Was the creation of Israel equal to colonisation of America? - Israel & Palestine

Was the creation of Israel equal to colonisation of America?

Israel & Palestine Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: Barbed wire

Talking about the State of Israel in the context of Anti-Zionism we should remember there's another affected party: the Palestinian Arabs.
Since they'd been living on the land for ages by the time the Jews began massive landing, they have all the rights to think this landing as a hostile act against them. Because of that driving the Arabs out of their land and creation of the State of Israel is anti-Arabic (?) and racism. The story repeats the story of Native Americans. There is a difference that colonising of America happened much earlier when no-one had an idea on human rights.
Arabian Anti-Semitism is well-based: the Israeli Jews did much harm to them that's why they hate Jews now, quite probably they hate all the Jews, not only those, who live in Israel. This is like the hate of Native Americans towards the white settlers.
The outcome of the colonisation of Palestine by Israel is like the outcome of the Indians: Palestinians find themselves in a reservation. Many more similarities may be found.
Zionists justify their claim because of the fact that Jews lived there in ancient times. Is that a good reason? I doubt. Many things have happened since that time and there's no possibility to rewind the tape.
Creating of Israel was possible in any unmanned land so no other people would have been affected. Zionists decided to conquer Palestine. They made their choice and they have now what they have. Suicide terrorists? You've chosen war, now eat it's fruits.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

my only problem with the creation of Israel was the fact that the UN was carving up lands that the people who lived there had no say in.

but that's the past.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Merkava

Arab Anti-semitism has existed as early as the 1920's - before Israel - before Haganah, irgun, and Stern gang even existed.

I actually think its the other way around - why do the Palestinians complain when Israel sends in Helicopters to kill their terrorist leaders? After all, the Palestinians do call this a war.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Barbed wire

quote:
Merkava said this in post #3 :
Arab Anti-semitism has existed as early as the 1920's - before Israel - before Haganah, irgun, and Stern gang even existed.


Antisemitism existed everytime and in every society which dealt with Jews, no wonder it existed in Arab society in 1920's.

quote:

I actually think its the other way around - why do the Palestinians complain when Israel sends in Helicopters to kill their terrorist leaders? After all, the Palestinians do call this a war.

Palestinians may also wonder why Israelites complain when they send suicide bombers.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Barbed wire

quote:
Dekka00 said this in post #2 :
my only problem with the creation of Israel was the fact that the UN was carving up lands that the people who lived there had no say in.

but that's the past.


Quite agree. There is no signicant force which would want to change the status-quo.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Merkava

quote:
Barbed wire said this in post #4 :


Antisemitism existed everytime and in every society which dealt with Jews, no wonder it existed in Arab society in 1920's.


Is this supposed to somehow justify it? The point is the first Arab-Jew violence in the middle east was initated by the Arabs due to their sole hate of Jews. Try to find something that out-dates the Hebron massacre of 1929.


quote:
Palestinians may also wonder why Israelites complain when they send suicide bombers.


There's a difference - Israeli helicopters target armed combatants, whereas suicide bombers target innocent civilians.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: IsraelIs4Ever

Every country was created by colonialism. Just look at Russia. One of the worst examples of colonialism. How about Europe? The whites from Urals swarmed down into Europe and colonized it. We can't forget the Arabs who colonized the middle east. Why do people go off in Israel? Anti-Semitism. You hardly hear a peep about China occupying Tibet. Russia and Chechnya, what conflict? Israel on the other hand is considered the worst country in the world. Why? Anti-Semitism. It is pure hypocrisy the way people attack Israel while they live in countries that were created by committing crimes against the native people of their countries. I suggest all of you who attack Israel go back to the countries where your ancestors migrated from. Give your countries back to the natives.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Barbed wire

quote:
Merkava said this in post #6 :


Is this supposed to somehow justify it? The point is the first Arab-Jew violence in the middle east was initated by the Arabs due to their sole hate of Jews. Try to find something that out-dates the Hebron massacre of 1929.


