Tell me now that she is "gone"... - Euthanasia/Right to Die

Tell me now that she is "gone"...

Euthanasia/Right to Die Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: Sayzak

Is this a fluke? She responds to music.

http://web.tampabay.rr.com/ccb/videos/Terri_music.rm

She opens her eyes on command (well, with a little delay).

http://web.tampabay.rr.com/ccb/videos/Terri_Big_Eyes.rm

She recognizes her mother, and when asked a question, she TRIES TO SPEAK!!!!

http://web.tampabay.rr.com/ccb/videos/hows_that_cold.rm

She is easily anoyed.

http://web.tampabay.rr.com/ccb/videos/Terri_Swab.rm


There are more.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

Snippets of videos are not proof. If you wait long enough, you get the response. The vast majority of the doctors who have ACTUALLY examined Terri, and I am not talking about the ones that only look at video, have concluded that she is in a vegetative state. Laughter, eye movement, groaning are all common for people in this condition.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

OPEN YOUR FREAKING EYES PEOPLE!!!!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

We could say the same to you. None of us has watched the entire 4 hours of video. We should trust the respected people in the medical community who have actually examined her, unlike the neurologist who is a pro-lifer and has not, and conclude that they know what they are doing. People are seeing what they want to see. Don't you think that if you are in her face for HOURS and are trying to get a response, eventually she will have a spontaneous reflex that will appear to be one? I do.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: niwrad428

quote:
fuscia said this in post #4 :
We could say the same to you. None of us has watched the entire 4 hours of video. We should trust the respected people in the medical community who have actually examined her, unlike the neurologist who is a pro-lifer and has not, and conclude that they know what they are doing. People are seeing what they want to see. Don't you think that if you are in her face for HOURS and are trying to get a response, eventually she will have a spontaneous reflex that will appear to be one? I do.


Agreed!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

thank you.

To those that believe she is still there, if you know any nurses or doctors, please do ask them what people in PVS act like. My sister is a nurse who has worked in nursing homes with patients with PSV. She said that you do see many of these responses.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
fuscia said this in post #4 :
We could say the same to you. None of us has watched the entire 4 hours of video. We should trust the respected people in the medical community who have actually examined her, unlike the neurologist who is a pro-lifer and has not, and conclude that they know what they are doing. People are seeing what they want to see. Don't you think that if you are in her face for HOURS and are trying to get a response, eventually she will have a spontaneous reflex that will appear to be one? I do.



quote:
niwrad428 said this in post #5 :


Agreed!


I second that!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

The parents of Terri, in direct violation of a court order, sent snippets of videos to several TV stations to gain the support of the nation. Although I applaud their efforts, the tape is disingenuous.

They asked Terri scores of times to blink her eyes and when she does, they edit that part of the session and send it out to the nation claiming she’s responsive.

This is a sensitive matter. Looking at those videos will make one think however we are not privied to all the information at hand. I simply do not believe that all the courts and judges who’ve heard this case are merely dismissing evidence that she’s still within the limits of today's medicine.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

Exactly oneofpeace!

On another thread, I stated that they sent these video's out hoping that there would be enough naive people to believe these tiny snippets without question....and it seems to have worked to some extent.

Fortunately there are more people out there who look at the whole picture in a more realistic manner and realize that all the doctors except for those right to lifer doctors (as the one Jeb Bush put forth) and the parents' doctors all stated that she is in a PVS. Even the court doctors who are not biased saw it that way as well.

She isnt gonna get better...what is it that people dont understand about that?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: niwrad428

Sayzak,
She is gone.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

They had on Anderson Cooper 360 the court appointed advocate for Terri. He talked about all the hours he spent in her room trying to get any type of response from her. Never got one. He said that he spent time with her parents in there as well as Michael. He said her parents were lovely people. Michael was not warm and fuzzy, but he really loves Terri and did a hell of a job looking after her. No bed sores in 15 years. That alone is pretty incredible given her condition. The transcripts are not up for the show yet. I'll try to find them tomorrow.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

The only naive people are the ones who would say that the evil "Christian" right have an agenda to determine what life is.

Well, I have news for you.
The flip side of this is...and the real problem for us all...is that the government can now decide when our lives should end.

Welcome to the 3rd Reich people.
Enjoy the ride...however long that may last.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

But my living will?
My living will!!!!!

The same sheisty lawyers who drew up and signed the will?
Good luck. The same sheisty lawyers and judges will be assigned to your case when you're lying there unable to speak for yourself. They may decide to let you rot in your bed for 50 years as long as they're making money off you in court.

And the same people you think love you now... they may just take your living will from your file cabinet or safety deposit box and burn it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
fuscia said this in post #6 :


To those that believe she is still there, if you know any nurses or doctors, please do ask them what people in PVS act like. My sister is a nurse who has worked in nursing homes with patients with PSV. She said that you do see many of these responses.


The truth is doctor's have NO CLUE what's going on inside the person. None. Nada. Nyet.

I mean can they ask them "Hey is anybody in there? Guess not, nobody replied."

Come on. Think about it. For one second give it a try here.
How do they know?

THEY DON'T!!!!!

And for the people who have had strokes, come out of PVS, they say THE DOCTOR'S HAD NO FREAKING CLUE!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

It's a little more complicated than that. Medical science has come quite far. But there are many cases where leading medical professionals are even stumped. Is this one of those cases... well, how many more years does this person have to be hooked up to a machine until we find out?

