Everything Came To Light When I Saw The Iraqis Celebrating - Post-9/11 Era

Everything Came To Light When I Saw The Iraqis Celebrating

Post-9/11 Era Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: Search4Truth

I was against this war for the rise in terrorism, and the other consequences this war has caused or will cause

but I will put all of that aside, and I will honestly admit its all worth it to see the Iraqi people liberated

I still don't believe this was really George Bushes motive for invading iraq, and I don't support wars based on lies but nonetheless I am extremely proud that our country liberated the people, and I feel I was very naive to forget about their suffering

If the world has to suffer as a result in order for them to be liberated, so be it

because they are humans like us, and every human deserves freedom

I honestly don't think this will bring peace to the world, but if our country decides to put a hault to the palestine/israel situation I think we will take a huge leap towards that path, and I feel we will drastically lower terrorism most importantly

Reply To this Message

Posted by: robert135

Agreed.

The palastinian conflict is a vipers den, and will be slow to resolve, but it is a hope that I believe a vast majority of people want to see ended peacefully.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: ncar

The conflict between Israel and the Palestinians is indeed a viper's nest. It would be great if there was a simple answer to the problem. But there isn't. Both sides must realize their opponent will not go away and will not accept anything but mutual security and coexistence. The issue is no longer of right and wrong but of survival. Pragmatism and mutual respect are the only things that will win the day.

For all of you on this and other forums that spout radical positions, hatred, and stereotypical visions of other peoples, remember that 98% of the people in the world just want security and enough food for their children and perhaps a chance to have a brighter future. It is you the radicals and holders of hate and vituperation that cause the wars you rail against, no matter what SIDE you are on.

Paul

Reply To this Message

Posted by: loba

quote:
Originally posted by Search4Truth
I was against this war for the rise in terrorism, and the other consequences this war has caused or will cause
______________
so I was

but I will put all of that aside, and I will honestly admit its all worth it to see the Iraqi people liberated
____________________________
Hm, maybe it is a matter to discuss about


I still don't believe this was really George Bushes motive for invading iraq, and I don't support wars based on lies but nonetheless I am extremely proud that our country liberated the people, and I feel I was very naive to forget about their suffering
____________________________
I say lets not stop searching4truth...

If the world has to suffer as a result in order for them to be liberated, so be it
__________________________________________________

provided its the ones' who have to suffer decision n' struggle (they say "freedom transfered by others is masked helotism ")

because they are humans like us, and every human deserves freedom
________
indeed...


I honestly don't think this will bring peace to the world, but if our country decides to put a hault to the palestine/israel situation I think we will take a huge leap towards that path, and I feel we will drastically lower terrorism most importantly
_________________________
I will gladly applause US gov
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Sean Kelly

quote:
Originally posted by Search4Truth
I was against this war for the rise in terrorism, and the other consequences this war has caused or will cause

but I will put all of that aside, and I will honestly admit its all worth it to see the Iraqi people liberated


.. and here I was expecting you to ask how much the U.S. paid each of those Iraqi's to dance around and play liberated in front of the camera..
Reply To this Message

Posted by: MrJukoVette

Sean i dont think they got $$$ millions contracts like Bruce Willis

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nowar

quote:
Originally posted by Search4Truth
I was against this war for the rise in terrorism, and the other consequences this war has caused or will cause

so I am, not was

quote:
Originally posted by Search4Truth
but I will put all of that aside, and I will honestly admit its all worth it to see the Iraqi people liberated

I will not, I'm happy for the Iraqi people, but it's only the begining, unfortunately


quote:
Originally posted by Search4Truth
I still don't believe this was really George Bushes motive for invading iraq, and I don't support wars based on lies

me too, but who cares as someone else said .... I and a lot of people in the world ...

quote:
Originally posted by Search4Truth
I honestly don't think this will bring peace to the world, but if our country decides to put a hault to the palestine/israel situation I think we will take a huge leap towards that path, and I feel we will drastically lower terrorism most importantly

That's what I said: now they have to prove their "taking care of people" motive, starting with Iraq - this is only the begining - but without forgetting the others.

This is only the begining.

I saw as you saw the Iraqi dancing in the street, talking freely ....
but did you saw those not dancing but speaking freely ?
did you saw those thanking the coalition but saying that Iraq MUST stay to Iraqi people, Iraqi gov ?
did you saw those throwing rocks at tanks ?
did you saw those saying that it would be a very bad idea for the U.S./U.K. troops to stay too long in Iraq ?
did you saw those saying that they don't want to be governed by U.S. with the help of those Iraqi whom left Iraq and did nothing except receiving money from U.S. gov ?

