-in-law.
They should have butted out from the beginning.

No wonder this girl had bulimia/control issues....I bet they controlled her her entire life...and then when she couldn't speak!?!?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Phalaris

quote:
So if I understand this, one is not allowed to commit suicide unless they put it in writing, then it's ok. IE LIVING WILL!!!

However in this case she didn't have a Living Will so someone else gets to dictate whether she lives or dies.


The bible clearly speaks out against suicide, which I am going to presume is at the foundation of any hard-set, all-encompassing idea that no one should be allowed to commit suicide, which seems to be the case here.

However, the bible also does not have anything to say about sustaining and prolonging mere existence with artificial intervention that was thousands of years away from being invented at the time the bible was written.

The bible does not have to deal with the dilemma of cases like these for the simple reason that in biblical times, if you couldn't breathe, consume food or water by mouth, process liquid waste with kidneys, or any of a number of things that medical intervention can do for you now, you would have died. Plain and simple. Moreover, the original critical injury or illness that caused these measures to be necessary probably often would have, in itself, been fatal. Now that we clever monkeys have figured out how to keep people who can't breathe breathing, and so on, some look to the ancient religious texts for appropriate guidance but it isn't there. Would the bible really dictate that it's always wrong for a person to choose not to pursue fruitless medical interventions that can merely prolong existence rather than cure or even alleviate the problem? Would the bible really say that it's always wrong to not to pursue every possible means to prolong someone else's existence?

As soon as you circumvent the wishes of god to call someone home with an injury or illness that, 2000 years ago, would've been fatal, you can no longer pretend to be under god's jurisdiction as duly noted in the bible.

It's OK to disagree on the difficult issues of what to do about prolonging existence in the case of conditions that are, or are almost certainly, beyond our ability to effectively treat, but don't trot out moralistic absolutes to either judge or legislate other people's choices.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

I just call;ed my Attorney to amend my first will and see to it that my wishes are csrried out if i ever get in a position where heroric metjods are required to keep me alive. I have been too close to death in the past ten years to go thru that again.

I need to update my will now that C is gone.

I am asking for "assisted suicide" but ol Jack will be long gone by then j/k

D

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
Delta said this in post #13 :
Indeed some are calling it a Homicide


Gee...let me take a wild guess as to who that would be.

This argument was tried on one of the judges..and he would not allow that argument to go forth....wanna know why?

Because it isnt a homicide.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Where exactly....scripture and verse does the Bible speak on suicide? Phalaris?
What about King Saul?

quote:
It's OK to disagree on the difficult issues of what to do about prolonging existence in the case of conditions that are, or are almost certainly, beyond our ability to effectively treat, but don't trot out moralistic absolutes to either judge or legislate other people's choices.


That's right.
That's why none of the world nor the Schindlers should have butted in. This was between the husband and wife. And that's why the religious right et al had no business getting involved.

quote:
Would the bible really say that it's always wrong to not to pursue every possible means to prolong someone else's existence?

What existence? You mean lying in a bed for the rest of your life, completely unaware...your soul stuck between heaven and earth. Neither here nor there? Tell me that's not cruel!!!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Edward Teach

Let's not get into religion here, we have a whole other forum for that.

Again we don't really know what her Will was except by someone who didn't come out with "her will" until he was involved with another woman and received a nice court settlement. He then convienently came up with the idea that Terri had mentioned this. And the only ones that agreed with him were 2 of HIS family. Everyone in her family disagreed with this being her WILL.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Edward Teach

Bottom line is that once he introduced his new family into the mix, he should have reliqunished guardianship. I think if there is any fight it should be the determination as to when a spouse gives up their rights to make life and death decision concerning their spouse.

We have common law marriages what about common law divorces.....?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

Its funny that you are still using the money as a factor for him doing this....there is nothing left of that money for it was spent on her treatment and on his attorneys throughout this mess.

AGAIN...if he wanted money, he would have taken the 10 million that the company offered him to give up this guardianship.

Secondly...if you look around you will find that it was HER parents that told him he should find another person in his life. They never had an issue with the woman he was seeing until he decided to grant Terri's wish...and it was then they made it an issue.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Edward Teach

No but when you start a lie then you gotta finish it or end up in jail.

And I expect they figured that if he found someone else that he would give up guardianship which he didn't.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
Ron Ackerman said this in post #24 :
No but when you start a lie then you gotta finish it or end up in jail.

What?

And I expect they figured that if he found someone else that he would give up guardianship which he didn't.

When they told him to do that...they were still on good terms...

Why would he do that knowing that they would never grant her wish?

You people act is if he didnt love this woman....that he would just give her up like she was property.



Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Ron Ackerman said this in post #21 :

Again we don't really know what her Will was except by someone who didn't come out with "her will" until he was involved with another woman and received a nice court settlement. He then convienently came up with the idea that Terri had mentioned this. And the only ones that agreed with him were 2 of HIS family. Everyone in her family disagreed with this being her WILL.


Well, by Florida law, Michael Shiavo legally was within his limits.
His parents overstepped their bounds even to the point of getting Rome and Washington in on it.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
Heavens11 said this in post #12 :
I find it a very cold and heartless thing to do -- Michael forcing Terri's parents away from the room when she is so near death (within 10 minutes according to news sources); then letting them in the room only after she died.