1. I'm not trying to judge anything, but analysing facts. There is much evidence of hate against Jews from ancient times, including anti-semitism of ancient Egyptians.

2. Do you mean that there wasn't an act of violence before the Hebron or those acts were because of 'sole hate of Jews'?

quote:

There's a difference - Israeli helicopters target armed combatants, whereas suicide bombers target innocent civilians.

Since there's conscription in Israel and both men and women are drafted, and men up 51 years old remain in reserve, serving up 39 days each year - like in no other country, then there are no civilians in Israel - all are soldiers.


quote:
IsraelIs4Ever said this in post #7 :
Every country was created by colonialism. Just look at Russia. One of the worst examples of colonialism. [quote]
Russia is an example of softest possible colonialism. Some countries pleaded to be parts of Russia, and problems were only in Checnhya and Poland in XIX century.

[quote]
How about Europe? The whites from Urals swarmed down into Europe and colonized it. We can't forget the Arabs who colonized the middle east.
Why do people go off in Israel? Anti-Semitism. You hardly hear a peep about China occupying Tibet. Russia and Chechnya, what conflict? Israel on the other hand is considered the worst country in the world. Why? Anti-Semitism. It is pure hypocrisy the way people attack Israel while they live in countries that were created by committing crimes against the native people of their countries. I suggest all of you who attack Israel go back to the countries where your ancestors migrated from. Give your countries back to the natives.


And you, Jews, go to Iraq where Abraham was from Such ideas aren't productive. Give Europe back to natives? Which ones? Show me them.
Russia as well as China are being much criticised, you just take the criticism against Israel closer to your heart, what is natural of course.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Barbed wire

Of course the Palestinian Arabs have hate towards Jews. But we shouldn't mess reason and consequence.

Once Arabs constituted the majority in Palestine, then thanks to the mass emigration of Jews into Israel they began to loose the dominant position.

Such state of things leads to anti-semitism, of course. So Arabs don't hate Jews because of their ignorance or/and intolerance.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: woolfe99

quote:
Barbed wire said this in post #9 :
Of course the Palestinian Arabs have hate towards Jews. But we shouldn't mess reason and consequence.

Once Arabs constituted the majority in Palestine, then thanks to the mass emigration of Jews into Israel they began to loose the dominant position.

Such state of things leads to anti-semitism, of course. So Arabs don't hate Jews because of their ignorance or/and intolerance.


Causation is rarely simple, and rarely uni-directional. It often goes both ways, and it definitely did here. There is no doubt that anti-semitism among Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular has increased a lot due to the presence of the Jews in Palestine and the State of Israel. But Arab anti-semitism pre-dates those events, as does anti-semitism throughout the world.

In the case of the Arabs, it was not so much anti-semitism per se. It is religious and cultural intolerance in general. This is a pretty insular and xenophobic religion and culture. A careful study of the pre-1948 history leads to a pretty much inescapable conclusion that the events would not have produced a conflict of this magnitude had that xenophobia not been indemnic to the culture and the region before the Jews got there. This is not to say that this factor is the only one contributing to the conflict, but it has been substantial factor in how it has played out from day 1.

- woofle
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Merkava

Edited for language and insults. -advance

Reply To this Message

Posted by: IsraelIs4Ever

quote:
Barbed wire said this in post #9 :
Russia is an example of softest possible colonialism. Some countries pleaded to be parts of Russia, and problems were only in Checnhya and Poland in XIX century.



What the hell is soft colonialism? Either it is or it isn't. Your problems were in a lot more than just Chechyna and Poland.
http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/...A/chapter_2.htm

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/home...usazerb/121.htm

quote:
Russia as well as China are being much criticised, you just take the criticism against Israel closer to your heart, what is natural of course.


Where are all the protests against Russia or China? Where are all the UN resolutions against them? Where are all the anti-Russian and anti-Chinese posts by the same people who slam Israel?

