Hamas: Attacks against Israel will continue after Gaza pullout - Israel & Palestine

Hamas: Attacks against Israel will continue after Gaza pullout

Israel & Palestine Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: TWBR

Hamas: Attacks against Israel will continue after Gaza pullout

By The Associated Press

GAZA CITY - The Islamic militant group Hamas will continue attacks against Israelis, despite plans to withdraw settlements and military bases from the Gaza Strip, a top Hamas leader in Gaza said Saturday.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasite/images/iht_daily/D110604/hhamam12.jpg
Senior Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar meeting with Palestinian officials in Gaza on Saturday. (Reuters)

"We do not trust the Israelis and we do not trust that the Israelis are going to withdraw from Gaza while they are speaking of controlling the sea and the air. Until the occupation completely ends, our resistance will continue," Mahmoud al-Zahar said.

Al-Zahar's comments came as Egyptian officials worked on an agreement for maintaining security in Gaza, Hamas' stronghold, in the wake of the planned pullback.

Egypt has offered to send security advisers to Gaza to help train and equip Palestinian forces, but al-Zahar said he rejected the proffered assistance.

"We are against any sort of commitment to any security steps on any side," al-Zahar told reporters in Gaza City. "We are still in the resistance ... to free our land from the occupation."

However, al-Zahar later said Hamas leaders abroad were expected to begin talks with Egyptian officials within several days.

Al-Zahar spoke before a meeting with Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia, who made a rare trip to Gaza to meet with the heads of the various Palestinian security branches and members of Palestinian political and militant groups.

It was al-Zahar's first public appearance since the funeral of Hamas' Gaza leader Abdel Aziz Rantisi, who was assassinated by Israel in April. Al-Zahar is one of Hamas' top leaders in Gaza. Many Hamas leaders have gone into hiding since then, though it is considered unlikely Israel would target Hamas leaders during a meeting with Qureia.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's cabinet approved a plan Sunday to evacuate settlements and soldiers from the volatile coastal strip by the end of 2005. Under the plan, Israel would maintain control of Gaza's coast, airspace and border with Egypt.

Al-Zahar said that the continued Israeli presence was unacceptable.

He did leave open the possibility that Hamas, which rejects the existence of Israel and hopes to replace it with an Islamic state, could change its position.

"When we hear something concrete, about full sovereignty, we will think about what is proposed to us," he said. "At this moment, our position stands firm. Our endeavor is a liberation endeavor, and if this liberation is not a full and comprehensive one, our endeavor will continue."

In addition to sending security advisers to Gaza, Egypt intends to increase the number of troops on its side of the border with Gaza and to help build new police stations and jails in the territory.

Egypt has also demanded Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat reorganize the nearly one dozen Palestinian security forces into three branches and give up much of his control over them.

Al-Zahar also warned Arab leaders not to cooperate with U.S. President George Bush, and called on them all to reject his proposals for reform in the Arab world.



Link -

Haaretz Daily - http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/438200.html

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

"We do not trust the Israelis and we do not trust that the Israelis are going to withdraw from Gaza while they are speaking of controlling the sea and the air. Until the occupation completely ends, our resistance will continue," Mahmoud al-Zahar said.

Here we see why Hamas doesnt want to agree with any peace plans with Israel because to Hamas, Israel is not trust worthy and Israel wont stop the occupation.

If Israel could somehow make its self trust worthy and stop the occupation, then Hamas is willing to have peace and will look forward the two-state solution.

Unless, when they say occupation they mean the entire land. If thats the case, then Hamas doesnt want the two-state solution or a peace plan.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

Can you believe this guy above? Hamas is one of the main reasons why your people TWBR have little to no peace today.

Now you may call this resistance if you want, however nothing positive ever come from their activities for the Palestinian people. When will you and others realize that maybe, just maybe they are hurting your cause more than helping it?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: woolfe99

quote:
TWBR said this in post #2 :
"We do not trust the Israelis and we do not trust that the Israelis are going to withdraw from Gaza while they are speaking of controlling the sea and the air. Until the occupation completely ends, our resistance will continue," Mahmoud al-Zahar said.

Here we see why Hamas doesnt want to agree with any peace plans with Israel because to Hamas, Israel is not trust worthy and Israel wont stop the occupation.

If Israel could somehow make its self trust worthy and stop the occupation, then Hamas is willing to have peace and will look forward the two-state solution.

Unless, when they say occupation they mean the entire land. If thats the case, then Hamas doesnt want the two-state solution or a peace plan.