And they were by far more than those dancing

I'm not quite sure you saw that ... that's the reason why I say: it's only the begining
Reply To this Message

Posted by: MrJukoVette

What i think should be done in Israel is keeping US (or any other western) peecekeepers, while making a separate, sovereign Palestine, and disarming all the terrorist groups who are interester in instability there. Support to Palestine is the best thing US can do to show friendlyness to muslims world.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: trustno1atall

quote:
Originally posted by Search4Truth
because they are humans like us, and every human deserves freedom



"...freedom and liberty, they are not America’s gifts to the world. They are God’s gift to humanity." -Goerge W. Bush.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: nowar

quote:
Originally posted by MrJukoVette
What i think should be done in Israel is keeping US (or any other western) peecekeepers, while making a separate, sovereign Palestine, and disarming all the terrorist groups who are interester in instability there. Support to Palestine is the best thing US can do to show friendlyness to muslims world.


right, and don't forget that it's something that Bush promised with the recently elected Palistinian prime minister ....
Reply To this Message

Posted by: MrJukoVette

quote:
Originally posted by nowar
I saw as you saw the Iraqi dancing in the street, talking freely ....
but did you saw those not dancing but speaking freely ?
did you saw those thanking the coalition but saying that Iraq MUST stay to Iraqi people, Iraqi gov ?
did you saw those throwing rocks at tanks ?
did you saw those saying that it would be a very bad idea for the U.S./U.K. troops to stay too long in Iraq ?
did you saw those saying that they don't want to be governed by U.S. with the help of those Iraqi whom left Iraq and did nothing except receiving money from U.S. gov ?

And they were by far more than those dancing

I'm not quite sure you saw that ... that's the reason why I say: it's only the begining

We didnt "saw" any of that. Did you? Did it take place? Who was not dancing and was speaking freely? What are you talking about?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: MrJukoVette

People want too much from US. States have lots of their own problems, and they have to take care of Israel, Iraq, Bin Laden, and so on. Give US some time.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: DrPoke

It was good to see all those people celebrating in Bagdad as they were doing in Basra over the week. Law and order seemed to be breaking down slightly hopefully not for too long. One guy in the crowd seemed to know what he wanted, he said "if the Americans have come to liberate us - a thousand thankyou's, if they have come for any other reason or for our oil and occupation then I would rather be ruled by another Iraqi" this was amid the celebrations, I hope the USA stays to its word and doesn't plunder the oil now.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nowar

quote:
Originally posted by MrJukoVette

We didnt "saw" any of that. Did you? Did it take place? Who was not dancing and was speaking freely? What are you talking about?


yes I saw Iraqi people from Bagdad from today on two independents french TV (don't come with crap comments on french, they are independent journalists).

As you know all officials have disappeared so there is no more official guides with the journalists. People can talk freely. Journalists can go where they want.

Depending on the area where they were their (Iraqi people) speech was opposed.

Those who were dancing and greetings was Shia living in the "Saddam quarter" the other ones was ordinary Iraqi people.

I also saw some Iraqi refugees thanking the coalition but having the same words about the future government.

About the journalists, I even saw fight between the fedayin and the coalition inside Bagdad, inside the fedayin group, not in a U.S. troop.

They have balls .... maybe stupid but they are doing their jobs now, showing both side: the good one and the less good one.

About the rocks, there is the same behaviour in Bassora against the British, but I don't think you saw that too ....
Reply To this Message

Posted by: MrJukoVette

(2003/04/09): "Baghdad falls to US forces" (quoted from www.iraq.net)

The government of Saddam Hussein has lost control over Baghdad after US forces advanced into the centre of the capital.

US tanks drove unhindered into public squares on the eastern bank of the Tigris for the first time, including the area surrounding the Palestine hotel, where the international media are based.

In a symbolic moment, an American armoured vehicle helped a crowd of cheering Iraqis to pull down a huge statue of Saddam Hussein in the al-Fardus square in front of the hotel.

Dozens of exultant people leapt on the deposed figure and stamped on it, shouting "Death to Saddam!".

People have attached the old Iraqi flag to the pedestal.

