Why are there homosexuals? |
| Posted by: sordidmesh | | Why is it that out of all the creatures on Earth, it is humans that overtly contain homosexuals within it's race? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | | heh - this seems like something my nine year old would ask me, but I like the thought of entertainging your question for the moment.
Now perhaps someone from the "homosexuality side" would explain this differently, but my own take is two-fold: genetic anomalies and learned behavior.
On the genetic side are actual gene mutations that result in imbalanced hormones shifting tendencies to be either more female or more male, etc which induces a hormonal attraction to the same sex. These are the "flamers" you see who seem like they truly are women trapped in a man's body, or vice versa.
On the learned behavior side, you've got a combination of influential sources that serve as role models to anyone who is receptive to them. Some BAD experience with the opposite sex or a parent as a kid or teen, some GOOD experience with someone of the same sex that seemed exciting, an out-spoken gay community encouraging acceptance, a very open mind and loving disposition - any of a number of factors can add up to someone "deciding" to lead a homo/bi-sexual lifestyle regardless of genetic composition.
Those are the only two things I really see driving this whole thing. Of interest to me is the genetic side because were such mutations to occur in the animal kingdom, based on natural selection they would be eliminated as quickly as they show up. Humans are the only animals that have largely insulated themselves from the processes of natural selection that would weed out genetic deficiencies such as physiological problems which require external support to get through life. Animals do not receive external support and hence the genetically weak die: survival of the fittest. A genetic mutation which induces inverse sexual behavior would not propagate because the animal would not procreate. Humans have a number of ways to circumvent this natural selection however, allowing genetic diseases and (in my opinion) undesirable mutations to continue to enter the genepool of the general populous rather than preventing procreation. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: sordidmesh | | I have a few ideas about this myself.
I most believe that homosexuality is not unlike a virus and that it can be treated, corrected and/or cured. That may offend many or some. Please understand I do not mean it in a discriminating or hateful way. I think there are many levels of homosexuality ranging from the in your face type that some like to overwhelm the public with during gay pride parades and like in some Vermont and Massachusetts schools systems where groups have been brought in to explain (or maybe foward) the gay agenda/movement. It ranges from the extreme overt type to the hypocritically, in-public homophobic tough guy who is really a closet homosexual away from his peers.
Back to why there are homosexuals though...I agree with what Sean Kelly has said in his descriptive learned behavior explanation. It results from good and bad prior experiences and from the environments in which people grow up in and go through in life. More on this later.... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: schmiggens | |
| quote: |
sordidmesh said this in post #1 :
Why is it that out of all the creatures on Earth, it is humans that overtly contain homosexuals within it's race? |
Humans as a species do SO may things that no other creatures do. We are the only species that has sex for pleasure (apart from dolphins) but we don't consider sex for pleasure to be inhuman or unnatural in anyway.
I think it is all part of being human, we are a highly advanced species when compared to any other and therefore and have advanced needs, including in our sexual relations.
We do things because they make us happy, and whether that means wearing a red t-shirt every day or being gay, it is all part of being human.
We are not animals, we do not need to live by the rules of animals.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | | Are you all serious? Please apply your logic as to what "causes" heterosexuality and you will see how ridicilous your theory is.
There are homosexuals for the same reason there are heterosexuals, because we are born. All animals are born, that is why they exist. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | outsider... Grant (gaboman) is just joking around!
I like what you said... right on We are simply because we were born. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | | Oh I know KJ, I actually found Gabo's post the funniest in this thread.
Gabo... are they cute aliens?  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | You would... Oh well, as long as you put the Blue one's on the side, for me. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | |
| quote: |
outsider said this in post #8 :
Gabo... are they cute aliens? |
No no, that's why they need a team of 5 homosexuals to help them improve their look and style... 
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | Damn it... you weren't supposed to have seen that!! I was trying to be 'sly.'
Hey outsider... did you know that we were 'contained by humans'? | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | | You know I wondered why the planetary alliance would not tell us about Area 15. I was sure it was humans that crash landed in 1702. Ahhhh... I was just a teenager then. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: gaboman | | You two, you forgot you turn your extra-terresterial encoders on.
All the "other kinds" are seeing every word!  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | | Why is it necessary to have 50 thousand homosexual threads?
Cant people just live in peace and be who they are without having to answer for themselves on a daily basis?
If you dont understand that people are just born that way...then you'll just never understand it at all.
Just accept it already...you cant "cure" it....
