Evidence Of Explosives In The Twin Tower Collapses.

9/11 fact and fiction Forum

EVIDENCE OF EXPLOSIVES IN THE TWIN TOWER COLLAPSES.

The evidence that the World Trade Center towers were demolished is compelling. Photographs of explosives detonating during the collapse of both the north and south towers are presented below. They are taken from two (publicly available) videos of the collapses. Each frame has been numbered by its position in the video. Both videos were filmed at 30 frames per second, so an eight frame interval covers about one quarter of a second.

The most remarkable aspect of the World Trade Center towers demolition, is that such obvious evidence of the use of explosives, has been completely ignored by the media. This refusal to report the obvious, clearly illustrates that the "free press" is free, only in name, and anything but free in reality.

That such obvious evidence of explosives has remained "hidden in full view" approaches the unbelievable.

The South Tower.

The video evidence that the World Trade Center towers were demolished is indeed compelling. Consider the following frames which show two distinct lines of explosives detonating across the east face of the south tower.

http://vancouver.indymedia.org/uploads/lines-explosives.jpg

Frame 147 shows a row of explosives detonating right across the east face at the 79th floor.
Frame 203 shows a row of explosives detonating right across the east face at the 75th floor.

The middle photos show the dust cloud from the explosions outlined in red.

The end photos show the relative positions of the two lines of dust and debris.

It has been claimed that the explosions of dust that span the east face of the tower, were caused by air being forced from the windows as the floors above collapsed. This explanation is obviously incorrect. If it was correct, such lines of dust would have been expelled from the windows of each floor in succession. That is, we would have seen such lines of dust expelled from floors 79, 78, 77, 76 and 75 in succession, but what we observe is an explosion of dust at floor 79, no new clouds of dust for a few floors, then another (larger) explosion of dust at floor 75.

The second line of explosives is much more powerful than the first, but the dust cloud from the first line of explosives, and the dust and debris from the upper floor collapse, initially obscure this.

The dust due to the visible explosions is a whitish grey. The dust from the demolition of the upper section (which is disintegrating as it falls) is dark grey. One wonders what caused this difference.

http://vancouver.indymedia.org/uploads/top-disintergrates.jpgyaxttg.jpg

In the video, it is clear that the top 30 or so floors have snapped off and are toppling eastward. In the above frames, we follow the north-east corner of the tower as this 30 floor section descends. Using the north-east corner as a reference, I have outlined in red, the progress of this 30 floor section as it descends.

The first thing to note, is that the top section itself must be disintegrating, otherwise (as the above frames show) the top section would have extended far into parts of the building that are clearly, as yet, unaffected by the collapse.

But what could possibly cause the top section to disintegrate? And in fact, what could possibly cause the top section to almost entirely disintegrate, before the lower section begins to collapse?

You have to realize that most of the top section had not been affected by the aircraft strike or fires and was thus still the same immensely strong structure that had supported the building for some 30 years. If this section was going to fall at all, this section would fall as one piece (like a tree in the forest). Unless, of course, this section had been laced with explosives and was undergoing a controlled demolition of its own, just a few moments before the lower part of the building was demolished.

http://vancouver.indymedia.org/uploads/south-3x6.jpg

The North Tower.

http://vancouver.indymedia.org/uploads/041a.jpg

In the following set of frames showing the North Tower collapse, pay close attention to the horizontal explosions of dust and debris that occur just above the red line marked on the above photograph.

http://vancouver.indymedia.org/uploads/north-3x6.jpg

Once again, note that the second layer of explosions is much more powerful than the first and that the dust cloud from the first initially obscures that of the second. Also, note the large orange areas of hot gas from the explosions. Recall, that this was about two hours after the aircraft struck the building, so there would be essentially no flammable material left on the floors from which the flash emanates (as the fire would have already consumed it all).