Feelings that Michael Schiavo and the Schindler's experienced in their disagreements with each other should have been pushed aside where Michael's wife and the Schindler's daughter was concerned in her dying moments. I can tell you this, it would take an army to move me away from a family member's bedside at the end.


Thanks chelktty for helping to clear this up. The first story that was put out about Terri’s death was how Mike wouldn’t let them in to see their daughter. After hearing Mike’s lawyer speak earlier today about it, once again Mike was painted as this horrible guy by the Schindlers.

Do you not see a pattern here Heavens? Why is it that so much character assassination is being launched from one side of the camp and not the other? Now I know the Schindlers are feeling grief but in my opinion it speaks to the character of that family. Not one of them has been able to call the others into check with their unending nonsense.

Mike’s lawyer said it was a split second decision. That Mike was down the hall laying down and the hospice nurse told him he need to get down to the room because Terri was entering her last stages.

It was the nurse that asked her brother to leave the room so they can assess the situation. He became irate and she had to have officers hold him back. She then called Mike and told him of the situation and he then decided not to let them in because he said he wanted Terri’s last moments to be free from that nonsense.

Now again I ask. With all the character assassinations going around it seems that Mike once again was thinking of Terri. Given the animosity between these two families, there’s simply no way they could have been in that room at the same time.

It’s more than about both sides putting their differences aside. It only takes one, one person to mess everything up for everyone else.

You may have dissenting opinion about Mike’s private decision about Terri but it is he who has shown the most integrity throughout this entire ordeal.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

I call heaven and earth today to witness against you: I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. Choose life, then, that you and your descendants may live, by loving the Lord, your God, heeding his voice, and holding fast to him. (Deuteronomy 30:19-20a, New American Bible)

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

And your point is what Delta? Clearly that verse is telling you what "life" he was speaking of choosing and it wasn't carnal, it was everlasting life.

Do you even know what you're quoting here?

I said it once, I'll say it again. It would seem that so many of you who believe in the better afterlife are sure in a hurry to stop those whom are weary in getting there.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #29 :

And your point is what Delta? Clearly that verse is telling you what "life" he was speaking of choosing and it wasn't carnal, it was everlasting life.

Do you even know what you're quoting here?

I said it once, I'll say it again. It would seem that so many of you who believe in the better afterlife are sure in a hurry to stop those whom are weary in getting there.


Preach brother, preach it!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

quote:
Delta said this in post #28 :
I call heaven and earth today to witness against you: I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. Choose life, then, that you and your descendants may live, by loving the Lord, your God, heeding his voice, and holding fast to him. (Deuteronomy 30:19-20a, New American Bible)


I was posting that biblical phrase to show that God wants us to look out for the life of others. How can I expect you whom have called me Asinine to accept this as only a biblical term and not a foray into a war.?

Since when did you become the only person to interpret the biblical phrase I used.?

This term I used was the beginning on a Right to Life thread.

Of course you ignore everything that Rebel is saying as you know more than An MD.

Think what you want.

Note that the world is divided on this situation which means there are a lot of persons who don't think you are right. Ouch That must hurt.! Asinine is your constant badering of Rebel . He has given his opinion enough for even you to be quiet for awhile. If that is possible.

I am not getting into a battle of words with you, as we are so opposite its sad. Call yourself a Christian all you want your words speak for themselves

Delta
Reply To this Message

Posted by: schmiggens

I just wanted to express my sympathy to Terri's family, both her mother and father and her husband. No one has really agreed on what has happened to Terri in life, but I think we can all agree that in death she has finally found peace and release from her tragic life.

I had hoped that the family could put their differences aside for just ten minutes and be together and grieve and mourne Terri's passing as a family. No matter what has happened between the two parties previously, it is a tradgedy for them all that someone that they love has passed away and it would have been nice for Terri if they could have put that behind them for just a few minutes.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
schmiggens said this in post #33 :
it would have been nice for Terri if they could have put that behind them for just a few minutes.


Youre right...it would have been nice..but for some reason, I have a feeling that after this mess, they all felt that there was no possible way that this could be done..it should have been, but I doubt it could have been.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

I have to say one thing about that priest that has been speaking for the Schindler family...how he has been talking about Michael Schiavo being a murderer an all (in so many words)...

What kind of priest is this???

Most priests I have encountered in my life preach forgiveness...he should be stating something along the lines that she should have been kept alive, but now that its done, we all need to forgive and work on the future.

This guy is basically furthering hate towards Michael Schiavo. He certainly isnt doing the right thing......IMO.

Like I said..this is like no priest I've ever dealt with.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

quote:
mystic said this in post #35 :
I have to say one thing about that priest that has been speaking for the Schindler family...how he has been talking about Michael Schiavo being a murderer an all (in so many words)...

What kind of priest is this???

Most priests I have encountered in my life preach forgiveness...he should be stating something along the lines that she should have been kept alive, but now that its done, we all need to forgive and work on the future.

This guy is basically furthering hate towards Michael Schiavo. He certainly isnt doing the right thing......IMO.

Like I said..this is like no priest I've ever dealt with.


I felt the same way Mystic. It was a totally ignorant discussion.

OReilly had a Priest and a Rabbi on tonight and they both agreed that to remove the feeding tube was wrong.

