Abortion as a form of birth control? |
| Posted by: flapbreaker | |
| quote: |
Sean Kelly said this in post #9 :
Dems like to kill babies? WTF is wrong with you people? |
It just goes to show that they have a difficult time rationalizing abortion.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Inner City Blues | |
| quote: |
flapbreaker said this in post #10 :
It just goes to show that they have a difficult time rationalizing abortion. |
Please spare me the ignorance. Pro-life people that support the death penalty, and support wars, at the same time not coming out against in vitro fertilization, are no better than the Democratic "baby killers." You're on no moral high ground.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: flapbreaker | |
| quote: |
Inner City Blue said this in post #11 :
Please spare me the ignorance. Pro-life people that support the death penalty, and support wars, at the same time not coming out against in vitro fertilization, are no better than the Democratic "baby killers." You're on no moral high ground. |
So now unborn children are on the same level as death row criminals? That's rich. And I don't think people should do invitro fertilizations. If you can't have a baby then deal with it.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Inner City Blues | |
| quote: |
flapbreaker said this in post #12 :
So now unborn children are on the same level as death row criminals? That's rich. And I don't think people should do invitro fertilizations. If you can't have a baby then deal with it. |
If a person is innocent and they are on death row, it is a horrible miscarriage of justice, but oh well for them, I guess it's kill them for the greater good of the system. Iraqi civilian, hey deal with the war it's for your own good. Hey embryo that may or may not yield a baby, you are more important than any other life in the world, well that's until you're born...
After you're born, don't come crying to me, pull yourself up by the bootstraps. Money for social services? Pfft...there are no handouts from me. I'm not going to put money in a foster care system, it's good enough with only about a quarter of you going up for adoption and only half being taken, that's good enough.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: flapbreaker | |
| quote: |
Inner City Blue said this in post #13 :
If a person is innocent and they are on death row, it is a horrible miscarriage of justice, but oh well for them, I guess it's kill them for the greater good of the system. Iraqi civilian, hey deal with the war it's for your own good. Hey embryo that may or may not yield a baby, you are more important than any other life in the world, well that's until you're born...
After you're born, don't come crying to me, pull yourself up by the bootstraps. Money for social services? Pfft...there are no handouts from me. I'm not going to put money in a foster care system, it's good enough with only about a quarter of you going up for adoption and only half being taken, that's good enough. |
Lame argument. Sounds like you think abortion should be used as birth control. Sick.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | | Completely off topic, so I'm splitting it.
For the record, I think abortion should be restricted to first trimester only, but that it should perhaps be a fairly expensive procedure so as to reduce dependence upon it as an acceptable means of birth control. Thre are more effective means of prevention that are not so gruesome. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
flapbreaker said this in post #4 :
And I don't think people should do invitro fertilizations. If you can't have a baby then deal with it. |
Thats a pretty harsh statement. You dont want to kill fetuses but you also are against someone WANTING to give life?
I dont understand why a person would have an issue with invitro.
| quote: |
Sean Kelly said this in post #7 :
For the record, I think abortion should be restricted to first trimester only, but that it should perhaps be a fairly expensive procedure so as to reduce dependence upon it as an acceptable means of birth control. There are more effective means of prevention that are not so gruesome. |
I think it should be restricted to the frist three months also....
I question the expensiveness you mention though....it could cause some issues, but thats its not a totally bad idea...I think its something that would be a good discussion point...I just dont know if this is the place to do it. (forum-wise)
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: flapbreaker | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #8 :
Thats a pretty harsh statement. You dont want to kill fetuses but you also are against someone WANTING to give life?
I dont understand why a person would have an issue with invitro.
|
Mystic your right that was harsh. Perhaps I should have rephrased it. The issue with in vitro is an ethical/moral one. Multiple eggs are fertilized for the process so I suppose the ethical part depends on when you think life starts. Anyway it's just my opinion. I think that if a couple cannot concieve the natural way then there's a reason for it.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | | Indeed, moving now! This was split off from an election thread and I forgot to move it afterward. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Inner City Blues | |
| quote: |
flapbreaker said this in post #6 :
Lame argument. Sounds like you think abortion should be used as birth control. Sick. |
Yes, just call it a lame argument and don't explore because you really don't have a response.
Oh an the only reason you see people against in vitro fertilization now is because they now know you have to dispose leftover embryos that aren't used. That's why they want to use it for stem cell research, if they're destined for the trash, they might as well be used.
