Hate America, Like Americans??? |
| Posted by: ickle | | I've read in many posts about people who don't like America the country but like American people. this whole conecpt is ridiculous for many reasons:
1) This can be said about any country. For example, it's like saying I don't like the Cuban government but I like Cubans. Duh! Cubans are human beings just like everyone else and you'd probably like most of them if you met them on the street. (Substitute any country for Cuba, even France.)
2) For those of you who don't like the US government but like Americans, you must realize that, on the whole, most Americans like if not love our government. Not that it is perfect by any means or that we agree with all of it's policies - but I think the overwhleming majority of Americans would rather have the form of government we have than any other that currently exists on this planet. So, although you may like Americans, realize that you probably like someone who really, really likes the US government.
3) People who hate other people solely based upon their country of origin are bigots - plain and simple. If you don't hate people because of their country of origin then you are just using common sense. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: NothingSacred | | I say it's valid. I'm born and raised in the good 'ole US of A, and I love my country. But right now, I HATE my government and I HATE George W. Bush, MUCH, MUCH, MUCH MORE than Saddam and Osama COMBINED do... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by NothingSacred
I say it's valid. I'm born and raised in the good 'ole US of A, and I love my country. But right now, I HATE my government and I HATE George W. Bush, MUCH, MUCH, MUCH MORE than Saddam and Osama COMBINED do... |
Ever get the feeling you've become obsessed about a subject to the point of insanity?
Clinton was a piece of ****, and I didnt vote for him, but as my president, I gave him that respect. I dont feel I could have ever stated " I hate him " and truely meant it. I definately wouldent have compared him to Hitler, commented daily on his stupidity (Lots of openings there) or his criminal behavior. I just waited until I could use my power of vote to do something about it.
Do you have any idea, what a ***ing idiot you sound like , when you state you hate Bush " MUCH, MUCH, MUCH MORE than saddam and osama combined do"?
Ever think you just may have lost perspective here?
(I dont really think you'll consider this)
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: DaveDom | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by ickle
I've read in many posts about people who don't like America the country but like American people. this whole conecpt is ridiculous for many reasons:
1) This can be said about any country. For example, it's like saying I don't like the Cuban government but I like Cubans. Duh! Cubans are human beings just like everyone else and you'd probably like most of them if you met them on the street. (Substitute any country for Cuba, even France.)
2) For those of you who don't like the US government but like Americans, you must realize that, on the whole, most Americans like if not love our government. Not that it is perfect by any means or that we agree with all of it's policies - but I think the overwhleming majority of Americans would rather have the form of government we have than any other that currently exists on this planet. So, although you may like Americans, realize that you probably like someone who really, really likes the US government.
3) People who hate other people solely based upon their country of origin are bigots - plain and simple. If you don't hate people because of their country of origin then you are just using common sense. |
Americans, you must realize that, on the whole, most Americans like if not love our government
And this is based on what? Have you forgotten the marches a few months ago. Very popular even in New York.
The concept that you can like someone and dislike someone else, as in, I like New Yorker Joe Bloggs but don't like Bush is pretty easy to understand surely?
I don't think people hate Americans. American films are the most popular in the world. There is just plenty about America that people don't like.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: NothingSacred | | The thing that amazes me, is how much people got pissed at Clinton for getting a BJ...an act that wasn't even illegal and shouldn't have been scrutinized in the 1st place. Sure, I agree it's immoral, but if it's not illegal doing it should have no consequence. Besides, we where better off in every way under Clinton, EVERYTHING SUCKS since that Dick Head Bush became president! Go ahead say that it was "artificial" and I'll just say "Give me a president who can give me a good 'artificial' 8 years and he can get all the BJs he wants." | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveDom
Americans, you must realize that, on the whole, most Americans like if not love our government
And this is based on what? Have you forgotten the marches a few months ago. Very popular even in New York.
The concept that you can like someone and dislike someone else, as in, I like New Yorker Joe Bloggs but don't like Bush is pretty easy to understand surely?
I don't think people hate Americans. American films are the most popular in the world. There is just plenty about America that people don't like. |
Boy, theres television reality for you. How many people do you think are in America? If you add up every protester you.ve ever seen on television, times that by 10, youd still be talking less than 1% of the total population. Granted, there are many protests not televised, and many people would protest, but either the couch is too comfy, or the drug dealer hasnt shown up yet, E.T.C.
What you seriously underestimate, is the number of Americans which never get polled (They're not home, they're at work) or never get publicity (They feel no need to justify their position to some liberal pseudo intellectual) They tend to be straight forward hard working people. If they decide they're unhappy with the currant leader, will simply vote him out of office, period. These folks just dont have the time or interest to spend their days online trying to convince some trash talking idiot from finland, that their country is not what it is painted to be. You folks just squeel to think our country is being torn apart at the seams over this whole nonsense, but sorry to inform you, its not.
And on that note, some of us DO take it personally, when you disrespect our country, and our president, daily, as a form of entertainment. What else could it be but entertainment value?