Now we will have an autopsy and that will lead to more disension. Oh Well!
D
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

A few words from the priest:

quote:
but Paul O'Donnell, a Franciscan friar who has been by the Schindlers' side for weeks, said "there is no way" her parents will join Michael Schiavo.

"It would be like a victim's family attending services with the murderer," he said.



Thats nice.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

This whole entire thing is surreal.
I am not certain I am dreaming this entire situation up...one day I'll come out of the Matrix...or this is avery odd psychotropic fugue.

The world is upside down.

http://www.inreview.com/attachment.php?postid=559132

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

Interesting commentary about Michael Schiavo...its kind of nice to hear someone stick up for the guy.

http://www.intellectualconservative...rticle4235.html

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #38 :
or this is a very odd psychotropic fugue.


I think you showed a picture of a psyhogtropic fugue.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
mystic said this in post #40 :

I think you showed a picture of a psyhogtropic fugue.




I believe it is.
Even my computer didn't like it.
I opened the fugue file to post it and
*boom* it blue screened my pc, locked it up and I had to reboot.
Glad I do this for a living or it would have put me over the edge...
Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #38 :
This whole entire thing is surreal.
I am not certain I am dreaming this entire situation up...one day I'll come out of the Matrix...or this is avery odd psychotropic fugue.

The world is upside down.

http://www.inreview.com/attachment.php?postid=559132


The girly mushroom strikes again.

M.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
Heavens wrote
My response was based on the first news story out on the subject. I had no idea of the details that you now know and chastise me for. I think there still could have been a way to allow them (the Schindler's) in the doorway and barred from further entry into the room by the police (which were present) and still allow Michael to be at her bedside. IF the Schindler's became to chaotic, then I would see no problem in removing them from the room. But at least allow them the benefit of the doubt -- they did bring the child into the world and raised her.


There was nothing to doubt since Bob Schindler was already showing his posterior. Remember Heavens, there is a long history of acrimony between these families. Why would you believe, especially after the display they were currently putting on, that there wouldn’t have been strife in Terri’s last moments if they were allowed in?

Nothing I’ve seen from the Schindlers have demonstrated an ability to be rational.

quote:
Delta wrote
I was posting that biblical phrase to show that God wants us to look out for the life of others. How can I expect you whom have called me Asinine to accept this as only a biblical term and not a foray into a war.?

Since when did you become the only person to interpret the biblical phrase I used.?

This term I used was the beginning on a Right to Life thread.

Of course you ignore everything that Rebel is saying as you know more than An MD.

Think what you want.


First, there are many institutions that quote bible verses out of context into convenience. If you’d ever taken time to read any of what you’ve posted, then you would understand that it wasn’t about carnal life but prelude to eternal life. I never claimed to be the “only person to interpret” the bible, however if you’ve ever read it for yourself, you would understand the very basic principle I posted in my preceding post.

Secondly Delta, I didn’t call you “asinine” I called a statement you made in another threat asinine because it was. Can you keep this into context please?

Lastly, and most importantly I challenge you to show me in any thread where I claimed to know more than an MD. If memory serves me correctly, I clearly stated that I couldn’t dispute his clinical knowledge of PVS.

Do you believe somehow that simply because a person has expertise that they don’t have personal convictions of opinion? I only challenged his assessment of Terri Schiavo not being in PVS vs doctors who’ve examined her and he conceded to as much so what’s your point here?

Look, I don’t mean to personally attack anyone and if you think that’s what I’m doing, then I’m sorry. However, so many people are governed by their emotions and not logic because of personal life experiences then act out their issues of heart when subjects like this come into play. I’m just a realist that’s all and sometimes from viewing your posts, you’ve seem to buy into the character assassin’s accusations of Mike Schiavo.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

I have been on INreview for over two and one half years, debated in the hottest political threads led the Scott Peterson thread from the beginning to end and had heated arguments with Mystic and others, Therein are the differences.

You speak as though its the end of all of conversation. The Catholic position drives you into an emotional fugue and maybe you don't realize it but you are coming across as an arrogant know it all.

I leave my emotions, for the most part out of threads like this.

Save that for the political threads, where I too have called others Idiots or morons but not here

But you have to remember this whole situation is an emotional time bomb that isn't finished yet.

Last night on 'A&E they ran a special ( already) It was a bit slanted against Michael, but very interesting as to many of the most famous Neurologists who over and over claimed Terri was not brain dead but very disabled.
Her husband shut off all treatments for Terri in 94 0r 5, This meant she got nothing. Rumors from a nurse in the home said he was heard saying the ***** should die. she is ruining my life? Right? No difference cause I feel actions sometimes speak l;ouder then words.

He authorized no more treatment. She was left to lie in the bed. no TV no flowers no music therapy Nada zilch nothing.
This move in itself is cruel and intolerable punishment.

The films they showed which were brought to Court obliviously showed Terri responding to her Mothers kisses and one Neurologist examined her total body and one could see the resistance she was giving with a leg.
They also showed her brain scan and it was pointed out that any area that was Grey indicated live brain cells. Imagine that.?

Point being if a person can't talk does not mean they are a vegetable.

It were these films that made the court rule in favor of the parents two times and Terri's food and water were continued.