I'll tell you where they are. They are no where. Why? Because the same people who bash Israel don't give a damn about what other countries are doing because it doesn't involve Jews.

quote:
Since there's conscription in Israel and both men and women are drafted, and men up 51 years old remain in reserve, serving up 39 days each year - like in no other country, then there are no civilians in Israel - all are soldiers.


There are no civilians in Israel? What garbage. So when women finish their 21 months of service in the military they are not civilians? And on the other 326 days a year when men are not in the reserve they are not civilians? Please provide your source of this definition as to who is or isn't a civilian. Plus what about men older than 51? Are they not civilians? So when you said there are no civilians in Israel, that was a lie.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: MichelAoun

quote:
Barbed wire said this in post #1 :
Talking about the State of Israel in the context of Anti-Zionism we should remember there's another affected party: the Palestinian Arabs.
Since they'd been living on the land for ages by the time the Jews began massive landing, they have all the rights to think this landing as a hostile act against them. Because of that driving the Arabs out of their land and creation of the State of Israel is anti-Arabic (?) and racism. The story repeats the story of Native Americans. There is a difference that colonising of America happened much earlier when no-one had an idea on human rights.
Arabian Anti-Semitism is well-based: the Israeli Jews did much harm to them that's why they hate Jews now, quite probably they hate all the Jews, not only those, who live in Israel. This is like the hate of Native Americans towards the white settlers.
The outcome of the colonisation of Palestine by Israel is like the outcome of the Indians: Palestinians find themselves in a reservation. Many more similarities may be found.
Zionists justify their claim because of the fact that Jews lived there in ancient times. Is that a good reason? I doubt. Many things have happened since that time and there's no possibility to rewind the tape.
Creating of Israel was possible in any unmanned land so no other people would have been affected. Zionists decided to conquer Palestine. They made their choice and they have now what they have. Suicide terrorists? You've chosen war, now eat it's fruits.


u're absolutly right
Israel is illegal
everything is wrong
the USA rule the world and all the countries are their dogs
that is so disappointing
Reply To this Message

Posted by: MichelAoun

quote:
Merkava said this in post #6 :


Is this supposed to somehow justify it? The point is the first Arab-Jew violence in the middle east was initated by the Arabs due to their sole hate of Jews. Try to find something that out-dates the Hebron massacre of 1929.




There's a difference - Israeli helicopters target armed combatants, whereas suicide bombers target innocent civilians.


Israeli helicopters target armed combatants ?? but they hit civilians !!! so u are claming that Israel does not kill innocent people ??? u are a fool
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Merkava

quote:
MichelAoun said this in post #14 :


Israeli helicopters target armed combatants ?? but they hit civilians !!! so u are claming that Israel does not kill innocent people ??? u are a fool


Yes, innocent people have died - but they were not the targets. Hamas and islamic Jihad specifically hide in very dense populated areas for that specific reason - to make Israel look like the 'bad guy'.

The point is Intention, and Israel has no intention to kill innocent civilians - Hamas and Islamic Jihad, on the other hand...
Reply To this Message

Posted by: MrJukoVette

IsraelIs4Ever said this in post #7 :
Every country was created by colonialism. Just look at Russia. One of the worst examples of colonialism.

Barbed wire said this in post #8 :
Russia is an example of softest possible colonialism. Some countries pleaded to be parts of Russia, and problems were only in Checnhya and Poland in XIX century.

Read some history. Russia, starting with it's emerging as Kiev Empire in 9th century, was one of the most offensive states. Numerous attacks on small nations surrounding it and other empires, following suffering from mongol occupation, then czar period russia and it's wars, and the brightest page of russian imperialism - USSR. Softest colonialism? HA HA HA

How about Europe? The whites from Urals swarmed down into Europe and colonized it.

Well the original population and new-comer whites have mostly integrated in EU. Lets not forget what the EU states did with asian and african nations and islands up until 1940s.

We can't forget the Arabs who colonized the middle east.

