Iraqi's Dirty Fighters

Post-9/11 Era Forum

Some of Iraq's fighters are lower than shark s**t by the way they're waging this war. Its been well documented and I won't go into it because the list is so long.

Preferably I'd like them in the Hague later on but a burial ground under the shifting desert sands from a colaition missile would be just as good.

What happened to the chivalry of the old days when you fought with pride wearing your nations uniform like the coalition is now. These fighters are nothing but terrorists and not even representative of a nation.

May they rot in hell with all the rest of their friends. They're living proof as we speak to show just how bad this regime is. Can it be any clearer as to how bad this regime is now?

Its Saddam's regime dirty war against men of honour.

Fred Hooper

So the Iraqi military continue to defend their country by any means possible against a foreign invasion. What a surprise!

I am sure that when america is invaded then only gentlemanly tactics will be used against the agressors.hmm.

So far, having nice military outfit hasn't helped USA a lot...

fred hooper,

Its one thing to defend your country against using your fellow citizens as firing shields or shooting fellow comrades that desert ot surrender. What are they even defending then? Their own little depsotic regime.

They are human scum. Some Iraqi fighters knew better though and wouldn't try such war criminal acts.

Fred Hooper

"Gentlemanly War?" Such a MORONIC concept that only Englishmen could have thought it up! You do ANYTHING you can to win. And if you're so outgunned that no matter what you do, you're going to lose...then you do ANYTHING you can to KILL AS MANY of your enemy as possible. That's what any RIGHT THINKING, LOGICAL person would do...there's no such thing as "Gentlemanly War", except maybe in Prince Charles' little dream world. Besides, the Iraqis are simple following the Americans Revolutionary war tactics. I'm surprised that their tactics are so mild, in their position, I'd do much more brutal and devious things.

Rules of War? And Englishman's dream world...

Reread what he said...

He doesn't mean fighting like the British in 1776...

He is referring to tactics such as these:

Taking family members hostage and/or killing them to force another to fight.

Standing behind their soldiers ready to shoot them in the back if they dare surrender.

Opening fire on your own civiilians who attempt to flee from a city, town, etc...


These things are not the attributes of soldiers, they are they attributes of tyrants.


Get it? Got it? Good.

I'd go even further and force the family members to fight too...

Yeah...I would have to agree with this.

The Iraqi military is completely out classed on every level. If they met us in the desert for a showdown this would be over in 100 hours like it was in 1991.

That being said...things like firing under a flag of surrender and using civilians as human shields are still war crimes and should be prosecuted as such.

International rules of engagement, will be used when the war is internationally justified.
As the war is not under international law, the iraqis can do what the fu.ck they want to defend their land....even if it means chucking a baby to the US soldier, and shooting him as he attempts to catch it...just an example,,,

Go Resistance

To anyone who thinks USA has been succesfull so far, the southern Iraq is nothing but desert,very little resistance compared to Baghdat. Saddam has made a big mistake in Gulf war, he has tried to defend each city with same amount of resistance. Now he doesn't give a sh.t about cities other than Baghdat. He will do anything to defend Baghdat. I agree with you USA will win this war but it wont be easy like Bush said before the war.

PS: Some people in this forum think that I support Saddam, well I do not. I belive that he should go down, but not like this. Not by killing so many civilians.

n/t

I don't know about the US army. But in all the other armys as far as i know. If you're at war, and you see another soldier trying to flee or give up to the enemy then it's your DUTY to shoot his coward ***.

Rambo, Saddam has killed so many civilians, thats right. But most of the deaths (especially kids) occured in Iraq for the last ten years are due to the embargo that USA has set for Iraq

I almost agree with sacred!

I think the main surprises are to the media and the arm chair generals. They are only now beginning to realize that this is in fact a war.

No doubt the paramilitary resistance is a disappointment to the coalition soldiers, but I don't think that they are surprised considering this is the middle east. Their guerilla tactics are pretty well known.

"Their guerilla tactics are pretty well known."

another thing you are missing: ask General Wallace, I made a post about his saying .....

No they don't know, they realize now ....

And what could they do when they have old guns, some rockets ...

remember vietnam ? it was not in Mid-East

guerilla is the war of the one which lack supplies ...

they think ! which seems to lack to a lot of people.

I do not defend Iraqi soldiers, they do their jobs as U.S./U.K. troops does

And I can stop to answer to your posts

wouldn't it be a dirty war if you cut your dick off and beat your enemy with it

all pro US muther****.ers,,,,please give me your phone numers so when iraq embarasses your wimpy troops, and sends them home in bodybags i can call you and say BASA

Oh geez Ali. You are so...what's the word...idiotic?