Prosecution witness takes stand..most damaging to Martha so far - Conviction of Martha Stewart

Prosecution witness takes stand..most damaging to Martha so far

Conviction of Martha Stewart Forum

Pages:  1Original Forum    Popular Forums    Search

Posted by: mystic

Stewart Took Insider Tip and Dumped Stock -Witness

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Martha Stewart (news - web sites) dumped her shares in a biotech firm after being given an insider tip that the company's chief was selling his shares, a witness said on Wednesday in the most damaging testimony against her to date.

But while prosecutors used their star witness to make the case against the trendsetter, Stewart's lawyers sought to undermine former Merrill Lynch employee Douglas Faneuil by painting him as a marijuana-smoking drug user.


Faneuil, a former assistant to Stewart's broker, said he gave the tip to the businesswoman by telephone on Dec. 27, 2001, when she sold nearly 4,000 shares of ImClone Systems Inc. stock for $228,000.


In his second day of testimony, Faneuil admitted illegally tipping off Stewart that Sam Waksal, ImClone's then chief executive, and his two daughters were dumping their shares.


"I told her that Sam was trying to sell," Faneuil explained to jurors, referring to Waksal.


Stewart asked about ImClone's stock price and then "she said 'I want to sell all my shares,"' Faneuil told the hushed courtroom.


His testimony is the cornerstone for the government's case against Stewart and her former Merrill Lynch broker and friend Peter Bacanovic, both charged with lying to cover up the suspicious trade.


Stewart and Bacanovic maintain they had a preexisting order to sell ImClone stock if it dropped below $60 a share.


If convicted of the most serious charge against her, securities fraud, Stewart faces up to 10 years in prison.


DRUG USE


The defense hopes to undermine the 28-year-old's credibility. Earlier, Stewart's lawyers questioned him about past marijuana use before the jury was called into court.


"During my period at Merrill Lynch I used (marijuana) about once a month," Faneuil said in response to questions from lead Stewart attorney Robert Morvillo.


Faneuil admitted to using Ecstasy several times and said he previously "experimented with other kinds of drugs" socially.


Morvillo said he should be allowed to bring up the use in front of jurors, saying it relates to credibility and draws into question whether he is testifying for the government to avoid any possible drug-related charges.


Prosecutor Karen Patton Seymour called questions about Faneuil's drug use "ridiculous." U.S. District Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum said she would rule on the matter later.


Faneuil first took the stand on Tuesday when he said Bacanovic, his former boss, had ordered him to pass the confidential information to the Stewart. Bacanovic, on vacation at the time, had left a message for Stewart to call Faneuil about Waksal, the witness said.


When he answered the phone, Faneuil said, he heard, "Hi this is Martha. What's going on with Sam?"

Faneuil said that when he explained that Waksal was trying to sell ImClone stock, Stewart asked "All of his shares?" The witness then informed her that Waksal was trying to sell all the shares he held at Merrill Lynch.

After ordering the sale of her own shares, Stewart told Faneuil to send her an e-mail verifying the trade.

A few days later, Faneuil said, he was questioned by a Merrill Lynch manager about the ImClone trades. He said he asked Bacanovic what he should say. Faneuil then mimicked an agitated Bacanovic, who repeatedly told his assistant, "The reason for Martha's sale was tax loss selling."

Tax loss selling is a strategy used at the end of the year to offset taxable stock gains with losses from stock trades.

Faneuil said Stewart's trade was not part of a tax strategy because there was a profit, not a loss, from the sale.

Faneuil initially supported Bacanovic's explanation and told investigators looking into the ImClone sale that Stewart sold the shares for tax reasons. He later recanted, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor and agreed to testify against his former boss and Stewart.

Lawyers for Stewart and Bacanovic are expected to start questioning Faneuil later on Wednesday.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Ken NJ

All bullcrap. Broker Faneuil, a former assistant to Stewart's broker, said he gave the tip to the businesswoman by telephone on Dec. 27, 2001, when she sold nearly 4,000 shares of ImClone Systems Inc. stock for $228,000. If anything, Faneuil has merely broken Merrill Lynch firm policy of confidentiality, not inside trading laws. That is between the employer and the employee with a right of action on the part of the client. The government has no legal interest to even prosecute this flimsy case it calls a third-party Stewart gaining from information through a breach of contract. Everything points to a civil case, not a criminal prosecution.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Kookaburra

Guess they should have stuck to trading baseball and Pokemon cards.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Ken NJ

How about bartering brownies for brown nosing.

Martha is guilty of stealing Sam Waksal from her own daughter's boyfriend. But the cops can't prosecute Martha for that since her daughter is over 21 when that happened. So they charged her for lying.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: mystic

quote:
Kookaburra said this in post #3 :
Guess they should have stuck to trading baseball and Pokemon cards.


Now thats funny!
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Ken NJ

You meant Martha's daughter Alexis and her boyfriend, Sam Waksal ?

Reply To this Message

Posted by: becker

quote:
Ken NJ said this in post #2 :
All bullcrap. Broker Faneuil, a former assistant to Stewart's broker, said he gave the tip to the businesswoman by telephone on Dec. 27, 2001, when she sold nearly 4,000 shares of ImClone Systems Inc. stock for $228,000. If anything, Faneuil has merely broken Merrill Lynch firm policy of confidentiality, not inside trading laws. That is between the employer and the employee with a right of action on the part of the client. The government has no legal interest to even prosecute this flimsy case it calls a third-party Stewart gaining from information through a breach of contract. Everything points to a civil case, not a criminal prosecution.


You are totally correct about the confidentiality part-which means there was no insider trading. It looks very interesting.
Reply To this Message

Posted by: Ken NJ

quote:
becker said this in post #7 :


You are totally correct about the confidentiality part-which means there was no insider trading. It looks very interesting.
Becker, did you see any newspaper reporting this aspect instead of all the government fed hoopla?

Isn't this amazing..... how the public is fed bad media sensation?
Reply To this Message

Posted by: becker

From what I saw the only thing the gov is trying to prove is Martha lying to the FBI. No insider stuff. I don't know the penalty for lying.

Reply To this Message

Posted by: Kookaburra

The FBI having a penalty for lying? They wouldn't be able to afford to pay their own fines if they were busted every time they lie.

I wonder how many people sitting in the jury and on the benches and in the other government areas are thinking "boy I hope I never caught in my lies and crimes" all the while they are trying someone else for something less.

I want Martha to be punished for her wrong doings if she's guilty, but it really irritates me that the same people trying her are most likely caught up in unethical practices themselves, but haven't been found out in the public yet.

Reply To this Message

Pages:  1 Free Forums    Chat Forum

Conviction of Martha Stewart Forum: Prosecution witness takes stand..most damaging to Martha so far

Forum Forum Forum