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
right to lifer doctors
neurologist who is a pro-lifer


As opposed to "right to death, pro-death."

Golly gee, what kind of doctor would you want?
It's amazing that "life" has such a negative connotation as opposed to "death" being so much better.

Topsy turvy world.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
HECK said this in post #15 :
It's a little more complicated than that. Medical science has come quite far. But there are many cases where leading medical professionals are even stumped. Is this one of those cases... well, how many more years does this person have to be hooked up to a machine until we find out?

-HECK!


Terry is not hooked up to a machine.
She breathes on her own. Her heart and lungs work on their own.

She had a feeding tube.

So, tell me, can negligent parents use such an excuse with their infant?
"Well, judge, the baby just wouldn't feed herself. And she died."

After this travesty, a response like that just may hold up in one of these crooked courts that infest our country.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

That argument is a fallacy.

Is the feeding tube not a machine? Is someone crumbling crackers and funneling them into a tube... nope.

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

Ever had an IV?
An IV with potassium (KCl) or glucose?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

If I said yes, would it make a difference?

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #12 :
The only naive people are the ones who would say that the evil "Christian" right have an agenda to determine what life is.

Well, I have news for you.
The flip side of this is...and the real problem for us all...is that the government can now decide when our lives should end.

Welcome to the 3rd Reich people.
Enjoy the ride...however long that may last.


Maybe you need a bit more information about this case. No one here thinks that the government should have interfered. We all agree that is wrong. The Big B and the Little B should have stayed out of it, and let the courts handle it.

The moot point here is that should she be allowed to die or not. Government interference is a different matter altogether.

M.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

Terri can't speak a word of english. She can't tell you that she's hungry. Does that mean she isn't hungry?

Ponder that one.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
SWWT wrote
The flip side of this is...and the real problem for us all...is that the government can now decide when our lives should end.


Aditya adequately answered this question. The decision to allow her life to end was her husbands not the court or government. The court just upheld his right to do so based on more than 7yrs of litigation arguing the same points you’re raising here in this forum.

However it is the government that’s trying to decide for the Schiavo family who in their family can live or die not the other way around.

quote:

As opposed to "right to death, pro-death."

Golly gee, what kind of doctor would you want?
It's amazing that "life" has such a negative connotation as opposed to "death" being so much better.


The doctors aren’t pro-death, they just offered their opinion based on their medical expertise not on their wanting Terri to die. However it is very clear that Jeb’s sudden finding of a pro-life neurologist, that it is a biased diagnosis.

quote:

So, tell me, can negligent parents use such an excuse with their infant?
"Well, judge, the baby just wouldn't feed herself. And she died."


This argument is unsustainable. First, a healthy baby is not the same as a permanently brain damaged person. A baby will ultimately grow, speak, eat, converse, respond, love and interact and does not have to be kept alive by artificial means.

This assertion is preposterous.

quote:
Sayzak wrote
Terri can't speak a word of english. She can't tell you that she's hungry. Does that mean she isn't hungry?

Ponder that one.


I don’t get some of you guy’s responses. I mean you do understand that her upper cortex is liquefied right? Doctors have already stated that she cannot feel hunger, pain or anything of the like.

I think this statement shows a fundamental lack of understanding, very common with this situation. People keep comparing her to stroke victims and comatose. They talk of how other loved ones have come out of it after doctors said they wouldn’t.

However, none of them have ever had the extensive damage to their upper cortex that Terri has. And anyone who has has never ever come out of it. This is irrefutable.

Sometimes doctors do get it wrong but that’s usually the exception not the rule. In this case, after seeing Terri’s MRI compared to a healthy one, it leaves little doubt that doctors are wrong in this case.

Hope always can be sustained indefinitely. It is only natural to reject findings that your loved one is already gone. However it isn’t a fare basis to sustain them against their wishes because of it.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

quote:
I don’t get some of you guy’s responses. I mean you do understand that her upper cortex is liquefied right? Doctors have already stated that she cannot feel hunger, pain or anything of the like.

I think this statement shows a fundamental lack of understanding, very common with this situation. People keep comparing her to stroke victims and comatose. They talk of how other loved ones have come out of it after doctors said they wouldn’t.

However, none of them have ever had the extensive damage to their upper cortex that Terri has. And anyone who has has never ever come out of it. This is irrefutable.

Sometimes doctors do get it wrong but that’s usually the exception not the rule. In this case, after seeing Terri’s MRI compared to a healthy one, it leaves little doubt that doctors are wrong in this case.

Hope always can be sustained indefinitely. It is only natural to reject findings that your loved one is already gone. However it isn’t a fare basis to sustain them against their wishes because of it.


I really don't appreciate the condiscending attitude. I DO understand the concept of her condition. I also understand that once the cerebral cortext is liquified, there's no going back.

I don't expect her to miraculousely "heal" after all these years.

However, there is some cerebral cortext intact, otherwise she couldn't do the things she does.

Also, I am not convinced that her condition couldn't improve, if only a little bit.

I couldn't end someone's life if they aknowledged my presence.

I would end my life before I ended someone else's by starvation.