Homosexuality isnt a disease.
Case closed. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | |
| quote: |
gaboman said this in post #17 :
You two, you forgot you turn your extra-terresterial encoders on.
All the "other kinds" are seeing every word! |
Dang! I thought I had this thing turned on. Well back to the Orion nebula to have it fixed.
Hey mystic, happy to hear from you.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #18 :
Why is it necessary to have 50 thousand homosexual threads?
|
| quote: |
Jokers_Harley said this in post #20 :
God I am so TIRED of this discussion.. |
I don't enjoy being so blunt, but here's a tip: if you're tired of a discussion then stay out of it.
I don't think it's so "case closed" and matter-of-fact as you do as with 99% of the discussions on this forum. It should go without saying that if everything were so cut & dry, there wouldn't be a need for conversations ever because you could find anything you'll ever need right here.
JH - I'm not sure if it was, but if your reference to "animals" was in response to my comments about the animal kingdom, there is a scientific, genetic basis for that information. In fact when you say yourself that homosexuals are "born that way", you are as well suggesting that DNA & genetics play a role in homosexuality because that's all ANY of us are born with: DNA genetic coding. All that we become by nature is defined therein. All that we become above that is learned. I just want to be clear. I would prefer that when I write things like that they are not received as, "blah blah blah blah blah ANIMALS blah blah blah blah blah" and then you freak out about the one key word you detect in there because that was not the point of the what I wrote.
Anyway, back to alien probes and transgalactic communications.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Jokers_Harley | | No, Sean let me clear the air out:
#1 When I posted that I was "tired of this discussion" I meant that I am sick and tired of the insults and the back-handed demeaning names some people resort to in the threads about homosexuality......... by my comment I meant just that, that I am sick of hearing it...... if someone has something intelligent to say then say it by all means but when all you see is the same comment of stupid or wrong or immoral.....well you tend to get the same feeling, that it is another thread where people can once again bash the gay.......... this one has started out intelligently so far but let's see how it turns out in a few days
#2 I understood what you said in your first post.......... to me it IS genetic coding/dna that makes one gay in my experience and opinion.............. I know enough gay people to know that they are born into that lifestyle. I never meant to jump dowm your throat but maybe we can find other words or examples of comparison............ after some of the things and feelings some people have on the forum over the homosexual issue, it would help ............... but it's just that, MO.............. anyhow sorry about it 
Erika
I guess we go back to alien probing once again.................... | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: sordidmesh | |
| quote: |
schmiggens said this in post #5 :
Humans as a species do SO may things that no other creatures do. We are the only species that has sex for pleasure (apart from dolphins) but we don't consider sex for pleasure to be inhuman or unnatural in anyway.
I think it is all part of being human, we are a highly advanced species when compared to any other and therefore and have advanced needs, including in our sexual relations.
We do things because they make us happy, and whether that means wearing a red t-shirt every day or being gay, it is all part of being human.
We are not animals, we do not need to live by the rules of animals. |
We are animals. Very inhumane animals often.
As for us being advanced beings... There are bats, frogs, snakes and some pond insects that have amazingly advanced senses and abilities that rival far beyond what humans can do. It is not just dolphins.
I am not totally convinced that our species is the only one that has sex for pleasure...
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: sordidmesh | |
| quote: |
outsider said this in post #6 :
Are you all serious? Please apply your logic as to what "causes" heterosexuality and you will see how ridicilous your theory is.
There are homosexuals for the same reason there are heterosexuals, because we are born. All animals are born, that is why they exist. |
Heterosexual behavior is the natural and expected behavior of all warm blooded creatures. I don't believe anyone is born gay.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: sordidmesh | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #18 :
Why is it necessary to have 50 thousand homosexual threads?
Cant people just live in peace and be who they are without having to answer for themselves on a daily basis?
If you dont understand that people are just born that way...then you'll just never understand it at all.
Just accept it already...you cant "cure" it....
Homosexuality isnt a disease.
Case closed. |
I don't understand it.
That doesn't mean I won't tolerate it or that I won't endlessly question it either.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: sordidmesh | |
| quote: |
Sean Kelly said this in post #21 :
I don't enjoy being so blunt, but here's a tip: if you're tired of a discussion then stay out of it.
I don't think it's so "case closed" and matter-of-fact as you do as with 99% of the discussions on this forum. It should go without saying that if everything were so cut & dry, there wouldn't be a need for conversations ever because you could find anything you'll ever need right here.
