In time for the election - Afghanistan

In time for the election

Afghanistan Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: USA1

Another big push is about to begin.
Let's get OBL before November.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: kula

Surely you are not suggesting political motivations for military action ?

But you never know, it might just work !

kula

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

Regardless, that WILL be the motive.
You know what? Bush deserves another term.
4 more years.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Coogee Beach

Yeah, 4 more years of war, lies, death and debt. What are you guys? Masochists?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

We love this place, glad you're not here.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: I use logic

quote:
Coogee Beach said this in post #4 :
Yeah, 4 more years of war, lies, death and debt. What are you guys? Masochists?

This is 2004, not 1996.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Coogee Beach

Your hero, Dubya, has started a war, lied about the reasons for it, killed countless tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis (and a few thousand insurgents/defenders) and nigh on a thousand of your own soldiers, poor 20-year-old saps from Omaha who couldn't place Canada on the map let alone Iraq, and plunged the USA into record debt of 500 billion smack-a-roonies, caused mostly by a war that costs $4 billion a week.

And you'd stilll vote for the guy?

Was Idi Amin not available?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

Absolutley. 4 MORE YEARS. What part don't you understand?
You see, you are biased and you know nothing about America or it's people's true feelings about this country.
You will NEVER understand and frankly I could care less if you don't.
You see, I am in the majority.
4 more years.
This is what my son told me yesterday. He is in Iraq and will spend another year and a half there. He will note for Bush in November.
I bet you can't figure that one out either.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Coogee Beach

Nup - guilty - because if my President had plunged my country into an expensive killing machine of hate and death that had no end in sight and indeed doesn't have an exit strategy, a cluster**** of hate and death that every day kills people and causes more terrorism and feeds more hatred for my country than anything else, especially cos it was launched under the pretext of WMDs and the war on terrorism when really the slimy little cowboy **** meant oil. Well. Four more years of that? Why not just get a stick and stab it into your eyes, a lot.

Buddy if you're the majority then no wonder we're in a war.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: kula

Bush is going to be on trial for war crimes for the next few years, so will not be available to run a country. (not that he did before hand !)

kula

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

LOL
4 more years.
Why do I aways here this "cowboy" thing coming from europe and australia?
Is "cowboy" supposed to be demeaning to Americans in some way?
I don't get it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

Well you can here it from an American too:

Bush is a friggin' don't-mess-with-Texas cowboy. Yee-haw

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

I love it. Cowboys are American heros not something deragatory.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Shadow Stalker

I've never understood how being a "cowboy" is a bad thing. Heck, I live in Texas (which i guess makes me a cowboy? )

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

it's just one of those things...

Reply To this Message

Posted by: I use logic

quote:
Coogee Beach said this in post #7 :
Your hero, Dubya, has started a war, lied about the reasons for it, killed countless tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis (and a few thousand insurgents/defenders) and nigh on a thousand of your own soldiers, poor 20-year-old saps from Omaha who couldn't place Canada on the map let alone Iraq, and plunged the USA into record debt of 500 billion smack-a-roonies, caused mostly by a war that costs $4 billion a week.

And you'd stilll vote for the guy?

Was Idi Amin not available?


YUP! Damn right!! Better than supporting terrorists like you.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: I use logic

quote:
USA1 said this in post #11 :
LOL
4 more years.
Why do I aways here this "cowboy" thing coming from europe and australia?
Is "cowboy" supposed to be demeaning to Americans in some way?
I don't get it.

Its called 'grasping at straws'. Its pathetic attempts at some excuse from something.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: kula

quote:
USA1 said this in post #11 :
LOL
4 more years.
Why do I aways here this "cowboy" thing coming from europe and australia?
Is "cowboy" supposed to be demeaning to Americans in some way?
I don't get it.


Cowboy is also a widely used derogatory term for someone who does a bad job/ someone unqualified to do a job or someone who claims to be able to do something they cannot. eg. A labourer of low intelligence. You have to also remember that your proud American heritage is viewed differently elsewhere in the world.