Do you think you're making a difference here? Do you feel your opinion will somehow change our collective hearts? All you manage to do, is instill further distrust and apathy towards your respective goverments and countries.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by NothingSacred
The thing that amazes me, is how much people got pissed at Clinton for getting a BJ...an act that wasn't even illegal and shouldn't have been scrutinized in the 1st place. Sure, I agree it's immoral, but if it's not illegal doing it should have no consequence. Besides, we where better off in every way under Clinton, EVERYTHING SUCKS since that Dick Head Bush became president! Go ahead say that it was "artificial" and I'll just say "Give me a president who can give me a good 'artificial' 8 years and he can get all the BJs he wants." |
Wake up skippy.......Im not sure how old you were at the time, but do you have any idea what "Whitewater" was about? How about Vince Foster, do you know what happened to him?
Remember anything about guidance computers for ballistic warheads being secretly sold to the Chinese?
He could receive a billion blow jobs for all I care, look at the real issues with his presidency. Or are you just too focused on Bush?
Hypocrite Royale!!!!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gdog
Boy, theres television reality for you. How many people do you think are in America? If you add up every protester you.ve ever seen on television, times that by 10, youd still be talking less than 1% of the total population. Granted, there are many protests not televised, and many people would protest, but either the couch is too comfy, or the drug dealer hasnt shown up yet, E.T.C.
What you seriously underestimate, is the number of Americans which never get polled (They're not home, they're at work) or never get publicity (They feel no need to justify their position to some liberal pseudo intellectual) They tend to be straight forward hard working people. If they decide they're unhappy with the currant leader, will simply vote him out of office, period. These folks just dont have the time or interest to spend their days online trying to convince some trash talking idiot from finland, that their country is not what it is painted to be. You folks just squeel to think our country is being torn apart at the seams over this whole nonsense, but sorry to inform you, its not.
And on that note, some of us DO take it personally, when you disrespect our country, and our president, daily, as a form of entertainment. What else could it be but entertainment value?
Do you think you're making a difference here? Do you feel your opinion will somehow change our collective hearts? All you manage to do, is instill further distrust and apathy towards your respective goverments and countries. |
Right on gdog!!!!!!!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: DaveDom | | Originally posted by gdog
Boy, theres television reality for you. How many people do you think are in America? If you add up every protester you.ve ever seen on television, times that by 10, youd still be talking less than 1% of the total population.
You can dismis the protests all you want but the fact is that all over the world more people protested on that day than have ever protested on any day in history. You only dismis it because you don't agree with the protesters.
What you seriously underestimate, is the number of Americans which never get polled (They're not home, they're at work) or never get publicity (They feel no need to justify their position to some liberal pseudo intellectual) They tend to be straight forward hard working people. If they decide they're unhappy with the currant leader, will simply vote him out of office, period.
These straight forward hard working people are the one's who, because of actions taken by your government, have had their life savings stolen. Bush is not a friend to the ordinary American. That is just spin and hype and governments get better at it every year. Blair's government is no different. If you care so much about the hard working people of America at least find out what Bush has done to the people who invested their life savings in Enron, the biggest financial supporter of Bush's administration (before they were found out and went belly up).
And on that note, some of us DO take it personally, when you disrespect our country, and our president, daily, as a form of entertainment.
You should take it personally, enough to be aware what your President is or isn't doing. Otherwise what kind of democracy is it? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveDom
Originally posted by gdog
You can dismis the protests all you want but the fact is that all over the world more people protested on that day than have ever protested on any day in history. You only dismis it because you don't agree with the protesters.
__________________________________________________
__
And what does that really mean? More people protested worldwide than anytime in history, and that somehow gives their point more relevance? more people are exposed to ridiculous cheap,fast media spin now than any previous time in the history of the world, you are living proof. How much did you have invested in Enron? None? really............me neither. How much did your family lose in the crash of 29? None? But you feel like you speak for the unfortunates who invested in Enron and got burnt. Stocks are risky, thats why I dont put my money there. I guessing your only real interest in these folks is to further your argument against Bush. Are you sure that YOU yourself is really all that aware of what my president is or is not doing. Enron supporting Bush's election is not the determining factor to discredit the administration. But im sure for you, having ANY shred of relevance to how you disrespect my country, was not a goal of yours. Finally, why is my country just so darn interesting for you? Do you want to fix us?
These straight forward hard working people are the one's who, because of actions taken by your government, have had their life savings stolen. Bush is not a friend to the ordinary American. That is just spin and hype and governments get better at it every year. Blair's government is no different. If you care so much about the hard working people of America at least find out what Bush has done to the people who invested their life savings in Enron, the biggest financial supporter of Bush's administration (before they were found out and went belly up).
__________________________________________________
__
You flatter yourself to be above the "spin" doled out by governments. You must have the sheer clairvoyance to decipher the truth from the spin, and all of us are pathetically obedient to our governments whims of what our opinion should be. You wouldent recognize an ordinary American if we walked up and punched you in the face. How will you feel when your virtual house of cards of opinion falls down against the truth that time brings?
