| This guys is drawing lines between imaginary dots to make a counter-productive point. Take this quote, for example:
| quote: |
| In 1932, the infectious agent of HIV was first tested on sheep in Iceland. That agent is called Visna. In 1932, in conjunction with the Tuskegee syphilis program, they were testing the infectious agent of HIV on an island nation. We have Visna as 30 percent of the sequences of the HIV here today. So, 1932 not only is significant for the start of a push for eugenics, i.e. a White birth order, but also the start of the testing of the infectious agent of HIV in AIDS. |
Given what I know of Eugenics and of the history of DNA & genetic research, 1931 is too early for such an attempt. At that time they were only just beginning to make correlations between the colors of eyes among fruit flies, figuring out just how genetics works. The suggestion that they immediately developed it into a viral weapon and unleashed it on the population is ridiculously beyond the capability of science at that time. Eugenics was limited to just what hef described earlier: encouragement of white births and discouragement of "colored" births in order to regulate the population. This was not a genetic experiment, it was a social one. | |