Kula
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

it's basically the counterpart of Curley Joe's favorite word "Europist"

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Shadow Stalker

Oh ok. *sigh* I support the same side as curly but man...he needs to grow up or something.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Anomaly77

quote:
USA1 said this in post #8 :
You see, I am in the majority.
4 more years.


I honestly do not think that you are the majority.
Bush may get four more years but, I think that more people support his staying president because they fear changing "command" during times like these, with all that is going on in Iraq. I do not think that most people are 100% (or even close to) happy with the job Bush has done, across the board and particularly domestically. I think that if there was a strong Democratic candidate running in the upcoming election, that Bush wouldn't have a prayer at re-election.

and to coogee beach:
quote:
Yeah, 4 more years of war, lies, death and debt. What are you guys? Masochists?

I found this quite amusing!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Coogee Beach

Bush got in last time without a majority. Interesting political system you have there.

The term cowboy could be construed thus: you're a cowboy, ie a good person, or in the case of Dubya, a borderline illiterate gung-ho ****wit.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

The cowboy thing must be a recent european and down under thing. I never heard it used this way. I guess they attached a name thinking it was derogatory. LOL. Go figure.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

Texans in particular have always been marked as cowboys by the rest of America.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Dekka00

watch some crappy action flicks where it's some US super-spy fighting Russian Communists... they get called cowboy sometimes

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

I guess I don't see derogatory analagy in it. Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with it.
Enough about that.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

I seems a lot of people are staying away from this subject. Why? Because it might just shed Bush in a positive light.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: gdog

quote:
Coogee Beach said this in post #7 :
killed countless tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis (and a few thousand insurgents/defenders)


Do you just pull these numbers out of the air or does reality ever come into play?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Crazie

Coogee please hush. You are making it painfully obvious you know nothing of America.

Anomaly77: I can see where you coming from. I used to live in NJ and I at one point was frightened that everyone in the USA thought like you do. Since leaving I"m glad to find out that I was wrong. America is as stupid as I thought. It's just the East Coast is full of Liberals unfortunately. But than again most of the east coast is mad of foreigners sot hat's really not suprising to me.

Kula: In case you can't tell we don't care what you Europeans prefer. LOL

Reply To this Message

Posted by: I use logic

quote:
USA1 said this in post #26 :
I guess I don't see derogatory analagy in it. Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with it.
Enough about that.

Actually, I think its a term used because cowboys fought, didn't they?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Coogee Beach

quote:
gdog said this in post #28 :


Do you just pull these numbers out of the air or does reality ever come into play?


Mate I could find you dozens of stats from the web sites of the Red Cross, Amnesty, etc - but would you believe them? Anything critical of the US military or government - ie pictures of dead children - is covered up and deemed un-American.

Again - you want me to dig you up some stats on how many innocent people - not including the poor fools in teh army armed against their will with hopeless weapons and no training who sat in pathetic bunkers while death rained on them from 30,000 feet - hm?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Coogee Beach

Hell - and this was in October of last year:

October 29, 2003

Iraqi war deaths 'total 13,000'

BBC: About 13,000 Iraqis, including as many as 4,300 civilians, were killed during the major combat phase of the Iraq war, according to a US research group.

It said the estimates were based on US combat data, battlefield press reports, and Iraqi hospital surveys.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: I use logic

Yeah, it makes you wonder how so many peopel died when we dropped leaflets to the peole, telling them what we were going to do. Too bad Al-Queda doesn't do that.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: legend73

Maybe some people prefer the Russian "Destroy everything" tactics applied in Chechnya. Why nobody knows how many civilians died in Chechnya?
Or, others may prefer the French "Run away" tactics applied in Rwanda (operation Turqoise), where millions of africans died after french troops saved the saveable and fled to France.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

How many didn't die because of Saddam NOT being in power? The Iraqis are finding out Freedom isn't free and they are willing to stay the course for this freedom Don't kid yourself, this is what they want.
I think your numbers are exagerated by thousands too.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Coogee Beach

They're not my stats USA1 - they're from all manner of different agencies - the Administration would have some numbers but they wouldn't tell you cos it might hurt Dubya's re-election.