You should take it personally, enough to be aware what your President is or isn't doing. Otherwise what kind of democracy is it? |
Were aware, thanks for your concern. Try cleaning your own house, you're spending far too much time on ours.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Search4Truth | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gdog
Clinton was a piece of ****, and I didnt vote for him, but as my president, I gave him that respect. I dont feel I could have ever stated " I hate him " and truely meant it.
|
Gdog, I understand what you are saying, but why should I respect a president who shouldn't even be the president!
If he was a true elected leader and he earned it, I would not be here at the moment criticizing him!
Because I would respect the peoples decision to put him in office, but unfortunately this is untrue and thats the truth of the argument
I am not going to sit back and say this is the past lets forget about it! We cannot ignore it, our country was built on this
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: DaveDom | | And what does that really mean? More people protested worldwide than anytime in history, and that somehow gives their point more relevance?
Obviously it means nothing to you but then I wouldn't expect it to because the only thing that matters to you is the ordinary American - the one's who got robbed by Enron with Bush's help. You haven't even said how you feel about this therefore I can only assume Bush means more to you.
And stop with the "stop picking on my coutry, go away" like you just sit over there minding your own business. It's not how America operates. You're country has influence on this country like wars for instance. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | | [QUOTE]Originally posted by Search4Truth
[B]If he was a true elected leader and he earned it, I would not be here at the moment critcizing him!
Yes...you would! Because he would have done the same thing as he chose to do. So that is not true! Liar! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Search4Truth
Gdog, I understand what you are saying, but why should I respect a president who shouldn't even be the president!
If he was a true elected leader and he earned it, I would not be here at the moment criticizing him!
Because I would respect the peoples decision to put him in office, but unfortunately this is untrue and thats the truth of the argument
I am not going to sit back and say this is the past lets forget about it! We cannot ignore it, our country was built on this |
I never respected Cinton either. He is heralded as this larger than life public servant of the masses who was only doing what most of the public wished they were doing. The dirt on this guy goes way deeper than anything you could say about Bush, but you ignore all that.
Check this out..... More facts coming to light about Clintons record with terrorism.
This point I assume we'll never agree upon, Bush WAS elected by electoral votes. The Supreme court put an end to the ridiculousness of hanging chads, endless recounts, and further attempts to postpone or change the inevitable. Put yourself on the other side of the fence, with positions changed and Gore had the superior vote numbers and Bush was pushing for recounts, you know you would have been SCREAMING "ITS OVER, YOU LOST, GET OVER IT GEORGE!" So to most of us over here, to question whether his presidency is legitimate just sounds like sour grapes. To state youd have the same reaction to your candidates superior vote total would be questionable at best.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Search4Truth | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gdog
This point I assume we'll never agree upon, Bush WAS elected by electoral votes. The Supreme court put an end to the ridiculousness of hanging chads, endless recounts, and further attempts to postpone or change the inevitable. Put yourself on the other side of the fence, with positions changed and Gore had the superior vote numbers and Bush was pushing for recounts, you know you would have been SCREAMING "ITS OVER, YOU LOST, GET OVER IT GEORGE!" So to most of us over here, to question whether his presidency is legitimate just sounds like sour grapes. To state youd have the same reaction to your candidates superior vote total would be questionable at best. |
Yes and maybe your not aware that Katherine Harris & Jeb Buh ordered the removal of 60,000 votres from Florida on the grounds they were felons.
But in fact, only 97% of them were guilty of no crime, except for being democratic voters.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/cta/p...ight/palast.ram
So what did you say about George Bush winning this election fair?????
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Search4Truth | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gdog
[B]
Check this out..... More facts coming to light about Clintons record with terrorism.
B] |
Yes I agree Clinton did his part to allow terrorism, I will not disagree with this at all.
But the bottom line is, George Bush ignored many warnings from intellegence sources that 9/11 would occur
I am not sure if you are aware of the 9-11 commission, but they are investigating the WTC attacks and so far they are currently blaming the current administration for allowing 9/11 to occur
KEY WORDS: CURRENT ADMINISTRATION
Its about time you republicans start taking fault for your own actions, and stop using Clinton as a scape goat for every single problem that goes wrong in America
So its Clintons fault that 2 million people have lost their jobs since bush t ook over??
Its Clintons fault that we are in the biggest defecit in americas history
Its Clintons fault that 9/11 occured??? Because if you want to go to the past, we can go all the way back to Ronald Regan who in fact trained and aided the Taliban & Osama Bin Laden
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | | My boy Ronnie would have rolled the whole middle east up by now if he had the chance.
He would be the perfect president for this era.
( Boy, I bet your gonna HATE this statement!!) | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Search4Truth
Yes I agree Clinton did his part to allow terrorism, I will not disagree with this at all.
But the bottom line is, George Bush ignored many warnings from intellegence sources that 9/11 would occur
I am not sure if you are aware of the 9-11 commission, but they are investigating the WTC attacks and so far they are currently blaming the current administration for allowing 9/11 to occur
KEY WORDS: CURRENT ADMINISTRATION
Its about time you republicans start taking fault for your own actions, and stop using Clinton as a scape goat for every single problem that goes wrong in America
So its Clintons fault that 2 million people have lost their jobs since bush t ook over??