That's exactly what he means. However, the statement is phrased to be purposefully ambiguous. He wants the Israelis to think the attacks will end after a total pullout, but the statement is such that if Hamas continued the attacks even afterwards, technically he didn't lie. It doesn't matter really, because Israel has a long history with Hamas and they know what their intentions are. Hamas wants Israel gone, but is willing to be pragmatic about it. That means that the elimination of Israel is something that occurs in phases. The ideology of Islamic resistance is that you terrorize the enemy until he makes terrortorial concessions, not as a result of peace negotiations, but out of weariness for combat, not wanting bad PR anymore, and pressure from your own citizens. The attacks may die down for a while after the concessions are made, only to be renewed later with the same purpose in mind, further concessions.

Don't kid yourself about Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other organizations like them. They will not tolerate a Jewish State anywhere in the middle east.

The fact that the PA and Egyptian governments legitimize groups like that by meeting with them is very unsettling. Hamas is a criminal organization and should be treated as such. It's like if George Bush had a meeting with prominent leaders of the Mafia. Give me a break.

- woolfe
Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

quote:
woolfe99 said this in post #4 :


That's exactly what he means. However, the statement is phrased to be purposefully ambiguous. He wants the Israelis to think the attacks will end after a total pullout, but the statement is such that if Hamas continued the attacks even afterwards, technically he didn't lie. It doesn't matter really, because Israel has a long history with Hamas and they know what their intentions are. Hamas wants Israel gone, but is willing to be pragmatic about it. That means that the elimination of Israel is something that occurs in phases. The ideology of Islamic resistance is that you terrorize the enemy until he makes terrortorial concessions, not as a result of peace negotiations, but out of weariness for combat, not wanting bad PR anymore, and pressure from your own citizens. The attacks may die down for a while after the concessions are made, only to be renewed later with the same purpose in mind, further concessions.

Don't kid yourself about Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other organizations like them. They will not tolerate a Jewish State anywhere in the middle east.

The fact that the PA and Egyptian governments legitimize groups like that by meeting with them is very unsettling. Hamas is a criminal organization and should be treated as such. It's like if George Bush had a meeting with prominent leaders of the Mafia. Give me a break.

- woolfe


We cant be 100% sure that Hamas and the other organizations are working on the the destruction of Israel. Do they want Israel to be destroyed? Yes, are they capable of doing so, not at this time.

I've seen Militants saying that they wouldnt mind to see a Jewish state in the Middle East aslong as they get their 67 borders, east jerusalem, and other things.

Israel could be doing the same, they could give the Palestinians what they want and then in the future, a new intifada will start and Israel will continue to steal the Palestinian land until there is no more.


Here is the article in Al'Jazeera - \

Hamas leader Mahmud al-Zahar told Aljazeera that Israel's planned evacuation of Jewish settlements in Gaza did not signal an end to the occupation.

Under international law, all Jewish settlements are illegal, a stance not recognised by Israel.

Al-Zahar said on Saturday that Israel's so-called "disengagement plan" did not tackle key issues including the fate of occupied east Jerusalem, Palestinian prisoners, borders, water rights and airspace sovereignty.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: woolfe99

[B]We cant be 100% sure that Hamas and the other organizations are working on the the destruction of Israel. Do they want Israel to be destroyed? Yes, are they capable of doing so, not at this time.

I've seen Militants saying that they wouldnt mind to see a Jewish state in the Middle East aslong as they get their 67 borders, east jerusalem, and other things.

Israel could be doing the same, they could give the Palestinians what they want and then in the future, a new intifada will start and Israel will continue to steal the Palestinian land until there is no more.[B]

Why would a "new intafada start" if the Palestinians are given what they want? That's the real problem here. Your post hints at two things - ending the occupation may not end terrorism, and that terrorism gives Israel a reason to take Palestinian lands.

As former PM Abbas said, once the PA gets its house in order, the Israelis will no longer have an excuse to be there. Their best defense is reform, not terrorism.

- woolfe

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

Who said that the Palestinians would start it?

And the Palestinian resistance is not terrorism.

I will explain later.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: woolfe99

You said "a new Intafada would start." Israel does not start "Intafadas." I am unclear on your point.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

What i meant was that Israel would do something to trigger a new intifada would start, since Israel triggered it , they are responsible for the new intifada.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

Didnt Sharon trigger the second Intifada?

Didnt that Zionist who massacred 29 Palestinians trigger the start of suicide bombings?

I am sure they did.

