The All-talk, No Action Approach |
| Posted by: Curley Joe | | [Liberals] state that "the struggle against Islamic radicalism is a festival of nuance. It is not quite a war, and it doesn't yield easily to simple notions of good and evil, friend and foe." That point of view is precisely why Americans will never trust a Democratic President to protect them. We are smart enough to reject an all-talk, no-action approach to security threats in which we sit around endlessly yakking with intractable friends and implacable foes. There are 50 years of damage to undo from such policies, and it is nothing short of remarkable that in three years, the Bush doctrine has pinned back the ears of terrorist groups and their supporting states. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: h@ts | | Curley Joe and Bush's idea of the struggle against terrorism:
P!ss your allies off, by bullying and threats and spying and calling them all kind of names and encourage such grown up behaviour as renaming foods, so no-one feels like helping you.
Cherry pick intelligence and when it's proved wrong blame everyone else.
Make post war presumtions by cherry picking advice and again when that proves to be a wrong, cover it up by holding an enquiry that stops anyone talking about how how much of a balls-up you've been making of things until after the election.
Certainly no " festival of nuance" there  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Curley Joe | | Can you say: Spin and rhetoric?
Nothin' new here.
Your transparent anti-Americanism is in perpetual motion — h@ts off to ya.  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: oneofpeace | | Sometimes I wonder about the IQ levels of some of these thread starters and war supporters.
Some do present a good case, however others are just flagrantly disregarding of any intelligent position. I'm sure I don't have to point them out. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Curley Joe | | Can you say: Spin and rhetoric?
I'm sure I need mention no names.
Your transparent liberlism is in perpetual motion — hats off to all o'yous. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: asantana | | so kill first think later, if there is any thing to think about it left, do you and your supporters own this world?? and who are you to judge every creature on the planet, wakeup... by killing every one who dosent support you you will end up alone in this world salebrating your victory alone, the rest are all dead. is that what you want???? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Curley Joe | |
| quote: |
asantana said this in post #6 :
so kill first think later, if there is any thing to think about it left, do you and your supporters own this world?? and who are you to judge every creature on the planet, wakeup... by killing every one who dosent support you you will end up alone in this world salebrating your victory alone, the rest are all dead. is that what you want???? |
Yes, asantana, that's EXACTLY what this thread starter states: "kill first, think later." This is what the U.S. does and this is what the U.S. did in Iraq. And this is the reason for which you are "grateful" to the U.S.
This is precisely why I take all of you anti-U.S. Bozos seriously — always have, always will. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: asantana | |
| quote: |
| This is precisely why I take all of you anti-U.S. Bozos seriously — always have, always will. |
open you blind eys and read that post again... I said GREATFUL FOR TAKING SADDAM OUT, NOT FOR KILLING SO MANY INNOCENT , I SAID ALSO, US CAME FOR THE OIL AND BY THE WAY TOOK SADDAM, FOR TAKING SADDAM I AM GREATFUL, NOT FOR THE REST is it clear now or you still understand only part of a sentence??? when do you learn to read the entir post and not only the part you like??????
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Curley Joe | |
| quote: |
asantana said this in post #8 :
open you blind eys and read that post again... I said GREATFUL FOR TAKING SADDAM OUT, NOT FOR KILLING SO MANY INNOCENT , I SAID ALSO, US CAME FOR THE OIL AND BY THE WAY TOOK SADDAM, FOR TAKING SADDAM I AM GREATFUL, NOT FOR THE REST is it clear now or you still understand only part of a sentence??? when do you learn to read the entir post and not only the part you like??????
|
OK, here's your whole sentence: "so kill first think later, if there is any thing to think about it left, do you and your supporters own this world??
And here's my response: Yes, asantana, that's EXACTLY what this thread starter states: "kill first, think later." This is what the U.S. does and this is what the U.S. did in Iraq. And this is the reason for which you are so "grateful" to the U.S.
This is precisely why I take all of you anti-U.S. Bozos seriously — always have, always will. 
I read the whole sentence that time. 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: asantana | | Unfortunately they haven’t come up with a pill to increase the level of intelligence yet, once they do I will buy you a whole box , may be it will help you a bit , nevertheless i will keep you on my list of intresting people | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Curley Joe | |
| quote: |
asantana said this in post #10 :
Unfortunately they haven’t come up with a pill to increase the level of intelligence yet, once they do I will buy you a whole box , may be it will help you a bit , nevertheless i will keep you on my list of intresting people |
I am so fortunate. Thank you! 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: oneofpeace | | Actually I feel sorrow for your misfortune. It's one thing to be on the wrong road, but it's dangerous to be on the wrong road and don't know it. You'll wind up hurting someone besides yourself.  umph umph umph | | Reply To this Message
|
Iraq Forum: The All-talk, No Action Approach
|