I believe that as the special said, husband finds new romance wants out of marriage and her death. Painting him as a high moral character is incorrect .He has moved on with his life, Common law wife, new family, why want this albatross on his back.REmoved.

People are just human and I guess he was sick of Terri and the money going out. Good Reason to stop all therapy?

There will continue to be debate on this subject, Now comes the Autopsy.

Dr Michael Baden was on Greta's show last night and offered a dramatic discourse on the Autopsy. In Fact he made mention of it being done to find criminal injustices to Terri even bordering on Homicide.

So one of peace I don't really mind your questions just when you hit me personally
. You have questioned everything Rebel; has stated and you friend you are no doctor. I admire his patience

D

Lets be friends. I am really a nice Wonder Woman. Ha Ha.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #43 :


There was nothing to doubt since Bob Schindler was already showing his posterior. Remember Heavens, there is a long history of acrimony between these families. Why would you believe, especially after the display they were currently putting on, that there wouldn’t have been strife in Terri’s last moments if they were allowed in?

Nothing I’ve seen from the Schindlers have demonstrated an ability to be rational.



First, there are many institutions that quote bible verses out of context into convenience. If you’d ever taken time to read any of what you’ve posted, then you would understand that it wasn’t about carnal life but prelude to eternal life. I never claimed to be the “only person to interpret” the bible, however if you’ve ever read it for yourself, you would understand the very basic principle I posted in my preceding post. YOu have no cl;ue what I read nor shoul.d comment on it. Its not your business

Secondly Delta, I didn’t call you “asinine” I called a statement you made in another threat asinine because it was. Can you keep this into context please? Well One lets see if you can do just thst instead of jukping opn the bandwagon of Death.
Lastly, and most importantly I challenge you to show me in any thread where I claimed to know more than an MD. If memory serves me correctly, I clearly stated that I couldn’t dispute his clinical knowledge of PVS. Perhaps claiming to know more was a little strong but questioning his every post has got to be annoying. He states his postion plainly enough, Perhaps not plain enough for your consumption due to the mental block in your head.
Do you believe somehow that simply because a person has expertise that they don’t have personal convictions of opinion? I only challenged his assessment of Terri Schiavo not being in PVS vs doctors who’ve examined her and he conceded to as much so what’s your point here? That its a divided issue not onesided and his side should be respected not deciminated everytime he comes on here
Look, I don’t mean to personally attack anyone and if you think that’s what I’m doing, then I’m sorry. However, so many people are governed by their emotions and not logic because of personal life experiences then act out their issues of heart when subjects like this come into play. I’m just a realist that’s all and sometimes from viewing your posts, you’ve seem to buy into the character assassin’s accusations of Mike Schiavo.


Not without reason, I would never assasinate anyones character unless there exsists proof and to me a zilliopn others he is a moral pig.

Ihave contiued my reply to you following.

Delta
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
I’m just a realist that’s all and sometimes from viewing your posts, you’ve seem to buy into the character assassin’s accusations of Mike Schiavo.


I actually told her the same thing last night when I talked to her.

And she knows that I have to agree with you.

People who take what the Schindler's say as truth and who havent considered his side or other news that prove otherwise have been manipulated.

It doesnt take that much to search for the truth if one wants to see it.

The Schindlers have done everything in their power to twist the truth, and the media has bought into that, printed it, and much of the public has bought into that. The fact is if people would look around and sift for the truth, they will find that the Schindler's have made many accusations that arent necessarily true.

Delta said:

quote:
It was a bit slanted against Michael


Yes, it was.

quote:
but very interesting as to many of the most famous Neurologists who over and over claimed Terri was not brain dead but very disabled.


Only one of those people had even examined her, and his stories about his own patients didn't even come close to comparing to her. All the people he compared her to did not come close to having the same type of brain damage. All his patients could function without a feeding tube or life support. That should tell you something.

quote:
She was left to lie in the bed. no TV no flowers no music therapy Nada zilch nothing. This move in itself is cruel and intolerable punishment.


This came from the nurse that got fired. The court found that her statement were not credible. I'd venture to guess that there was a reason for them stating that. Do you even know if there were statements made that proved her wrong, which in essence proved to the court that she wasnt credible? Think about that.

After talking to you last night, you admitted that you had never even seen or heard Michael Schiavo until last night. You also stated that he "looked" like a jerk.

How were you able to assess that from him without even knowing his story from his point of view? You took the Schindler's word as gospel, and never looked back.

How do people make a assessment like that without looking at both sides?

I don't understand that.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

I would think you woul.d keep our private conversations private but thats too much to ask of one who knows everything.....J/K I knew you would reply as we talked.

I have to get dressed, jujst learned my back brake lights are not working. And the techinicians are coming out to fix my blown gasket. Ha Ha

NOt my week. Wondering around in the rain yesterdsy 40 miles from home,I would have freaked if Ihad known. My Guardian Angel took care of me and I think Ineed him here on this bosrd at times Hee Hee.

I will be back and address your critque which by the way you didn't see the first twent minutes of,f you remember.

Lata

D

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
Delta said this in post #47 :
I will be back and address your critque which by the way you didn't see the first twent minutes of,f you remember.


I remember...but you gave me the run down.