Nice of you to drop those leaflets. But where were people meant to go? Out into the desert? With family friends in Falluja? Maybe they could come over your place in Disneyland.

Freedom isn't free? Tell that to all the people who's children are dead from US bombs. ask them if invading their country and bombing **** out of it to get rid of Saddam and his non-existant weapons if that was a good idea, was worth it, was worth their children's lives. Saddam needed to go - but not like this. Not with all this ongoing, never-ending hate and war and shite ... there had to be another way, in the human world of 2004, with all our advances in so many other things, we can't find a way to free a people, a country, without killing tens of thousands of innocents? I mean ... 9/11 was incomprehsibly bad. But is it worse, are the lives of all those dead children worth less?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: USA1

Coogee,
Maybe you could have just talked Saddam out of power.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Coogee Beach

Why not try him for war crimes? Or at least attempt it? Worked with that Milosevic...

better than killing all those people, those completely innocent families, etc, and breeding all that hatred for the US ... if the US/UN could somehow have managed to overthrow Saddam peacefully ... and I admit it's not an easy thing to do ... and I don't have an answer, apart from my war crimes effort that seemed to work with Milosevic ... anyway... if the US/UN could have somehow worked out how to overthrow Saddam, peacefully, it could have been a beacon for the rest of the world on conflict resolution in the new millenium.

But nope - went in with all the guns and killed all the people under the GUISE of fighting against terrorism (perpetrated by Al Queda) and WMDs (that don't exist) and a link between the two (that also doesn't exist) - thereby creating more terrorism and hatred for the West and the US in particular and killing lots of people needlessly.

Like i said - I don't pretend to have an answer - but matey, they wanted to invade Iraq on Sep 12. And they used 9/11 and all those poor folks god rest their souls as an excuse and the world is not a safer place for it.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: revelator

quote:
USA1 said this in post #37 :
Coogee,
Maybe you could have just talked Saddam out of power.


Hands up who knows how many mass killings are going on right at this very minute in several nations on the continent of Africa?

Very few hands going up.

I wonder why?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Coogee Beach

Well, Sudan had terrorist training camps at one stage ... it's a hotbed of anti-US Islamic sentiment ... several people there wear turbans. Problem for the 100,000 famililes destroyed by the ethnic cleansing is there's no oil under Sudan. nothin but dust and dead blacks, which aren't really worth anyone, the UN, the US, Russia, Egypt, Cambodia, New Zealand, anyone, giving a **** about because really, what's in it for them? Someone from World Vision or whoever willl go over and feed those poor starvin' babies if we all feel guilty enough, but certainly the US won't invade and liberate the people there cos ... well, I'd be interested to hear a few theories.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: revelator

quote:
Coogee Beach said this in post #40 :
Well, Sudan had terrorist training camps at one stage ... it's a hotbed of anti-US Islamic sentiment ... several people there wear turbans. Problem for the 100,000 famililes destroyed by the ethnic cleansing is there's no oil under Sudan. nothin but dust and dead blacks, which aren't really worth anyone, the UN, the US, Russia, Egypt, Cambodia, New Zealand, anyone, giving a **** about because really, what's in it for them? Someone from World Vision or whoever willl go over and feed those poor starvin' babies if we all feel guilty enough, but certainly the US won't invade and liberate the people there cos ... well, I'd be interested to hear a few theories.



But that is only one instance of current ethnic cleansing going on in one country in Africa. Keep going, someone will tell you when to stop ...
Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Afghanistan Forum: In time for the election

Forum Forum Forum