Boom! Saddam May Just Win. |
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | Don't you find it strange how the war is going? IRAQ people will die to win, So what if Saddam waited until our troop numbers are very high and push a button and blew the country up? What If he has a deal with Korea? Think about it. If we lost 250k of our troops the us would be defensless. Korea has a hard on for us. Its been said that saddom's underground bunker can survive a nuke. I believe we are just being "Baited" by saddom. we keep send in more and more troops. Saddom has said many times "no-one is going to get his country". These people have been pissed of at the US since the "shaw of Iran" thing in the 80s and we took all their gold and never gave it back. They vowed to pay us back ever since, and they have! Check this out for yourself. Today, no-one wants bring this up, because its why we have suffered world trade and 911 attacks. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | Actually, i do. i have spent time over there, I speak all 5 of the languages real well. Have you ever be outside the US? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | Also Marc1888, it appears that you must be very young or have a major lack of "World' knowledge. i came to this conclusion after reading your profile/responses etc. You also indicate that you care about only yourself and no-one else's opinion. (Closed minded) Are you one of these people who use this as a way to "vent" your disappointment of yourself? If you were a little older, you would remember what happened in the eighties. At the very least, You could respond to others opinions with some respect, ask them "why" they believe what they wrote. You may just learn something you don't know. Knowledge is power. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: wonkyconcrete | | I have heard the 'baiting the US' theory a few times recently and it is beginning to make sense. Even if saddam doesnt kill the US troops, the military spread out over a large area, fighting battles in different regions leaves the US exposed.
It also means the US have less military to send into places (like North Korea) which allows them to get on with their own agenda without having to worry about the marines supervising it.
It may not be North Korea that is doing the baiting either, infact North Korea may also be bait for a much larger, shall we say, fishing trip. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: GuyFromPakistan | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by bitwiz44
Who might be doing the "fishing trip"? |
This is pure speculation but I kind of like the idea...
the fisher...err...umm...c...c...China?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: wonkyconcrete | | China would certainly be on the list, the US has many enemys who will wait as long as it takes to get the upper hand and so many methods to use, war has changed I think we will see new types of conflicts, new ways to 'hurt' nations. which is sad, but a fact of life when some countrys have massive weapons arsenals and cannot be beaten in an 'old fashioned' war scenario. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: robert135 | | Let me tell you something about America. Lets say somehow that all of those troops were wiped out. America would not be defenseless. If the American people are willing to die for OTHER people's freedom, how hard do you think they would fight for their own. The next day would be the largest voluntary recruitment day into the military of any nation ever. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: wonkyconcrete | | I cant argue with that, all countries would probebly do the same. I was just saying to expect 'unconventional' methods of standing up the to the US as there arnt many people who can stand up to the destructive power of the US. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: MaxPowers | | ...god.
Even if the whole US military abroad could be destroyed the US would not be defenseless.
You think Vietnam was a crazy war? How about an invasion against the US. Can we say 280,000,000 people, fiercely defensive of their homes? How about 300,000,000 firearms in privately owned hands?
I think not. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Hitman | | If saddam does do it
he will lose most of the backing of the countrys he does have surporting him.
Then again Like you said he is willing to die and take as many with him as he can | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | Over the years major cities and suburbs have banned fire arms. They have invaded homes and removed firearms in this state. Yet It would be true that some still have them,(guns) but not enough to defend in a home war. ammo is also very limited. It still is was a bad law to pass. You get attacked (here) from another country and you need to be screened and wait 3 days just to get a gun to defend your family? who ever would attack us here would do something first like a few well placed missles hiting our geo fault lines causing earthquakes. or their hidden "Sleepers" blowing up stuff. I think there is a few ways to bring the US down long before the fighting is in our streets. Hey, How about this thought...We use all our prision inmates to fight? They like to kill, let them have at it before we loose a "good" citizen! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: USASoldier | | And to top it off, we have at least 5 military bases in Every Country around the World. We already have the Advantage in a World War. Were already on everyones doorstep | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: wonkyconcrete | | The coming war (read continuation of this conflict) wont be fought mainly between militarys, it will be fought between the terrorists already in place and will drag in the 'normal' man on the street. American citizens will be seen defending their own country from within. Homeland security will take on a different meaning!