Not just arabs, but turks and persians as well. Everybody tried colonizing and ruling everybody. Everybody failed.

Why do people go off in Israel? Anti-Semitism. You hardly hear a peep about China occupying Tibet. Russia and Chechnya, what conflict? Israel on the other hand is considered the worst country in the world. Why? Anti-Semitism. It is pure hypocrisy the way people attack Israel while they live in countries that were created by committing crimes against the native people of their countries.

That's true.

I suggest all of you who attack Israel go back to the countries where your ancestors migrated from. Give your countries back to the natives.

And the real natives in Israel are jews.


Barbed wire said this in post #8 :
Since there's conscription in Israel and both men and women are drafted, and men up 51 years old remain in reserve, serving up 39 days each year - like in no other country, then there are no civilians in Israel - all are soldiers.

Ofcourse they all have to be soldiers if there are millions around them who want to kill them.

Russia as well as China are being much criticised, you just take the criticism against Israel closer to your heart, what is natural of course.

5000 rallied in France in a peace-protest against Russian atrocities in Chechnya. China? I heard NOTHING to date condemning China, maybe except for it's human rights violations.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: MichelAoun

quote:
Merkava said this in post #15 :


Yes, innocent people have died - but they were not the targets. Hamas and islamic Jihad specifically hide in very dense populated areas for that specific reason - to make Israel look like the 'bad guy'.

The point is Intention, and Israel has no intention to kill innocent civilians - Hamas and Islamic Jihad, on the other hand...


ok maybe Israel has no intention to kill innocent civilians by the helicopters , they target hamas and they hit innocent palestinians by mistake , but aren't they killing the palestinians with other ways ?? do u think i am a fool ?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Merkava

quote:
MichelAoun said this in post #17 :


ok maybe Israel has no intention to kill innocent civilians by the helicopters , they target hamas and they hit innocent palestinians by mistake , but aren't they killing the palestinians with other ways ?? do u think i am a fool ?


What other ways? Perhaps you should go look at an IDF soldier handbook. One of the first rules is to not cause harm to civilians, and unarmed uncombatants.

It's like saying American soldiers intentionally go in and kill Iraqi civilians. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if you believed that one too.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Barbed wire

quote:
woolfe99 said this in post #10 :


In the case of the Arabs, it was not so much anti-semitism per se. It is religious and cultural intolerance in general. This is a pretty insular and xenophobic religion and culture.
- woofle


That's strange to hear.

In history Muslim world was more tolerant to Jews then Christian Europe:

1. Islam mandates a limited level of tolerance for both Jews and Christians, as long as they did not challenge the superious status of Islam. Early verses in the Quran limit religious disputations with them to those occurring in a fair manner.

"And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, except with means better (than mere disputation), unless it be with those of them who inflict wrong (and injury): but say, 'We believe in the revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our Allah and your Allah is one; and it is to Him we bow (in Islam).'" (XXIX: The Spider: 46)
2. When Muslim armies conquered nations, they felt no special need to force people of the Book, including Jews, to convert to Islam. Under Sharia law they were given the status of dhimmi, which gave them certain rights, as well as certain responsibilities. As dhimmi, Jews faced a greater level of tolerance under Muslim rule than under Christian rule. Dhimmi were provided with limited autonomy, and allowed to practice their religion. although Dhimii had to pay the Jizya, they were exempted from the Zakat (giving alms to the poor). The exact treatment of dhimmi varied greatly from place to place.

The constitution of Medina, one of the earliest documents of the Muslim community in Medina, which was transmitted by Ibn Hisham states: "The Jews of Banu Awf [phrases are repeated for the different Jewish communities] are a community along with the believers. To the Jews their religion and to the Muslim their religion."

For Jewish tribes which had treaties with the Muslim umma, the constitution of Medina states: "A Jew who follows us has a right to the same help and support as the believers, so long they are not wronged by him and he does not help others against them."

