Why George W. Bush Really Invaded Iraq - Iraq

Why George W. Bush Really Invaded Iraq

Iraq Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: Asian-American

March 24, 2003 issue
Copyright © 2003 The American Conservative

A neoconservative clique seeks to ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interest.

by Patrick J. Buchanan

The War Party may have gotten its war. But it has also gotten something it did not bargain for. Its membership lists and associations have been exposed and its motives challenged. In a rare moment in U.S. journalism, Tim Russert put this question directly to Richard Perle: “Can you assure American viewers ... that we’re in this situation against Saddam Hussein and his removal for American security interests? And what would be the link in terms of Israel?”

Suddenly, the Israeli connection is on the table, and the War Party is not amused. Finding themselves in an unanticipated firefight, our neoconservative friends are doing what comes naturally, seeking student deferments from political combat by claiming the status of a persecuted minority group. People who claim to be writing the foreign policy of the world superpower, one would think, would be a little more manly in the schoolyard of politics. Not so.

[ . . . ]

Complete article at http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

The ol' Israeli/Mossad connection.

This explanation fits Pat Buchanan since he is an avowed Jew hater.
What other explanation for the war could there ever be.

Israel/the Jews are the bad guy in everything...and such nonsense has gone on for centuries...why stop now?

In fact, brace yourselves it's only going to get worse.

I hope you can look beyond the nonsense Asian-American. After all, the 1940's wasn't a good time for Asian Americans in the US either.
Why contribute to more bias and prejudice against another minority?

But what do I know?
I am highly evolved and have no thoughts whatsoever.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Asian-American

Thanks for posting your opinion, I enjoyed your commentary.

Regards.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Whidden

Hey Asian-American, I moved this thread over to the Iraq forum, it will get more hits over here.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: h@ts

sowhatsthetruth -

I dont' know anything about Pat Buchanon but surely this article deserves a better response that it's "anti-Semitic".

Much of the article is about that very thing, using the anti-Semitic race card to avoid responding. I'd really like to hear a reasoned response from anyone, and there are many supporters of Israel's position in the Middle East on this board, because this article is packed with charges against the neoconservative, their motives, Israel's use of 9/11 to remake the Middle East as they want it. Here's just a few paragraphs cut from the article:

quote:
On Sept. 20, forty neoconservatives sent an open letter to the White House instructing President Bush on how the war on terror must be conducted. Signed by Bennett, Podhoretz, Kirkpatrick, Perle, Kristol, and Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer, the letter was an ultimatum. To retain the signers’ support, the president was told, he must target Hezbollah for destruction, retaliate against Syria and Iran if they refuse to sever ties to Hezbollah, and overthrow Saddam. Any failure to attack Iraq, the signers warned Bush, “will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.”
------------------
Donnelly was echoed by Jonah Goldberg of National Review: “The United States needs to go to war with Iraq because it needs to go to war with someone in the region and Iraq makes the most sense.”
------------------
Goldberg endorsed “the Ledeen Doctrine” of ex-Pentagon official Michael Ledeen, which Goldberg described thus: “Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show we mean business.
--------------------
Stability is an unworthy American mission, and a misleading concept to boot. We do not want stability in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and even Saudi Arabia; we want things to change. The real issue is not whether, but how to destabilize
---------------------
the Standard, we should launch wars on “any group or government inclined to support or sustain others like them in the future.”
--------------------
I can also envisage the establishment of some kind of American protectorate over the oil fields of Saudi Arabia, as we more and more come to wonder why 7,000 princes should go on being permitted to exert so much leverage over us and everyone else.
----------------------
“Iraq is the tactical pivot, Saudi Arabia the strategic pivot, Egypt the prize.”
----------------------
U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton said in meetings with Israeli officials … that he has no doubt America will attack Iraq and that it will be necessary to deal with threats from Syria, Iran and North Korea afterwards.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
h@ts said this in post #5 :
sowhatsthetruth -

I dont' know anything about Pat Buchanon but surely this article deserves a better response that it's "anti-Semitic".



I didn't say good ol' boy Pat was "anti-Semitic" I said he's an avowed Jew hater....who cries wolf everytime anyone calls him "anti-semitic." In fact I am surprised ol' Puchanan hasn't strapped some semtec on himself and walked into a crowded Israeli cafe....that's how much Puchanan despises Israel and the Jews. I guess his vitriolic statements are as much bravery as a coward can muster.

How long have you been following Puchanan's statements on this very issue of Israel?

Let me put it to you this way...
If the only reason the US was in the Middle East was to keep Islamics from trying to destroy Israel...I would be OK with the war...but that is not the case.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

Anyone else catch that this artical is from 2003? I didn't even bother reading it. Knock yourselve's out.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Puchanan has been spouting the same crap for decades now.
The date doesn't matter...the rhetoric has always been the same.

Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Iraq Forum: Why George W. Bush Really Invaded Iraq

Forum Forum Forum