And these Palestinian organizations are totaly different from the Mafia.


Al-Aqsa Martyrs chief says will halt attacks

Zacharia Zubeidi, commander of the Fatah Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades in Jenin and a target of Israel's most-wanted lists, said Monday that he would halt terror attacks if IDF forces withdrew from the violence-torn West Bank city and settlements in the area.

Zubeidi, speaking in Hebrew to Israel Radio, said that members of the Martyrs armed group could join the Palestinian Authority security forces after an Israeli pull-out.

Senior PA officials had already asked Zubeidi to cease attacks following a future withdrawal, he said.

Last year, during the brief tenure of then-PA prime minister Mahmoud Abbas, Zubeidi, like many Al Aqsa Martyrs commanders, refused to recognize the hudna, or temporary truce on attacks, declared by Hamas and other militant groups.

In remarks broadcast on Monday, however, Zubeidi, referring to Palestinian officials with whom he had spoken, said, "They know that when the Israelis go out of Jenin, I, in sum, will stop."

He added that "As long as they [remain], I cannot stop, because they come to kill me. I cannot put my hands up. I will never put my hands up. That's it - period. If they leave Jenin, I have no problem. But as long as they are in Jenin, I shoot, because they are coming to kill me."

Zubeidi said that the decision to stop attacks would come from Ramallah, the seat of the PA government chaired by Arafat, also leader of Fatah.

"Ramallah decides. If Ramallah decides that we stop, we will stop. If Ramallah decides that we should join the Palestinian security [services], we will join. I have no problem.

"First, though, the soldiers must leave. The IDF must get out of our territory. If Israel leaves Jenin altogether, and does not come back, doesn't bring in tanks and kill us every day, there's no need even to raise up weapons."

The few West Bank settlements that may be evacuated under the disengagement plan are located outside of Jenin.


Haaretz - http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/438978.html

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

I am really on the border line of reducing myself to something other than I profess. The consistent garbage you (TWBR) continue to spread here is unreal. You blame nothing, NOTHING on your own people. You continue to believe your idiocies about Israel will start another “infatada” to take your land. What’s stopping them from simply taking it in the first place?

You are empty of any realistic values and perspectives on life in favor of your anti-West and Israel rhetoric you read from your obvious and usual sources of contention.

I hope you’re in college and not Kill Israel University either. I think if you go to some sort of educational facility, you will see that you indeed are very unknowledgeable and impressionable by that garbage you consistently read from your websites.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: woolfe99

Oh yeah right, Sharon triggered the Intifada by going to the Temple Mount. The Palestinians who actually carried out all the terrorist attacks have no responsibility. It's all about the fact that Sharon did something that symbolically pissed off the Palestinians. Of course people should always start 4 year waves of daily terrorist actitivities to protest things like Sharon going to the Temple Mount. It's the only reasonable response. Why consider a non-violent protest?

Or yes, perhaps it was about the actions of a single nutcase that happened in 1993.

I'll tell you what, all the Israeli actions right now are retaliation for Hebron that happened in 1929. Why not, sounds rational to me.

- woolfe

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

quote:
woolfe99 said this in post #12 :
Oh yeah right, Sharon triggered the Intifada by going to the Temple Mount. The Palestinians who actually carried out all the terrorist attacks have no responsibility. It's all about the fact that Sharon did something that symbolically pissed off the Palestinians. Of course people should always start 4 year waves of daily terrorist actitivities to protest things like Sharon going to the Temple Mount. It's the only reasonable response. Why consider a non-violent protest?

Or yes, perhaps it was about the actions of a single nutcase that happened in 1993.

I'll tell you what, all the Israeli actions right now are retaliation for Hebron that happened in 1929. Why not, sounds rational to me.

- woolfe


Well, Sharon is a terrorist who is responsible for many war-crimes, how do u not expect the Palestinians not to get mad? And when Militants get mad, they dont start protests, maybe civilians do, but not Militants.

Militants - resist

Civilians - protest
Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

Hey OneOfPeace, why dont u actually use your brain and start to talk about the topic and not about me, i know that your in love about me, but its getting a bit annoying.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

So here we see that Al'aqsa Martyrs Brigades have shown that they are interested in the peace process, something that many of you deny.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

You are definitely reinforcing an argument that endorses the notion of stupidity genes.

Ok, let me spell it out to you, I’ll try and do it in a fashion even YOU can understand.


It’s not about Al-Aqsa. The P.A. is the central negotiating entity for the Palestinian people. So what if Al Aqsa agree to peace, what about the 40 other factions running loose in Palestine?