From my understanding of what you told me, they showed a few three second blips of videos of her (the only ones we have been privvy to thanks to the Schindlers creative editing process), which manipulated you that much more.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
Delta wrote
The Catholic position drives you into an emotional fugue and maybe you don't realize it but you are coming across as an arrogant know it all.


The former part of this statement isn’t worth dignifying. The latter part is even worse so I’ll simply attribute this to your emotions you say you’re trying to leave out of your judgments.

quote:

Last night on 'A&E they ran a special ( already) It was a bit slanted against Michael, but very interesting as to many of the most famous Neurologists who over and over claimed Terri was not brain dead but very disabled.


I didn’t see special so I can’t effectively comment on it. However the doctor in the other thread in which you accuse me of knowing more, well he stated in one of his posts that you can get 100 experts to examine one person and come up with several different diagnosis and prognosis.

Being that Terri’s condition hasn’t improved for over 15 yrs, I’d say there’s more evidence to suggest the diagnosis of PVS was correct.

quote:

Her husband shut off all treatments for Terri in 94 0r 5, This meant she got nothing.


Terri came to be in that condition in 1990. Did the A&E special tell you he took care of her most diligently until 94 or 95 when he realized that doctors were probably right about her prognosis? He even went to school to become certified in healthcare so he can better care for her. Did they mention that? If they didn’t it’s a shame, if they did and you left it out, then it’s obvious that you’re biased.

As for that nurse you’ve mentioned, Mystic answered it quite effectively. The courts found her story not credible period. Imagine if you would that someone dredged up everything you were accused of in an effort to paint you in a light you knew wasn’t true.

quote:

He authorized no more treatment. She was left to lie in the bed. no TV no flowers no music therapy Nada zilch nothing.
This move in itself is cruel and intolerable punishment.


By who’s standards A&E? First, Terri couldn’t watch TV so why have it there. As for her being “left to lie in bed” that is utter nonsense. Terri didn’t have one bed sore to my knowledge. Had she been neglected like you or A&E seem to heavily believe, she’d definitely have them everywhere.

quote:

The films they showed which were brought to Court obliviously showed Terri responding to her Mothers kisses and one Neurologist examined her total body and one could see the resistance she was giving with a leg.
They also showed her brain scan and it was pointed out that any area that was Grey indicated live brain cells. Imagine that.?


Terri’s mother filmed over 4hrs of video yet she only showed us a few clippings of it. Now why do you think that was?

As for the neurologist, I have nothing to say about that but his diagnosis of living brain cells in the region of her dead cells directly contradicts even the Schindler’s doctor’s medical opinions.

quote:

Perhaps claiming to know more was a little strong but questioning his every post has got to be annoying. He states his postion plainly enough, Perhaps not plain enough for your consumption due to the mental block in your head.


And you say I come off a little arrogant? Look, I have to say this. Though I respect the doctors expertise in this matter it is not shared with all doctors, even he alludes to this.

Though claiming I questioned his every post is quite another exaggeration, I did question his opinion of right to die. I also told him quite diplomatically that I would give more weight to the doctors who examined Terri than himself since they’ve done a thorough examination.

He also conceded to that being a very relevant point and any one reading my responses to “some” of his posting could see that I was referencing his opinion not medical expertise. He doesn’t believe in allowing a person to die under any circumstance and I simply don’t agree with that, especially if it is the person’s wishes to relieve them of suffering.

If I’m wrong, simply cut and paste in this forum where I challenged his medical expertise, simple as that. Since the doctor himself hasn’t made any of the claims you’ve made above, I think it’s safe to say that this is your opinion. Your right to have it but I can certainly see how you can become overly and emotionally indulgent in the dirty politics of this entire ordeal.

Lastly, you seem to be very emotional for one who leaves their emotions out of forums like these. If you are emotional to begin with, it’s rather hard to separate yourself from it.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
Delta also wrote
I believe that as the special said, husband finds new romance wants out of marriage and her death. Painting him as a high moral character is incorrect .He has moved on with his life, Common law wife, new family, why want this albatross on his back.REmoved.


Oh, I forgot to address this little judgmental point of yours which is commonly stated by those on the far right.

In 1993, Mike Schiavo stated that this same family now accusing him of adultery urged in to get involved with other women because they knew Terri was gone and he had needs to be fulfilled.

Now since the conflict they are accusing him of adultery. I find that “convenient” if this is true. It sounds feasible.

I find it funny that so many of you can sit in judgment of this man who probably endured heavy emotional stress during this entire ordeal, yet he isn’t allowed to seek comfort of any kind.

Given all the other things the Schindlers have suddenly levied at Mike, I’m not surprised one bit at this. Their tactics, no matter how much they disagree are despicable. The fact that so many of you are buying into it only signifies the mentality of those hanging witches in Salem, Mass. Completely absent of facts, you all will jump to every and any conclusion.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
Heavens11 said this in post #49 :
Oh, brother! Talk about extremism on the other side of the argument.


If by that statement you mean that I wont accept the Schindler's views based on what they want to show rather than telling people the truth (to which we are privvy to, if once cares to see it)..


Then I guess I am what you say.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Mystic!

You are a truth junkie!
You love the truth!
How extremist of you!

[Come on people love the lies hate the truth] Be an extremist for the "right" side.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #50 :
Did the A&E special tell you he took care of her most diligently until 94 or 95 when he realized that doctors were probably right about her prognosis?