No one knows if she can feel that or not. NO ONE.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

The attitude isn’t much condescending as it is perplexing Sayzak. It would seem that some of you simply refuse to accept the findings of medical experts who’ve taken the time to thoroughly examine Terri during the Florida state judicial process over the past few years..

No one can know for sure if a person in her state can or can’t feel pain however you’re all missing the point. Her husband isn’t fighting for Terri because he decided to euthanize her. He’s trying to honor his wife’s wishes.

All doctors can do is offer their well qualified and expert opinions. After 15yrs I doubt if Terri is going to suddenly get any better Sayzak. Maybe? Sure there’s always a maybe but that isn’t the point.

The courts have heard all the arguments presented, even yours. All of them have unanimously concluded that this was Terri’s wish. Now after years of jurisprudence Congress wants to jump in and declare she didn’t get due process? Now the Federal Courts are involved and after reviewing the case, they too have concluded that this was Terri’s wish.

Whether any of us agree, this is the bottom line. It is all of you who want to argue everything else as the merit for keeping her alive. Maybe you are right about her feeling and maybe her husband is wrong for believing she can’t be rehabilitated. However, this is his call and he has to live with it. Government and the rest of those who seem to know what Terri wants better than she did can surely have your opinion but they need to simply butt out. This is and always was a family matter.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
adityamahesh said this in post #21 :


Maybe you need a bit more information about this case. No one here thinks that the government should have interfered. We all agree that is wrong. The Big B and the Little B should have stayed out of it, and let the courts handle it.

The moot point here is that should she be allowed to die or not. Government interference is a different matter altogether.

M.


Maybe you are not familiar with our government.
The government includes the courts...judicial branch....both federal and state have been involved....even without Congress or Bush interference....the government via the judicial system has been involved in this for 15 years.

And it has turned into a when does life end issue and a who can determine when life ceases and how issue.
And now the government through legal precedent can determine who lives or dies.

And that's how it all started in nazi Germany. They started with the disabled. The government determined who lived or died based on their political agenda.

Can you not see this?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
I mean you do understand that her upper cortex is liquefied right?


No thats baloney.
Explain to me how solid matter becomes liquid and the conditions necessary for such a state change and then maybe then you can see how absolutely stupid is that statement.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

How many of you people with children of your own would pull the feeding tube on your child?

You keep talking about yourself, how you would want it pulled.
Think about it....what would you do if it were your child in this situation?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #28 :
How many of you people with children of your own would pull the feeding tube on your child?

You keep talking about yourself, how you would want it pulled.
Think about it....what would you do if it were your child in this situation?



She is an ADULT, married to someone!!! Her parents don't have legal right to her medical choices. I am an adult... I'm 35 years old. Though I'm not married (can't be.. for reasons we don't need to hash in here), I do have a partner. She knows my wishes.... as does my mother. My mother will NOT step in and change that. She respects my wishes. As hard as it would be to let me go, my mother would never go against something that I want.

Now, how does ANYONE know that Terri never mentioned her preferrance to her parents? I'm NOT saying that she did... but, she could have. Still... she's married, and legally her husband has the rights to say what to do, and what she wanted.... PERIOD!!! THAT is how the law works. I didn't write the laws... but, that's how it goes.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #27 :


No thats baloney.
Explain to me how solid matter becomes liquid and the conditions necessary for such a state change and then maybe then you can see how absolutely stupid is that statement.



Really... so all the medical tests that they've done... and what the results show are baloney? Hmmmm....
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Explain to me how solid matter becomes liquid and the conditions necessary for such a state change and then maybe then you can see how absolutely stupid is that statement.


quote:
reply: Really... so all the medical tests that they've done... and what the results show are baloney? Hmmmm....


Do you understand the question?

How does brain, solid matter, liquify?

How does ice become water?

How does my hand turn into soup?

<edit> What is the melting point of brain matter of the cerebral cortex variety?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: fuscia

The brain matter dies and shrinks. The area then fills with spinal fluid. Look it up.

As for the assertation that she must have some cerebral cortex left or she would not have the movement that she does, that also is false. The brain stem controlls heart beat, eye movement, breathing, and body movement. All of those functions go on even when the cerebral cortex is gone.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
SWTT wrote
No thats baloney.
Explain to me how solid matter becomes liquid and the conditions necessary for such a state change and then maybe then you can see how absolutely stupid is that statement.


Since you seem to know more than qualified medical experts, maybe you should open up an institution and teach them of their waywardness.

quote:


[url=http://deathonline.net/what_happens/body/brain_death.cfm]Brain Death[/b]

Article Excerpts

….In the absence of oxygenated blood, brain cells quickly die. The dead cells break down and liquefy. Brain death is quite different from reversible coma (unconsciousness) in which living brain cells remain….

….A person can remain permanently unconscious with total or partial brain death. A person with death of only the upper brain (cerebral hemispheres) will not have consciousness, memory, knowledge or thought, but the living lower brain (brain stem) allows the heart to pump, the lungs to breathe and the body to function.


quote:

How many of you people with children of your own would pull the feeding tube on your child?

You keep talking about yourself, how you would want it pulled.
Think about it....what would you do if it were your child in this situation?


The love of Terri’s parents has already been acknowledged but Kris makes the core of the point. She is adult not a child, however the parents position is understandable. They just happen to, acknowledging so, refuse to accept Terri’s wishes.

quote:

The government includes the courts...judicial branch....both federal and state have been involved....even without Congress or Bush interference....the government via the judicial system has been involved in this for 15 years.