JH - I'm not sure if it was, but if your reference to "animals" was in response to my comments about the animal kingdom, there is a scientific, genetic basis for that information. In fact when you say yourself that homosexuals are "born that way", you are as well suggesting that DNA & genetics play a role in homosexuality because that's all ANY of us are born with: DNA genetic coding. All that we become by nature is defined therein. All that we become above that is learned. I just want to be clear. I would prefer that when I write things like that they are not received as, "blah blah blah blah blah ANIMALS blah blah blah blah blah" and then you freak out about the one key word you detect in there because that was not the point of the what I wrote.
Anyway, back to alien probes and transgalactic communications. |
Yeah and referring to people as idiots is more offensive than anything and weakens any suggestion made.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Sean Kelly said this in post #21 :
I don't enjoy being so blunt, but here's a tip: if you're tired of a discussion then stay out of it.
I don't think it's so "case closed" and matter-of-fact as you do as with 99% of the discussions on this forum. It should go without saying that if everything were so cut & dry, there wouldn't be a need for conversations ever because you could find anything you'll ever need right here.
|
My "case closed" was due to the fact that I dont see homosexuality as a choice. That was my way of bowing out of the conversation in this thread.
My "why do we need 50 thousand threads on homosexuality?" is what it is. Why must we have 50 threads for the same question?
I dont care debating about it....but why is it necessary to ask a question over and over again on different threads...its not like the same people will come on and give a different answer or anything.
I appreciate the fact that you want to slap my hand here....but before you ground me at least ask why I said what I did. Other than that...I always look forward to your thoughts on any subject Sean. I just think you jumped on me too quickly here.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
sordidmesh said this in post #25 :
I don't understand it.
That doesn't mean I won't tolerate it or that I won't endlessly question it either. |
I understand that.
The point overall is that everyone is split on this subject...some people believe its a choice and other believe its a trait from birth.
Your question was "Why are there homosexuals?" You are asking a question that no one has an exact answer for you except maybe the people that are most qualified to answer it. You say its a choice, but you arent gay so you are just guessing...wouldnt you rather get that answer from people that are gay? They are more qualified to answer it than anyone.
You have two people that you know on here that are gay and say they are born gay. Why wouldnt you accept that answer?
It seems to me that you are looking for people to agree with you.... And you will find those people.....the unfortunate problem for you is that you will also find people that dont agree with you.
Im not qualified to answer that question. I have always been told by gay people that they are born gay...I dont think I am in the position to refute that....I also believe that biologically speaking its more than likely that they are born that way.
So is your question really answered? Nope. Will it ever be? I doubt it.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | | I don't think this is a repeat question to begin with. All of the other threads on related topics include:
Is it right or wrong to be gay? (morality)
Should gays be allowed to marry / join the military? (policy)
Does such-and-such make me gay? (confusion)
The current question I took as a more general "where does homosexuality come from?" which is not related to any of the above topics. And if the question has popped up in the more generalized morality debate, it was probably buried under pages of other postings and not a clear part of the discussion. I find the question perfectly valid.
Furthermore, I taken to cracking down on duplicate topic postings over the last few weeks specifically because I don't want to see the same discussion started over and over. I'm a member of other forums that deal with this problem and it annoys the hell out of the regulars to be bombarded by the same questions over and over from newbies. Rest assured that same topics will eventually be merged to be integrated into a cohesive conversation as it should have been in the first place, if not simply closed with a redirect to the conversation that is already in progress.
And I guess my reaction to you is based on your having been here for a while I hoped for a bit more tolerance where if someone wants to discuss a topic, by all means let them. The mixup lies in that you regard this as a topic already covered where I see this topic as fresh. I just don't want to see anyone, particularly relatively newer members, discouraged from expressing themselves and/or asking questions in the forums. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Sean Kelly said this in post #29 :
And I guess my reaction to you is based on your having been here for a while I hoped for a bit more tolerance where if someone wants to discuss a topic, by all means let them. The mixup lies in that you regard this as a topic already covered where I see this topic as fresh. I just don't want to see anyone, particularly relatively newer members, discouraged from expressing themselves and/or asking questions in the forums. |
Okay...I respect that.
To get back on the subject:
I still dont think its a question that can be answered as right or wrong though.
If you arent gay...you cant answer it because you wouldnt know.
And if you are gay and do answer it, people dont believe you.
So the bottom line of my point is that you can ask a question but if you already a firm stance on the subject and refuse to see it any other way...then whats the point of asking?