No they did not.

They had his attorney speak a couple time. Most of the show was told from Pam Anderson's view (the Schindler's attorney). They had one or two short clips of Michael Schiavo, one of his brother, but the majority was clips of interviews by Terri's brother, father, sister, and mother.

Like Delta herself even admitted...it was slanted against Micheal Schiavo, even though they tried to make it look as if they were being fair.

Like you questioned...there were too many things in which they did not tell.

Pam Anderson also made a mention to the fact the when Terri was by her grandma's side (could have been Michael Schiavo's grandma..I got confused to which side they were speaking of)..she had mentioned that she would never want to be kept alive like that.

Anderson went on to say that her comment was just made at that moment, but she really meant nothing by it.

Step up for Anderson legal advice and get a free mind reading!

Pretty obvious that people accept the fact that she said that outloud.

They say she is a devout catholic, they say she would never want this, yet they admit that she said that. Why would a devout catholic, who is supposedly against taking someone off life support, say a statement like this? Hmmm..
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

quote:
mystic said this in post #54 :


No they did not. Yes they did where were you? OH you missed that part

They had his attorney speak a couple time. He spoke a lot saying how much of A Saint Mike was M ost of the show was told from Pam Anderson's view (the Schindler's attorney). They had one or two short clips of Michael Schiavo, one of his brother, but the majority was clips of interviews by Terri's brother, father, sister, and mother.

Like Delta herself even admitted...it was slanted against Micheal Schiavo, even though they tried to make it look as if they were being fair. When have we ever seen a special that was totaly fair? Never Mystic, but Bill Kurtis trys to give a 50 50 slant even though the parts you are referring to about Michael did not paint him as a truly loving husband
Like you questioned...there were too many things in which they did not tell. At least we agree on that one Darlin
Pam Anderson also made a mention to the fact the when Terri was by her grandma's side (could have been Michael Schiavo's grandma..I got confused to which side they were speaking of)..she had mentioned that she would never want to be kept alive like that. And that utterance should be her wishes when it might have been made in the light of an emotional situation years ago when she was a new bride, never thinking this kind of thing could ever happen to her. Remember young people think they are immortal. If she meant that utterance then she should have had a living will drawn up,not leave herself to the whims of a husband who is gravely stressed and sick of the entire situation.
Anderson went on to say that her comment was just made at that moment, but she really meant nothing by it. Exactly what I just said ,an emotional utterance.
Step up for Anderson legal advice and get a free mind reading!

Pretty obvious that people accept the fact that she said that outloud. Pretty obvious by whos standard you anti lifers ?

They say she is a devout catholic, they say she would never want this, yet they admit that she said that. Why would a devout catholic, who is supposedly against taking someone off life support, say a statement like this? Hmmm..


Who is THEY? Mikes family? How did they know what she said at the bedside of Grandma?
Hmm? YOu have come out with your opinion and I mine and never the twain shall meet. Reminds me of old times The true point is there was no proof just something hubby dreamed up to get her off his back. Hey anyone would be stressed to the max but for God's sake Starvation and dehydration is going too far. Her parents said to give her to them they would take care of her at their home Why wasn't this done? Because of his wish to be rid of her? When a person is so disabled they cannot speak for themselves then we need to have mercy. Not giving basic hydration and food to her was barbaric and thats that.

Since there are so many differing opinions on the subject of with holding basics to one of need do you think we will ever know what terrible things she suffered? Guess not, But I will stand on the side of Mercy as our Pope has done.

D
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

Here is something I didnt see mentioned:


quote:
Despite the row over money, Schiavo and the Schindlers agreed on one major point in the 2000 testimony: the extent of Terri's brain damage, according to additional court documents cited by The Miami Herald. In the documents, Pamela Campbell, then the Schindlers' lawyer, told the court that "we do not doubt that she's in a persistent vegetative state."


Ooops...

Earlier I referred to her as Pam Anderson. Mistakenly I did that. Must have been due to the commerical I saw for Pamela Anderson's new show due out this fall. My bad.

The lawyer is actually Pamela Campbell.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
Delta wrote
And that utterance should be her wishes when it might have been made in the light of an emotional situation years ago when she was a new bride, never thinking this kindof thing could ever happen to her. Remember young people think they are immortal. If she meant that utterance then she shouldhavehad a living will drawn up,not leave herself tothe whims of a husband who is gravely stressed and sick of the entire situation.


Delta, please make your post a little more legible. It’s hard sometime differentiating between your quotes and those you are responding to. Some of your colors are running between the two. Ok now back to the posting you’ve just posted.

How many “utterances” and “emotional situations” can Terri have to have been stressed each time she’s stated her wishes? Obviously she made the statements to others besides her husband. Even her own friends testified about it in court.

I’d surely say that’s more than “the light of an emotional situation” going on here. And how many 25yr olds have living wills? I venture to ask how many 35 yrs do?

quote:

When a person is so disabled they cannot speak for themselves then we need to have mercy. Not giving basic hydration and food to her was barbaric and thats that.


Mike was showing mercy by honoring his wife’s wishes. The Schindlers made a statement in court from what I understand, that they don’t care what Terri said, they want her alive.

So again, who’s the selfishly motivated one here?