Incidently, if anyone is intersted, it is quite eye opening checking the Homeland security website and looking at the images our government have choosen to use. (A viking backed by a dragon is easily interpreted as 'power to the aereon race), They also have an image of a dragon and the US army apparantly attacking NY, I will leave the intrepratation of that, but it used to be an image of a dragon attacking the twin towers, although that was changed a couple of years ago. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: MaxPowers | | ...yeah I don't think the terrorists will have much effect anymore. They caught us off guard. Now we are ever vigilant. Do you doubt that if they tried anything on a plane now that they wouldn't get their asses torn to pieces? Plus we are lucky in that the terrorists that live here are of a different race. Don't think that most Americans aren't suspicious of every Muslim, or muslim looking person in this country. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: MaxPowers | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by bitwiz44
Over the years major cities and suburbs have banned fire arms. They have invaded homes and removed firearms in this state. Yet It would be true that some still have them,(guns) but not enough to defend in a home war. ammo is also very limited. It still is was a bad law to pass. You get attacked (here) from another country and you need to be screened and wait 3 days just to get a gun to defend your family? who ever would attack us here would do something first like a few well placed missles hiting our geo fault lines causing earthquakes. or their hidden "Sleepers" blowing up stuff. I think there is a few ways to bring the US down long before the fighting is in our streets. Hey, How about this thought...We use all our prision inmates to fight? They like to kill, let them have at it before we loose a "good" citizen! |
Oh well, still 65 million armed Americans. 250-300 million firearms. I don't really care if the liberal cities were to get invaded. That would just have to be their problem. Either way though, the US has bases and troops all over the world. Nothing, short of perhaps a major human wave attack by India and China combined could ever conquer America. Thats my .02
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: wonkyconcrete | | I agree that the terrorism we have seen so far is easier to deal with and we probebly wont be caught off gusrd again, in the same way. I do think we will see, however, a new wave and 'style' of terroism. Individual fundamentalists poisoning water supplies, de-railing trains, real and hoax bomb scares in public places, easy to manufacture at home (ricin etc) chemical weapons.
This invasion has no doubt convinced a lot of 'middle of the road' fundamentalists to take action and more actively support their cause. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by wonkyconcrete
I agree that the terrorism we have seen so far is easier to deal with and we probebly wont be caught off gusrd again, in the same way. I do think we will see, however, a new wave and 'style' of terroism. Individual fundamentalists poisoning water supplies, de-railing trains, real and hoax bomb scares in public places, easy to manufacture at home (ricin etc) chemical weapons.
This invasion has no doubt convinced a lot of 'middle of the road' fundamentalists to take action and more actively support their cause. |
Its scary, but its not hard to see that many anti goverment cults would use this as an excuse to accomplish they own dirty deeds. If the bombing of the fed building in ok. took place now we would be focused on looking for a middle east person. Also the Muslim religion has expanded past the middle east looking person. Remember "Cat stevens". You just cannot count of being able to "spot " one of these people who are a sleeper terroist. Your best friend may even be one of them and you would never know it untill its too late.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | another thought; How many of you rely on electronic money? you keep a small amount of cash in your home, but you have a ATM, credit cards ETC. Ever have a problem? What if all of a sudden this electronic system was not working? The bank people would not let you with draw any of your cash, they live and die by what the computer screen says..Right? What if some terriost computer genus has a way to do this? (some of the best programmers are from the middle east) How could you buy food for your family? Ammo for your gun? Would there be kaos? If we have a problem on our soil you can bet the banks would be the first to close. then what are you going to do? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Enigma | | In that case, the entire American economy would melt down, taking evey other countrys economy with it. International corporations would collapse, and the entire world would be plunged into a depression. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Enigma
In that case, the entire American economy would melt down, taking evey other countrys economy with it. International corporations would collapse, and the entire world would be plunged into a depression. |
Some how I would think other countries have a back up plan. Say Enigma, What are the people of "Down under" thoughts on all thats happening? Also I never heard of any countries piss off at you guys, Is that true? If so why?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Enigma | | Well the public opinion down here is just the same as everywhere else. Divided. Some people support it, and some people don't. I'm not sure on the actual figures, as I don't know of any recent polls.
As for other contries opinion of us, well I can't really speak for that. I don't believe we've stepped on all that many toes in the past, but we've had less time to do it too. A lot of people don't realise that Australia as a country is only a little over a century old. It's only relatively recently that it's even started to be largely recognised in the international community. We are a fairly small nation compared to some other places, with a population only a little over 10 million I believe. I feel we are a very strong nation, and a very fair nation however. Australia is a nation of immigrants, so there is an incredible fusion of culture down here, and because of that, a fairly wide acceptance. That has only come around in the past 50 or so years though. I'm glad to say that past problems such as racism and discrimination are all but gone now. Maybe it's that multicultural aspect. I dunno. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Enigma
Well the public opinion down here is just the same as everywhere else. Divided. Some people support it, and some people don't. I'm not sure on the actual figures, as I don't know of any recent polls.