And since when did Congress appoint themselves judiciary? The point people are making is that if there’s a dispute, there is a legal process for remedy. Congress (Legislative branch) nor the President (Executive branch) are equipped to make judgment. That is the design of the judicial branch as you’ve pointed out.

quote:

And that's how it all started in nazi Germany. They started with the disabled. The government determined who lived or died based on their political agenda.


This is a bit of a stretch even for you. Are you comparing AGAIN this case to Hitler and Nazism? I don’t believe I’ve heard a more ridiculous argument. Sorry if that sounds condescending, but that’s the only way I can be direct without over writing here.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

Sorry, here's the link repost.

Brain Death

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
fuscia said this in post #32 :
The brain matter dies and shrinks. The area then fills with spinal fluid. Look it up.


Don't have to. I addressed this issue with you when you made the ludicrous claim that her brain had liquified.
And I explained it in the same manner as above.

I am merely pointing out that people are saying things that make no scientific sense at all to explain their views on this as somehow people are going to swallow such nonsense hook line and sinker.


quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #33 :
[B]
Since you seem to know more than qualified medical experts, maybe you should open up an institution and teach them of their waywardness.
[QUOTE]

No need to get uppity, but please, before you say such things like "I mean you do understand that her upper cortex is liquefied right?" please check your own brain in at the door, k?
I mean how can I take anything you say on the subject as fact when people say such nonsense?

[quote]This is a bit of a stretch even for you. Are you comparing AGAIN this case to Hitler and Nazism? I don’t believe I’ve heard a more ridiculous argument. Sorry if that sounds condescending, but that’s the only way I can be direct without over writing here.


Sorry if you cannot see the larger picture and ramifications...
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #34 :
Sorry, here's the link repost.

Brain Death


"The dead cells break down and liquify?" So matter turns to liquid? or does the water in the cells become present?
Or does cerebro spinal fluid rush into the front of the brain?

I mean come on!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #26 :


Maybe you are not familiar with our government.
The government includes the courts...judicial branch....both federal and state have been involved....even without Congress or Bush interference....the government via the judicial system has been involved in this for 15 years.

And it has turned into a when does life end issue and a who can determine when life ceases and how issue.
And now the government through legal precedent can determine who lives or dies.

And that's how it all started in nazi Germany. They started with the disabled. The government determined who lived or died based on their political agenda.

Can you not see this?


I am very well familiar with your government and how most of the democratic governments are set up. I do know how the government functions, and that the judicial and executive branches are interdependent on each other for smooth running of the country.

However, in this case, the parents approached the courts to have them intercede. What do you expect the government to do? Refuse to participate?

People and government are interdependent on each other. This is not a totalitarian government that can pass laws on their whim. Your comparison with Nazi Germany is inaccurate. In that situation, the argument was to 'keep the race pure and strong'. In the present case, all that the courts are helping to determine are that whether a certain person (not a generalization of all the patients suffering from certain neurological disorders), Terri Schiavo, should be allowed to cease to function, based on the medical opinions offered by the different doctors who examine her.

M.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #36 :


"The dead cells break down and liquify?" So matter turns to liquid? or does the water in the cells become present?
Or does cerebro spinal fluid rush into the front of the brain?

I mean come on!


Maybe you should read up on apoptosis and programmed cell death (regarding which I had given some background information in another thread), instead of arguing with people here. You are asking them to prove something which they are not experts at. So why don't you read up on it from expert sources? Any college cell biology book should give you enough information.

M.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
adityamahesh said this in post #38 :


Maybe you should read up on apoptosis and programmed cell death (regarding which I had given some background information in another thread), instead of arguing with people here. You are asking them to prove something which they are not experts at. So why don't you read up on it from expert sources? Any college cell biology book should give you enough information.

M.


sorry didn't mean to argue.

I checked with one of our microbiologists...it didn't make sense to her either.
I will wait until the most knowledgable microbiologist here whose father happens to be a neurologist comes back from vacation....or I will read more on it when I get the time.

This just goes against everything I learned in college biology...didn't think I was that old.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #27 :


No thats baloney.
Explain to me how solid matter becomes liquid and the conditions necessary for such a state change and then maybe then you can see how absolutely stupid is that statement.


You keep acting as if the cortex turn into liquid...no one is saying that!

The fluid is already there.

Heh...I already explained that...guess you missed it!

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a clear bodily fluid that occupies the subarachnoid space in the brain (the space between the skull and the cerebral cortex—more specifically, between the arachnoid and pia layers of the meninges). It acts as a "cushion" or buffer for the cortex.

Once the cortex starts to deteriorate, the fluid takes over even more.

Again...."water on the brain."

You might look up Alzheimer's disease. The process is close to the same thing.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #39 :


sorry didn't mean to argue.

I checked with one of our microbiologists...it didn't make sense to her either.
I will wait until the most knowledgable microbiologist here whose father happens to be a neurologist comes back from vacation....or I will read more on it when I get the time.

This just goes against everything I learned in college biology...didn't think I was that old.


She isnt a very intelligent microbiologist if she doesnt understand that CFS is already present around the cortex.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
mystic said this in post #40 :


You keep acting as if the cortex turn into liquid...no one is saying that!