I never said abortion should be used as birth control, I'm just revealing the problem with your moral absolutes.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Jim Nasium | | i doubt that there's any one of us here, liberal OR conservative, that favors abortion as a "means of birth control." That's ridiculous. I'm totally opposed to that - preplanned abortions. but once a pregnancy exists, if and ONLY if, there is a VERY good reason to terminate that pregnancy, i don't think the government or the courts should be dictating anything, providing it's done in the first trimester when it is highly questionable whether a human life exists. beyong that first trimester, i think that some other alternative should be applied, as difficult as that might make things for the mother and/or child. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | | 1) if the mother's life is in danger from the pregnancy, obviously it's a clear-cut case of life or death so an abortion in that instance I wouldn't argue with.
2) if the pregnancy is from rape, it'd be great if the mother would go ahead and have the child anyway, but she didn't have a choice, so the decision should be hers.
99% of the time, however, abortion is used as birth control. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Jim Nasium said this in post #12 :
i don't think the government or the courts should be dictating anything, providing it's done in the first trimester when it is highly questionable whether a human life exists. |
Agreed!
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #13 :
99% of the time, however, abortion is used as birth control. |
Please quote the date and source of these statistics.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | | i pulled that out of my ass I have no idea what the actual number is
I'll see if I can find reasons abortions were performed online but I doubt I will be able to.
are you saying most abortions are not performed because the person doesn't feel like having a kid when they are pregnant from consensual sex? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | | ok I found this
it's from an obvious Pro-life page but here ya go
http://www.christianpulpit.com/righttol.html
Percentage of abortions performed due to life or health threat to the mother: 1%
Percentage of abortions performed due to rape or incest: 2%
Percentage of abortions performed due to health of the baby: 4%
Percentage of abortions performed for social reasons: 93%
Source: "Why Do Women Have Abortions?", A. Torres & J.D. Forrest,
Family Planning Perspectives, Jul/Aug 1988
Number of live births in 1992: 4,065,014
Number of abortions in 1992: 1,528,930
Percentage of pregnancies ending in abortion: 27%
Source: World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1996, New Jersey | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Dekka00 said this in post #15 :
are you saying most abortions are not performed because the person doesn't feel like having a kid when they are pregnant from consensual sex? |
No..thats not what Im saying...but you said that they are having abortions and using it as birth control.
Thats just not exactly a right statement. Technically, people dont just say Id rather have an abortion than use a condom or take the pill.
That statement almost implies that.
I would agree that most people have abortions for social reasons, but I also know that a great many of these women use birth control. The pill, nor condoms are 100 percent effective. I can verify that.
The only way to insure that abortions are not used socially when legal is through abstinence...the only problem is that it isnt realistic.
Look, I know this might be precieved as a cheesy statement, but we have so many children in the world that are unwanted as it is...and so many children grow up in homes feeling unloved and unwanted because their parent didnt really want them to begin with. I think having an abortion in the first trimester is the best way to go...
I also feel that a male dominated government should not be the ones telling women what to do with their own body. If she doesnt want the child, and the man doesnt want the child...what happens to it? Sure...adoption can happen, but what of all the other children that never got adopted? Its just another child in this world abandoned.
See...pro-lifers are all about life...but they arent the ones that have to deal with the child when the parents dont want them. I also dont see them helping all those children in orphanges and giving them homes in their homes.
Im not gonna rag on your source, because Im not sure anyone can truly get an accurate statement at all. A right wing source will give a high percentage, a left wing will give a lower percentage.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: schmiggens | | I don't know what the rate is in USA, but since 1991, the rate of abortions in Australia has actually dropped every year. This is happening without any government intervention, it's just that people are finding alternatives on their own and that has got to be a good thing. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #17 :
Thats just not exactly a right statement. Technically, people dont just say Id rather have an abortion than use a condom or take the pill.
That statement almost implies that.
okay I can see why you'd have a problem with that wording so I'll call it post-conception birth control then. As long as the pregnancy was a result of consious choice I cannot justify allowing a fetus to be killed.
I would agree that most people have abortions for social reasons, but I also know that a great many of these women use birth control. The pill, nor condoms are 100 percent effective. I can verify that.
The only way to insure that abortions are not used socially when legal is through abstinence... exactly! the only problem is that it isnt realistic.
it's perfectly realistic. It worked in the past, it can work now. Unwanted children are not so much society's problem as the two parent's problem. They didn't want a kid? Tough. They understand how sexual reproduction works. They had sex anyway. Now they better get used to the idea of being a parent real quick, because they are going to be.