As for other contries opinion of us, well I can't really speak for that. I don't believe we've stepped on all that many toes in the past, but we've had less time to do it too. A lot of people don't realise that Australia as a country is only a little over a century old. It's only relatively recently that it's even started to be largely recognised in the international community. We are a fairly small nation compared to some other places, with a population only a little over 10 million I believe. I feel we are a very strong nation, and a very fair nation however. Australia is a nation of immigrants, so there is an incredible fusion of culture down here, and because of that, a fairly wide acceptance. That has only come around in the past 50 or so years though. I'm glad to say that past problems such as racism and discrimination are all but gone now. Maybe it's that multicultural aspect. I dunno. |
Enigma, I have been to many other countries, but not to yours. It seems the places I have been the local folk have a poor opinion of an american. It even seemed "hostile" in great brittian and I was there on a project that open up 200+ jobs for than area. What is the general opinion about americans in your country?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Rage | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by bitwiz44
Its scary, but its not hard to see that many anti goverment cults would use this as an excuse to accomplish they own dirty deeds. If the bombing of the fed building in ok. took place now we would be focused on looking for a middle east person. Also the Muslim religion has expanded past the middle east looking person. Remember "Cat stevens". You just cannot count of being able to "spot " one of these people who are a sleeper terroist. Your best friend may even be one of them and you would never know it untill its too late. |
| quote: |
Originally posted by bitwiz44
another thought; How many of you rely on electronic money? you keep a small amount of cash in your home, but you have a ATM, credit cards ETC. Ever have a problem? What if all of a sudden this electronic system was not working? The bank people would not let you with draw any of your cash, they live and die by what the computer screen says..Right? What if some terriost computer genus has a way to do this? (some of the best programmers are from the middle east) How could you buy food for your family? Ammo for your gun? Would there be kaos? If we have a problem on our soil you can bet the banks would be the first to close. then what are you going to do? |
You presumed in both of your posts that a terrorist is either a middle easters or a muslim.
I disagree with those posts except for one thing; programmers from the mid east are good. You bet they are..
-Rage
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Rage
You presumed in both of your posts that a terrorist is either a middle easters or a muslim.
I disagree with those posts except for one thing; programmers from the mid east are good. You bet they are..
-Rage |
No that was not my point. It was a statement to get who ever to relize A terrorist can be any one. i still however believe We brought this on ourselves though the "Shaw of Iran" thing in the 80s. I do not take for granted someone capabilities to get even. One person commented on here like a terrorist is easy to spot and has a certian look. Thats is wrong. And have learned Most Muslims are in pursuit of peace. How ever some cultures In the US have claimed to convert to muslim and use that to justify their hate. By doing that the true peace side of the Muslim religion gets distorted. Most US people cannot tell the difference between a Lebonise, Assyrin, Turk, India, Etc. They do not even have a clue that some of these countries have more than one religion.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Bebert | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Rage
You presumed in both of your posts that a terrorist is either a middle easters or a muslim.
I disagree with those posts except for one thing; programmers from the mid east are good. You bet they are..
-Rage |
That's what this war is about : prejudice.
I mean, these pro-war people dont realize how paternalist/imperialist their views are.
"we are bringing these people FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY, WELFARE, from our highest civilized country...You-not-understand-now, but-you-grateful-later. "
We are back in the XIXth century.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Rage | | bitwiz44, I agree with you on your last post. Few of us ruined it for the rest. As i said earlier in another post, after 9/11, i had been humilated more than once when i was in the US.
The odd thing is that most of those people who insult or throw words become very friendly when they know me in person, the question is why do they (the mid east haters) always persume that you're a bad person unless proven otherwise.
-Rage | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Rage
bitwiz44, I agree with you on your last post. Few of us ruined it for the rest. As i said earlier in another post, after 9/11, i had been humilated more than once when i was in the US.
The odd thing is that most of those people who insult or throw words become very friendly when they know me in person, the question is why do they (the mid east haters) always persume that you're a bad person unless proven otherwise.