The fluid is already there.

Heh...I already explained that...guess you missed it!

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a clear bodily fluid that occupies the subarachnoid space in the brain (the space between the skull and the cerebral cortex—more specifically, between the arachnoid and pia layers of the meninges). It acts as a "cushion" or buffer for the cortex.

Once the cortex starts to deteriorate, the fluid takes over even more.

Again...."water on the brain."

You might look up Alzheimer's disease. The process is close to the same thing.


"No one is saying that."
Oh really what is one to conclude from this statement of one 'o' peace: "I mean you do understand that her upper cortex is liquefied right?"

Mystic I already understood what was said here and I acknowledged that in my post...

It's this little ditty that one 'o' peace linked to that is utter bullshiit.

quote:
Brain death (irreversible cessation of all function of the brain) normally occurs after a stroke, or an impact that causes the brain to swell and push against the skull, preventing blood from flowing to the brain. In the absence of oxygenated blood, brain cells quickly die. The dead cells break down and liquefy. Brain death is quite different from reversible coma (unconsciousness) in which living brain cells remain.


WTF? And that's what I talked to her about....how do these cells just up and turn to liquid?

http://deathonline.net/what_happens...brain_death.cfm
Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

Firstly, I must disagree with anyone (oneofpeace too) who thinks that PVS is brain death. NINDS clearly specifies that PVS is incorrectly referred to as brain death, although brain death can result from cerebral hypoxia, which can also cause PVS.

Secondly, I do not know what that website defines as 'liquification', but my best guess is that the cell membranes disintegrate and the cellular fluid, along with all the dead organelles is released, and that is what they mean by 'liquification'. I will also state that NINDS nowhere uses that term.

M.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

I picked this website to explain the process of neurological cell degeneration. Brain death defines the “entire brain”. I don’t recall anyone saying she was brain dead. I do recall people saying, as did I, that her upper cerebral cortex is dead and has been liquefied.

I pointed out a pretty good source to back up my statement. It isn’t something I made up, I heard more than one doctor say so.

SWTT has flat out stated that it was a “stupid statement”. I simply attribute that to her/his ignorance and passionate position on the subject matter.

The article quite clearly defines brain cellular liquefaction exactly as it was inflicted on Terri Schiavo

“In the absence of oxygenated blood, brain cells quickly die. The dead cells break down and liquefy.”

These are not my words, it is the words of neurologists. Rejection of it simply because you do not understand the process doesn’t make it fallacious information.

I’m sorry if you think I was getting uppity SWTT. Since you called my statement stupid, I may have been reflecting my irritation because you are not the only misinformed person basin opinion around the nation and world for that matter.

This is precisely why I say we should leave it to those who best have the expertise.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:

Sorry if you cannot see the larger picture and ramifications


I forgot to address this.

Hitler’s mission was to purify the world of what he believe was impurity. This is NOT the case with the Schiavo situation. It is the husband trying to honor the wishes of his wife. Since when was Hitler trying to honor anyone but himself?

Can you see why I’m having trouble with your “big picture and ramifications”?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
adityamahesh said this in post #43 :
the cell membranes disintegrate and the cellular fluid, along with all the dead organelles is released, and that is what they mean by 'liquification'..



Thats what I was trying to say...but it isnt liquify in the sense that it magically turned from solid to liquid...

The CFS has replaced the deteriorated areas.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #44 :
I picked this website to explain the process of neurological cell degeneration. Brain death defines the “entire brain”. I don’t recall anyone saying she was brain dead. I do recall people saying, as did I, that her upper cerebral cortex is dead and has been liquefied.


I apologise. I have been reading a lot, so I mistook your statements. Many people on the Internet think she is brain dead.

I still stand by my statements regarding liquification. One of peace, I would suggest you use NINDS too. It is the most authoritative and certifiable source.

M.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

Okay..I found a statement from the appellate court to back this whole thing up!


Reviewing the medical evidence the appellate court stated:

"Theresa's brain has deteriorated because of the lack of oxygen it suffered at the time of the heart attack. By mid 1996, the CAT scans of her brain showed a severely abnormal structure. At this point, much of her cerebral cortex is simply gone and has been replaced by cerebral spinal fluid. Medicine cannot cure this condition. Unless an act of God, a true miracle, were to recreate her brain, Theresa will always remain in an unconscious, reflexive state, totally dependent upon others to feed her and care for her most private needs."

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

This is so sad. When she dies, I don't want to hear anything like "it's for the best" blah blah blah. Maybe it is... maybe it is... but we'll never know if it wasn't for the best.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: lickety_split

quote:
niwrad428 said this in post #10 :
Sayzak,
She is gone.


Was she "gone" 15 years ago when her husband was spending all the settlement money he had received after her accident to take care of her?

Was she "gone" when the money ran out and he ran out of patience to continue the therapy he started? Was she "gone" from the moment he found out her brain was damaged when he conveniently remembered that she told him she did not want to live like that??

Was she "gone" immediately after her brain was damaged or did Mr. Shiavo see some 'hope" for recovery early on and then decided that Terri told him she didn't want to live like that??

Well now, she's dying by starvation and dehydration. Don't think she would have wanted to die like that. Would anyone?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #31 :




Do you understand the question?