Its Clintons fault that we are in the biggest defecit in americas history
Its Clintons fault that 9/11 occured??? Because if you want to go to the past, we can go all the way back to Ronald Regan who in fact trained and aided the Taliban & Osama Bin Laden |
Look...I did not vote for Clinton. Preference choice I guess...but perhaps you didn't know...but I'm sure you do, that he created the biggest increase in taxes in presidential history. FACT!!! Personally...I did not appreciate that!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: photek | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by NothingSacred
I say it's valid. I'm born and raised in the good 'ole US of A, and I love my country. But right now, I HATE my government and I HATE George W. Bush, MUCH, MUCH, MUCH MORE than Saddam and Osama COMBINED do... |
hey why are you still posting, didn't you just make a complete *** of yourself by categorizing a group of americans as being ignorant and stupid and worthless?
if you hate george bush more than hussein and bin laden combined...well, it just proves you don't know **** about iraq's former government or anything about the war.
haha and you have the balls to criticize other people. you're a complete fool.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: DaveDom | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gdog
My boy Ronnie would have rolled the whole middle east up by now if he had the chance.
He would be the perfect president for this era.
( Boy, I bet your gonna HATE this statement!!) |
"rolled the whole middle east up by now" nice phrase and a telling one if ever I heard one. You just love American military rolling over countries don't you. Are the people dying even real to you or just ticks on your scorecard?
Bring back Ronnie and we can really get down to some good old TORTURE, RAPE, and MURDER!?
Your Ronnie was quite a man. But he can't take all the credit for the TORTURE, RAPE, and MURDER because Ronnie (like Bush) was a man who liked to delegate to such people as Cheyne and Rumsfelt and the CIA. Maybe they could set up and train some new death squads in the Middle East, just to add a little pressure on the people so they don't get out of hand and start thinking they can have a democray.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: NothingSacred | | The thing is, I don't give a flying "F" about what Hussein did to his people, rather than waste money on this stupid war, I'd rather cut a backroom deal with him for cheap oil... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: kickace999 | | i dont see your point why people cant hate the american administration while at the same time like the american people. Afterall don't we hate Saddam but want to help the iraqi people? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: USA1 | | If Gore had won the election, we would still be in Iraq. Nothing would have changed. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ickle | | For all of you blaming the Enron deal on George Bush, you really are ignorant:
a) Enron began engaging in their illegal acts long before Bush took office.
b) Even though they were engaging in these acts while Clinton was was in office, it wouldn't be fair to blame Clinton either.
c) You'll notice that seven of these indivuals were just indicted and will be tried for their crimes.
BOTTOM LINE: The actions of a few indivudals at a PRIVATE company have nothing to do with who is president. And, even if they did, Clinton would certainly have to share the blame.
I'm not a fan of Clinton, but I do have the common sense not to make posts which imply that everything that went wrong in America while he was president were personally his fault. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveDom
"rolled the whole middle east up by now" nice phrase and a telling one if ever I heard one. You just love American military rolling over countries don't you. Are the people dying even real to you or just ticks on your scorecard?
Bring back Ronnie and we can really get down to some good old TORTURE, RAPE, and MURDER!?
Your Ronnie was quite a man. But he can't take all the credit for the TORTURE, RAPE, and MURDER because Ronnie (like Bush) was a man who liked to delegate to such people as Cheyne and Rumsfelt and the CIA. Maybe they could set up and train some new death squads in the Middle East, just to add a little pressure on the people so they don't get out of hand and start thinking they can have a democray. |
HAHAHAHAHA...sorry man, it was mostly just an attempt to wave a red cape in front of the bull. You can put your "indignation" away now. But now that you mention it, yeah, it does make me proud to see our armed forces rolling over our ENEMIES. It makes me **** proud! And believe me, im very aware of the death of these people. Im also very aware of the deaths of the service people of the 91 gulf war who paid the ultimate price, and our people who died during this conflict, as well as the roughly 3000 innocent Americans who died on 9/11. I know this is where you scream "THERES NO PROOF OF A LINK BETWEEN SADDAM AND 9/11"......I dont care, I really dont. Same dirtbags, same agenda. Why risk another American life wringing our hands over what we all know to be true(except you of course).
"TORTURE/RAPE/MURDER!!!!!"
Cmon slappy, get off the drama wagon, this is more fitting on a hand painted protest sign. Im sure when Clinton killed Vince Foster, he probably had someone else do it for him. Guess what? even your leaders have people killed regularly, maybe daily. Guess what else? even though you personally are too pale and sensitive to realize it, 99.99% truely NEEDED killing. Im sure that makes you just squirm in your seat doesnt it? Thats why you arent fit to lead a strong nation. Youd travel the world shaking hands, kissing babies, and feeding the homeless in soup kitchens while your country fell to the maniacs, criminals, and terrorists givin free reign while you view the world through your rose colored glasses. Just wondering, have YOU ever seen death up close? or are you only fit to question others. I personally handle death and dying on an almost daily basis, hands on, up close, in your face. Not the hypothetical death you rant about.