-Rage |
My thought on this is Inherently we are quick to "Shoot first, ask questions later". Fear come in many shapes and devices. we have more corrupt lawyers than any country in the world, good people get screwed everyday by them. Its very rare to even find a "Good" lawyer and/or one that will go after the bad lawyers. So we get from time to time something to focas our anger at. Call it an ICON of sorts. And anything thats resembles this icon triggers the Shoot First theory. Most of us regret being wrong about another person and are asshamed of what we did to them. But some can change a negitive issue into money. Or they create a negitive for money. Every negitive issue we are faced with, someone some where is making money over it. The last couple of wars the only gain i remember is some got RICH over it. I find it truly sad that killing has turned into a money maker.
I applogize for those who were brutal to you. It was wrong of them. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Rage | | Thanks for the thoughts bitwiz44, if only more were thinking the same way you do..
-Rage | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Enigma | |
| quote: |
| Enigma, I have been to many other countries, but not to yours. It seems the places I have been the local folk have a poor opinion of an american. It even seemed "hostile" in great brittian and I was there on a project that open up 200+ jobs for than area. What is the general opinion about americans in your country? |
Hmmm. Well I haven't seen any embedded hatred or resentment myself, though it would be much easier for someone from the US to pick up on something like that if it exists. I can't say I've seen much of any hostility for any race or country down here though. I've heard one or two idiots make some "jokes" about people from the middle east just after september 11, but nothing really apart from that. Of course, we pay out on the Kiwis all the time, but that's just a friendly rivalry. There's no real hostility there.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: fred hooper | | Thats true. I can put into down to our barely hundred year history as a nations and geographical isolation for the non hatred of any other peoples or nation. The people here are the most important aspect though by far and even 99.9% of immigrants over the decades leave behind their former countries troubles. Peace, harmony and wealth reign foremost every time.
Paradise in one word and some don't really know good we have it. I've travelled the world and I assure you that we have it best in all aspects of life and society. Lifestyle is the business of living in OZ.
What about East Timor in 1999? Thats our spirit and we've never fought a war for our own personal foreign conquest or gain.
Fred Hooper | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | I want to say"thanks" to Rage and the guys "down under" for their insite they have shared. Knowledge is power.
Getting back to the real reason I started this: I still cant help believing we are in for a big suprise. surely saddom had to know this would go like it has. So what is his "Trump" card?
Ironic, I just remembered the opening story of a "Mad max" movie.
 | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Enigma | | I think Saddam knew that if the US ever actually took action against him, he was finished. He thought he count on the track record of the US of not bothering to get involved with pretty much anything unless it was of direct benefit to the US though. This action by the US caught him by surprise I think. He was probably planning to just have things running round and round in the UN forever, and if the US hadn't made this action, I think it probably would have. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | Ok, that is possible, but we was so sure that he had all these "Bad" weapons, but still we have not found the "smoking gun" needed to justify our actions against him. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Enigma | | We have found 10 missiles loaded with chemical agents. Missles hat the Iraqi government flatly denied having before this conflict started. There is most likely many more discoveries like this still to come. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Rage | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Enigma
We |
I didn't know that you guys have Internet in the battlefield..
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Enigma | | :P
Yeah, I was looking a that myself after I posted it. I couldn't be stuffed editing it though. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | The "TEN" ...That was found, does it consitute a take over? More has to be found or there will be a "Black eye". You think that maybe the rest of them are pointed at the troops? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Enigma | | I personally believe more will be found, but I think most of them are not just sitting out in the open like what has been found so far. I think that Saddam probably has a large cache in hidden bunkers out in the desert, or buried under and around military installations. That's just my theory though. Time will tell. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Duntov | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by bitwiz44
The "TEN" ...That was found, does it consitute a take over? More has to be found or there will be a "Black eye". You think that maybe the rest of them are pointed at the troops? |
No matter what we find, there will be those who will keep denying the threat. How many people will 10 chemical laiden warheads kill anyway? The point is, Sadam has shown he is willing to use them in the past. What would he be willing to do if he had nuclear weapons?
This war is most certainly justified. There is no black eye. Anyone that thinks there is, is the one without knowledge.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Duntov
No matter what we find, there will be those who will keep denying the threat. How many people will 10 chemical laiden warheads kill anyway? The point is, Sadam has shown he is willing to use them in the past. What would he be willing to do if he had nuclear weapons?
This war is most certainly justified. There is no black eye. Anyone that thinks there is, is the one without knowledge. |
Since you live in FLorida, let pose this senerio to you. You for some odd reason is supected of being part of a drug ring. The reallity is your not, however they get a search warrant, wreck your home looking for "A large cache of drugs". The end result is they only find TEN joints. Your life is runed, they call it Justified cause they found ten joints and the pot may be from a time long a go when you use to smoke, it was a simple oversite that you still had them any way. How would others view what happened to you?