How does brain, solid matter, liquify?

How does ice become water?

How does my hand turn into soup?

&lt;edit&gt; What is the melting point of brain matter of the cerebral cortex variety?



Wow... talk about being a smart ass!!! *shakes head* I'm not playing this game with you!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #31 :


Do you understand the question?

How does brain, solid matter, liquify?

How does ice become water?

How does my hand turn into soup?

&lt;edit&gt; What is the melting point of brain matter of the cerebral cortex variety?


I'll play...


Brain matter liquefies after watching a 24-hour Oprah marathon.

Ice becomes water, duh, thanks to Santa Claus. He ships in from the North Pole. Geez.

Your hand turns into soup after being sold for parts in Cambodia.

The melting point of brain matter of the cerebral cortex variety is .79 C


And I have one... could God microwave a burrito so hot even He couldn't eat it?

-HECK!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Inner City Blues

The woman is gone, the cerebral cortex is liquid. The EEG shows no higher brain activity. A panel of five doctors (2 from parents, 2 from husband, 1 from court) all came to the consensus that she's a vegetable. What more do you want? The video they have is over four hours long. The courts have viewed this video and here "responses" are not accurate. People call for MRI and PET, but they know nothing about the imaging technique. It will provide no new evidence and the tests already done provide more than enough information then what is being requested. Shoot, PET and fMRI give less information than EEG. The courts have seen a lot more than these "Save Terri" sites.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

ICB- I've seen these facts, too. Unfortunately there are those holier than thou Crusaders that are using this families suffering for another agenda.

-HECK!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

I've really been struggling with this issue.

At first, I agreed with most everyone that the tube should stay removed.

Then, for some reason I began to feel all guilty inside as though by saying that I was encouraging "murder."

Every morning and night since last Friday the first thing in my mind has been Terry Shaivo. I don't even know the woman. And why should I even be caught up in this?

So, I talked to my Pastor tonight.
And like Mystic, he believes this poor woman's fate has been used and abused for the agenda of the Christian right. And it disgusts him.

Most of what he had to say was echoed by what many of you who agreed with her husband's wish had said.

Now, a few years ago when he was a Pastor in Weston, Missouri, he had a teenage daughter with a rare birth defect and he was faced with the choice of removing her feeding IV's or keep them. The doctors asked his daughter what she wanted and she said she wanted the nausea to go away. It was the nourishment that made her nauseous. So they removed the feeding IV's. She was fully aware of what was going on and she did not even feel the pain of hunger or thirst. She just felt relieved of the nausea.

It's really horrible that we are even having to discuss Terry and her family and husband and what she is going through.
And for me to believe what so many of the "Christian right" are saying about this incident and comparing it to Nazi Germany....well, I feel shame for even buying into it. Thank God it only took me a week to wise up to this nonsense.

And I want to thank many of you who put up with some of the things I said...please just realize that I had an internal struggle about all of this and actually you helped me to see this for what it is.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Inner City Blues

quote:
Sayzak said this in post #24 :

However, there is some cerebral cortext intact, otherwise she couldn't do the things she does.
No, that's the brainstem controlling her activity, the cerebral cortex is gone.

Schiavo CT Scan
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

quote:
The EEG shows no higher brain activity.


I'm assuming the "higher brain" isn't active simply because the cerebral cortext is not functioning, right?

It's my understanding that the cerebral cortext does not contain a human beings personality, their emotions, their memories, or their insticts. Let me know if I'm wrong in my assumption then, that it controls their ability to think and move. What would you look like if you couldn't think or move? It would suck.

What if there was some technology that could act as a crerebral cortext, opening the chance for you to think, or move?

No one here at INReview is enough of an expert to say it isn't possible.

Yeah, all that doesn't exsist yet. But for years people have been walking around with electronic ears. Now people have electronic eyes and other limbs. Eventually, (by eventually I mean sooner than later) we'll have the technology to bypass brain activity, to manufacture a thought carrier... etc.

I think Terri is alive in there... I think her mind was put on pause when her cerebral cortext was destroyed. I don't think she's dreaming or thinking. I think she's "stuck".
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
HECK said this in post #52 :


I'll play...


Brain matter liquefies after watching a 24-hour Oprah marathon.

Ice becomes water, duh, thanks to Santa Claus. He ships in from the North Pole. Geez.

Your hand turns into soup after being sold for parts in Cambodia.

The melting point of brain matter of the cerebral cortex variety is .79 C


And I have one... could God microwave a burrito so hot even He couldn't eat it?

-HECK!




Thanks for the humor Heck!!!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nikiTa

quote:
Sayzak said this in post #57 :


I think she's "stuck".


So why not let her get un"stuck?"
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

There are two ways to do that. 1. Future technologies and therepies. 2. Death.

I just think it's extremely unfortunate that her husband is making that choice for her. And I think it's absolutely cruel that he'd let her starve to death. At least inject her with more morphine than her body can tollerate.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Inner City Blues

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #55 :

I've really been struggling with this issue.

At first, I agreed with most everyone that the tube should stay removed.

Then, for some reason I began to feel all guilty inside as though by saying that I was encouraging "murder."

Every morning and night since last Friday the first thing in my mind has been Terry Shaivo. I don't even know the woman. And why should I even be caught up in this?