You’re so blind with hatred that you don’t even see that they are hurting your case more than helping. After all the “uprisings” and wars, Palestinians have gained NOTHING. After ever suicide bombing, they lose more of their own lives, and after every terrorist attacks, they end up homeless instead of gaining any new real estate.

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that when you get bad results you should change your actions instead of doing the same thing and hoping for different results. It’s idiocy plane and simply.

The fact that you subscribe to it leaves me with little doubt that you’re not cut from the same cloth.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

Hey sport, again, some organizations are linked, Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades is an offshoot of Fatah faction.

Well, you can say that after all the uprisings and wars havent helped the Palestinians, but we are not sure if both never happened how the situation would be right now?

What if the resistance didnt give Israel a chance to take Gaza and the West Bank? Who knows?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: woolfe99

Let's talk about some what-if's. If the Arabs in Palestine had not attacked Jewish refugees from the very early stages of them showing up in the late 19th century, and had welcomed them as brothers, there would have been no wars, no intifadas, no nothing. More than likely, there'd be a single bi-national state in all of Palestine right now, probably with an Arab majority, but with Arabs and Jews living together peacefully.

The only reason the British (in 1937) and later the UN (in 1947) called for partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arabs states was that the two groups had demonstrated that they couldn't live together. And far and away, it was Arab on Jew violence that made it a necessity.

- woolfe

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

What if Zionists didnt agree to make the Jewish State in Palestine? Palestine where it already had people who didnt want them.

There wouldnt be no Israeli and Palestinian conflict.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: woolfe99

quote:
TWBR said this in post #19 :
What if Zionists didnt agree to make the Jewish State in Palestine? Palestine where it already had people who didnt want them.

There wouldnt be no Israeli and Palestinian conflict.


You're right, if the Jews had not fled from persecution in Europe to Palestine, where there were, as you correctly state, "people who didn't want them," then none of this would have happened. More than likely, a couple million more Jews would have been murdered by the Nazis. But who cares anyway, the Jews, as you say, were not only "not wanted" in Europe, they weren't "wanted" by the Arabs either.

You put your finger right on the button. The core of the problem is that the Jews went somewhere where they were not wanted. But who has been the problem here? The people who fled from persecution to Palestine, or the people who wouldn't accept their presence there?

Can an Arab and a Jew not live side by side? Apparently not, as the British observed when they first relectuntantly proposed partition in 1937:

http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/History/peel1.html

The British tried to set up Palestine as a bi-national state, but they had to abandon the idea in favor of partition because the Arabs would not accept the Jewish presence. In 1937 the British offered the Arabs about 2/3's of what was left of Palestine (after 70% had been made into Jordan), with the supposition that it would become part of Jordan, leaving the Jews with about 17% of historic Palestine. The Arabs were to get money from the new Jewish state and from the British government as further incentive. The Jews were not happy about being alotted so little land. They wanted a larger state. But they accepted the proposals. The Arabs rejected it, because it meant a part of Palestine would be in Jewish hands.

This dispute, historically, is all about ethnic and religious intolerance.

If the Palestinians want to hate the Jews forever, let them hate all they want. But sooner or later they need to understand what is in their best interests. And where has violence gotten the Arabs? Each time they were offered a state (1937, 1947, 2000), and rejected it, resorting to force instead, they are offered less than before.

As One basically said, if its broke, you need to fix it.

- woolfe
Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

quote:
woolfe99 said this in post #20 :


You're right, if the Jews had not fled from persecution in Europe to Palestine, where there were, as you correctly state, "people who didn't want them," then none of this would have happened. More than likely, a couple million more Jews would have been murdered by the Nazis. But who cares anyway, the Jews, as you say, were not only "not wanted" in Europe, they weren't "wanted" by the Arabs either.

You put your finger right on the button. The core of the problem is that the Jews went somewhere where they were not wanted. But who has been the problem here? The people who fled from persecution to Palestine, or the people who wouldn't accept their presence there?

- woolfe


Well Woolfe, in 1946 there were about 600,000 Jews in Palestine, so the claim that a couple million more Jews would have been murdered by the Nazis is false.

Dont forget that your beloved Zionists helped the Nazis kill the Jews. I will explain later on.