Duntov, dont think for a minute i support keeping sadam. If you recall many in the UN did not support this "Witch" hunt for the same reason you would not want your "Home" invaded over a hunch. The US stated Those weapons of mass distruction will be found! Saddam stated "Its about the oil". Have you noticed your gas prices dropping? I would not want saddam to end up a martar when the dust settles and the US does not need a black eye in the UN.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Enigma
I personally believe more will be found, but I think most of them are not just sitting out in the open like what has been found so far. I think that Saddam probably has a large cache in hidden bunkers out in the desert, or buried under and around military installations. That's just my theory though. Time will tell. |
I'm thinking along the same lines as you. The Us needs to find the "Smoking gun" soon.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Enigma | | There are many differences between that scenario and what is going on in Iraq, but the most blatent one I will point out is that they have not turned Iraq upside down looking for these weapons yet. Hell, if you want to draw these kind of comparisons, I'd say it's more like they found the 10 joints sitting on your doorstep, and they haven't even checked the safe yet. If you had a massive cache of joints, would you just leave them sitting out for all to see, especially if you had the cops crawling up your *** looking for anything to bust you with? Hell no, you'd hide them pretty **** well, or maybe even take them off your property all together. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Enigma
There are many differences between that scenario and what is going on in Iraq, but the most blatent one I will point out is that they have not turned Iraq upside down looking for these weapons yet. Hell, if you want to draw these kind of comparisons, I'd say it's more like they found the 10 joints sitting on your doorstep, and they haven't even checked the safe yet. If you had a massive cache of joints, would you just leave them sitting out for all to see, especially if you had the cops crawling up your *** looking for anything to bust you with? Hell no, you'd hide them pretty **** well, or maybe even take them off your property all together. |
Your point is well takin. The us needs to find the "safe". I was try to describe the same to Dun, You just said it better than I did. (also you proved I am %$^@^ untill i get a few cups of coffee in me)
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Duntov | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by bitwiz44
Since you live in FLorida, let pose this senerio to you. You for some odd reason is supected of being part of a drug ring. The reallity is your not, however they get a search warrant, wreck your home looking for "A large cache of drugs". The end result is they only find TEN joints. Your life is runed, they call it Justified cause they found ten joints and the pot may be from a time long a go when you use to smoke, it was a simple oversite that you still had them any way. How would others view what happened to you?
Duntov, dont think for a minute i support keeping sadam. If you recall many in the UN did not support this "Witch" hunt for the same reason you would not want your "Home" invaded over a hunch. The US stated Those weapons of mass distruction will be found! Saddam stated "Its about the oil". Have you noticed your gas prices dropping? I would not want saddam to end up a martar when the dust settles and the US does not need a black eye in the UN. |
What does living in Florida have to do with your analogy?
10 Joints don't kill people. Do they? Also gas is still about 30% percent higher than in December. And........... only about 6 percent of our oil comes from Iraq!
Sadam will only be a martar to those few that benefited from his reign.
Those in denial will continue to spin this the way they want.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Charles | | I think many countries are VERY interested in seeing the US fail. From our European "friends" to the Chinese and other major powers. Anything that hurts us is good for them politically. But they also understand quite clearly that anything that hurts our consumers is BAD for them. Its about $$$. If the Chinese manufacturing sector lost US consumers their economy would collapse.
They will take proxy pot shots at every opportunity, but there is no conspiracy or threat of direct action. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Charles
I think many countries are VERY interested in seeing the US fail. From our European "friends" to the Chinese and other major powers. Anything that hurts us is good for them politically. But they also understand quite clearly that anything that hurts our consumers is BAD for them. Its about $$$. If the Chinese manufacturing sector lost US consumers their economy would collapse.
They will take proxy pot shots at every opportunity, but there is no conspiracy or threat of direct action. |
Dun: Nothing personal, We here in chicago are programmed to believe Florida is where the major drug Cartel hang out/live. Wether or not its true, Some one there could be a victim of "We Think that have a huge cache of drugs" is what I was implying. (maybe i had too much Miami Vice)
Charles; Who or what is W.C.? There is a lot of truth to what you said.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Duntov
What does living in Florida have to do with your analogy?
10 Joints don't kill people. Do they? Also gas is still about 30% percent higher than in December. And........... only about 6 percent of our oil comes from Iraq!
Sadam will only be a martar to those few that benefited from his reign.