3. Using verses from the Quran, some Muslims hold that, although a Muslim must be friendly with Jews and Christians, one should avoid befriending or initializing a friendship with them. This view is still held by many Muslims today. However, Muslims do consider Judaism as one of the divine faiths; a great number of their prophets are of the Bani-Israel tribe:

"We gave him Isaac, and Jacob: all We guided and before him, We guided Noah, and among his progeny David, Solomon, Ayub, Joseph, Moses, and Aaron :Thus do We reward those who do good. And Zakariya and Yahya, and Jesus and Elias: all in the ranks of righteous. And Isma'il and Elisha and Jonah (Yunus) and Lut. And to all we gave favour above the nations."

Many other prophets are considered to be the descendants of the tribe.

"Bani-Israel" itself means the children of Israel and more or less concerns those of Jewish faith. Those who the Bani-Israel tribe consisted of were regarded to as "the preffered ones", as mentioned in the Qur'an:

"O Children of Israel! Call to mind My favour which I bestowed on you and that I preferred you to all others (for my Message)"

According to Qur'anic verses, the particular tribe showed constant ungratefulness towards God and did not obey the command of their great prophets.

"Indignity is put over them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of protection) from God, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of God, and destruction is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayats (evidences) of Allah and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (God) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in God's disobedience, crimes and sins).

In the contrary Jews were expelled from medeival Britain, Spain and Portugal.

S.D. Goitein in his book "Jews and Arabs, Their Contacts Through the Ages" described the relations between Jews and Arabs as "simbiosis".

Of course, the Jews living in Muslim society didn't have same rights as Muslim, but I can't see there any special anti-semitism surpassing European one.

quote:
woolfe99 said this in post #10 :

A careful study of the pre-1948 history leads to a pretty much inescapable conclusion that the events would not have produced a conflict of this magnitude had that xenophobia not been indemnic to the culture and the region before the Jews got there. This is not to say that this factor is the only one contributing to the conflict, but it has been substantial factor in how it has played out from day 1.
- woofle

Please expand on this statement
Reply To this Message

Posted by: MichelAoun

quote:
Merkava said this in post #18 :


What other ways? Perhaps you should go look at an IDF soldier handbook. One of the first rules is to not cause harm to civilians, and unarmed uncombatants.

It's like saying American soldiers intentionally go in and kill Iraqi civilians. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if you believed that one too.


why should u be surprised ?
that's the truth
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Barbed wire

quote:
Merkava said this in post #11 :


You clearly bring this up to justify anti-semitism. Why else?


Wrong. I bring this up to show that Arabian anti-semitism wasn't exceeding anti-semitism in any other places (some "general" level) until Jewish immigration to Palestina took place.

quote:
Merkava said this in post #11 :

The first massacre to take place in the Jew-Arab conflict was committed by Arabs almost 20 years before the state of Israel even existed.

It means nothing since Jewish immigration began long before 1947. Next the event you mentioned wasn't the first unrest in Arab-Jewish relations:

quote:
Rashid Khalidi has pointed out, land sales and transfers of whole groups of Palestinian fellaheen out of their traditional villages to make way for Zionist collectives instigated a number of serious peasant-led rebellions . Among the most important were those in the Tiberias region in 1901-1902 and Afula in 1910-1911.

Although peasant insurgencies against Zionist settlements were recorded from as early as 1884-1886, those in Tiberias and Afula were significant because they galvanized Arab nationalist opinion against the systematic colonization of Palestine by Jewish agricultural communities.


quote:
Merkava said this in post #11 :


Now this idiot justifies terrorism with his petty propaganda of an excuse.

Feeling stupid yet?


Some people fall to insults in argument when they can't defend their position. I'm sorry it's your case.

quote:
[i]Merkava said this in post
Are the babies soldiers too? - the Palestinians dont seem to have a problem killing them. Unarmed plain clothed Israelis who served in the military for 2 years at some past time in their life aren't soldiers - and arent legitmite targets, according to any convention.