US President George W Bush has said this is a historic moment.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: MrJukoVette

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39075000/jpg/_39075059_toppled203.jpg

Reply To this Message

Posted by: nowar

quote:
Originally posted by DrPoke
It was good to see all those people celebrating in Bagdad as they were doing in Basra over the week. Law and order seemed to be breaking down slightly hopefully not for too long. One guy in the crowd seemed to know what he wanted, he said "if the Americans have come to liberate us - a thousand thankyou's, if they have come for any other reason or for our oil and occupation then I would rather be ruled by another Iraqi" this was amid the celebrations, I hope the USA stays to its word and doesn't plunder the oil now.


as the one who said:

"U.S. can take Saddam but they will not take one piece of Iraq sand" .....
Reply To this Message

Posted by: zid

And another who said:

"The US has never asked for any land from any country, except for the land to bury the men and women who did not return home." (quote might be off a lil bit...but its pretty close) Colin Powell

Reply To this Message

Posted by: photek

i would personally like to thank search, and anyone else who has come to admit some positive outcomes of this conflict.

i'am sure you still have many problems with the war in general, and that is your right. the arguments over weapons and bush may continue, but there is no doubt about what the people of iraq are feeling. that's all there is to it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Grimminick

My position hasn't altered any. It's good to see Iraqis free, these were feel good pictures but now the diplomacy starts and I don't think that's the hawks strongpoint. If Bush hands over the reins to the UN then hats off to him, it will certainly put my mind to rest and possibly many others. But if he doesn't then watch this space...the Iraqis may find themselves only momentarily free.
There is a danger here of getting carried away by recent pictures. I admit I'm a little surprised by the eventual euphoria and hope that the trust the Iraqis are putting in the coalition forces isn't misplaced. The opportunity exists now for America to show that its not all military muscle, but also a true force for democracy. To do that it will have to concede that the Shia muslims will need strong representation in the new government as they are 60% of the population, even though they have stronger links to Islamic Fundamentalism than to the ideology of the fallen Baath party.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: photek

have any of you noticed that donald rumsfeld has said many times that iraq is not going to have democracy imposed. the interrum government is going to be representative, obviously not democractic since these people will not be elected. after that, the iraqi people will establish their own system. the interrum government is meant to serve as an example, and i'am sure the iraqis will choose democracy for themselves.

your opinion hasn't changed? you should admit that the war was beneficial, and therefore change your opinion of it.

nobody's questioning the future will be tough, and the political side of it very tricky, but i have faith in the iraqi people...middle easterners are very intelligent people, and as they become experienced through example of the interrum government they will become an efficient government ruled state.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: MikeXXL

You can easily tell the real peace protestors from the fake anti-American ones.

Anti-American ones will always try to snatch some sort of victory when they have been utterly and completely defeated.

What happened today was a historic moment. There was no bloodbath as many of the peaceies predicted nor was there much civilian property damage. The looting that is occuring is being done against government buildings, remnants of a despotic regime.

I have a feeling the peaceniks are extremely disappointed that the US won the war with so few casualties (both coalition and Iraqi) and now they can't say to us, "We told you so!"

Reply To this Message

Posted by: OneNationUnderG

quote:
Originally posted by Search4Truth
I was against this war for the rise in terrorism, and the other consequences this war has caused or will cause

but I will put all of that aside, and I will honestly admit its all worth it to see the Iraqi people liberated


I am impressed that you said that Search4Truth. I am glad to see that you have an open mind. I was worried for a while that you didn't. Keep on searching. I think if you keep your mind open you will continue to be proud of your country.

God Bless The USA
Reply To this Message

Posted by: MaRyJaNe

Good for you!!

Reply To this Message

Posted by: scottc

quote:
I have a feeling the peaceniks are extremely disappointed that the US won the war with so few casualties (both coalition and Iraqi) and now they can't say to us, "We told you so!"


Hmm, wasnt this conflict supposed to be about the threat of WMD. Where were they?. There are several thousand Iraqi civilians in hospitals and over a thousand dead. In addition to the over a hundred "coalition?" forces. The ease with which this war was won does indeed give cause for "we told you so", since if he was so dangerous and likely to use WMD, dont you think he would have used them when he knew he was going down?. I believe that New Zealand forces probably could have overcome the pathetic Iraqi forces, which means what was the point?.

Also, do not think under any stretch of the imagination that this is over. Every second that an American governs Iraq, there will be terrorist attack after terrorist attack, from both Iraqi's and every other islamic nation.