Those in denial will continue to spin this the way they want. |
Also, My mistake, Our gas went down below $1.33 avg from $1.79. I thought every one elses did too. Sorry 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: robert135 | | Definately not. Gas in vegas is at 2.01 a gallon and holding *&*&&%&%^^%&^%&% it! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Duntov | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by bitwiz44
Dun: Nothing personal, We here in chicago are programmed to believe Florida is where the major drug Cartel hang out/live. Wether or not its true, Some one there could be a victim of "We Think that have a huge cache of drugs" is what I was implying. (maybe i had too much Miami Vice)
Charles; Who or what is W.C.? There is a lot of truth to what you said. |
Bitwiz44, nothing personal taken. I understand. We all think you guys are a bunch of Mafia. Too much God Father I think.

| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Duntov | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by bitwiz44
Since you live in FLorida, let pose this senerio to you. You for some odd reason is supected of being part of a drug ring. The reallity is your not, however they get a search warrant, wreck your home looking for "A large cache of drugs". The end result is they only find TEN joints. Your life is runed, they call it Justified cause they found ten joints and the pot may be from a time long a go when you use to smoke, it was a simple oversite that you still had them any way. How would others view what happened to you?
Duntov, dont think for a minute i support keeping sadam. If you recall many in the UN did not support this "Witch" hunt for the same reason you would not want your "Home" invaded over a hunch. The US stated Those weapons of mass distruction will be found! Saddam stated "Its about the oil". Have you noticed your gas prices dropping? I would not want saddam to end up a martar when the dust settles and the US does not need a black eye in the UN. |
Okay, here is my idea BitWiz. We take all the warheads on both sides and pack them with joints. Fire away! (pun)
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: jnwagner | | Nobody has the technology to "blow up" 250,000 troops spread across an area the size of California. Yes, some damage could be done, but the U.S. would remain THE world power. We still have enough nukes to deter an attack on this country by another nuke power. Don't forget the subs! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Charles | |
| quote: |
| Charles; Who or what is W.C.? There is a lot of truth to what you said. |
Winston Churchill. It's my favorite quote. It literally jumped out of the book at me when I read it. He was referring to Europe in the mid 1930's. He had Hitler pegged from the start but no one would listen. I am reminded of the wisdom of this quote when brutal regimes start raising hell - Bosnia, Iraq, etc.
There was, perhaps, still time for an assertion of collective security, based upon the avowed readiness of all members concerned to enforce the decisions of the League of Nations by the sword. The democracies and their dependent states were still actually and potentially far stronger than the dictatorships, but their position relative to their opponents was less than half as good as it had been twelve months before. Virtuous motives, trammeled by inertia and timidity, are no match for armed and resolute wickedness. A sincere love of peace is no excuse for muddling hundreds of millions of humble folk into total war. The cheers of weak, well-meaning assemblies soon cease to echo, and their votes soon cease to count. Doom marches on.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Grimminick | | Charles, a quote can not "literally" jump out at you, only "metaphorically." Sorry cheap shot, nothing to do with the war, apologies. I'll get my coat! | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Charles | | But its true. I am horrible with quotes but when I read this all the other words around it seemed blurred and it "popped" out at me. I find it applicable to many issues and it seems to me a basic algorithm for understanding human conflicts.
If comes to a contest between a newborn lamb and a hungry wolf, the wolf will ALWAYS win.
I did deserve your correction though and will try to keep it in mind. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | Have you heard this?
"Since we are here lets clean up syria too while we're at it"
CNN | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: brendy | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by wonkyconcrete
I have heard the 'baiting the US' theory a few times recently and it is beginning to make sense. Even if saddam doesnt kill the US troops, the military spread out over a large area, fighting battles in different regions leaves the US exposed.
It also means the US have less military to send into places (like North Korea) which allows them to get on with their own agenda without having to worry about the marines supervising it.
It may not be North Korea that is doing the baiting either, infact North Korea may also be bait for a much larger, shall we say, fishing trip. |
wonkyconcrete, wake up, you are dreaming again. Do you really think our military and intelligence have not map this thing out. Why is it that people believe the US is lying to us. There are too many watch dogs to allow this to happen. People be patience, and thank GOD you live in a country that wants to protect you and others that desire freedom and peace.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by brendy
wonkyconcrete, wake up, you are dreaming again. Do you really think our military and intelligence have not map this thing out. Why is it that people believe the US is lying to us. There are too many watch dogs to allow this to happen. People be patience, and thank GOD you live in a country that wants to protect you and others that desire freedom and peace. |
Lying? Well lets see...hmmm, Could it be we have been lyied to many times in the past? And when "we are not suppose to know something was underhanded" the records are sealed for a hundred years to assure all involved are long gone?