By the way, Germany also has mandatory draft, not to mention China, Lebanon, Finland, Greece, Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, South korea, and Taiwan.


Even RUSSIA has mandatory Military draft (unless you go to college).
[/B]

No country from the mentioned requires its citizens to serve as much as 39 days a year. It shows that Israel isn't a peaceful country like them. Israelites are in real armed settlers and the war in Palestine isn't like one regulated by the conventions. It's not a war of a government against other government using regular troops, but a war of a people (including the elderly, women and children) against other people including their women and children. To be just I add that the Jewish side is more civilised and they want to become a peaceful country (at least Yitzhak Rabin wanted).

In Russia a male needs to get a Ph.D. to be freed from army service. High education reduces the term of service to 1 year from 2 (ground forces) and university students get a postponement to finish their high education or post-graduate studies.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Merkava

quote:
Barbed wire said this in post #21 :
[B]

Wrong. I bring this up to show that Arabian anti-semitism wasn't exceeding anti-semitism in any other places (some "general" level) until Jewish immigration to Palestina took place.


Since when is LEGAL immigration a justification for anti-semitism? The Arab riots of the 1920's had no justification at all.


quote:
Barbed wire said this in post #21 :
[B]It means nothing since Jewish immigration began long before 1947. Next the event you mentioned wasn't the first unrest in Arab-Jewish relations:


Since when does legal immigration justify anti-semitism and terrorism?

quote:
Some people fall to insults in argument when they can't defend their position. I'm sorry it's your case.


No country from the mentioned requires its citizens to serve as much as 39 days a year. It shows that Israel isn't a peaceful country like them.


»You're on an idiot streak.« {merkava: disagree without resorting to personal insults please. thank you.}

Germany - 9 months
Greece - 18 Months
LEBANON - 12 months
Russia - 24 months
Singapore - over 24 months
South Korea - 26 months

Educate yourself, i'm getting tired of doing it for you.

http://www.fact-index.com/c/co/conscription.html
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Barbed wire

Merkava: I finally concluded that's impossible to lead a polite discussion with you.
Herewith I inform you you're ignored.
Bye.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Barbed wire

quote:
MrJukoVette said this in post #16 :
IsraelIs4Ever said this in post #7 :
Every country was created by colonialism. Just look at Russia. One of the worst examples of colonialism.

Barbed wire said this in post #8 :
Russia is an example of softest possible colonialism. Some countries pleaded to be parts of Russia, and problems were only in Checnhya and Poland in XIX century.
...
.

Because here the discussion on Russian history would be an off-topic, the answers are posted in another forum:
http://www.inreview.com/showthread....&threadid=24319
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Merkava

quote:
Barbed wire said this in post #23 :
Merkava: I finally concluded that's impossible to lead a polite discussion with you.
Herewith I inform you you're ignored.
Bye.


Couldn't take the heat, huh?

Oh well - with such amazing arguments like "Israel has a unique conscription which shows that its not a peaceful country", i couldn't help but make fun of you.

Perhaps that "unique conscription" (which isnt even all that unique), is due to the fact that the state has come under attack several times by its Arab neighbors throughout all its life?

I especially liked your "All Israelis are soldiers" argument. You pretty much suggest that Even though an Israeli toddler blown to bits might LOOK BAD, its technically justified because one day that toddler would have to serve in the military!

Ohh, but thats just 'barbed wire' being non-biased and filtering out the propaganda from both sides
Reply To this Message

Posted by: anti

It is not equivalent to colonisation. It was the arabs who refused to live in peace with the Jews, chose war, and lost. Nobody was completely happy with the partition, but it was roughly based on where most people were living. The refugee crisis was largely of manufacture by the arabs, who said - "come give up your land , you'll get it back when we destroy the zionist state. " We'll they didn't and they won't.

Prior to the partition, the Jews bought land, legally, from the arabs, who laughed all the way to the bank. Once the Jews made that land valuable, the arabs started crying foul.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Arandomguy

to see such faulty arguments.