So, I talked to my Pastor tonight.
And like Mystic, he believes this poor woman's fate has been used and abused for the agenda of the Christian right. And it disgusts him.

Most of what he had to say was echoed by what many of you who agreed with her husband's wish had said.

Now, a few years ago when he was a Pastor in Weston, Missouri, he had a teenage daughter with a rare birth defect and he was faced with the choice of removing her feeding IV's or keep them. The doctors asked his daughter what she wanted and she said she wanted the nausea to go away. It was the nourishment that made her nauseous. So they removed the feeding IV's. She was fully aware of what was going on and she did not even feel the pain of hunger or thirst. She just felt relieved of the nausea.

It's really horrible that we are even having to discuss Terry and her family and husband and what she is going through.
And for me to believe what so many of the "Christian right" are saying about this incident and comparing it to Nazi Germany....well, I feel shame for even buying into it. Thank God it only took me a week to wise up to this nonsense.

And I want to thank many of you who put up with some of the things I said...please just realize that I had an internal struggle about all of this and actually you helped me to see this for what it is.


It is a heavy issue, but I really do think the husband wants to fulfill his wife's wishes. There has been so much grandstanding and character assassination that it really is pointless and hurtful.

My sister made an interesting comment about this. Terri did this to herself remember. She had a heart attack caused by bulemia. As sad as it is that she didn't get help for her condition, she pushed herself to the brink of death. Some people only hurt themselves in a minor way and they can make a turn around, or go right back to killing their bodies. Other's kill themselves the first time. Terri really should have died from this condition, but now people are trying to keep her alive and I think it's the worse thing to do.

I understand it's hard for a parent to let go, but there are times where you have to do just that.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Inner City Blues

quote:
Sayzak said this in post #60 :
There are two ways to do that. 1. Future technologies and therepies. 2. Death.

I just think it's extremely unfortunate that her husband is making that choice for her. And I think it's absolutely cruel that he'd let her starve to death. At least inject her with more morphine than her body can tollerate.


People with feeding tubes removed that are conscious don't feel the pain. sowhatsthetruth even wrote about it. The pastor's daughter felt better after they removed the feeding tubes, it was making her nauseus.

I don't think there are any technologies that will magically create the cerebral cortex, unless you think stem cell research might be useful, but I don't think that would work in this case either.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Inner City Blues

quote:
Sayzak said this in post #57 :

I'm assuming the "higher brain" isn't active simply because the cerebral cortext is not functioning, right?

It's my understanding that the cerebral cortext does not contain a human beings personality, their emotions, their memories, or their insticts. Let me know if I'm wrong in my assumption then, that it controls their ability to think and move. What would you look like if you couldn't think or move? It would suck.

What if there was some technology that could act as a crerebral cortext, opening the chance for you to think, or move?

No one here at INReview is enough of an expert to say it isn't possible.

Yeah, all that doesn't exsist yet. But for years people have been walking around with electronic ears. Now people have electronic eyes and other limbs. Eventually, (by eventually I mean sooner than later) we'll have the technology to bypass brain activity, to manufacture a thought carrier... etc.

I think Terri is alive in there... I think her mind was put on pause when her cerebral cortext was destroyed. I don't think she's dreaming or thinking. I think she's "stuck".


Unfortunately the cerebral cortex is the part of the brain that determines your intelligence, personality, your interpretation of sensory impulses, motor function, planning and organization, and touch sensation.

When you destroy that, I'm sorry, but you're gone.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: HECK!

quote:
sowhatsthetruth said this in post #58 :




Thanks for the humor Heck!!!


Just trying to keep it fun around these parts

-HECK!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
Inner City Blue said this in post #61 :
She had a heart attack caused by bulemia. As sad as it is that she didn't get help for her condition, she pushed herself to the brink of death. Some people only hurt themselves in a minor way and they can make a turn around, or go right back to killing their bodies. Other's kill themselves the first time.


Before my older brother moved to Seattle, he was living in Atlanta...he met this gal, and she was a really nice gal.

but, she suffered from Bulemia as well.....she was also a diabetic.

Soon after they married, the marriage went to hell...The marriage ended a year later.

That was five years ago...

But two years ago....she died from complications from this eating disorder.

it really is sad what people put their bodies through...and how it can cut their life short.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: adityamahesh

quote:
Sayzak said this in post #57 :


I'm assuming the "higher brain" isn't active simply because the cerebral cortext is not functioning, right?

It's my understanding that the cerebral cortext does not contain a human beings personality, their emotions, their memories, or their insticts. Let me know if I'm wrong in my assumption then, that it controls their ability to think and move. What would you look like if you couldn't think or move? It would suck.

What if there was some technology that could act as a crerebral cortext, opening the chance for you to think, or move?

No one here at INReview is enough of an expert to say it isn't possible.

Yeah, all that doesn't exsist yet. But for years people have been walking around with electronic ears. Now people have electronic eyes and other limbs. Eventually, (by eventually I mean sooner than later) we'll have the technology to bypass brain activity, to manufacture a thought carrier... etc.

I think Terri is alive in there... I think her mind was put on pause when her cerebral cortext was destroyed. I don't think she's dreaming or thinking. I think she's "stuck".