Note that the horizontal explosions of dust on the leftmost side of the tower are already visible and expanding in the first frame. These continue their expansion through frame nine and subsequent frames. Similarly, explosions of dust become apparent across the entire width of both (visible) faces of the tower, however, between frames 001 and 009 the television mast on top of the tower makes no downward movement at all. This shows that the horizontal explosions of dust and debris precede the collapse and thus cannot be the cause of it (in fact, it is these explosions that initiate the collapse).

http://vancouver.indymedia.org/uploads/1-9.gif

That the horizontal explosions of dust precede the collapse is vividly expressed by the above animated graphic which alternates the first and ninth frames. This clearly shows that the explosions of dust were not caused by air being forced from the windows as the floors above collapsed (this was a ridiculous assertion anyway).

Since the visible evidence points to only two layers of explosives per tower, one has to conclude that the aircraft were directed to hit particular floors (possibly by homing beacons in the towers). This would also explain the total lack of solid evidence for the "Arab hijackers" hypothesis (there was however, a quantity of laughable, obviously manufactured evidence, indicating that this was an attempt to frame the Arabs).

Of course the visible explosions (or at least their dust clouds) are only part of the story, as the main weight supporting columns in the central core also had to be weakened before the towers would collapse in the way they did. But what is visible, is more than enough evidence, to conclude that the towers were deliberately demolished.

http://vancouver.indymedia.org/uploads/1-67.gif

The above animated graphic alternates the first and 67th frames. It shows a classic controlled demolition of a 12 story building (the top 12 stories of the North Tower). Strange how the roofline collapses so evenly, I guess, that all the central core columns and all the perimeter wall columns collapsed simultaneously. Some coincidence eh?

The first line of explosives detonated across the 98th floor (where the collapse began). The second line of detonations occurred across the 92nd floor (just above the lower red line) with large flashes of hot gas from the explosions, clearly visible. Initially, the second line's detonation is obscured by the dust cloud of the first. However, being much more powerful detonations, the second line's dust cloud quickly bursts into view.

A close look at the video/photos shows that the collapse begins at the 98th floor, then the 99th floor collapses onto the 98th, then the 100th floor collapses onto the 98th, then the 101th floor collapses onto the 98th, then the 102th floor collapses onto the 98th, etc until the second line of detonations initiates the final collapse. So once again, we have the disintegration of the tower above the impact floors, before the collapse of the tower below the impact floors.

Interestingly, this observation disproves the so called pancake theory, where one floor collapses onto the next lower floor, causing that floor to also collapse (not that the pancake theory made any sense anyway). Here, what we see is 5 or 6 floors in a row, all falling onto the 98th floor, which does not collapse (until the second line of explosives are detonated, taking out its support). The pancake theory would have the 98th floor collapsing onto the 97th, causing that to collapse onto the 96th, causing that to collapse onto the 95th, etc.

These very strange circumstances, mentioned above, have a very simple explanation: The twin towers were deliberately demolished. Occam's razor, suggests that the simplest explanation, a deliberate demolition, is probably also the correct explanation.

The original north tower collapse video can be found here (0.8 MB).
The original south tower collapse video can be found here (1.7 MB).
An animated-gif from the video of the north tower collapse can be found here (0.9 MB).
An animated-gif from the video of the south tower collapse can be found here (2.2 MB).

To play the videos you need to download 3ivx. 3ivx is a plug-in for Windows Media Player and QuickTime. It enables the playing of DivX 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, OpenDivX, XviD, FFMpeg, AngelPotion, SMR, Philips MPEG-4, Apple MPEG-4, MS-MPEG-4v3, 3ivx D3, D3.5 and 4, RealMagic MPEG-4, Sorenson MPEG-4, Blizzard MPEG-4 and other MPEG-4 variants and the encoding of high quality MPEG-4 video. So, it is a must for your system. It can be downloaded from http://www.3ivx.com/download

http://members.fortunecity.com/911/
http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortunecity.com/911/
http://guardian.150m.com
http://guardian.250free.com