The reason that the Palestinians didnt want the Jews in Palestine was mainly because of Zionism, they were aware that Zionists had plans to make a Jewish state in Palestine and they werent too happy about it.


quote:
woolfe99 said this in post #20 :

Can an Arab and a Jew not live side by side? Apparently not, as the British observed when they first relectuntantly proposed partition in 1937:

http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/History/peel1.html

The British tried to set up Palestine as a bi-national state, but they had to abandon the idea in favor of partition because the Arabs would not accept the Jewish presence. In 1937 the British offered the Arabs about 2/3's of what was left of Palestine (after 70% had been made into Jordan), with the supposition that it would become part of Jordan, leaving the Jews with about 17% of historic Palestine. The Arabs were to get money from the new Jewish state and from the British government as further incentive. The Jews were not happy about being alotted so little land. They wanted a larger state. But they accepted the proposals. The Arabs rejected it, because it meant a part of Palestine would be in Jewish hands.

This dispute, historically, is all about ethnic and religious intolerance.

If the Palestinians want to hate the Jews forever, let them hate all they want. But sooner or later they need to understand what is in their best interests. And where has violence gotten the Arabs? Each time they were offered a state (1937, 1947, 2000), and rejected it, resorting to force instead, they are offered less than before.

As One basically said, if its broke, you need to fix it.

- woolfe


Can an Arab and a Jew not live side by side? Yes, before Zionism, Arabs would not mind living with Jews, but after, Arabs dont want Jews around them, because they dont want to loose their land.

The Palestinians didnt have to accept any offer, they have every right to keep their land, all of those offers can go to hell, if the Arabs dont want to leave their land then they dont have to, so dont come here crying about how the Arabs rejected the plans, because, mainly, i dont give a crap.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: woolfe99

TWBR:

I can see it is hopeless to discuss these issues with you. You don't see the validity of points made on the other side, and likely never will. Your arguments are not balanced or well thought out.

It was a nice try, but I'm done.

- woolfe

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

Woolfe you hit the nail on the head and the attitude displayed by TWBR here is exactly the sentiment of Arabs and Muslims all over the world and it is indeed rooted in intolerance, intolerance of ethnicity and religion.

The fact that Palestinians speak of Israel “stealing their land” is untrue and I believe it exposes the truth behind their rage.

These are the things they have no answer for whatsoever.

1. Israel bought all land owned before 1948 legally
2. Jordan got ¾ of the land and Arabs raise no concerns with it
3. The first recorded massacres between the two people were
committed by Arabs against Israelis
4. Arabs rejected Israel’s existence and sought war to kill them all.

There is more, however it was Arabs that never accepted Israel’s right to exist not the other way around. And since they lost those wars they lost some spoils and to this day they cry foul because of it.

Now today as a direct result of their own actions, Palestinians live in ghettos and deal with military occupation. They complain of Israel in the West Bank and Gaza only after they realize they cannot defeat them in war. Their original rejections were of their existence there all together.

As a result we have TWBR who consistently posts his lopsided chapeau from ihateisrael.hamas.org websites and litters this forum with this misinformation propagated by these sites. He really doesn’t know why he believes what he does but believes it none the less with his whole heart.

The PC/Internet is like a knife. In the right hands it can be properly used with percision. However as we see demonstrated here by TW, in the wrong hands it can not only hurt those around you, but hurt yourself as well, dangerously so.

He’s not even bright enough to know that his own people are barred from the internet. Why? Same reason they control the media there. So they can be control the minds of their people so they cannot decipher the truth. However, this lad here (TW) has no excuse since he is previed to access all information out there but chooses to only access that which helps propagate his outrageous belief structure.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #23 :
Woolfe you hit the nail on the head and the attitude displayed by TWBR here is exactly the sentiment of Arabs and Muslims all over the world and it is indeed rooted in intolerance, intolerance of ethnicity and religion.

The fact that Palestinians speak of Israel “stealing their land” is untrue and I believe it exposes the truth behind their rage.

These are the things they have no answer for whatsoever.

1. Israel bought all land owned before 1948 legally
2. Jordan got ¾ of the land and Arabs raise no concerns with it
3. The first recorded massacres between the two people were
committed by Arabs against Israelis
4. Arabs rejected Israel’s existence and sought war to kill them all.



Israel bought all land owned before 1948 legally

We are not talking about the land that Jews had, we are talking about two things,

1) The villages that were ethnically cleansed by the Jewish Terrorist Groups.
2) The land that Israel keeps on stealing, how many homes have they destroyed? Thousands and were replaced by Israeli homes, shops, and other places. I am not talking about the land stolen in the Wars, the Wall is a great example of what im talking about.