Im not trying to be rude or inconsiderate but I think what Im saying is perfectly logical.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #30 :
I still dont think its a question that can be answered as right or wrong though.
If you arent gay...you cant answer it because you wouldnt know.
And if you are gay and do answer it, people dont believe you.
|
My only rebuttle is that the question posed here is not one of right or wrong. Nor is it necessarily true that if you aren't gay you couldn't possibly know the answer because I think that applying logic narrows down all the magical elements of the universe to only two which could reasonably be the "causes" of homosexuality: nature or nurture.
The thing about asking a homosexual to answer this is that:
1) You cannot get an unbiased answer; publicly they all want to say, "I was born gay!" because it's just not as glamorous to be a product of your environment.
2) No one person carries an authoratative response for all those like them. It would be great to kick off a national or international study to find out just what percentage are nature versus nurture. I suspect that the end results will show that what I predict goes: that it's both.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Sean Kelly said this in post #31 :
My only rebuttle is that the question posed here is not one of right or wrong. Nor is it necessarily true that if you aren't gay you couldn't possibly know the answer because I think that applying logic narrows down all the magical elements of the universe to only two which could reasonably be the "causes" of homosexuality: nature or nurture.
The thing about asking a homosexual to answer this is that:
1) You cannot get an unbiased answer; publicly they all want to say, "I was born gay!" because it's just not as glamorous to be a product of your environment.
2) No one person carries an authoratative response for all those like them. It would be great to kick off a national or international study to find out just what percentage are nature versus nurture. I suspect that the end results will show that what I predict goes: that it's both. |
I agree bias does factor in to a point maybe in some cases...but how can you really say for sure that they ARENT telling the truth? Maybe you are generalizing because you see it to be a learned trait...and therefore if you state that they might be telling the truth, then you have to somewhat admit you might be wrong...right?
I still believe that when one asks a question like that, and they know where they stand then they arent really looking for an answer...they are looking for who agrees and who doesnt....so the question is quite misleading I think.
If a person asks a question to get an answer why arent there more questions? If I ask an honest question and Im trying to get to the "truth"... then I would have to keep asking questions to reach a conclusion. If I already know where I stand and I refuse to see it another way, then isnt the question really mute at that point?
You cant get to the truth if you think you already arrived at it.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | | Again, I will repeat myself. List all of the reasons why someone is heterosexual. You can equally apply that to homosexual.
If being gay is learned then so is being straight. If someone chooses to be gay then you can choose to be straight.
And how is it a learned behavior when someone (many gays) grow up in very rural areas and small towns in heterosexual families and heterosexual communities? Who on earth did they learn how to be gay from? This is where the environmental influences argument breaks down. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #32 :
I agree bias does factor in to a point maybe in some cases...but how can you really say for sure that they ARENT telling the truth? |
Truth has nothing to do with it; I don't look at them as liars, only as unreliable sources of information, from a statistical analysis standpoint. A good analysis needs a broad data source, not one verbal opinion.
| quote: |
Maybe you are generalizing because you see it to be a learned trait...and therefore if you state that they might be telling the truth,then you have to somewhat admit you might be wrong...right? |
While I don't have a problem admitting when I'm wrong, in this case I would not be wrong because I think it's both nature & nurture, a certain percentage each, not one or the other.
| quote: |
outsider said this in post #33 :
And how is it a learned behavior when someone (many gays) grow up in very rural areas and small towns in heterosexual families and heterosexual communities? Who on earth did they learn how to be gay from? |
"learned behavior" does not imply that someone was a role model for them to follow in the footsteps of, nor that they had some mentor specifically leading them one way or another. it simply implies that genetics had no bearing on their ultimate decision and that events in the person's lifetime have led them to be gay or straight, one way or the other. Said events could for example be a bad experience with a cousin who left a bad taste in their mouth (so to speak - heh! ) for that gender leading them to shun that gender and by default be more receptive to the other. Things like this happen ALL THE TIME. In the same sense, nobody out in Hicksville is teaching ranch boys about bestiality, yet bestiality happens - how do you suppose that is? The answer is that shite happens and everything following birth is a "learning experience" - hence "learned".
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | | 50% of everything we are is Nature and 50% is Nurture. This is a psychological fact. So I get where you are coming from. But Sean you make it sound like some dudes cousin raped him so now he's gay. Or maybe dude is bad with girls, so he turns to men. That is how I was reading what you worded.