O.K. That did it for me!! Just how stupid are you?? Plains crashed into the buildings.. The gas was not turned off.. I watched them fall along with 50 millions of Americans.. From what I can piece together by your threads you are some kind of nut trying to stir up trouble.. Alot of people lost there lives in this Blatant Attack against America.. Yes there was a explosion.... I'll tell you what... Fill a container with gas, Put a rag into it,Throw it into your front window,, Does it explode??? Did you get a second explosion when your kitchen went up??
I cant finish this right now.... I'm too mad and I don't want to say anything to get me thrown off this forum..

evidence of explosives? there sure was. i saw it. it was the two big ol' planes that flew into the buildings.

I'm sorry you're that naieve 'aweful truth'.

Interesting eh?
No replies about facts or figures at all.
Just garbage.
Those who have replied so far should get an education.

(you replied. )

You should put your energy into something more constructive. The only person who believes this crap is you. Brilliant work though but, just not logical.

I could explain every one of your images fopr you and prove there were no explosives other than jet fuel but, I'm affraid it would take too much time and it would be waisted.

This story was covered by British media, there is also a record of each of the smaller explosions on a couple of earthquake monitors. We are also told here that these stories are 'no go' areas in the US.

The twin towers coincidence may turn out to be just that, but still you have to question why the US gets a very different view of it all to the rest of the world.

Funny thing media.

kula

Everyone has a conspiracy theory. Elvis is still alive. The Pope killed JFK. The Mafia murdered Marylyn Monroe. The Jews are taking over the world. The Washington sniper shootings were staged by the US government. And right now, if the conspiracy theory is anti United States, it will be plastered all over the world.

Hey, I thought Israel was responsible for 9/11? What happened to that theory? Remember all those thousands of Jews who suddenly didn't report to work that day? Or is this part of the same theory? The Zionist conspirators placed explosives there. But wait, what about those planes shown in the video that hit the buildings? Ah, that was part of the conspiracy as well. The planes WERE actually hijacked by Al Queada, because OBL is actually a secret US operative. But the US government, controlled by the worldwide Zionist/Jewish conspiracy, realized that the planes hitting might not be enough to bring the buildings down, so they planted these bombs there, see. But no one believes it, because the media controls our minds. It's all true.

Trust me.

- woolfe

I didnt say it was covered as a conspiracy story, what you know as 9-11, some of us know as the twin towers coincidence, i think the conspiracy stories, or at least most of the ones ive read, have originated in the US.

Until someone comes up with evidence to the contary, it will remain a coincidence, or several. How all the planes slipped through US defence, .....i dont think there is any need to go on and on and on and on and on, again !

kula

What are you talking about "coincidence." What exactly is your theory about what really happened that day?

Where does he get this stuff?

The members in this forum need to get more of an open mind. Here we have a person who had detail after detail, picture after picture showing us his theory. Instead of trying to rebut his claim or prove him wrong, they chose to attack his character instead.

These people will never be able to fathom the truth or look at an issue from both perspectives. Regardless of if his theory is right or wrong, you should look at both perspectives before opening your mouth. It is a clear lack of judgment when you come to a conclusion before hearing a word of what he has to say.

I can guarantee that half of you disagreed with him even before reading his information. From my past experiences with members in this forum, their is no doubt in my mind that statement is true.


Please try to be more open and your intellect will flourish.

I thought incompetence had been ruled out, what with the prior studies that were made of Arab terroprists hijacking planes and crashing them into buildings. and all. Then of course there is the coincidence of continued icompetence between each successive impact.

Its a good job there were no lizards involved !!

kula

SPEAKING OF CONSPIRACY FABLES:

THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS CONSPIRACY THEORY OF THEM ALL.

It is blatently anti-semitic and totally stretches the bounds of believability (note that Arabs are Semites).

It goes something like this:

There is a massive Arab/Semite conspiracy to destabilize the West.