Jordan got ¾ of the land and Arabs raise no concerns with it

You mentioned it like a billion times and i never had the chance to research it, i will in the future.


The first recorded massacres between the two people were
committed by Arabs against Israelis


Wrong,

1) They were anti-zionist riots, they werent planned to be massacres, but at the end, yes, they were massacres.

2) They didnt massacre Israelis, they massacred Jews. So if you wanna talk about massacres between Palestinians and Israelis, Israelis did the first massacres.

Arabs rejected Israel’s existence and sought war to kill them all.

Yeah, i wonder why, the Israelis/Zionists were angels back then, they never attacked the Arabs.

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #23 :
There is more, however it was Arabs that never accepted Israel’s right to exist not the other way around. And since they lost those wars they lost some spoils and to this day they cry foul because of it.



They arent crying about it, infact, they have gotten better since the war, and they accept the embarrising defeat.

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #23 :
Now today as a direct result of their own actions, Palestinians live in ghettos and deal with military occupation. They complain of Israel in the West Bank and Gaza only after they realize they cannot defeat them in war. Their original rejections were of their existence there all together.



Now today as a direct result of their actions, Israelis must live in fear of suicide bombings and other types of attacks on them. They complain of terrorism and that they are victims when they terrorize the Palestinians, settlers and civilians attack them, and some want the whole Gaza and West Bank, Meaning that they want to destroy the exsistance of the Palestinians. But its not most, its only a minority, just like its the minority of the Palestinians who want to see Israel destroyed.

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #23 :
As a result we have TWBR who consistently posts his lopsided chapeau from ihateisrael.hamas.org websites and litters this forum with this misinformation propagated by these sites. He really doesn’t know why he believes what he does but believes it none the less with his whole heart.



The same can be said to you brain-less Zionists.

and

He really doesn’t know why he believes what he does but believes it none the less with his whole heart.

How can you speak for me if you never met me in your life? I think that your speaking about your self there, and the same can be said to you brain-less Zionists.

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #23 :

The PC/Internet is like a knife. In the right hands it can be properly used with percision. However as we see demonstrated here by TW, in the wrong hands it can not only hurt those around you, but hurt yourself as well, dangerously so.

He’s not even bright enough to know that his own people are barred from the internet. Why? Same reason they control the media there. So they can be control the minds of their people so they cannot decipher the truth. However, this lad here (TW) has no excuse since he is previed to access all information out there but chooses to only access that which helps propagate his outrageous belief structure.


The same could to be said to you brain-less Zionists.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

quote:
TWBR
We are not talking about the land that Jews had, we are talking about two things,

1) The villages that were ethnically cleansed by the Jewish Terrorist Groups.
2) The land that Israel keeps on stealing, how many homes have they destroyed? Thousands and were replaced by Israeli homes, shops, and other places. I am not talking about the land stolen in the Wars, the Wall is a great example of what im talking about.


You talk of “Jewish Terrorist Groups” as if they were a part of the Jewish government. The fact is they were hunted down and destroyed. Something your people fail to see as a problem for themselves and instead see them as some “resistance” or “freedom fighters”. What have they been freed from? Maybe you all should rename them “bondage fighters” since that is the only thing they seem to accomplish for your people.

Secondly, constantly Israel has been rejected and only recently they realized they had to accept their presence there. The consistent attacks on Jews have resulted in the things you’ve mentioned above. The wall is just one more thing reaped from the consistent suicide bombings and appears to be an effective tool since the bombings have slowed to almost a crawl.

quote:

You mentioned it like a billion times and i never had the chance to research it, i will in the future.


I understand why you wouldn’t want to comment on it. After all, it shows the truth behind the propaganda campaign you’re waging against Israel in these forums. It’s just one more thing that you know nothing of but insist on being right about.

quote:

Wrong,

1) They were anti-zionist riots, they werent planned to be massacres, but at the end, yes, they were massacres.

2) They didnt massacre Israelis, they massacred Jews. So if you wanna talk about massacres between Palestinians and Israelis, Israelis did the first massacres.


What a couple of imbecile remarks above here. It just shows yet something else your “wet behind the ears” self know nothing of.

Arabs were under the leadership of an uncompromising idiot Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. He incited the Arabs to rebel against the British Mandate and to kill the Jews there. The first were called the Hurani riot in 1921 and continued sperodically throughout the 20’s where it ended with the Hebron massacres in 1929. They were planned and calculated murders committed by YOUR people period.