In addition, as I have posted elsewhere, take a look at http://news.independent.co.uk/world...sp?story=379060 and tell me if you think Iraq is "free". Even the Kurds are pissed off at the American plans, which if you didnt know include keeping most of the Baath party, (that the CIA was responsible for putting in place back in the sixties anyway), with the only changes being the replacement of Saddam and a few generals with American ex Military. Does this sound like your type of freedom?.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: photek

quote:
Originally posted by scottc


Hmm, wasnt this conflict supposed to be about the threat of WMD. Where were they?. There are several thousand Iraqi civilians in hospitals and over a thousand dead. In addition to the over a hundred "coalition?" forces. The ease with which this war was won does indeed give cause for "we told you so", since if he was so dangerous and likely to use WMD, dont you think he would have used them when he knew he was going down?. I believe that New Zealand forces probably could have overcome the pathetic Iraqi forces, which means what was the point?.

Also, do not think under any stretch of the imagination that this is over. Every second that an American governs Iraq, there will be terrorist attack after terrorist attack, from both Iraqi's and every other islamic nation.

In addition, as I have posted elsewhere, take a look at http://news.independent.co.uk/world...sp?story=379060 and tell me if you think Iraq is "free". Even the Kurds are pissed off at the American plans, which if you didnt know include keeping most of the Baath party, (that the CIA was responsible for putting in place back in the sixties anyway), with the only changes being the replacement of Saddam and a few generals with American ex Military. Does this sound like your type of freedom?.


scott, please do not start this argument. first of all, i don't know where you get such detailed information about who the u.s is planning to 'keep' and 'replace' since the u.s doesn't even know themselves.

you need to stop listening/watching whatever you're listening/watching and really pay attention to what's going on.

rather than arguing, let's just wait several months and see that the u.s will practice no occupation of iraq, and the iraqis will be satisfied with the interrum government which will subsequently lead to a fully iraqi governed institution. and, like with the war, i will say 'told you so.'
Reply To this Message

Posted by: scottc

quote:
scott, please do not start this argument. first of all, i don't know where you get such detailed information about who the u.s is planning to 'keep' and 'replace' since the u.s doesn't even know themselves.


This comes from information given to the Kurds by the US. The US has flat refused to allow the UN take any responsibility in aiding the formation of an Iraqi government, which means that it will not have any recognition by the world. The Iraqi people are primarily islamic, meaning that were there fair and free elections, the most likely winner would be a militant islamic government, which would be disasterous for US interests. Look at who put Saddam in power in the first place, and the reasoning behind this. The Baath party is composed of not militant islamics, which is why Usama Bin Laden despised the regime so much. The deputy president was a catholic.

quote:
you need to stop listening/watching whatever you're listening/watching and really pay attention to what's going on.


Like CNN or fox news you mean?. This is obviously what is "really going on".

quote:
rather than arguing, let's just wait several months and see that the u.s will practice no occupation of iraq, and the iraqis will be satisfied with the interrum government which will subsequently lead to a fully iraqi governed institution. and, like with the war, i will say 'told you so.'


There certainly will be an occupation, which has already been agreed. I have no doubt the Americans will get out of Iraq, just as soon as they have installed a puppet dictator that will listen to what they say. It will then take several years, not months, to wait for this puppet dictator, like Saddam before him, to stop playing ball with the US and this whole scenario can be repeated yet again.

Like with the war "I told you so", as the war was SUPPOSED to be about WMD. If Saddam had such WMD, why did he not use them?. If he did not use them when his country is being invaded, what are the chances he would have used them proactively?.

I remember last week a British journalist asking a US general, "given this sounds like almost a victory speech, could this be the first war in history that is won before the cause is found?". This turned out to be true.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Grimminick

Mike why do you persist in seeing this war as some sort of game. Ha ha the peaceniks lost, we were right. Let me explain something to you. I didn't want the coalition to "win". I didn't want Iraq to "win." I didn't want a bloody war in the first place. To me there are no winners and losers on the military side of things. You may see things in black and white but we don't. We try to look deeper into the cause and effect of what is happening over in Iraq.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Grimminick

Good post scott. I said before that America would have to have the Shias heavily represented in their new government to reflect their majority in the popultaion. But that would cause allegiance with Iran and the Islamic fundamentalism they share. The litmus test was whether America could swallow that and still do the right thing by the iraqis. Unsurprisingly they failed. Welcome to another US inspired regime.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Enigma

quote:
Like with the war "I told you so", as the war was SUPPOSED to be about WMD. If Saddam had such WMD, why did he not use them?. If he did not use them when his country is being invaded, what are the chances he would have used them proactively?.