American colonization was nothing like Israel's immigration. First off the english settlers had and made no historic claim to the land. but that's not all that important. Israeli settlers did not take land from the natives, they bought it. Israeli settlers where joining their sephardic cousins, english colonists had no pre existing foothold. The Israeli settlers were met with harsh resistance and anti-semitism, the english settlers recieved aid from friendly native tribes. Israel gave back land it conquered in a DEFENSIVE war, the english settlers expanded without pause.

Please take an american history class. and while you're at it, take a modern middle-east class too.

and please don't turn tail and run when u are proven wrong. research your statements before u write them.

and israel requires all citizens (EXCLUDING many orthodox jews who get deferment based on religious beliefs) to serve in the armed forces, true. But that's not becuase israel is a aggressive country, it's because with such a small land area surrounded by vicious neighbors, they need all the protection they can get. By the way, not every soldier is trained for active combat. many are teachers, many are even cooks.

As for the unfortunate collateral damage to innocent palestinians, it is afar cry from blowing up teenagers in a line to a club or blowing up a pregnant woman in a grocery store or opening fire on cowering teenage girls when confronted with the israeli army proper. Im not saying it is justified, just that there is such a strong intention of killing innocent israeli citizens that israeli counter-action pales in comparison to its savagery.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
Barb wrote
Since they'd been living on the land for ages by the time the Jews began massive landing, they have all the rights to think this landing as a hostile act against them. Because of that driving the Arabs out of their land and creation of the State of Israel is anti-Arabic (?) and racism


Massive landing? Driving Arabs out of their land? How about some facts?

Arab immigration to Palestine was diminishing prior to 1920. For centuries the land became neglected and crime and mortality rates were high. After Jews migrated to the land, they “purchased” every square inch of it they owned. I challenge anyone to show me different.

Your later post is ridiculous since Jews never “drove out” anyone from their land. This is propaganda promoted by the Arab world. Furthermore, after Jews began to revitalize the lands Arab migration there outnumbered that of the Jews.

[/quote]
The story repeats the story of Native Americans. There is a difference that colonising of America happened much earlier when no-one had an idea on human rights.
[/quote]

There is no comparison here. First, Native Americans had their land taken from them. They and their children were killed in mass in order to achieve it. They were cheated out of the land through bogus deals and broken promises and today they have nothing to show for it.

Arabs by contrast sold their land to Jews at enormous profits and as much as they want you and the world to believe Jews killed them and took their land, that version is unsupported by facts. The reason why Israelis are in the West Bank and Gaza today is because Arabs made war instead of compromise.

quote:

The outcome of the colonisation of Palestine by Israel is like the outcome of the Indians: Palestinians find themselves in a reservation. Many more similarities may be found.
Zionists justify their claim because of the fact that Jews lived there in ancient times.


Israel never put one Arab on a reservation or in a refugee camp, Syria, Egypt, and Jordan made them and refused to absorb any of them into their communities. I find this especially funny since Jordan took ¾ of Palestine in the first place.

Show me one instance of refugee camps created in history that the refugees weren’t absorbed into native societies?

quote:

Zionists decided to conquer Palestine. They made their choice and they have now what they have. Suicide terrorists? You've chosen war, now eat it's fruits.


Totally unsupported by facts. Zionist never “conquered” anyone. Arabs made war and lost the spoils now their story is Jews came and stole our land.

As for suicide terrorist, your point is very interesting. However you don’t think Palestinians should expect retaliation when they support and often fund these bombers? When they have bomb labs and weapons tunnels in their homes?

You can’t have it two ways. If you suicide bomb, then don’t complain about Israeli occupation. They give them every excuse to be in their neighborhoods. Even the PA acknowledges this in their statements now a days. Although they can't seem to condemn suicide bombers without mentioning Israel in the process.
Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Israel & Palestine Forum: Was the creation of Israel equal to colonisation of America?

Forum Forum Forum