As for your second asinine statement “They didn’t massacre Israelis, they massacred Jews” they are one in the same. Israel existed long before 1948 if that is your ridiculous point, however there NEVER existed a people called Palestinians anywhere in history.

quote:

They arent crying about it, infact, they have gotten better since the war, and they accept the embarrising defeat.


Well isn’t that mighty noble of them. However it does little to absolve them of their behavior and their subsequent losses for them. They have no choice but to “accept the embarrassing defeat”. Either that or live in denial.

quote:

Now today as a direct result of their actions, Israelis must live in fear of suicide bombings and other types of attacks on them. They complain of terrorism and that they are victims when they terrorize the Palestinians, settlers and civilians attack them, and some want the whole Gaza and West Bank, Meaning that they want to destroy the exsistance of the Palestinians.


This is a lie perpetrated and spun by your extremist who perpetuates the anti-Israel propaganda you cling to as truth. Israel never claimed nor tried to destroy the existence of Palestinians. That has been a claim by your people against Israel throughout the century.

All killings were initiated by your people FIRST! Now I know that’s something hard to swallow but it’s fact. They never let it rest since to this day. You talk of land Israel’s taken but you fail to mention how the land was taken in the first place.

Plain and simple, if you choose that course of action (suicide bombings) then you must accept the results of your actions, not cry about them. Maybe that should put that emblem on their national flag.

quote:

The same can be said to you brain-less Zionists.


I am neither Zionist nor Jewish. I was born and raised in America where I currently reside. Fortunately I have a better view on what’s happening there than you do and probably ever will after reading your constant anti-Israel rhetoric in which you know nothing about.

quote:

How can you speak for me if you never met me in your life? I think that your speaking about your self there, and the same can be said to you brain-less Zionists


I only know you by your idiot responses in these forums. Many times you say you don’t know, even about your own religion, yet you whole heartedly believe in a position you know little about. The fact that you call me a Zionist only accentuates your blind biased hatred instead of justified reasoning.

Maybe you should run to your mommy and ask here for a new position because your old one is noneffective and tired as it only reflects the whimperings and whinnings of your people and culture.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: antizionist2004

You are not a zionist? You don't support a Jewish state?

Because your posts seem to suggest otherwise...

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

My post are meant to interject some subjectivity here. Something that you and TWBR seem to be incredibly lacking. I already know where Israel is wrong but why post it since you and TWBR seem to be doing a good job at posting obscured and skewed truths.

I support justice and since I don't have anyone here saying in effect all Palestinians are the devil, then I guess I will have to contradict you and TWBR's accusations and conjecture.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: antizionist2004

By the way..TWBR I agree about what you say of the Zionists who "collaborated" with the Nazis..I thought it was Arab propoganda 'till I found a Jewish site that had a section entitled "questions to the Zionists" and it was all about the Holocaust..how the Zionists rejected Jews being imported into Europe, they wanted Palestine..also how Zionists collaborated with Mussolini..the list goes on..they even stab their brothers in the back, e.g. killing 17 Jews in the King David Hotell..the list goes on..

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #25 :


You talk of “Jewish Terrorist Groups” as if they were a part of the Jewish government. The fact is they were hunted down and destroyed. Something your people fail to see as a problem for themselves and instead see them as some “resistance” or “freedom fighters”. What have they been freed from? Maybe you all should rename them “bondage fighters” since that is the only thing they seem to accomplish for your people.

Secondly, constantly Israel has been rejected and only recently they realized they had to accept their presence there. The consistent attacks on Jews have resulted in the things you’ve mentioned above. The wall is just one more thing reaped from the consistent suicide bombings and appears to be an effective tool since the bombings have slowed to almost a crawl.



A Zionist tactic when it comes to the Jewish Terrorist Groups is to exclude their main purpose and make it look like they had nothing to do with Zionists.

These terrorist groups had a purpose and it was to ethnic cleanse villages and make Palestinians flee, this was the main purpose and was supported if not ordered by Zionists.

Immediately after the vote of the UN Partition Plan of 1947, the Zionists aimed at confirming Jewish dominance over the 50% Arab living in the proposed Jewish state, and to expand those limits so as to include the greatest possible area--if not all Palestine--before Britain withdrew from the country on May 14, 1948. (Bitter Haevest, by Sami Hadawi,p.85) The Zionist plan of intention was disclosed during a conversation in December 1947 between a British officer of the Jordan Arab Legion and a Palestinian Government Jewish official. The former is reported to have asked the latter, “whether the new Jewish state would not have many internal trouble in view of the fact that the Arab inhabitants of the Jewish state would be equal in number to the Jews.” The Jewish official is reported to have replied, “oh no! That will be fixed. A few massacres will get rid of them.” Glubb, op. cit, p.81)

We always hear "The fact is they were hunted down and destroyed", well, they did their jobs and they werent needed any more, however, didnt some of those organizations turn into some type of other organization? IDF? Likud?