There are many many reasons, but I'll keep the list as short as possible.

1. Saddam might have wanted to live after this conflict was over. If he did survive the bombardment a few days ago, he'll know by now there is nothing for him to return to, and I think it is quite possible he'll try and slip away over the boader. If he had used WMD, there would be absolute outrage in the entire international community, and nobody would be willing to harbour him, knowing that 3/4 of the military power on the planet would be knocking on doors to find him.

2. The US still has to prove they were justified in thier actions. We have people all over asking the question "where are these supposed WMD?". If Saddam had launched WMD during the attack, first of all he would've justified the actions of the US to the international community, and made a lot of thier critics, and Saddams supporters rather uncomfortable.

3. The bulk of them were most likely not ready to be deployed. His major stockpiles of WMD will be hidden carefully, so that the UN inspectors stumbling around blindly in his country have basically no chance of finding them. In doing so, he most likely placed them in a position were they are unable to be deployed, suh as buried, or hidden in a bunker out in the desert.

4. Most of Saddams control over the troops in the field was cut before the time came where he might have used them out of desperation. The US did this deliberately, precisely for this reason. Even if he had wanted to give the order, I doubt it would've reached the people who were in a positon to deploy any WMD, if indeed there were any people left who were in that position.

5. The morale of the Iraqi troops was so low, they probably wouldn't have carried out the order even if they got it.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: T.L.B.

This war isn't over yet people. There is still plenty of time to find WMD and unfortunately, there is still plenty of time for it to be used on people too.

It won't really be over until the new Iraqi government is in place and they are operating on their own.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: liquidplumber

i heard on the news this morning that although the troops have found some "questionable" weapons, first and foremost they are there to liberate the people, then they can look for these weapons....most importanly, the troops have only come accross 20 or so sites of the well over 1000 possible weapon locations known to the US government...

my point is that it is a little early to start the " no WMD" rhetoric...
also no one knows what went over the borders or the extent of the underground caverns where these things could be hidden.... we need to take a wait and see approach, emphasis on the "wait"... the fact that this war gets to unfold right before our eyes is deceptive in that it skews the time table and makes one think that it has been going on for a much longer time than it really has.....3 weeks..

RE: SEARCH4TRUTH

i'm proud of you.... its nice to see that even the most liberal of Bush haters can come to the right conclusion... however i think it is important to remember that while yesterday was a great day for Iraq, there is still much fighting left to do....the war is not "over" as many would say, but the tables have definantly been turned....

whatever it is that led you to " see the light" please share more of it with nowar....he still needs a little help yet... but maybe he'll come around

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Charles

quote:
yes I saw Iraqi people from Bagdad from today on two independents french TV (don't come with crap comments on french, they are independent journalists).


The US media showed the smiles and the non-smiles. I saw lots of clean cut Iraqi men in civilian clothes who were not celebrating, as well as many who were celebrating. Of course its a mixed bag. Where do you think all of Saddam's army divisions went? They put on civvies. Lot's of people from the regime establishment don't have much to look forward too and have lost a lot. The media showed angry Iraqi's - saying they were glad Saddam was gone but that the US should leave soon too. Its going to be dangerous and I expect more casualties from ambushes then from the war itself.

quote:
About the journalists, I even saw fight between the fedayin and the coalition inside Bagdad, inside the fedayin group, not in a U.S. troop.
They have balls .... maybe stupid but they are doing their jobs now, showing both side: the good one and the less good one.


Yes - the brave French. They showed that in the US too! A group of misguided young men going to attack a US position with RPG's. It was over in about 2 minutes. Overwhelming response by US forces killed and wounded a few.

I know you were hoping to see the misguided Iraqi's succeed and kill a few Americans. I also know you would never admit to that.

quote:
About the rocks, there is the same behaviour in Bassora against the British, but I don't think you saw that too ....