Sayzak, you are proposing technology that is many decades ahead. Brain is much, much (in fact, a lot of 'much'es) complex organ than a simple ear or eye. We have studied the eye for decades, and only now we can have rudimentary technology that can simulate as an artificial eye. I don't think you have any idea how many things that are needed to be considered when interfacing between tissue and metal. We don't even know the exact functionality of many parts of the brain yet, we only have theories. As for interfacing any artificial component with those millions of neurons? We are talking about highly sophisticated nano-technology here. I doubt even government-classified technology has reached those levels. By the time we have that technology available for general medical use, Terri Schiavo would be long dead from old age.

As for stem cell technology, it might be useful in a decade or so, but right now it is still in infancy, and with all the controversy surrounding it, there will not be as much progress on it as could be done.

M.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

I'm an athiest... Religion has had nothing to do with how I feel about this case. I feel really burdoned by this.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: chelktty

Sayzak it's good that you care, but you shouldn't feel burdoned with it...it's not your burdon to carry.
I've been watching the different news networks that have been profiling similar cases in the past years, though I don't remember any of them getting this much attention. This is a private matter. Anyone who is not attached to this case by blood or marriage shouldn't let it rule their emotions. Quite frankly it's nobody's business but the Shindlers and the Shiavos.
The suggestion of stem cell research is a double edged sword for the majority arguing to keep Terri alive; pro-life groups. They're for keeping Terri alive, but against using stem cells as they could come from aborted embryos and fetuses.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: niwrad428

quote:
lickety_split said this in post #50 :


Was she "gone" 15 years ago when her husband was spending all the settlement money he had received after her accident to take care of her?

Was she "gone" when the money ran out and he ran out of patience to continue the therapy he started? Was she "gone" from the moment he found out her brain was damaged when he conveniently remembered that she told him she did not want to live like that??

Was she "gone" immediately after her brain was damaged or did Mr. Shiavo see some 'hope" for recovery early on and then decided that Terri told him she didn't want to live like that??

Well now, she's dying by starvation and dehydration. Don't think she would have wanted to die like that. Would anyone?


How about he was holding out hope that her condition would improve. After a certain amount of time he accepted the fact that his wife was not coming back and determined that it was time to let her go.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: lickety_split

quote:
niwrad428 said this in post #69 :


How about he was holding out hope that her condition would improve. After a certain amount of time he accepted the fact that his wife was not coming back and determined that it was time to let her go.


Well, that's a good point. Do you suppose Terri probably told him something like '...if I had to live in a permanent vegetative state after "X" amount of years, please don't let me live..." right?

I assumed she meant from the onset of the diagnosis that her brain is not functioning and she needed assistance to eat, breathe, etc. I would also think she probably meant "she would prefer not to live in a PVS and would rather her suffering end SOON as possible"

Her husband and the doctors claim they knew that she was not going to improve and she would spend the rest of her life in a PVS state early on. I cannot see why the husband went out of his way to keep her around (alive) when he claims she told him BEFORE the accident that she did not want to live that way.

He grew tired of caring for her and lost hope. He wants to move on now...but he doesn't want Terri's parents to have her because of a falling out they had over her care.

Rather than divorce her or hand over custody....he remembers Terri's wishes years after the fact. Years of letting her hang on, years of continuous adultery, years of fighting with the parents of his loved ones, now he wants to stop feeding her after having supported, feeding and caring for her after so many years. Back and forth, fighting to take the life of the woman he once loved and still loves when he could have made the decision to end her life at the onset- despite her parents objections.He should have expressed Terri's wishes from the beginning, isn't this true? Is there any evidence supporting that the husband expressed concern for his wife wishes within a timely manner?

Sounds like creep in my book.

Just my opinion on the matter, thanks for listening.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

Actually, it didn't take him long to start lobbying to have her feeding tube removed. Only a couple of years, actually. He's been fighting with the courts for years to let her die.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

If I were him though, I would let her family make the decisions. Think about it, the only thing he gains form her death is money. He loses nothing because he believes she's not there.

Her family WANTS responsibility. They WANT to take care of her. He won't let them on stupid notion that it's "her wishes" she were to die.

There's no proof of that.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

There is no proof that she didn't say it either, Matt...

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

No proof either way, but isn't that what really matters here?

She's being starved to death on that notion.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sayzak

I can't prove that my dog doesn't want to have his head blown off, so I'm just going to go ahead and let my neighborsplatter my dog's brains all over the driveway.

It's not riiiight.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

What a ridiculous analogy.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: chelktty

quote:
Sayzak said this in post #72 :
If I were him though, I would let her family make the decisions. Think about it, the only thing he gains form her death is money. He loses nothing because he believes she's not there.

How does he gain monetarily from her death?? Whatever money was there from her settlement is long gone after her years of constant medical care.

Her family WANTS responsibility. They WANT to take care of her. He won't let them on stupid notion that it's "her wishes" she were to die.

Since when is honoring the wishes of your spouse a "stupid notion"? Her family WANTS to keep her alive despite what Terri would have wanted because she vocalized her wishes to her husband and not to them. Why is that far-fetched or hard to believe? There are things I've discussed with my fiance that I haven't with my family. of coarse thanks to this media circus I've now let my family AND my fiance know my wishes.

There's no proof of that.

There is no proof to dispute it either. The courts have been over and over and over this issue. It's been determined that she would not want to live that way.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Lawless

quote:
Sayzak said this in post