I will research this soon.


quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #25 :

I understand why you wouldn’t want to comment on it. After all, it shows the truth behind the propaganda campaign you’re waging against Israel in these forums. It’s just one more thing that you know nothing of but insist on being right about.



No you dont understand anything, i said that i never read about the subject, so i am not able to comment on it.

Shut up with the propaganda stuff, why dont you, instead of crying about it, if you really think its propaganda, prove me wrong.

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #25 :

What a couple of imbecile remarks above here. It just shows yet something else your “wet behind the ears” self know nothing of.

Arabs were under the leadership of an uncompromising idiot Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. He incited the Arabs to rebel against the British Mandate and to kill the Jews there. The first were called the Hurani riot in 1921 and continued sperodically throughout the 20’s where it ended with the Hebron massacres in 1929. They were planned and calculated murders committed by YOUR people period.

As for your second asinine statement “They didn’t massacre Israelis, they massacred Jews” they are one in the same. Israel existed long before 1948 if that is your ridiculous point, however there NEVER existed a people called Palestinians anywhere in history.



Why bother defend them? Is that they werent panned and organized Massacres, they were anti-zionist RIOTS\

Also,the riots which turned out to be massacres have no link watsoever with the massacres of Palestinians by the Jewish Terrorist Groups.

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #25 :

This is a lie perpetrated and spun by your extremist who perpetuates the anti-Israel propaganda you cling to as truth. Israel never claimed nor tried to destroy the existence of Palestinians. That has been a claim by your people against Israel throughout the century.



First of all, i never said that Israel has claimed to destroy the existence of the Palestinians.

I said that there are minorities of Israelis who do, and they even have organizations, i will get the name of it.

quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #25 :

All killings were initiated by your people FIRST! Now I know that’s something hard to swallow but it’s fact. They never let it rest since to this day. You talk of land Israel’s taken but you fail to mention how the land was taken in the first place.

Plain and simple, if you choose that course of action (suicide bombings) then you must accept the results of your actions, not cry about them. Maybe that should put that emblem on their national flag.



So, between the Israelis and the Palestinians, the Palestinians were the first to kill. Ok, lets see if thats true.

Ok, heres my part, find me an incident where the Palestinians killed Israelis before this incident.

On 23 May 1948, the Israeli army wiped out the al-Tantoura village by killing 71 of its inhabitants. The rest fled.


quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #25 :

I am neither Zionist nor Jewish. I was born and raised in America where I currently reside. Fortunately I have a better view on what’s happening there than you do and probably ever will after reading your constant anti-Israel rhetoric in which you know nothing about.



Oh please, you think like a Zionist and chose to spend your time trying to defend Zionists, you know your are Zionist.


quote:
oneofpeace said this in post #25 :

I only know you by your idiot responses in these forums. Many times you say you don’t know, even about your own religion, yet you whole heartedly believe in a position you know little about. The fact that you call me a Zionist only accentuates your blind biased hatred instead of justified reasoning.

Maybe you should run to your mommy and ask here for a new position because your old one is noneffective and tired as it only reflects the whimperings and whinnings of your people and culture.


Well OFP, how can you expect to agree with my responses when your Pro-Israeli?

Pro-Palestinians will agree with my arguements and will not call them idiotic or biased.

Pro-Israelis will not agree with my arguements and will call then idiotic or biased.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

What does that have to do with now? You think Palestinians are killing each other over who they perceive as "Israeli collaborators"? I remember one of them dragging this woman from her home and shot her in the middle of the street because it was "rumored" she collaborated with Israelis. They had no proof whatsoever and the guy admitted it while at the same time justifying that it was probably true.

Facts are these. Israel did not begin the violence and dispite all you two want to post here you cannot claim with any basis of fact that this isn't true.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

What? Thats it? Waste of my time.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: oneofpeace

I bet it is little Osama, since you have a hard time digesting truth in favor of your racial hatred propagaded from your favorite anti-Western websites.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: TWBR

You just cant stop humiliating your self? Cant you?

Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Israel & Palestine Forum: Hamas: Attacks against Israel will continue after Gaza pullout

Forum Forum Forum