And Ronald Reagan was one of our greatest presidents. Period!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: kickace999 | | Originally posted by gdog
My boy Ronnie would have rolled the whole middle east up by now if he had the chance.
now that you mention it, yeah, it does make me proud to see our armed forces rolling over our ENEMIES. It makes me **** proud!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The whole middle east? Do you have a problem with every single country in the middle east?? Are you some kind of war fanatic that gets a kick out of watching our troops going over there and risking there lives? Do you like seeing the civilian deaths that are also caused by this kind of this situation?? If you think that America should be taking over the whole middle east you're sick. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: dvader | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by ickle
For all of you blaming the Enron deal on George Bush, you really are ignorant:
a) Enron began engaging in their illegal acts long before Bush took office.
b) Even though they were engaging in these acts while Clinton was was in office, it wouldn't be fair to blame Clinton either.
c) You'll notice that seven of these indivuals were just indicted and will be tried for their crimes.
BOTTOM LINE: The actions of a few indivudals at a PRIVATE company have nothing to do with who is president. And, even if they did, Clinton would certainly have to share the blame.
I'm not a fan of Clinton, but I do have the common sense not to make posts which imply that everything that went wrong in America while he was president were personally his fault. |
Well said. The same applies to the economy, too.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: DaveDom | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gdog
HAHAHAHAHA...sorry man, it was mostly just an attempt to wave a red cape in front of the bull. You can put your "indignation" away now. But now that you mention it, yeah, it does make me proud to see our armed forces rolling over our ENEMIES. It makes me **** proud! And believe me, im very aware of the death of these people. Im also very aware of the deaths of the service people of the 91 gulf war who paid the ultimate price, and our people who died during this conflict, as well as the roughly 3000 innocent Americans who died on 9/11. I know this is where you scream "THERES NO PROOF OF A LINK BETWEEN SADDAM AND 9/11"......I dont care, I really dont. Same dirtbags, same agenda. Why risk another American life wringing our hands over what we all know to be true(except you of course).
"TORTURE/RAPE/MURDER!!!!!"
Cmon slappy, get off the drama wagon, this is more fitting on a hand painted protest sign. Im sure when Clinton killed Vince Foster, he probably had someone else do it for him. Guess what? even your leaders have people killed regularly, maybe daily. Guess what else? even though you personally are too pale and sensitive to realize it, 99.99% truely NEEDED killing. Im sure that makes you just squirm in your seat doesnt it? Thats why you arent fit to lead a strong nation. Youd travel the world shaking hands, kissing babies, and feeding the homeless in soup kitchens while your country fell to the maniacs, criminals, and terrorists givin free reign while you view the world through your rose colored glasses. Just wondering, have YOU ever seen death up close? or are you only fit to question others. I personally handle death and dying on an almost daily basis, hands on, up close, in your face. Not the hypothetical death you rant about.
And Ronald Reagan was one of our greatest presidents. Period! |
Same dirtbags, same agenda.
You are extreme! I hope your fellow war-fans are reading this crap. I think this is about the most vile and unpleasant post I have read on this forum.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: scottc | |
| quote: |
For all of you blaming the Enron deal on George Bush, you really are ignorant:
a) Enron began engaging in their illegal acts long before Bush took office.
b) Even though they were engaging in these acts while Clinton was was in office, it wouldn't be fair to blame Clinton either.
c) You'll notice that seven of these indivuals were just indicted and will be tried for their crimes.
BOTTOM LINE: The actions of a few indivudals at a PRIVATE company have nothing to do with who is president. And, even if they did, Clinton would certainly have to share the blame.
I'm not a fan of Clinton, but I do have the common sense not to make posts which imply that everything that went wrong in America while he was president were personally his fault. |
I think you misunderstand the controversy regarding enron and Bush. Enron contributed $736,800 to George W. Bush over the past eight years, his single largest contributor. Of the twenty largest contributors to George W. Bush's Presidential campaign, fully half had major links to Enron; indeed, five of his seven largest seven contributors were connected to Enron. No matter what they did or did not do on the record, that sure looks like a flock of ducks, with George W. Bush in their midst, paddling toward and into the presidency.
Vinson & Elkins, a Texas law firm, is number two. Vinson & Elkins is Enron's law firm. The firm prepared the partnership documents for Enron's apparently fraudulent operations, which moved debt off book, falsely inflated profit statements, and enriched several top executives of Enron (as well as several investment firms which were also among Bush's major contributors). It was this law firm which, when the first whistles were blown, did an 'outside' review of Enron's partnerships and subsidiaries and found their operations acceptable.
Number four among big donors is Anderson Worldwide, corporate parent of Enron's accounting firm, Arthur Anderson. No one needs to be reminded that Arthur Anderson oversaw Enron's books and gave their seal of approval to the validity of Enron's corporate reports. Nor that Anderson's consulting branch help Enron shape its devious dealings.
Morgan, Stanley, Dean Witter & Co. is number five. Morgan Stanley was a major investor in Enron's LJM2 subsidiary. The chicanery of LJM2, of course, played a truly major role in necessitating Enron's $1.2 billion in restatement of shareholder equity and its overstatement of earnings by nearly $600 million - the proximate causes of its implosion and bankruptcy.