They certainly showed all of that in the US media. Now of course they are trying to focus on the OTHER side of the story as well because its pretty compelling to see ANY Iraqi's cheering the coalition after we had just bombed them. I guess its true that Saddam was worse.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Charles

Very Brave Search - this distinguishes you from the throng of liberals. I also understand your position from the beginning as not being a "peace" guy - but just a harsh realist based upon many undisputable historic facts, valid fears, as well as a number of assumptions I still don't agree with. But in any case good show!

quote:
I was against this war for the rise in terrorism, and the other consequences this war has caused or will cause


Its not over yet! There are individuals, groups, and countries that want to see this fail and will do everything they can to make sure it remains a costly and risky enterprise. We will lose as many people over the next few weeks as we lost in combat during the "war". That loss rate could continue for months and months. All that is necessary to stagnate the situation are a few dedicated radicals who pop up to assassinate and progressive elements trying to form a new government. Its going to be ugly.

quote:
but I will put all of that aside, and I will honestly admit its all worth it to see the Iraqi people liberated


Those are compelling pictures and stories. This enterprise was the "right" thing to do. But there are risks and it could fail - or at least not achieve the results that this new opportunity has created for Iraq. We will learn more about Saddam as time goes on.

quote:
I still don't believe this was really George Bushes motive for invading iraq, and I don't support wars based on lies but nonetheless I am extremely proud that our country liberated the people, and I feel I was very naive to forget about their suffering


We all know the war started for a combination of reasons. Those reasons aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. We must also admit that opposition to the war was supported by many groups/countries who also had their own agendas that were not based upon the best interests of the Iraqi's.

I do not believe the primary reason for the war was so that the US could "steal" oil. But I agree that "oil" as a strategic resource for the world was a major factor and that the status quo of conflict, despair, poverty, and radicalism wasn't helping the peace process. While I doubt Bush is proficient at Chess, this was obviously a well planned strategic move by the administration to try to establish an alternative regime in the middle east that isn't by nature NECESSARILY anti American. They have the educational background, infrastructure, and revenue to provide a solid foundation for prosperity.

It provides a good example to other dictatorships on what NOT to do.

Now the US/UK have to prove to the arab countries AND Isreal that we are serious about resolving the Palestinian crisis. If we can provide a legitimate alternative and a viable plan then Bush will have to be praised as the man who truly gave the middle east a chance for peace. Even if he supports a good plan, we could still fail. But at least he will have tried. I think its a worthy cause for our country (wealth) and EVEN for our soldiers (Blood), and as you say, success here will reduce the seeds of terrorism that threaten us all.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: aluminum

It's reassuring to see people in agreement when it comes to the well-being of others.

quote:
There certainly will be an occupation, which has already been agreed. I have no doubt the Americans will get out of Iraq, just as soon as they have installed a puppet dictator that will listen to what they say. It will then take several years, not months, to wait for this puppet dictator, like Saddam before him, to stop playing ball with the US and this whole scenario can be repeated yet again.


You can always count on someone turning a post dedicated to free people celebrating, into negative criticism. I can see some validation in your rebuttal, but I respectfully disagree your projected outcome. While I've never taken government promises as gospel, I do honestly believe they'll attempt to make good restoring stability in the middle east, regardless of what others claim as ulterior motives.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: photek

scott you are quite a character. not only do you fit the category of 'one of those people' who continues to attack the coalition no matter what, bitter that his viewpoint was denied by the outcomes of the conflict, but i'am sure that had we found wmd you'd just make another ridiculous argument that puts the coalition at blame. sharing opinions with you is pointless.

you just don't give a **** about the iraqi people. my proof is that your posts only talk about weapons of mass destruction. all you care about is legitimizing this war by finding these weapons, and think that if they aren't, whatever happens to the iraqi people is insiginificant.

yea, screw the people. we better find these weapons otherwise it's all over.

to see someone rejecting the emotions of the iraqi people themselves, and continue to talk about wmd when this is going on, is not even ignorance. it's insulting, insensitive, foul behavior. and quite frankly, it's stupidity

if you are so worried about wmd, then go focus your efforts on trying to make a related change. let the rest of america support the progression of iraq and it's people, while you sit and whine about weapons.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: photek

and i love how you know exactly what kind of political structure we're going to 'impose' on iraq. where did you discover all these details about the dictator being put into place? this is very interesting. you seem to have access to a lot of facts that nobody else in the world has heard. you must close aquaintances in the white house??

didn't think so. stop dennouncing the american government for the dictator they're going to put in charge of iraq as if you've seen into the future and confirmed this.

more stupidity.

keep it coming. i'll just keep shutting you down.

Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Post-9/11 Era Forum: Everything Came To Light When I Saw The Iraqis Celebrating

Forum Forum Forum