Look, I know this might be precieved as a cheesy statement, but we have so many children in the world that are unwanted as it is...and so many children grow up in homes feeling unloved and unwanted because their parent didnt really want them to begin with. I think having an abortion in the first trimester is the best way to go...
I also feel that a male dominated government should not be the ones telling women what to do with their own body. If she doesnt want the child, and the man doesnt want the child...what happens to it? Sure...adoption can happen, but what of all the other children that never got adopted? Its just another child in this world abandoned.
I'm not one to try to force my ideas upon other people, people are gonna do what they're gonna do. If someone decides to rebel against America's Puritan values, that's alright. But they are gonna have to live the results of it. Don't like the results, don't live that kind of life. However, if maintaining your lifestyle means you have to either abandon a child or kill a fetus, I think I am justified in calling it "wrong" and furthermore justified in saying it should be illegal. In fact I could go a step further and say you ought to change the way you are living, and not feel guilty of instrusive evangelism.
See...pro-lifers are all about life...but they arent the ones that have to deal with the child when the parents dont want them. I also dont see them helping all those children in orphanges and giving them homes in their homes.
you're right, the ones responsible should be the ones held responsible.
Im not gonna rag on your source, because Im not sure anyone can truly get an accurate statement at all. A right wing source will give a high percentage, a left wing will give a lower percentage. |
I'm gonna see if I can round up a few numbers later today or tomorrow...
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | | I don't think abstenence is beyond our reach. Most sex is recreational and not terribly genuine/loving to begin with - why would it be so difficult to teach kids an alternative to caving into the media and letting their hormones control them? There's great danger to life with STD's which social diseases and could disappear with changes in social behavior. There are too many people on this planet which are the result of promiscuous sex and unregulated child bearing. There are a good number of problems that tie into this topic.
Mystic, I see your point regarding our present inability to regulate using abortion as a form of brith control (short of outlawing it altogether), but what if we did something with abortion from a regulatory standpoint like we do with driving: if you end up in that clinic for an unplanned pregnancy, you must take a follow-up course on sex education, planned parenthood, etc. just as the DMV allows you to get out of certain tickets as being points aginst your driving record by attending a follow-up traffic school..? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Sean Kelly said this in post #20 :
I don't think abstenence is beyond our reach. Most sex is recreational and not terribly genuine/loving to begin with - why would it be so difficult to teach kids an alternative to caving into the media and letting their hormones control them? There's great danger to life with STD's which social diseases and could disappear with changes in social behavior. There are too many people on this planet which are the result of promiscuous sex and unregulated child bearing. There are a good number of problems that tie into this topic.
Mystic, I see your point regarding our present inability to regulate using abortion as a form of birth control (short of outlawing it altogether), but what if we did something with abortion from a regulatory standpoint like we do with driving: if you end up in that clinic for an unplanned pregnancy, you must take a follow-up course on sex education, planned parenthood, etc. just as the DMV allows you to get out of certain tickets as being points aginst your driving record by attending a follow-up traffic school..? |
I think that's a great idea. Makes me wonder why it has never been brought up before.
As for the abstinence issue...I totally see your point and I understand it also...but realistically, we can teach and teach our kids...but its not just the media that controls them, its their own peers...we, as parents, can only do what we can do...eventually the hormones start raging, and we arent typically around when that happens...
I think its more important to be able to make sure that the kids that do choose to have sex is to make sure that contraceptives are available to them. If people want them to avoid STD's and AIDS, then teaching them the responsible choice is the right thing, and if abstinence isnt a realistic choice for them, at least condoms can be.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Nymphadora | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #17 :
No..thats not what Im saying...but you said that they are having abortions and using it as birth control.
Thats just not exactly a right statement. Technically, people dont just say Id rather have an abortion than use a condom or take the pill.
|
Wouldn't it just be lovely if that actually didn't happen, but it does, all to often. I personally know some poeple, not a person, but PEOPLE who go to the clinic on a routine basis and get abortions done just incase they are pregnant. They don't want the poeple to tell them weather they were pregnant or not, they go get it done, leave and act like its a trip to the supermarket.
It disgusts me. But it happens, and will continue to happen.
| | Reply To this Message
|
Abortion Forum: Abortion as a form of birth control?
|