At face value, your right, however when all our corrupt attorneys get in the mix the spirit of what we are concerning freedom and truth goes to hell.
Remember when Florida had the ballot problem? All the airports were flooded with attorneys headed there. Wouldnt suprise me that they are brushing up their arabic at this very moment!

| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Grimminick | | Yep, Syria's next. Wonder what BS lies they'll concoct about that one. Can always rely on the a few cretins buying it whatever reason is given. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | Ya know, after starting this thread and 430+ readers and 60 post I did not get even 1vote.....Bah humbug!  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Grimminick
Yep, Syria's next. Wonder what BS lies they'll concoct about that one. Can always rely on the a few cretins buying it whatever reason is given. |
today it they are on the trail of the BAD" guys and those weapons of mass distruction and that leads them to syria.....and thats the facts! they claim. And if they dont find them there...where to next?...Korea? I bet thats where the stuff went to. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | And i dont get it? This thread was just move to Terrisiom....and it jumps back here....I am confused.....I need to cut back on the coffee.... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Charles | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Grimminick
Yep, Syria's next. Wonder what BS lies they'll concoct about that one. Can always rely on the a few cretins buying it whatever reason is given. |
Well, one of the main points of using a "big" stick on occasion is to provide an example so that you don't have to use it all the time.
While I am not up on all the details - and I try to avoid the "buzz" from 24x7 news channels, I would like to sort out a few things about Syria.
Are they really in effect occupying Lebanon?
Are they really aiding and abbetting and supporting recognized terrorist groups? (I know you will respond with "recognized by what standard?" and my response is "the standard that says deliberately attacking/killing civilians is wrong."
If on balance it turns out that Syria is on the wrong side of the line, I think they should be treated as such.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Grimminick | | The wrong side of what line? The same side of the line as Iraq that never attacked you or looked even likely of attacking you. Whee does the US get its idea that it and it alone can decide who needs sorting out and who doesn't. Is'nt somewhere like Zimbabwee in need of some of your liberating war more than Syria. Isn't Saudia Arabia a much more significant threat as a terrorist state than Syria. Isn't N korea a far more dangerous nation of WMD than Syria. Why does Syria in allits mediocrity suddenly register so highly on the US list. None of this makes any sense. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Charles | | What we are trying to do is IMPOSE some rules in the middle east in an effort to create the conditions for peace and stability. It just didn't seem to happen "all by itself."
Give peace a chance Grim!
If you look at the average arab fellow at a demonstration burning flags and calling the US the mother of evil, etc., etc., it must lead you to believe that they are being, shall we say, manipulated to some extent?
Of course its convenient to blame the USA as a distraction for their people. Makes life easier for the regimes.
I think the next few years will see significant changes in the middle east. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Grimminick | | But that's not what the war was supposed to be about -Imposing rules. It was about liberating people. Of course it was supposed to be about WMDs but because sod all has still yet to be found the liberating argument sounds so much better and we'll all just go with that one until something jucier turns up.
IMPOSE laws - no Charles I don't like the sound of that one bit. Why do you feel the need to impose anything. US said this was about free democratic choice for the Iraqi people now Saddam hasgone. You don't IMPOSE freedom, a society arrives at its own interpretation naturally and without foreign outside help. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Rambo | |
| quote: |
| It was about liberating people. |
No it wasn't. Why the hell do you clowns keep spouting this crap?
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Grimminick | | I was speaking ironically, you moron Rambo. I don't believe it has anything to do with liberation, I was simply making the point that so many different arguments were used that no-one knew exactly what the real reason was for war...oh, all exempt you Rambo cos you're way clever like ain't you. (I'm speaking ironically again, turd head) | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Rambo | |
| quote: |
| I don't believe it has anything to do with liberation, I was simply making the point |
The point? What was that? That the war in Iraq wasn't about liberation? How clever to have realized that all by yourself.
Jacka*ss Monkey Nut.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: honda_accord113 | | BOMB THE RAG HEADS. WHY WAIT FOR US TO FIND SADDAM JUST END OUR PROBLEMS. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Grimminick
I was speaking ironically, you moron Rambo. I don't believe it has anything to do with liberation, I was simply making the point that so many different arguments were used that no-one knew exactly what the real reason was for war...oh, all exempt you Rambo cos you're way clever like ain't you. (I'm speaking ironically again, turd head) |
Now, now, boys, some call it tomatoe others call it tomatoh... the fact is it's no longer called SADDAM INT'L AIRPORT....