If you can’t show a story from both sides, then don’t show it at all. Inevitably people will believe whatever a TV tube and the internet tells them to, even if it bares no resemblance of the truth.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

At this juncture Mystic, I believe the Schindlers would have said just about anything to stop the tube from being removed, even renege or recant some of their earlier statements. Certainly in their deluded minds they believe that the love they have for Terri is justification for slandering Mike Schiavo’s name all over the public.

Isn’t it funny that for 3yrs, they all got along great, then after the fall out, Mike Schiavo was the devil reincarnate? They accused him of everything since, even strangling his wife and causing this condition she suffered from and instead of reasonably sound minded people, though they disagree, saying that the Schindlers are obviously slandering him out of grief, no they are accepting all of the garbage chapeau that comes out of their mouths.

I understand grief and disagreement but when does character kick in? That is, if you have any.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

quote:
Delta said this in post #55 :
The true point is there was no proof just something hubby dreamed up to get her off his back. Hey anyone would be stressed to the max but for God's sake Starvation and dehydration is going too far. Her parents said to give her to them they would take care of her at their home Why wasn't this done? Because of his wish to be rid of her? When a person is so disabled they cannot speak for themselves then we need to have mercy. Not giving basic hydration and food to her was barbaric and thats that.[/COLOR]
D [/B]



If he wished to "Get rid of her" as you've so eloquently put it.... would he have not given them the rights to her? Would he not have taken the millions of dollars offered to him to do just that???? It wasn't about "Getting rid" of someone, D.... and NO ONE, other than Terri, and Michael, know the truth about the conversation regarding her wishes. YOU don't know, I don't know. NO ONE knows this. It was between them... whether it happened or not. But, he did what he said that she requested.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

Hmmmm... because that's what people do, Bob... they tend to believe the media, and what they see and hear.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #51 :


Oh, I forgot to address this little judgmental point of yours which is commonly stated by those on the far right.

In 1993, Mike Schiavo stated that this same family now accusing him of adultery urged in to get involved with other women because they knew Terri was gone and he had needs to be fulfilled.

Needs its always that with you men darn Needs what about Terr'is needs to have a loving spouse with her until the very end. Not someone who came across as a smart alec in the special anyway. I haVE RESEARCHED HIM NOW AND STILL STICK TO MY GUNS ON HIS CHARACTER. I don't agree with duplicity but maybe they were so emotionally involved they weren't thinking correctly. Never should a parent give forthwith the Ok to commit adultery. No excuse for that
Now since the conflict they are accusing him of adultery. I find that “convenient” if this is true. It sounds feasible. He did copmit Adultery pure and simple so maybe that was his reasoning to be rid of her.
I find it funny that so many of you can sit in judgment of this man who probably endured heavy emotional stress during this entire ordeal, yet he isn’t allowed to seek comfort of any kind.

You know he brought this all upon himself so don't feel sorry for him,put your sorrow where it belogs on the Soul of Terri

Given all the other things the Schindlers have suddenly levied at Mike, I’m not surprised one bit at this. Their tactics, no matter how much they disagree are despicable. The fact that so many of you are buying into it only signifies the mentality of those hanging witches in Salem, Mass. Completely absent of facts, you all will jump to every and any conclusion.


Don't attack what you don't seem to understand One, its called Mercy. And oh I am emotionally involved and I guess thats apparent But I am not sorry for feeling something at least I feel and thats a good Christian thing. Rather feel then gather on the side of non caring suposed Christians. Do you know that here in Louisiana it is against the law to deprive your dog of food and water? Now we are finally moving toward an answer for us human beings. Its called Death with Dignity.

D
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

We all know the story. How is it that with total absence of anything resembling truth, you can accept the slandering of Mike's character as fact?

I've said it before, the character assasinations one sided. That should be enough for the reasonable to question it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

Delta... you've RESEARCHED his character? What, are you a private investagator now... and you've been following him around, and PERSONALLY seeing things, and PERSONALLY interviewing him, and people who KNOW him???

Come on... researching what you can find on the internet, in the news, etc.... that's all slanted reporting. You pick and choose what you want.

Unless you KNOW this man.... you don't know ANYTHING about him. I don't know him... and I don't know what he's like.... but, it is NOT my job to judge... nor yours.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #58 :
At this juncture Mystic, I believe the Schindlers would have said just about anything to stop the tube from being removed, even renege or recant some of their earlier statements.

Agreed!

Certainly in their deluded minds they believe that the love they have for Terri is justification for slandering Mike Schiavo’s name all over the public.

Amazing isnt it? To go that low, and then basically allow their "spiritual advisor" to keep preaching that he killed her? This guy is getting death threats due to their slander.

Isn’t it funny that for 3yrs, they all got along great, then after the fall out, Mike Schiavo was the devil reincarnate? They accused him of everything since, even strangling his wife and causing this condition she suffered from and instead of reasonably sound minded people, though they disagree, saying that the Schindlers are obviously slandering him out of grief, no they are accepting all of the garbage chapeau that comes out of their mouths.

I understand grief and disagreement but when does character kick in? That is, if you have any.

Good point!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
Delta wrote
Needs its always that with you men


That sound pretty scornful. Maybe we are dealing with a little more than you let on here….possibly?

quote:

what about Terr'is needs to have a loving spouse with her until the very end. Not someone who came across as a smart alec in the special anyway.