There is a gigantic network of Arab/Semite spies and agents throughout the world, at the beck and call of a BIG Semite called bin Laden.

Controlling this gigantic network of Semite spies and agents from a cave in Afghanistan (while all the time under observation by the CIA and friends (who have produced tapes of this master plotter conversing with his mother)) bin Laden manages to destroy the two largest commercial buildings in the USA and put a significant dent in the Pentagon.

Not only this, but he is cunningly able to stand-down the United States Air Force, thus permitting this immense destruction to occur without airforce interference, which would have otherwise quickly laid waste to his plans. Such an achiever.

And not only this, but in order to sow confusion among his enemies, he publicly, and repeatedly, denies any involvement whatsoever in this amazing achievement. Such a man.

Boggles the mind, doesn't it.

Only the maddest -- probably insane -- conspiracy theorists believe this dribble.

Seriously guys, some people actually believe this crap.

IN PARTICULAR, MANY FELLOW AMERICANS BELIEVE THIS INSANE CRAP.

http://members.fortunecity.com/911/
http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortunecity.com/911/
http://guardian.150m.com
http://guardian.250free.com

Next you will be trying to tell us that the people who believe these fairy tales would also steal the oil from another country whilst telling everyone they were looking for weapons of mass destruction buried underneath the sand !

It'll make a good film, but it's not really believable is it ?

Heres another good film storyline, the same people (again, if youve got good actors, why change them) create a right to own guns (fair enough) but on top of that they actually go out and buy guns......and then shoot each other creating the highest domestic murder rate using guns in the world. It's crazy i know, but thats the movies for you !

kula

Don't come here. It's really dangerous you know, with everyone shooting up the place and stuff. We ride around in our Navigators just looking for a gun fight and as soon as we find an anti-American, we blast him to smitherines and put his head on a stick. Sometimes we actually drag them around the town until they are ripped to shreds and all the people come out and chant, "Death to the imigrants!"

The point is:
Everyone on this forum, whether poster or viewer, knows this basic fact.

DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ HERE.

It's like wearing a mask. Get it?

i don't beleave that it was explosives cause the jet fuel just burned away the metal in the supports so good report but i don't beleave it and don't think that any americna citizen would plant the bomb or and alqueta could get in that high in the tower with explosives

Right.
Think about everything you post and then get everyone on the forum in a room together. Would you still make the same comments? Doubtful.

Is this ludicrous thread still alive???

What whidden said ^

I'm usually on the other side of what people on this forum say, but this was just complete non-sense.

Even the unlikely non-interception of hijacked planes by military posed and ready to deal with such an attack ? Even after the government were aware that such an attck might occur? I think the phrase 'where there is smoke' may be relevent. The governmet may not have planted bombs on every floor of the world trade centre, but it certainlet appears that the incident was 'allowed' to happen. Wether it was actively assisted is yet another area.........

kula

Terrorist have been hijacking airplanes for 30 years prior to 9/11. The difference is that then all they wanted to do is get from one place to another. So the US policy was a wait them out type of policy. The terrorist hijacked a plane they land release some hostages and eventually it ends in authorities storming the aircraft. But on 9/11 they took a different path. instead of taking the airplanes to some obscure destination they decided to use them as weapons. Once that was determined there was not enough time to get a fighter jet in position to shoot down the others. Things just didn't work that fast and I suspect even today we would not be able to get a military jet in the air in enough time to take out a hijacked aircraft taken by a terrorist.

Well i must say i enjoy a good conspiracy theory every now and then...

As much as i would hate to believe this was a conspiracy it is indeed interesting. I saw a very long post on another forum that tends to be more controversial, factual and nutty than this site and the guy did a great job. By the time i got done reading it I was like "Hmph... Well". LOL. This is not to say i believe the conspiracy.

The fact is conspiracy or not, it would not be the first and we'll never know the truth.