______
June 6, 2003 is the 59-year anniversary of D-Day. To all the combat soldiers, officers, airmen and navy men of Britain, Canada and the United States who participated in the invasion of Normandy, France in 1944, and to all those men and women of the then-French underground, including the French, Brits and Scandinavians—to all these heroes, most of them mere children then, who made the supreme sacrifice—we all, those now living and those yet to be born, owe our profound gratitude.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: MrJukoVette | | LOL GUYS Pleaaaase i cant read this anymore.
NKorea blews the heck out of Iraq killing everybody - 250,000 american soldiers, and 24,000,000 iraqis. I am pretty sure 2 nuclear warheads 1950s quality that they have would be enough. After it happens, US with all it's WMDs including but not limited to chemical, biological, explosive and nuclear bombs; with all it's air and sea forces; with 280,000,000 population will be completely defenseless. Also, NATO allies will momentarily go from peace and alliance to a state of war, the whole world will be against the US, OH YEAAAAA! Saddam will win.
Oh i forgot. He won't - aliens will come and help US. Together with an army of Robocops and Terminators. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: MrJukoVette | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Charles
What we are trying to do is IMPOSE some rules in the middle east in an effort to create the conditions for peace and stability. It just didn't seem to happen "all by itself."
Give peace a chance Grim!
If you look at the average arab fellow at a demonstration burning flags and calling the US the mother of evil, etc., etc., it must lead you to believe that they are being, shall we say, manipulated to some extent?
Of course its convenient to blame the USA as a distraction for their people. Makes life easier for the regimes.
I think the next few years will see significant changes in the middle east. |
Good one Charles! 
You seem to be the only thinking person here.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Americaaah | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by MrJukoVette
LOL GUYS Pleaaaase i cant read this anymore.
NKorea blews the heck out of Iraq killing everybody - 250,000 american soldiers, and 24,000,000 iraqis. I am pretty sure 2 nuclear warheads 1950s quality that they have would be enough. After it happens, US with all it's WMDs including but not limited to chemical, biological, explosive and nuclear bombs; with all it's air and sea forces; with 280,000,000 population will be completely defenseless. Also, NATO allies will momentarily go from peace and alliance to a state of war, the whole world will be against the US, OH YEAAAAA! Saddam will win.
Oh i forgot. He won't - aliens will come and help US. Together with an army of Robocops and Terminators. |
I can never understand what your point is, JukoVette.... 
______
June 6, 2003 is the 59-year anniversary of D-Day. To all the combat soldiers, officers, airmen and navy men of Britain, Canada and the United States who participated in the invasion of Normandy, France in 1944, and to all those men and women of the then-French underground, including the French, Brits and Scandinavians—to all these heroes, most of them mere children then, who made the supreme sacrifice—we all, those now living and those yet to be born, owe our profound gratitude.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: rowdyrjp | | This thread reads like the "Project for a New America" web site!!
No wonder USA Gov feels they can attack anyone anywhere with impunity. They have programmed enough Americans to believe bizarre ludicrous scenarios where the entire world is their enemy... where everyone who looks different is a sleeper { God, how sad... I am sure whatever burning corner in hell Se. McCarthy is in he wishes he could come back... this is his kind of fear mongering paranoia }... and where average citizens consider it OK that their Gov has an interest in deciding how other countries are run??????? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | This thread was started A long time ago. Today Its a mute point. Perhaps the reason it was moved also. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: rowdyrjp | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by bitwiz44
This thread was started A long time ago. Today Its a mute point. Perhaps the reason it was moved also. |
Mute? As in silenced... as in the way the USA media has tried to portray victory = success... despite evidence to the contrary?
Or do you mean moot? As in meaningless since war has been fought and Iraq is conquered?
If mute...... yes and I deplore said media.
If moot... no, these issues once forgotten are in fact given legitamacy.... I would never want to legitimize War when it is illegal and unnecessary!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: bitwiz44 | | No Rowdy....As in my theory of why I started the thread. As for this war...Only the money people had anything to gain.  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: rowdyrjp | |
| quote: |
Originally posted by bitwiz44
No Rowdy....As in my theory of why I started the thread. As for this war...Only the money people had anything to gain. |
Yes, only people in positions of power benefit financially and power wise { expanded influence } when nations are conquered.
But the fact that these people were the ones to gain makes the thread "moot"....how?
Sorry, I think with all the posts here... I may have lost track of what your point is..... my bad.
| | Reply To this Message
|
Post-9/11 Era Forum: Boom! Saddam May Just Win.
|