On my, how do you see Mike as a smart alec and not see the slandering from the Schindlers defies belief. Had they not tied this up in court for so many years, it would have been long ago a moot point.

Terri wasn’t missing nothing and her needs were certainly being cared for. For you to believe that she was slighted because after 5 yrs Mike found someone else, well I think it’s just more of the status quo we’ve seen from the Schindlers.

quote:

I haVE RESEARCHED HIM NOW AND STILL STICK TO MY GUNS ON HIS CHARACTER. I don't agree with duplicity but maybe they were so emotionally involved they weren't thinking correctly. Never should a parent give forthwith the Ok to commit adultery. No excuse for that


You are unbelievable. So you honestly think that Terri would have wanted him to simply wait until she’s gone? Ask yourself that question about your spouse. Then again, maybe not with that opening statement you’ve made.

quote:

He did copmit Adultery pure and simple so maybe that was his reasoning to be rid of her.


Well first it was for the money, now for the woman. It was because he abused her too. So no one has adequately answered the question. Why not simply rid himself of her and give them to her parents? Wait, I know. Because he hated her parents so much that he decided to do all this to get even right?

quote:

You know he brought this all upon himself so don't feel sorry for him,put your sorrow where it belogs on the Soul of Terri


Well, any points for being of sound reason has just gone out the window, at least from my perspective. So Terri’s bulimia and subsequent heart stoppage was Mike’s fault? How absurd to believe this is all his doing.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

quote:
Kris Rucker said this in post #64 :
Delta... you've RESEARCHED his character? What, are you a private investagator now... and you've been following him around, and PERSONALLY seeing things, and PERSONALLY interviewing him, and people who KNOW him???

Come on... researching what you can find on the internet, in the news, etc.... that's all slanted reporting. You pick and choose what you want.

Unless you KNOW this man.... you don't know ANYTHING about him. I don't know him... and I don't know what he's like.... but, it is NOT my job to judge... nor yours.


No I am not an investigator but Kris when one reads a number of articles doesn't one have the right and ability to offer an opinion? I think half of what the media says is wrong but then there is the other half that is correct.

I don't have to know you personally to know your character same with others. We form opinions Kris this is my opinion not yours and am not asking you to share it.

D
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:

Delta... you've RESEARCHED his character?


Yep, she got it straight from FOX News "NO SPIN ZONE".

I'll be back later. I know she's going to be off the chain when I get back..
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
Delta said this in post #62 :
Needs its always that with you men darn Needs what about Terr'is needs to have a loving spouse with her until the very end. Not someone who came across as a smart alec in the special anyway.

They showed like only one clip of something he stated...how was that being a smart alec?

This is what Im talking about...one little tiny two second clip of a man you stated that you had never seen or heard until last night, and you summed up his character?

I cant be the only one scratching my head over this one.


I haVE RESEARCHED HIM NOW AND STILL STICK TO MY GUNS ON HIS CHARACTER.

You researched him? Care to tell me what the websites were? Maybe religious.org or ritetolife.org, or something along those line perhaps? Look past those right to life websites...they are only selling what you have already bought.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #69 :


Yep, she got it straight from FOX News "NO SPIN ZONE".

I'll be back later. I know she's going to be off the chain when I get back..



What chain Sweetie? Big bad One of peace blew his gasket thnking Bill Oreilly has been my news source.

Sorry to disapoint you but I have been all over the internet looking for articles. Where do you get your info from Canada?

D
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Inner City Blues

I hope people what people take from this case is that eating disorders are no picnic. You're lucky if live with minor injury, since you can turn your life around. You're lucky if you die because the pain will be gone. Terri on the other hand was locked in limbo killed herself enough to not be able to interact with the world, but not enough to extinguish brainstem function.

There have been very many nasty things said against the husband, and I think he was really trying to fulfill his wife's wishes. I can understand the parents grief and their inability to let go. How many people really want their children to go before them? But I think you have to step back and let the spouse decide. Not only is it best legally, but the spouse is the one that is there 24/7 so they know their spouse better than any parent will ever know.

As for the allegations of spousal abuse, I'll put it succinctly. She was bulimic. That means low potassium levels, which leads to higher blood pressure, kidney stones, bone loss, and higher probability of fractures. Her bone scan revealed injury to here skull, thoracic cavity, a vertebra, including here knees, hips, and ankles. Everything makes sense. Potassium level below normal adult due to bulimia. She probably exercised a lot also to lose weight, and she already has weakened bones, thus fractures should occur in the legs. She suffered cardiac arrest and collapsed (not uncommon), this explains injuries like those to her head and, according to her medical record, her knee. As for the thoracic cavity, CPR and resuscitation. The abuse claim is just another claim to slime the husband, which is unfortunate.

I guess more people will make sure they get a living will now.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Delta

quote:
mystic said this in post #70 :


You know Mystic my belief on Right to Life, We discussed it last night. and we even discussed if you with a son could bring yourself to deprive him of food and water. What was your answer? NO NO NO.. So don't come on here and be a hypocrite because you like to argue.

If my sources include Right to life origins so be it. I believe in the right to life so I do not believe in Abortions, or deprivatin of basic food and water to another human being. If that makes you uneasy I really don't care, you live with your way and I will live mine.


D