Merely being in power when the controversy was unearthed is not the reason. Bush is in power because of these people. (and his brother Jeb of course).
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: ickle | | So, if we have this big conspiracy, why are the Enron executives being indicted and going to trail? Surely if these people could put Bush in power, they could cover up a little accounting fraud.
I think the situation at Enron had a lot to do with a few individuals (criminals) running a company who were scheming to enrich themselves at the expense of others. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveDom
Same dirtbags, same agenda.
You are extreme! I hope your fellow war-fans are reading this crap. I think this is about the most vile and unpleasant post I have read on this forum. |
Reality can be a scary thing....maybe you should just go pet a kitty for awhile and sing songs with your friends.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: DaveDom | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gdog
Reality can be a scary thing....maybe you should just go pet a kitty for awhile and sing songs with your friends. |
You're not wrong there, your Bigoted view of reality is scary. Thankfully you're a dying breed. You probably think that the rise of the right in America will be a permanent thing. I don't think so, to many Americans are too intelligent.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveDom
You're not wrong there, your Bigoted view of reality is scary. Thankfully you're a dying breed. You probably think that the rise of the right in America will be a permanent thing. I don't think so, to many Americans are too intelligent. |
OK, now were talking..... How do you see me as bigoted?
Because I dont mince words about being strong against our enemies? Because im brutally REALISTIC about the people who threaten and hate my country? Because you view pacifism as intelligence and I dont?
You are correct about one thing, there IS a rise of the right, nothings permanent, but its a trend of sanity returning to my country that was long overdue.
And were not a dying breed, we're dying to BREED!!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: DaveDom | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gdog
OK, now were talking..... How do you see me as bigoted?
Because I dont mince words about being strong against our enemies? Because im brutally REALISTIC about the people who threaten and hate my country? Because you view pacifism as intelligence and I dont?
You are correct about one thing, there IS a rise of the right, nothings permanent, but its a trend of sanity returning to my country that was long overdue.
And were not a dying breed, we're dying to BREED!! |
Re-read you own post Quote: I know this is where you scream "THERES NO PROOF OF A LINK BETWEEN SADDAM AND 9/11"......I dont care, I really dont. Same dirtbags, same agenda. Why risk another American life wringing our hands over what we all know to be true(except you of course).
You're racist and you display the kind of arrogance that so many people outside the US find repugnant. I can tell from your tone that you're thrilled by the killing and the violence and the power. You almost sound like you're drooling over the kind of power that American now yields.
But the popularity of your type of right-wing fanatisism is in a minority in the States. The fact that it is more popular now is just a blip in recent history caused by 9/11. But you can't use 9/11 as and excuse forever to do anything you want to any countries you don't like. Make the most of it - I can't see it lasting much longer.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: photek | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gdog
OK, now were talking..... How do you see me as bigoted?
Because I dont mince words about being strong against our enemies? Because im brutally REALISTIC about the people who threaten and hate my country? Because you view pacifism as intelligence and I dont?
You are correct about one thing, there IS a rise of the right, nothings permanent, but its a trend of sanity returning to my country that was long overdue.
And were not a dying breed, we're dying to BREED!! |
i have to say that more often than not pacifism is definitely a better choice than war, and many pacifists are more intelligent than many war-buffs.
but this is just not one of those times, and that's all there is to it.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: photek | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveDom
But you can't use 9/11 as and excuse forever to do anything you want to any countries you don't like. Make the most of it - I can't see it lasting much longer. |
dave come on man, is that what you really think this is?
the u.s's efforts are a result of not liking the 'country' of iraq and taking out 9/11 aggression on it? this has nothing to do with disliking iraq, it has to do with the regime.
i'am very very very confident hussein had his hand in 9/11, but that's just my opinion.
and yea, i can't see it lasting much longer either because like i said, this had nothing to do with disliking the country of iraq, neither were efforts in afghanistan a result of disliking afghanistan, that was a result of 9/11 which the world knows was coordinated by al-qaeda. so i'am not sure what you're talking about.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by photek
and many pacifists are more intelligent than many war-buffs.
|
Thats a pretty ignorant statement. Ill take it as an opinion.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveDom
You're racist and you display the kind of arrogance that so many people outside the US find repugnant. I can tell from your tone that you're thrilled by the killing and the violence and the power. You almost sound like you're drooling over the kind of power that American now yields.
But the popularity of your type of right-wing fanatisism is in a minority in the States. The fact that it is more popular now is just a blip in recent history caused by 9/11. But you can't use 9/11 as and excuse forever to do anything you want to any countries you don't like. Make the most of it - I can't see it lasting much longer. |
Arrogant...yes, guilty as charged.
Racist.....no, that would say I beleive all peoples of middle eastern background are less human than I.
And that is not the truth. Now you re read my post..... I said Saddam/ al qaeda are the same dirt bags, and I stand behind my opinion 100%. This has NOTHING to do with racism.
I am thrilled with Americas power, no excuses, no apology.
If you're an enemy, your death makes me happy. If you're an innocent, im sorry your leader placed you in a situation to lose your life.
What the hell do you know about minority opinion in my country?
Now you're being just a little too "self informed" for me.