Nature and nurture have a lot to do with who we are. That is why men who are gay get married (to women) to try to hide who they are. They are told by society and their family (this is by the way the nurture part), that it is wrong. So they add some heavy percentage points to the Nurture side and live an unhappy life. And I might add they destroy the happiness their wife could have had with a straight husband. Sorry had to add that.
So if that is what you mean by environmental or learned behavior, I agree. Nurture plays a big part.
And the only comment I have to farm boys and animals is, males have more testosterone, they will try anything. Females rarely try these things.
I think that you think that all gays are biased in their opinion. Believe it or not I am not like that. I can be very objective in a discussion. So my opinion as a gay man should not be considered unreliable just because I am gay.
And believe it or not Sean, gays have had to look at it from the "other" side. That's how it works when you are gay. You are raised as a heterosexual, you are expected to be and act like a heterosexual, but through a lot of critical thinking and feelings, and attraction, you realize you are not a heterosexual.
I've lived both lives. This is the one that feels like the natural one to me. I'm only a militant nut when someone shoves hate in my face. Otherwise I am happy to discuss.
And I do have to agree with you on many sources of information. ONE source is not real smart, but neither is a very BIASED source.
I used to believe we were gay because of nurture and not nature. But now I know that no matter who you are, or what you are it is a 50/50 split. It's how you keep the split in balance that matters. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: sordidmesh | | Once again Sean Kelly expresses the exact sentiments that I have on the issue.
It WAS exactly my intention for the question to be taken as a more in general type.
 | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: chelktty | | Excellent post Outsider! I don't think that it's a learned behavior either. I definitely think it's a gene thing. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: sordidmesh | | It all goes back to religion vs. science.
I believe it is possible to have faith in both, however hard it may be to see religion being actual and accurate history. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: chelktty | | True Sordidmesh, that's why so many philosophers are athiests. They pick apart religion and compare it to fact until they determine that there is no God.
That's not what I think, but some philosophers feel that way. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | | religion vs. scienece is really religion vs. religion
but anyway
reasons that I am heterosexual:
1) chicks are hot  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Dekka00 | | now, maybe not in all cases is homosexuality a learned behavior, but there are definitely some people who turn gay.
Sometimes it's because they have super-Catholic parents and devote their lives to pissing them off.
Sometimes it's because of a bad experience.
I'm sure there are other reasons too.
But the point is not all homosexuals were born that way. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | Well, it could probably also be said that not all straights are born that way.
There are many that could be gay, but their upbringing has made them straight.
You do have a good point though, Dekka. There are more than likely many who have turned to a same sex relationship due to their upbringing, or situations that have arisen during their childhood. For me, I have dated men, and I was even married. But, since I was a child, I have always liked girls. When I was younger than 10 years old I can remember that I liked women. But, I didn't have a true understanding what that feeling was. I couldn't identify it... and then, when I started to understand/comprehend it, I buried it. Why... because of my upbringing, my friends, society. I came out in 1988, and it was NOT easy. I was a scared 17 year old.
Anyway... I just wanted to say that you had a good point.
Oh, and I'm with you... chicks are HOT!  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: devildog | | My best friend is gay. I've said such. Some choose not to believe that but oh well. Anyway,I grew up with Alan,and spent virtually every second with him. Spent some time in the Marines and when I got out things returned as usual. We lived together and were as close as any brother combo in America(still are). Well, as expected we went out every chance we had in search of woman. He had a couple girls Friends in his life,and they cheated on him,treated him poorly etc just like the rest of us have experienced. I did not know he was gay until he tried to make a move on me while I slept. I guess I was about 26 then. Shocked to say the least. Is it because of failed relationships? Maybe. The point is this man is a very manly man and you could not tell of his sexual preference. Even if you lived with him. I personally believe that he doesn't like the basic make-up of a woman. Lets face it. Most can be *****es, Controlling and once involved with them ,some(most I've seen) try to cut your involvement with your friends. I must admit that when I go to Gay bars with him it is a very fun experience. I feel like gays USUALLY lead a happier life. He didn't want to live in a way that wasn't as "fun". I understand this. I get along with him & John extremely well,and never do we do anything but smile,laugh and have fun. I envie this life as I am like him in this way. I just want to be happy and smile genuinely. I don't think he felt he could acquire this want(need) with a relationship with a woman. He watched his Friends do it and saw the results. Most became miserable and that coincided with his very few relationships that he had in his earlier days. I feel he choose this life. Is it wrong? I don't think so. His brother just got married to a woman recently but I know that he was involved in a Gay relationship while he was in the Navy. To a straight laced hetero like me who wouldn't turn gay even if I were imprisoned for life , I feel his brother HAS to be gay. But he choose to Marry a woman maybe because he felt that it was "right". So I am on the fence as to being Gay is a choice or not. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | |
| quote: |
devildog said this in post #46 :
.. I am on the fence as to being Gay is a choice or not. |
Your entire message supports the idea that it could be both!
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Sean Kelly said this in post #47 :
Your entire message supports the idea that it could be both! |
I disagree with that. I thought it was a well written post...but it came off, to me anyways, as he wasnt sure if it was a choice or not.
Maybe Alan always had feelings for men, but peer-wise he didnt think it would be accepted. Maybe his failed relationships with women stemmed from his lust for men. (Its the best way I felt I could put this).
Maybe his brother is really gay also, but peer-wise couldnt handle taking that step....maybe his marriage is set to be doomed because of it. (that will be something that will show in time I guess).
I think its a guessing game for those of us who really and truly dont know...and for those that do...have felt it all along, but had to do what they had to do based on society and status based on their peers. I still feel its biological.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Sean Kelly | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #48 :
I still feel its biological. |
His description of the friend who had gay tendencies yet still married a woman shows that no matter what his tendencies (regardless of whether genetic or learned), the tendencies were present nonetheless and he ended up living an opposite lifestyle. This suggests that despite tendencies, learned behavior can override.
As someone else mentioned earlier in the thread, what applies to one (hetero vs homo) must apply to the other. While I was at first inclined to debate this, I think the statement stands well on its own. While one may have hetero tendencies, one may learn to live homo and vice versa. This supports the idea that sexual orientation/preference (or "lifestyle" ), no matter which the case, may indeed be determined at least in part by learned behavior.
I suppose there is not much supporting evidence in devildog's observations for the biological side of things, and hence I revise my statement: I think his experiences are supportive of the nurture side of things. But it does not eliminate the "nature" side of things.
By "support", I'm not saying that devildog himself has made some determination or personal decision to support any given side of a debate, only that the information he presents is by nature supportive of it.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: chelktty | |
| quote: |
devildog said this in post #46 :
My best friend is gay. I've said such. Some choose not to believe that but oh well. Anyway,I grew up with Alan,and spent virtually every second with him. Spent some time in the Marines and when I got out things returned as usual. We lived together and were as close as any brother combo in America(still are). Well, as expected we went out every chance we had in search of woman. He had a couple girls Friends in his life,and they cheated on him,treated him poorly etc just like the rest of us have experienced. I did not know he was gay until he tried to make a move on me while I slept. I guess I was about 26 then. Shocked to say the least. Is it because of failed relationships? Maybe. The point is this man is a very manly man and you could not tell of his sexual preference. Even if you lived with him. I personally believe that he doesn't like the basic make-up of a woman. Lets face it. Most can be *****es, Controlling and once involved with them ,some(most I've seen) try to cut your involvement with your friends. I must admit that when I go to Gay bars with him it is a very fun experience. I feel like gays USUALLY lead a happier life. He didn't want to live in a way that wasn't as "fun". I understand this. I get along with him & John extremely well,and never do we do anything but smile,laugh and have fun. I envie this life as I am like him in this way. I just want to be happy and smile genuinely. I don't think he felt he could acquire this want(need) with a relationship with a woman. He watched his Friends do it and saw the results. Most became miserable and that coincided with his very few relationships that he had in his earlier days. I feel he choose this life. Is it wrong? I don't think so. His brother just got married to a woman recently but I know that he was involved in a Gay relationship while he was in the Navy. To a straight laced hetero like me who wouldn't turn gay even if I were imprisoned for life , I feel his brother HAS to be gay. But he choose to Marry a woman maybe because he felt that it was "right". So I am on the fence as to being Gay is a choice or not.
Great post Devil!
I think it's certainly a possiblity that your friend was perhaps gay all along. That was probably why he had so many issues with the women he dated. I think it's also a possibility that some of your adament stances regarding gays may have to do with your discomfort from when your friend came on to you. You still love your friend, but there's almost a mistrust now. I've always had friendships with guys, but when they would cross the line of friendship and make a move on me, it always changed the relationship between us. I always felt a twinge of we're FRIENDS! How could you intrude on me like that??