Seventh generation American whos traveled my country extensively, but you on your computer all day has a much better finger on the pulse of my country. What a laugh....whos arrogant now? Fix your own country, stop pretending you have a clue about mine.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: photek | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by gdog
Thats a pretty ignorant statement. Ill take it as an opinion. |
sorry to break it to you but that's the truth. and there's no denying that it's much more likely that peace is a better answer than war 9 times out of 10.
like i said, this is not one of those times.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gdog | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by photek
sorry to break it to you but that's the truth. and there's no denying that it's much more likely that peace is a better answer than war 9 times out of 10.
like i said, this is not one of those times. |
Scroll back up and re read what I said was ignorant.
Most of the anti war crew here is what I would classify as pacifist.
Very little of the rhetoric is based on intelligence or fact.
The term "War buff" seems to mean you have researched various conflicts and the circumstances leading to them.
So in my mind, stating pacifists are more intelligent than war buffs is an ignorant statement.
Peace is better than war? well of course it is, hands down.
Id love to see someone try to argue against that.
Long for peace, prepare for war.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: DaveDom | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by photek
dave come on man, is that what you really think this is?
the u.s's efforts are a result of not liking the 'country' of iraq and taking out 9/11 aggression on it? this has nothing to do with disliking iraq, it has to do with the regime.
i'am very very very confident hussein had his hand in 9/11, but that's just my opinion.
and yea, i can't see it lasting much longer either because like i said, this had nothing to do with disliking the country of iraq, neither were efforts in afghanistan a result of disliking afghanistan, that was a result of 9/11 which the world knows was coordinated by al-qaeda. so i'am not sure what you're talking about. |
A lot of the arguments we are having now can't be resolved because we are talking about what might happen. Bush may not do anything else and I hope he doesn't need to. In the end no one really knows for sure what motivates Bush and Cheyney and Rumsfeld.
But right now Bush is milking the victory in Iraq, despite thousands of Iraqis dying, many of the soldiers conscripts (and aparently many of them forced to fight). And if I'm finding this triumphalism and jingoism difficult to watch, imagine how the Arab world are seeing it.
And lets not forget the war on terrorism goes on. No one knows what that really means.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: photek | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveDom
A lot of the arguments we are having now can't be resolved because we are talking about what might happen. Bush may not do anything else and I hope he doesn't need to. In the end no one really knows for sure what motivates Bush and Cheyney and Rumsfeld.
But right now Bush is milking the victory in Iraq, despite thousands of Iraqis dying, many of the soldiers conscripts (and aparently many of them forced to fight). And if I'm finding this triumphalism and jingoism difficult to watch, imagine how the Arab world are seeing it.
And lets not forget the war on terrorism goes on. No one knows what that really means. |
i agree there. in fact, if i was bush i would have made an official acknowledgement of iraqi civilian casualties. moment of silence, and a brief statement apoligizing to all who have lost their families. definitely should have been done.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveDom
But right now Bush is milking the victory in Iraq, despite thousands of Iraqis dying, many of the soldiers conscripts (and aparently many of them forced to fight). And if I'm finding this triumphalism and jingoism difficult to watch, imagine how the Arab world are seeing it.
|
Frankly, DaveDUMB, the fact that you find 'all this' (aka President Bush's Big Victory) difficult to watch is quite irrelevant (and quite satisfying).
___
'The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses.' She's got a baseball bat and she's yelling, "You want a piece of me?"'
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: photek | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Americaaah
Frankly, DaveDUMB, the fact that you find 'all this' difficult to watch is quite irrelevant (and quite satisfying).
___
'The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses.' She's got a baseball bat and she's yelling, "You want a piece of me?"' |
actually americaah you should also find some of this difficult to watch because behind some of the victories lie over a thousand dead iraqis, over a hundred dead americans, as well as tens of british and some australians.
what should be difficult for you to watch is the fact that those involved in any part of fighting/reconstruction iraq are having to do so as a result of 24 years of someone else's cruelty.
what i'am especially struggling with is the notion that iraqi soldiers, even those who were not forced to fight, deserved their fate.
did they? what about the fact that so many of these people were just blinded by a group of maniacal ******** who made them believe b.s and made things up to 'prove' their point? what can you do when evrrything you see and hear is controlled? those people fought for iraq under the wrong pretense, so all in all, the only people that deserve to die in this conflict are members of the regime who knew exactly what they were doing and why.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: dvader | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Americaaah
Frankly, DaveDUMB, the fact that you find 'all this' (aka President Bush's Big Victory) difficult to watch is quite irrelevant (and quite satisfying).
|
What exactly was supposed to be difficult to watch?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by photek
actually americaah you should also find some of this difficult to watch because behind some of the victories lie over a thousand dead iraqis, over a hundred dead americans, as well as tens of british and some australians.
what should be difficult for you to watch is the fact that those involved in any part of fighting/reconstruction iraq are having to do so as a result of 24 years of someone else's cruelty.
what i'am especially struggling with is the notion that iraqi soldiers, even those who were not forced to fight, deserved their fate.
did they? what about the fact that so many of these people were just blinded by a group of maniacal ******** who made them believe b.s and made things up to 'prove' their point? what can you do when evrrything you see and hear is controlled? those people fought for iraq under the wrong pretense, so all in all, the only people that deserve to die in this conflict are members of the regime who knew exactly what they were doing and why. |
Photek, please don't tell me what I should or shouldn't find difficult to watch. Are you implying that I don't value the life of the dead as a result of this war? What exactly are you saying? You once before accused me of something similar—I don't quite remember what.