I could be totally wrong. But that's what I felt when I read your post.
And great writing BTW.
|
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #48 :
Maybe Alan always had feelings for men, but peer-wise he didnt think it would be accepted. Maybe his failed relationships with women stemmed from his lust for men. (Its the best way I felt I could put this). |
You said exactly what I was thinking.
And just to add a fact that no one seems to have considered, or perhaps said in these words.
ALL gays & lesbians are "straight" before they are gay. At least in the learned behavior/nurture department.
This is where the huge misconception comes about that gays can "choose" or "change" their Biological attraction to individuals of the same gender.
I knew a man who was in such denial, that he actually had no idea he was gay for many years into his adult life. And eventually he realized what certain feelings meant to him. He was a very butch man. Everyone was really shocked when he announced he was gay.
And of course I know many men and women who have always known they were gay their whole lives. They knew they would never live their lives with someone of the opposite gender, and they never have.
I also think another myth is that most people think that gays are unable to have sexual relations with someone of the opposite gender. That is untrue. That happens a lot when someone is living in the closet. However the gay person doesn't have the same kind of feelings in that situation. It's very much an empty sex act, lacking any kind of love. So how does biology and nurture fix that situation?
You know, just a comment, I have to say this is a very civil thread. I'm quite impressed with some of the excellent points brought up here by others.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
Sean Kelly said this in post #49 :
His description of the friend who had gay tendencies yet still married a woman shows that no matter what his tendencies (regardless of whether genetic or learned), the tendencies were present nonetheless and he ended up living an opposite lifestyle. This suggests that despite tendencies, learned behavior can override.
|
But how do you know that the "learned behavior" wasnt just the pressure of society to be a certain way? Maybe that was a pressure he couldnt handle at this time in his life.
We know that some gay people cant handle the pressure...
Its fact that some teens have committed suicide over the pressure and some marriages have ended in divorce because they decided to be who they were all along.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #52 :
... to be who they were all along. |
You gotta love that phrase.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | | I found something that someone wrote on the net. I have no clue if he is gay or not, but I thought this applied to the nature/nurture argument.
My own experience
Being left-handed... gives me a razor-thin view of what it's like to be a minority. As a left-hander, I'm discriminated against all the time. Not for serious things: I am not denied housing, medical care, a job, a seat on the bus. But I experience anti-lefty bias in the form of school desks that are unusable, carrot peelers that are useless, power tools (such as skill saws) that are dangerous or even life-threatening, pens that smear and make my writing illegible, computer mice that cause hand cramps. Teachers in England tried to force me to write with my right hand when I was a child; I used to stutter, and perhaps that was why.
Language certainly discriminates against the left-hander: A "left-handed compliment" is not something you want to hear; the word for "left" in French is gauche, and in Latin it's sinister; in contrast, from the French word for "right," droit, we get the English word adroit, and Latin for right is dexter (from which we get such words as dexterous). Ambidextrous means literally "both right."
Am I "in my right mind"? Current research can't prove whether or not lefties really do tend towards right-brain dominance. Would right-sphere specialization explain why I think of myself as creative? I would swear being left-handed helps my Tetris scores (thanks to all that visualization of abstract geometric shapes, which we lefties are famous for).
Who would I be if I was right-handed? Not the same person. Left-handedness is part of my identity, my self. I would sooner cut off my right arm than be converted to right-handedness; as strong a statement as that is, left-handedness is so integral a part of me that I could not imagine living otherwise. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: devildog | | You guys/gals are pretty much right on target. I DO think it is possible that Alan was Gay all along, BUT I assure you that one would've had to have training to detect it. Of coarse looking back is 20/20. He did only have 1 maybe 2 girlfriends as a youth but the perpetual quest for "it" was deceiving to say the least. Also, when we did go out, he was extremly bold in his tactics. Almost like " Hey my names' alan wanna @#%$#? (slap) moves on,Hey my names' Alan wanna....(slap) He didn't want to waste time with small talk. He thought playing the odds so to speak would be better. Makes more sense to me now,but then I just thought he was nuts. It did make for an entertaining evening.
He loathes the fakeness involved with what we hetero's go through. Try to impress, throw out your best lines, wine & dine, whatsyournamewhereyoufromwheredidyougotoschooll, etc.
Then spend a large portion of your time appeasing your partner and doing things you really don't want to do. He sees me going to the musuems as he sits to watch the Football Game that I would love to see. Men don't want to go to the Park. Good Lord! But I've been to every one in this county(must be 20) I see the men there and I know they hate it. But we do it. Right? Well he says Bunk that. I am doing what make me happy. And lets face it, men get along with men. The company is better for us. More enjoyable on average. When I visit him I must say it is my ONLY release. The only time I NEVER think of my problems. The mind is free, if you know what I mean. Sorry woman but it is true. So I guess I admire his lifestyle really. Moreover, I would like to be gay...until it was my turn  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | | That was an excellent post devildog. I have to commend you on your utter honesty.
There are a lot of straight men who understand what it is like to be gay, and they are envious of the way it is for us. We don't have the constant male/female misunderstandings in our day to day relationships. Unfortunately, these men choose to treat us bad. All because of some lame jealousy. I'm not implying that you are jealous by the way.
"Moreover I would like to be gay..." THAT was hysterical!  | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: mystic | |
| quote: |
outsider said this in post #51 :
You said exactly what I was thinking.
And just to add a fact that no one seems to have considered, or perhaps said in these words.
ALL gays & lesbians are "straight" before they are gay. At least in the learned behavior/nurture department.
This is where the huge misconception comes about that gays can "choose" or "change" their Biological attraction to individuals of the same gender. |
HEY outsider!!!
Well said!
I totally agree with you...I think the learned behavior is actually the other way around....they dont learn to be gay....they learn to not be gay based on what society tells them they are supposed to do.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: devildog | | Thanks outsider. And I must say that after writing some of this and thinking about our life together growing up I have come to a conclusion. If Alan was gay all along...The battle he fought on a daily basis within himself during his fundamental years is unimaginable. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: chelktty | | Devil....I think it's possible that because of that post I see you less as an advisary over this issue. Well written, incredibly honest and enlightening.
Respects. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | | You are so right mystic.
Here is some interesting information on Nature vs. Nurture
"For example, many twin studies have made use of identical twins (who have the same genetic makeup) who were raised in differing environments in order to control for genetic effects: that is, any variation between twins is clearly attributable to the environment, allowing the researcher to quantify the effects of the environment by measuring variance of a trait between twins. Identical twins raised separately may have experienced quite different environments; yet many studies have often been found that they live similar lives, have similar personalities and similar levels of intelligence. On the other hand, even identical twins who are raised together often differ in significant ways. "
More often than not, if one twin is gay, so is the other. Identical or paternal twins, it makes no difference. I know the University of Minnesota has always had twin studies. They are one of the worlds authority on twins. Very interesting. | | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: outsider | |
| quote: |
devildog said this in post #58 :
Thanks outsider. And I must say that after writing some of this and thinking about our life together growing up I have come to a conclusion. If Alan was gay all along...The battle he fought on a daily basis within himself during his fundamental years is unimaginable. |
I really think you need to ask him how hard it was for him. He is your friend, you grew up together, he can explain it to you in words you will understand.
I could go on, post after post telling you how hard it is. But nothing explains it better than when it comes from someone we love and respect.
And devil, I'm not trying to be mean here, but when we think, we evolve.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Luke90 | |
| quote: |
mystic said this in post #57 :
I totally agree with you...I think the learned behavior is actually the other way around....they dont learn to be gay....they learn to not be gay based on what society tells them they are supposed to do. |
I think you hit the nail on the head. All the societal and peer influences are heterosexual. Little boys might find little girls "yucky" but they still know enough to play war and get dirty and compete. Before their sexuality kicks in children learn these accepted roles. After, they either focus on fitting these roles, or decide to go with what feels right for them.
This is why I think the growing acceptance of homosexuality - not just in the US but in most open societies - is healthy. Ever since the Ancient Greeks tightened up, gay people have had to hide their feelings, - either denying them entirely or acting on them in secrecy - or face shame, ridicule, and ostracization.
Some people believe that gay people "recruit" and "convert" and the reason there are so many gay kids in Colleges, High Schools, and even Middle Schools is that society has lost its "moral fiber" and Queer Eye for the Straight Guy is converting "normal" heterosexual kids into gays. I believe all these gay people, of all ages, have always been there, but now they can "come out" and be themselves instead of feeling the need to hide or to deceive themselves.
| | Reply To this Message
|
| Posted by: Lawless | | Thank you Luke... I agree with you, whole heartedly. *Round of applause for Luke* Hip, Hip, Horray! | | Reply To this Message
|
Culture & Society Forum: Why are there homosexuals?
|