Did I ever imply that I wanted anyone other than the dictator's regime to pay?
What exactly are you 'on MY case' about? I always find that I agree with your ideas, but apparently you seem to believe that I am some kind of a blood-thirsty war monger.
Well, I suppose you too are entitled to your opinion.

___
'The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses.' She's got a baseball bat and she's yelling, "You want a piece of me?"'
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: dvader | | Americaaah,
Maybe you missed my question. Can you tell me what it was, specifically, that was supposed to be difficult to watch?
Thanks. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by dvader
Americaaah,
Maybe you missed my question. Can you tell me what it was, specifically, that was supposed to be difficult to watch?
Thanks. |
This was DaveDom's statement. I was merely quoting him.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: photek | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Americaaah
Photek, please don't tell me what I should or shouldn't find difficult to watch. Are you implying that I don't value the life of the dead as a result of this war? What exactly are you saying? You once before accused me of something similar—I don't quite remember what.
Did I ever imply that I wanted anyone other than the dictator's regime to pay?
What exactly are you 'on MY case' about? I always find that I agree with your ideas, but apparently you seem to believe that I am some kind of a blood-thirsty war monger.
Well, I suppose you too are entitled to your opinion.

___
'The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses.' She's got a baseball bat and she's yelling, "You want a piece of me?"' |
oh come on, that's not what i'am saying at all. and i apologize if you took my last post as an attack on you.
i think you would have just made a much more solid and well rounded point if you had said that you also find some of what's happening now difficult to watch since behind it all are the people no one will ever see again. i mean the iraqis have had so much b.s to deal with. again, i'am not saying in any way you don't realize this, i would just have liked to see it in your post, because otherwise people like dave conclude silly things.
hope that clears it up.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: dvader | | I still do not know what it was *specifically* that was supposed to be difficult to watch.
Someone enlighten me. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: DrPoke | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by kickace999
i dont see your point why people cant hate the american administration while at the same time like the american people. Afterall don't we hate Saddam but want to help the iraqi people? |
Err.. No, that's what you are led to believe.
Yes you hate Saddam, but the Iraqi people are but insignificant plebs in the game of world domination. If you can show me a large group of Americans who weep alot for the dead civilians , thousands, of Iraqi's, and seem to be still being killed by what they call occupying forces, then I can show you a small minority in your country. I don't know what kind of wa-nk news coverage you see in the USA, but over here we have reporters sitting there when these incidents happen and cannot find any bullet holes in the walls surrounding the American troops, who have said they've been fired on, before killing numerous peaceful protestors.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: DaveDom | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by dvader
What exactly was supposed to be difficult to watch? |
The triumphalism is what I'm talking about. The war lasted 3 weeks. Iraq is in a mess. According to Bush, America didn't go in there to defeat the coutry it went in to get rid of the regime (amongst other things). But the triumphalism is all about the power and supremacy of the America government and military.
I said I find the jingoism and triumphalism distastful. If I feel that way how must it be percieved in the Arab world. Some people on this forum don't give a sh!t. Well America should give a sh!t about how it's percieved in the world and for obvious reasons.
Sadly America had two great opportunities to show it is not the arrogant nation many think it is - the first after 9/11 when there was huge world-wide sympathy for the country and now the war in Iraq (utterly defensless against the shock and awe bombing) - and blew the first opportunity and looks like doing it with the second.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveDom
The triumphalism is what I'm talking about. The war lasted 3 weeks. Iraq is in a mess. According to Bush, America didn't go in there to defeat the coutry it went in to get rid of the regime (amongst other things). But the triumphalism is all about the power and supremacy of the America government and military.
I said I find the jingoism and triumphalism distastful. If I feel that way how must it be percieved in the Arab world. Some people on this forum don't give a sh!t. Well America should give a sh!t about how it's percieved in the world and for obvious reasons.
Sadly America had two great opportunities to show it is not the arrogant nation many think it is - the first after 9/11 when there was huge world-wide sympathy for the country and now the war in Iraq (utterly defensless against the shock and awe bombing) - and blew the first opportunity and looks like doing it with the second. |
So DaveDUMB, is all this factual information or is it just your opinion? Please distinguish for us.
___
'The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses.' She's got a baseball bat and she's yelling, "You want a piece of me?"'
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: photek | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by dvader
I still do not know what it was *specifically* that was supposed to be difficult to watch.
Someone enlighten me. |
like i said, over 1000 iraqis dead.
100 some odd american soldiers dead.
tens of british, australian
if that's not difficult to watch....or at least consider, i'am not sure what your problem is.
| | Reply To this Message
|
Post-9/11 Era Forum: Hate America, Like Americans???
|